Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
>> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
>> for the presidency itself, the right call.
>
>She was not on any primary for her to run for president.

OK, geniuses, tell me then why Trump didn't need to debate the other
Republican candidates, but was just automatically the winner of *your*
primaries, HUH?!

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-08-26, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> I have always voted Blue before, going back to 1996. So this time
>>>>>>> isn't a change, but the circumstances are unique.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Neither blue nor red are the same parties that they were even 20 years ago.
>>>>>>Only the idiots, on both sides, are voting party line anymore.
>>>>>>Forget the personalities and look at the issues and policy and choose wisely.
>>>>>>And please, do not be a single item voter. They are the biggest idiots and it doesn't matter what
>>>>>>the item is.
>>>>>
>>>>> When the "single item" is democracy itself, I'd say the biggest idiocy
>>>>> would be to vote to destroy it in DJT.
>>>>
>>>>Democracy?
>>>>
>>>>Ok.
>>>>
>>>>So how many votes did Kamala receive in order to be declared the nominee for POTUS?
>>>>What happened to the ~14 million votes that Joe Biden received?
>>>>What happened to the ~5 million votes the other primary candidates received?
>>>>Why Kamala?
>>>>Who made THAT decision?
>>>>Where is the democracy in it?
>>>>
>>>>Remember, this is not a case of Biden resigning from office.
>>>>That is a different situation completely.
>>>>
>>>>So doesn't it bother you that democracy was trashed by your own party in order to install a
>>>>candidate who never received a single vote?
>>>>
>>>>It should.
>>>
>>> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
>>> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
>>> for the presidency itself, the right call.
>>>
>>You voted for Biden to be on the ballot as POTUS and Kamala to be on the ballot as VP.
>>
>>Next.
>
>
> Biden is 80-something, ma'am, we needed to replace him.
>

Irrelevant.
Your democracy was undermined by your own party and you do not even realize it.

And as for Biden's cognitive abilities don't you find it odd that the MSM covered for Biden for at
least 4 years and then all of a sudden "discovered" his marbles were missing?

Damn, you libbys are brainwashed.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

On 2024-08-26, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
>>> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
>>> for the presidency itself, the right call.
>>
>>She was not on any primary for her to run for president.
>
>
> OK, geniuses, tell me then why Trump didn't need to debate the other
> Republican candidates, but was just automatically the winner of *your*
> primaries, HUH?!
>
Irrelevant.
Polls showed that Trump was far ahead so why should he risk a debate?
And for the primary the voters chose Trump over the others.

Are you high again?

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>>>> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
>>>> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
>>>> for the presidency itself, the right call.
>>>>
>>>You voted for Biden to be on the ballot as POTUS and Kamala to be on the ballot as VP.
>>>
>>>Next.
>>
>> Biden is 80-something, ma'am, we needed to replace him.
>
>Irrelevant.
>Your democracy was undermined by your own party and you do not even realize it.
>
>And as for Biden's cognitive abilities don't you find it odd that the MSM covered for Biden for at
>least 4 years and then all of a sudden "discovered" his marbles were missing?
>
>Damn, you libbys are brainwashed.

It really was a reaction to the debate. I wrote on Twitter/X that I
"liked the side" of DJT I saw at the debate, that's how fucked my
brain was by seeing old Joe like that. But now we have the VP
stepping into the position, of nominee.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>On 2024-08-26, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
>>>> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
>>>> for the presidency itself, the right call.
>>>
>>>She was not on any primary for her to run for president.
>>
>> OK, geniuses, tell me then why Trump didn't need to debate the other
>> Republican candidates, but was just automatically the winner of *your*
>> primaries, HUH?!
>>
>Irrelevant.
>Polls showed that Trump was far ahead so why should he risk a debate?
>And for the primary the voters chose Trump over the others.
>
>Are you high again?

Are you stupid? You will make excuse after excuse, for a man who
isn't worth it.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <9d2qcj1asr95ueeckuabtoea82d1etv8vu@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> I have always voted Blue before, going back to 1996. So this time
> >>>>>> isn't a change, but the circumstances are unique.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>Neither blue nor red are the same parties that they were even 20 years ago.
> >>>>>Only the idiots, on both sides, are voting party line anymore.
> >>>>>Forget the personalities and look at the issues and policy and choose wisely.
> >>>>>And please, do not be a single item voter. They are the biggest idiots and it doesn't matter what
> >>>>>the item is.
> >>>>
> >>>> When the "single item" is democracy itself, I'd say the biggest idiocy
> >>>> would be to vote to destroy it in DJT.
> >>>
> >>>Democracy?
> >>>
> >>>Ok.
> >>>
> >>>So how many votes did Kamala receive in order to be declared the nominee for POTUS?
> >>>What happened to the ~14 million votes that Joe Biden received?
> >>>What happened to the ~5 million votes the other primary candidates received?
> >>>Why Kamala?
> >>>Who made THAT decision?
> >>>Where is the democracy in it?
> >>>
> >>>Remember, this is not a case of Biden resigning from office.
> >>>That is a different situation completely.
> >>>
> >>>So doesn't it bother you that democracy was trashed by your own party in order to install a
> >>>candidate who never received a single vote?
> >>>
> >>>It should.
> >>
> >> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
> >> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
> >> for the presidency itself, the right call.
> >>
> >You voted for Biden to be on the ballot as POTUS and Kamala to be on the ballot as VP.
> >
> >Next.
>
>
> Biden is 80-something, ma'am, we needed to replace him.

3 months ago you were all raving about what great shape he was in.

That still doesn't answer the question about the primary.

In article <tm3qcj98ponofmjvbjg1rknc86oe377rs4@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
> >>>> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
> >>>> for the presidency itself, the right call.
> >>>>
> >>>You voted for Biden to be on the ballot as POTUS and Kamala to be on the ballot as VP.
> >>>
> >>>Next.
> >>
> >> Biden is 80-something, ma'am, we needed to replace him.
> >
> >Irrelevant.
> >Your democracy was undermined by your own party and you do not even realize it.
> >
> >And as for Biden's cognitive abilities don't you find it odd that the MSM covered for Biden for at
> >least 4 years and then all of a sudden "discovered" his marbles were missing?
> >
> >Damn, you libbys are brainwashed.
>
>
> It really was a reaction to the debate. I wrote on Twitter/X that I
> "liked the side" of DJT I saw at the debate, that's how fucked my
> brain was by seeing old Joe like that. But now we have the VP
> stepping into the position, of nominee.

Joe was booted and Camel was put in place.

In article <mr2qcj110q0q83pqa76kr3qrv1g64mmglh@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
> >> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
> >> for the presidency itself, the right call.
> >
> >She was not on any primary for her to run for president.
>
>
> OK, geniuses, tell me then why Trump didn't need to debate the other
> Republican candidates, but was just automatically the winner of *your*
> primaries, HUH?!

Who said anything about debates. He was on the primary. The people
voted. Camel is being put in place.

In article <dc4qcjp9ldh900u1e1rf3kod500gmrok03@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> >On 2024-08-26, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
> >>>> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
> >>>> for the presidency itself, the right call.
> >>>
> >>>She was not on any primary for her to run for president.
> >>
> >> OK, geniuses, tell me then why Trump didn't need to debate the other
> >> Republican candidates, but was just automatically the winner of *your*
> >> primaries, HUH?!
> >>
> >Irrelevant.
> >Polls showed that Trump was far ahead so why should he risk a debate?
> >And for the primary the voters chose Trump over the others.
> >
> >Are you high again?
>
>
> Are you stupid? You will make excuse after excuse, for a man who
> isn't worth it.

It's truth. You know shes right so you turn against Trump again.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>> It really was a reaction to the debate. I wrote on Twitter/X that I
>> "liked the side" of DJT I saw at the debate, that's how fucked my
>> brain was by seeing old Joe like that. But now we have the VP
>> stepping into the position, of nominee.
>
>Joe was booted and Camel was put in place.

Misogynist.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-08-26, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <mr2qcj110q0q83pqa76kr3qrv1g64mmglh@4ax.com>,
> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
>> >> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
>> >> for the presidency itself, the right call.
>> >
>> >She was not on any primary for her to run for president.
>>
>>
>> OK, geniuses, tell me then why Trump didn't need to debate the other
>> Republican candidates, but was just automatically the winner of *your*
>> primaries, HUH?!
>
> Who said anything about debates. He was on the primary. The people
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJZ-BHBKyos
>
> voted. Camel is being put in place.

And that is the point Joel nor any of the other libbys can address.
This was a coup no matter what they claim.
And they should be very afraid.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>On 2024-08-26, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <mr2qcj110q0q83pqa76kr3qrv1g64mmglh@4ax.com>,
>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
>>> >> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
>>> >> for the presidency itself, the right call.
>>> >
>>> >She was not on any primary for her to run for president.
>>>
>>> OK, geniuses, tell me then why Trump didn't need to debate the other
>>> Republican candidates, but was just automatically the winner of *your*
>>> primaries, HUH?!
>>
>> Who said anything about debates. He was on the primary. The people
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJZ-BHBKyos
>>
>> voted. Camel is being put in place.
>
>And that is the point Joel nor any of the other libbys can address.
>This was a coup no matter what they claim.
>And they should be very afraid.

I'm not afraid of a damn thing. But I don't want DJT in the White
House, again, we have seen what that is like, we have heard about
Project 2025, you can shove your right-wing nonsense up your asses.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-08-27, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>On 2024-08-26, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>> In article <mr2qcj110q0q83pqa76kr3qrv1g64mmglh@4ax.com>,
>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
>>>> >> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
>>>> >> for the presidency itself, the right call.
>>>> >
>>>> >She was not on any primary for her to run for president.
>>>>
>>>> OK, geniuses, tell me then why Trump didn't need to debate the other
>>>> Republican candidates, but was just automatically the winner of *your*
>>>> primaries, HUH?!
>>>
>>> Who said anything about debates. He was on the primary. The people
>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJZ-BHBKyos
>>>
>>> voted. Camel is being put in place.
>>
>>And that is the point Joel nor any of the other libbys can address.
>>This was a coup no matter what they claim.
>>And they should be very afraid.
>
>
> I'm not afraid of a damn thing. But I don't want DJT in the White
> House, again, we have seen what that is like, we have heard about
> Project 2025, you can shove your right-wing nonsense up your asses.
>
To quote your buddy snit: "I win, you lose". Not that I care, just mentioning the similarities.
You can't even explain your reasoning other than Trump "bad orange man".
So you are yet another low information voter.
Just like your buddy snit Michael Glasser.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

In article <tn5qcjl7lbgl0h8v6ohu65g14mi5hlc37u@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> >On 2024-08-26, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> In article <mr2qcj110q0q83pqa76kr3qrv1g64mmglh@4ax.com>,
> >> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
> >>> >> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
> >>> >> for the presidency itself, the right call.
> >>> >
> >>> >She was not on any primary for her to run for president.
> >>>
> >>> OK, geniuses, tell me then why Trump didn't need to debate the other
> >>> Republican candidates, but was just automatically the winner of *your*
> >>> primaries, HUH?!
> >>
> >> Who said anything about debates. He was on the primary. The people
> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJZ-BHBKyos
> >>
> >> voted. Camel is being put in place.
> >
> >And that is the point Joel nor any of the other libbys can address.
> >This was a coup no matter what they claim.
> >And they should be very afraid.
>
>
> I'm not afraid of a damn thing. But I don't want DJT in the White
> House, again, we have seen what that is like, we have heard about
> Project 2025, you can shove your right-wing nonsense up your asses.

You still haven't said what rights he will take from you if he wins. Why
is that? Did you realize you were full of shit?

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in news:vaj2rs$2l8kk$1@dont-email.me:

> On 2024-08-26, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
>>>> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
>>>> for the presidency itself, the right call.
>>>
>>>She was not on any primary for her to run for president.
>>
>>
>> OK, geniuses, tell me then why Trump didn't need to debate the other
>> Republican candidates, but was just automatically the winner of *your*
>> primaries, HUH?!
>>
> Irrelevant.
> Polls showed that Trump was far ahead so why should he risk a debate?

If Trump was right why would debates be a risk?

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vaiqh2$2ju9c$1@dont-email.me:

> On 2024-08-26, Joel <joelcrump@gmaalt.computer.workshopil.com> wrote:
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> I have always voted Blue before, going back to 1996. So this time
>>>> isn't a change, but the circumstances are unique.
>>>>
>>>Neither blue nor red are the same parties that they were even 20
>>>years ago. Only the idiots, on both sides, are voting party line
>>>anymore. Forget the personalities and look at the issues and policy
>>>and choose wisely. And please, do not be a single item voter. They
>>>are the biggest idiots and it doesn't matter what the item is.
>>
>>
>> When the "single item" is democracy itself, I'd say the biggest
>> idiocy would be to vote to destroy it in DJT.
>>
>
> Democracy?
>
> Ok.
>
> So how many votes did Kamala receive in order to be declared the
> nominee for POTUS? What happened to the ~14 million votes that Joe
> Biden received? What happened to the ~5 million votes the other
> primary candidates received? Why Kamala?
> Who made THAT decision?
> Where is the democracy in it?
>
> Remember, this is not a case of Biden resigning from office.
> That is a different situation completely.

Really?

Truman didn't resign from
office while declining to run
again.

LBJ didn't resign from
office while declining to run
again.

Polk didn't resign from
office while declining to run
again.

Buchanan didn't resign from
office while declining to run
again.

Washinton didn't resign from
office while declining to run
again.

Jefferson didn't resign from
office while declining to run
again.

What makes "resigning from
office" so critical to you?

Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in news:vaj2rs$2l8kk$1@dont-email.me:
>> On 2024-08-26, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>[Kamala D. Harris] was not on any primary for her to run for president.
>>>
>>> OK, geniuses, tell me then why Trump didn't need to debate the other
>>> Republican candidates, but was just automatically the winner of *your*
>>> primaries, HUH?!
>>>
>> Irrelevant.
>> Polls showed that Trump was far ahead so why should he risk a debate?
>
> If Trump was right why would debates be a risk?

He basically just expected to be given the nomination by asking for
it.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:47:38 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
>>> I have always voted Blue before, going back to 1996. So this time
>>> isn't a change, but the circumstances are unique.
>>>
>>Neither blue nor red are the same parties that they were even 20 years ago.
>>Only the idiots, on both sides, are voting party line anymore.
>>Forget the personalities and look at the issues and policy and choose wisely.
>>And please, do not be a single item voter. They are the biggest idiots and it doesn't matter what
>>the item is.
>
>
>When the "single item" is democracy itself, I'd say the biggest idiocy
>would be to vote to destroy it in DJT.

*applause*

Democrats deliver - millions of jobs, stronger infrastructure and rural
broadband. a Biden child tax credit, bold climate action, lowering the cost of
prescription drugs all thanks to Biden's patriotic vision of a fairer America,
doing so with liberty and justice for all.

--
#NEVERtrump

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:02:26 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>On 2024-08-26, Joel <joelcrump@gmaalt.computer.workshopil.com> wrote:
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> I have always voted Blue before, going back to 1996. So this time
>>>> isn't a change, but the circumstances are unique.
>>>>
>>>Neither blue nor red are the same parties that they were even 20 years ago.
>>>Only the idiots, on both sides, are voting party line anymore.
>>>Forget the personalities and look at the issues and policy and choose wisely.
>>>And please, do not be a single item voter. They are the biggest idiots and it doesn't matter what
>>>the item is.
>>
>>
>> When the "single item" is democracy itself, I'd say the biggest idiocy
>> would be to vote to destroy it in DJT.
>>
>
>Democracy?
>
>Ok.
>
>So how many votes did Kamala receive in order to be declared the nominee for POTUS?
>What happened to the ~14 million votes that Joe Biden received?
>What happened to the ~5 million votes the other primary candidates received?
>Why Kamala?
>Who made THAT decision?
>Where is the democracy in it?

Candidates aren't chosen by democracy necessarily, only the final winner.

>Remember, this is not a case of Biden resigning from office.
>That is a different situation completely.

When you prove the Democratic rank and file doesn't want her and that the
virtually unanimous roll call vote was somehow faked, get back to us.

>So doesn't it bother you that democracy was trashed by your own party in order to install a
>candidate who never received a single vote?
>
>It should.

It clearly bothers you that Trump isn't going to have the easy path of opposing
Joe Biden and that it's now Trump who is the old feeb who can't get a single,
coherent sentence out of his mouth.

The Democrats delivered under Obama too, cleaning up the economic train wreck
Bush and the GOP left behind. Bush started two wars that failed and one of them
ran twenty years, but it was Obama who got Bin Laden.

--
#NEVERtrump

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:57:02 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>On 2024-08-26, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> I have always voted Blue before, going back to 1996. So this time
>>>>>> isn't a change, but the circumstances are unique.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Neither blue nor red are the same parties that they were even 20 years ago.
>>>>>Only the idiots, on both sides, are voting party line anymore.
>>>>>Forget the personalities and look at the issues and policy and choose wisely.
>>>>>And please, do not be a single item voter. They are the biggest idiots and it doesn't matter what
>>>>>the item is.
>>>>
>>>> When the "single item" is democracy itself, I'd say the biggest idiocy
>>>> would be to vote to destroy it in DJT.
>>>
>>>Democracy?
>>>
>>>Ok.
>>>
>>>So how many votes did Kamala receive in order to be declared the nominee for POTUS?
>>>What happened to the ~14 million votes that Joe Biden received?
>>>What happened to the ~5 million votes the other primary candidates received?
>>>Why Kamala?
>>>Who made THAT decision?
>>>Where is the democracy in it?
>>>
>>>Remember, this is not a case of Biden resigning from office.
>>>That is a different situation completely.
>>>
>>>So doesn't it bother you that democracy was trashed by your own party in order to install a
>>>candidate who never received a single vote?
>>>
>>>It should.
>>
>>
>> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
>> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
>> for the presidency itself, the right call.
>>
>You voted for Biden to be on the ballot as POTUS and Kamala to be on the ballot as VP.
>
>Next.

You watched him mark his primary ballot?

You've been told this before, but:

The parties' candidates used to be chosen by Congress.
By 1824, that proved to be unworkable, so the state party leadership decided who
to support and the national party leaders chose from the various state
suggestions.

By the end of WWI, the concept of state primaries allowing the voters to choose
the candidates was established but did not become the norm for decades.

As recently as 1968, nominees were selected without voter input. That year,
Hubert Humphrey was selected in convention despite the fact that he didn't run
in the primaries.

The aftermath of Trump's irresponsible abandonment of Afghanistan was just one
more Republican mess a Democrat got stuck cleaning up.

--
#NEVERtrump

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 23:19:55 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>Your democracy was undermined by your own party and you do not even realize it.

As has been pointed out to you before, selecting candidates by primary election
is only a few decades old.

Pity you hate the fact so much.

--
#NEVERtrump

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 23:24:44 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>On 2024-08-26, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
>>>> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
>>>> for the presidency itself, the right call.
>>>
>>>She was not on any primary for her to run for president.
>>
>>
>> OK, geniuses, tell me then why Trump didn't need to debate the other
>> Republican candidates, but was just automatically the winner of *your*
>> primaries, HUH?!
>>
>Irrelevant.

No, it's not. Your party put the fix in so Trump could be nominated without
having to debate or even lay out policy.

>Polls showed that Trump was far ahead so why should he risk a debate?
>And for the primary the voters chose Trump over the others.
>
>Are you high again?

The GOP nomination process was rigged. It was a fake election.

A Biden achievement: Half a million immigrants married to Americans can now
apply for legal residence.

--
#NEVERtrump

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 23:57:33 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>And that is the point Joel nor any of the other libbys can address.
>This was a coup no matter what they claim.
>And they should be very afraid.

The Republican nomination process was rigged. That's how they came to nominate
a loser.

DEPORT TRUMP 2024!
--
#NEVERtrump

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:13:21 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>On 2024-08-27, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>On 2024-08-26, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <mr2qcj110q0q83pqa76kr3qrv1g64mmglh@4ax.com>,
>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >> Kamala D. Harris was on the ballot I voted on in the primary. She's
>>>>> >> the incumbent Vice President. I consider her nomination, now being
>>>>> >> for the presidency itself, the right call.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >She was not on any primary for her to run for president.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, geniuses, tell me then why Trump didn't need to debate the other
>>>>> Republican candidates, but was just automatically the winner of *your*
>>>>> primaries, HUH?!
>>>>
>>>> Who said anything about debates. He was on the primary. The people
>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJZ-BHBKyos
>>>>
>>>> voted. Camel is being put in place.
>>>
>>>And that is the point Joel nor any of the other libbys can address.
>>>This was a coup no matter what they claim.
>>>And they should be very afraid.
>>
>>
>> I'm not afraid of a damn thing. But I don't want DJT in the White
>> House, again, we have seen what that is like, we have heard about
>> Project 2025, you can shove your right-wing nonsense up your asses.
>>
>To quote your buddy snit: "I win, you lose". Not that I care, just mentioning the similarities.
>You can't even explain your reasoning other than Trump "bad orange man".
>So you are yet another low information voter.
>Just like your buddy snit Michael Glasser.

Liar, he did explain. He's voting for Harris because of Project 2025.

Since you have me killfiled, perhaps someone will kindly repost the following:

Project 2025 is the "terms and conditions" of Trump's presidency. Don't just
skip past it and click "I agree".

Pg 696 paves the way for the abolition of Social Security. Universal Savings
Accounts is another term for "Wall Street knows better how to use your money
than you do". Tell it to 2008.

696 also eliminates the Biden achievement of lowering medication prices for
Medicare patients. This is a blatant giveaway of billions of tax dollars to the
pharmaceutical companies.

Pg 584 calls for the elimination of LGBTQ civil rights protections for Americans
as well as returning to discrimination in hiring and pay policies for women.

Pg 459 resurrects the Comstock as the foundation for preventing abortion nation
wide and throw abortion providers in jail as well as end contraception.

Pg 78 calls for Trump to purge the civil service of everyone who is not a MAGA
loyalist and institute a loyalty pledge before hiring. We used to have that
system and it turned out to be destructive so Congress legislated it away
centuries ago.

Pg 319 calls for the elimination of the Dept of Education.

The Heritage PDF of Project 2025 has the pages indexed incorrectly making it
difficult to navigate.
If you don't want to download the pdf from the Heritage Foundation, you can read
about Project 2025 here. https://kamalaharris.com/project2025/

--
#NEVERtrump

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 03:15:25 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:

>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>news:vaiqh2$2ju9c$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 2024-08-26, Joel <joelcrump@gmaalt.computer.workshopil.com> wrote:
>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I have always voted Blue before, going back to 1996. So this time
>>>>> isn't a change, but the circumstances are unique.
>>>>>
>>>>Neither blue nor red are the same parties that they were even 20
>>>>years ago. Only the idiots, on both sides, are voting party line
>>>>anymore. Forget the personalities and look at the issues and policy
>>>>and choose wisely. And please, do not be a single item voter. They
>>>>are the biggest idiots and it doesn't matter what the item is.
>>>
>>>
>>> When the "single item" is democracy itself, I'd say the biggest
>>> idiocy would be to vote to destroy it in DJT.
>>>
>>
>> Democracy?
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>> So how many votes did Kamala receive in order to be declared the
>> nominee for POTUS? What happened to the ~14 million votes that Joe
>> Biden received? What happened to the ~5 million votes the other
>> primary candidates received? Why Kamala?
>> Who made THAT decision?
>> Where is the democracy in it?
>>
>> Remember, this is not a case of Biden resigning from office.
>> That is a different situation completely.
>
>
> Really?
>
> Truman didn't resign from
>office while declining to run
>again.
>
> LBJ didn't resign from
>office while declining to run
>again.
>
> Polk didn't resign from
>office while declining to run
>again.
>
> Buchanan didn't resign from
>office while declining to run
>again.
>
> Washinton didn't resign from
>office while declining to run
>again.
>
> Jefferson didn't resign from
>office while declining to run
>again.
>
> What makes "resigning from
>office" so critical to you?

Spray tan and desperation.

/REPUBLICANS
--
#NEVERtrump