The truth comes out.

'Bombshell ABC News affidavit released, exposes disturbing pro-Kamala
debate scheme'

<https://www.wnd.com/2024/09/bombshell-abc-news-affidavit-released-exposes-disturbing-pro-kamala-debate-scheme/>

''I have secretly recorded several conversations that will prove that
the Harris Campaign insisted upon not only the Fact Checking of Donald
Trump, but also insisted on what questions were not to be asked under
any circumstances or else ...''

'Claims of a purposeful scheme to skew the Sept. 10 ABC News
presidential debate in favor of Vice President Kamala Harris over former
President Donald Trump are now intensified with the Sunday release of a
sworn statement by a network whistleblower specifying the allegations.

The affidavit under penalty of perjury released by @DocNetyoutube
indicates ABC coordinated with the Harris campaign to give her sample
questions, along with assurances Trump would be fact-checked while
Kamala would not, and favorable accommodations for the Democrat's
appearance on screen.

The document, dated Sept. 9, one day prior to the debate and redacted in
portions to conceal the whistleblower's identity, is from a Manhattan,
New York, resident who has worked at ABC News for more than 10 years in
"various technical and administrative positions."

"For the record, I do not endorse Donald Trump in his capacity as
candidate for the president of the United States," the whistleblower
says.

President Donald Trump and Kamala Harris debate in Philadelphia on
Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024 (Video screenshot)

"The intent of this affidavit is to address concerns about perceived
biases within news reporting within my employer's debate that will be
hosted on September 10, 2024."

The ABC employee says Harris received "particular accommodations
including, but not limited to, the providing of a podium significantly
smaller than that used by Donald Trump, and assurances regarding
split-screen television views that would favorably impact Kamala
Harris's appearance relative to Donald Trump."

The sworn statement continues: "It was agree that Donald Trump would be
subjected to fact-checking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would
not comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company
that Donald Trump would be fact-checked. In fact, various people were
assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate Trump
would make during the debate.

Is the news we hear every day actually broadcasting messages from God?
The answer is an absolute yes! Find out how!

"In fact, [the] Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump
would be fact checked. This was done via multiple communications with
the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the
negotiations. To my understanding, any rules negotiations and
conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump
and Harris campaign involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more
calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on
the call."

The statement also indicates: "The Harris campaign was provided with
sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar
topics that would appear during the debate."

"Furthermore, the Harris campaign imposed serious restrictions on the
scope of questioning, including:

No questions regarding the perceived health of President Joe Biden.
No inquires regarding her tenure as attorney general in San Francisco.
No questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West, who faces
allegations of embezzling billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and who
may be involved in her administration if elected.
The whistleblower claims to have "observed a pronounced bias against
Donald Trump within ABC News. Employees expressing favorable views
towards him experience significant concerns about potential
retribution."

The employee says the purpose of the affidavit is "to document and
provide transparency regarding the issue of fairness and impartiality in
the debate process and broader concerns about journalistic integrity at
ABC News."

The conclusion of the sworn statement mentions copies of the sworn
statement being sent via regular mail and FedEx to the whistleblower's
home address, and a certified letter to U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson
dated Sept. 9, 2024, "to establish a record that the correspondence was
sent before the debate commenced."

"Additionally, for further investigation, I have secretly recorded
several conversations that will prove that the Harris Campaign insisted
upon not only the Fact Checking of Donald Trump, but also insisted on
what questions were not to be asked under any circumstances or else the
Harris campaign would decline to participate in the debate."'