On 2024-08-26, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Here we go again.
> Trump should walk from this one.
>
><https://thepostmillennial.com/kamalas-campaign-demands-seated-debate-with-notes-for-sept-10-abc-event-report>
>
> 'Kamala's campaign demands seated debate, with notes, for Sept. 10 ABC
> event: report'
>
> '"The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN rules, asked
> for a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We said no
> changes to the agreed upon rules."'
>
> 'Kamala Harris wants to change the rules of the upcoming, Sept. 10
> presidential debate to be held on ABC. Instead of a normal, standing
> debate, Harris wants the candidates to be seated, and instead of both
> candidates speaking contemporaneously, drawing on facts and figures they
> know, she wants to have notes, as though it's some kind of open-book
> test in a freshman lecture class.
>
> The Trump campaign's Jason Miller spoke to Politico Playbook, saying
> "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate under the exact same
> terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp, after having already agreed to
> the CNN rules, asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening
> statements. We said no changes to the agreed upon rules."
>
> "If Kamala Harris isn’t smart enough to repeat the messaging points her
> handlers want her to memorize, that’s their problem," Miller said. "This
> seems to be a pattern for the Harris campaign. They won’t allow Harris
> to do interviews, they won’t allow her to do press conferences, and now
> they want to give her a cheat-sheet for the debate. My guess is that
> they’re looking for a way to get out of any debate with President
> Trump."
>
>
> Harris has not held a press conference, done or committed to a long-form
> interview, barely takes reporters' questions, and has only agreed to one
> debate against Trump—one she apparently wants entirely on her terms.
>
> Harris has also said she wants "hot mics," which her campaign said was,
> in essence, to catch Trump saying something off hand, something
> critical, that she could use against him. "Our understanding is that
> Trump’s handlers prefer the muted microphone because they don’t think
> their candidate can act presidential for 90 minutes on his own," said
> campaign senior comms adviser Brian Fallon. "We suspect Trump’s team has
> not even told their boss about this dispute because it would be too
> embarrassing to admit they don’t think he can handle himself against
> Vice President Harris without the benefit of a mute button."
>
> Trump has been amenable not only to the ABC debate, which he agreed to
> with President Joe Biden, who has since been pushed off of his party's
> ticket, but he agreed to all of Biden's terms for their CNN debate on
> June 27, which preceded the Democrat Party's replacing Biden with
> Harris. Fallon claimed that Miller's assertion about the requested rules
> change was false. "All three parties (Trump, Harris and ABC) have agreed
> to standing and no notes, and we never sought otherwise," he said.
>
> However, as Politico notes, "At the time they accepted ABC’s invitation,
> the Harris campaign did so while making clear to the network that the
> rules themselves were up for debate. And if this current snag is any
> indication, that debate is far from settled."
>
> "I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning," Trump said on Sunday, "both
> lightweight reporter Jonathan Carl’s (K?) ridiculous and biased
> interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and their so-called Panel
> of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I do the Debate against Kamala
> Harris on that network? Will panelist Donna Brazil give the questions to
> the Marxist Candidate like she did for Crooked Hillary Clinton?
>
>
> Will Kamala’s best friend, who heads up ABC, do likewise. Where is
> Liddle’ George Slopadopolus hanging out now? Will he be involved.
>
> They’ve got a lot of questions to answer!!! Why did Harris turn down
> Fox, NBC, CBS, and even CNN? Stay tuned!!!"
>
Actually Kamala's strategy is a good one especially for the low information voter who gets her news
from CNN, MSNBC, NPR etc.

Hear me out.

So, if Trump says nope I am not agreeing to those terms then the media will portray him as a weak
chicken.
In fact that is already happening.

If Trump agrees to the terms, Kamala will cheat like a card counter in Vegas only without the
intelligence.
She will have the questions and answers ahead of time and that is what her notes will contain.
Kamala's strategy is to stay away from the media and do teleprompter canned speeches because that
is all she is capable of. Kamala is incapable of thinking extemporaneously. When she tries she ends
up creating a word salad that makes no sense.
But Trump needs to smoke her out so that is where the debates come in.
So it's really lose-lose for Trump if he agrees to her terms IMHO.

And as far as Kamala is concerned does she think she can pull this same sort of crap with Xi?
He will destroy her and the USA along with her.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:40:22 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>If Trump agrees to the terms, Kamala will cheat like a card counter in Vegas only without the
>intelligence.

So you admit Trump is going to lose?

--
#NEVERtrump

On 8/26/2024 4:40 PM, pothead wrote:
> On 2024-08-26, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Here we go again.
>> Trump should walk from this one.
>>
>> <https://thepostmillennial.com/kamalas-campaign-demands-seated-debate-with-notes-for-sept-10-abc-event-report>
>>
>> 'Kamala's campaign demands seated debate, with notes, for Sept. 10 ABC
>> event: report'
>>
>> '"The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN rules, asked
>> for a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We said no
>> changes to the agreed upon rules."'
>>
>> 'Kamala Harris wants to change the rules of the upcoming, Sept. 10
>> presidential debate to be held on ABC. Instead of a normal, standing
>> debate, Harris wants the candidates to be seated, and instead of both
>> candidates speaking contemporaneously, drawing on facts and figures they
>> know, she wants to have notes, as though it's some kind of open-book
>> test in a freshman lecture class.
>>
>> The Trump campaign's Jason Miller spoke to Politico Playbook, saying
>> "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate under the exact same
>> terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp, after having already agreed to
>> the CNN rules, asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening
>> statements. We said no changes to the agreed upon rules."
>>
>> "If Kamala Harris isn’t smart enough to repeat the messaging points her
>> handlers want her to memorize, that’s their problem," Miller said. "This
>> seems to be a pattern for the Harris campaign. They won’t allow Harris
>> to do interviews, they won’t allow her to do press conferences, and now
>> they want to give her a cheat-sheet for the debate. My guess is that
>> they’re looking for a way to get out of any debate with President
>> Trump."
>>
>>
>> Harris has not held a press conference, done or committed to a long-form
>> interview, barely takes reporters' questions, and has only agreed to one
>> debate against Trump—one she apparently wants entirely on her terms.
>>
>> Harris has also said she wants "hot mics," which her campaign said was,
>> in essence, to catch Trump saying something off hand, something
>> critical, that she could use against him. "Our understanding is that
>> Trump’s handlers prefer the muted microphone because they don’t think
>> their candidate can act presidential for 90 minutes on his own," said
>> campaign senior comms adviser Brian Fallon. "We suspect Trump’s team has
>> not even told their boss about this dispute because it would be too
>> embarrassing to admit they don’t think he can handle himself against
>> Vice President Harris without the benefit of a mute button."
>>
>> Trump has been amenable not only to the ABC debate, which he agreed to
>> with President Joe Biden, who has since been pushed off of his party's
>> ticket, but he agreed to all of Biden's terms for their CNN debate on
>> June 27, which preceded the Democrat Party's replacing Biden with
>> Harris. Fallon claimed that Miller's assertion about the requested rules
>> change was false. "All three parties (Trump, Harris and ABC) have agreed
>> to standing and no notes, and we never sought otherwise," he said.
>>
>> However, as Politico notes, "At the time they accepted ABC’s invitation,
>> the Harris campaign did so while making clear to the network that the
>> rules themselves were up for debate. And if this current snag is any
>> indication, that debate is far from settled."
>>
>> "I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning," Trump said on Sunday, "both
>> lightweight reporter Jonathan Carl’s (K?) ridiculous and biased
>> interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and their so-called Panel
>> of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I do the Debate against Kamala
>> Harris on that network? Will panelist Donna Brazil give the questions to
>> the Marxist Candidate like she did for Crooked Hillary Clinton?
>>
>>
>> Will Kamala’s best friend, who heads up ABC, do likewise. Where is
>> Liddle’ George Slopadopolus hanging out now? Will he be involved.
>>
>> They’ve got a lot of questions to answer!!! Why did Harris turn down
>> Fox, NBC, CBS, and even CNN? Stay tuned!!!"
>>
> Actually Kamala's strategy is a good one especially for the low information voter who gets her news
> from CNN, MSNBC, NPR etc.
>
> Hear me out.
>
> So, if Trump says nope I am not agreeing to those terms then the media will portray him as a weak
> chicken.
> In fact that is already happening.
>
> If Trump agrees to the terms, Kamala will cheat like a card counter in Vegas only without the
> intelligence.
> She will have the questions and answers ahead of time and that is what her notes will contain.
> Kamala's strategy is to stay away from the media and do teleprompter canned speeches because that
> is all she is capable of. Kamala is incapable of thinking extemporaneously. When she tries she ends
> up creating a word salad that makes no sense.
> But Trump needs to smoke her out so that is where the debates come in.
> So it's really lose-lose for Trump if he agrees to her terms IMHO.
>
> And as far as Kamala is concerned does she think she can pull this same sort of crap with Xi?
> He will destroy her and the USA along with her.

That's correct. However, what Trump should do is say 'okay, I agree to
that, but only if you debate me on Fox under the original terms of the
ABC debate, which you are now changing. Otherwise, we debate on ABC
under the already established terms. Your move, cackling coot'

Yak <yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:vakgh8$2vli3$2@dont-email.me:

> On 8/26/2024 4:40 PM, pothead wrote:
>> On 2024-08-26, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Here we go again.
>>> Trump should walk from this one.
>>>
>>> <https://thepostmillennial.com/kamalas-campaign-demands-seated-debate
>>> -with-notes-for-sept-10-abc-event-report>
>>>
>>> 'Kamala's campaign demands seated debate, with notes, for Sept. 10
>>> ABC event: report'
>>>
>>> '"The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN rules,
>>> asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We
>>> said no changes to the agreed upon rules."'
>>>
>>> 'Kamala Harris wants to change the rules of the upcoming, Sept. 10
>>> presidential debate to be held on ABC. Instead of a normal, standing
>>> debate, Harris wants the candidates to be seated, and instead of
>>> both candidates speaking contemporaneously, drawing on facts and
>>> figures they know, she wants to have notes, as though it's some kind
>>> of open-book test in a freshman lecture class.
>>>
>>> The Trump campaign's Jason Miller spoke to Politico Playbook, saying
>>> "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate under the exact
>>> same terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp, after having already
>>> agreed to the CNN rules, asked for a seated debate, with notes, and
>>> opening statements. We said no changes to the agreed upon rules."
>>>
>>> "If Kamala Harris isn’t smart enough to repeat the messaging points
>>> her handlers want her to memorize, that’s their problem," Miller
>>> said. "This seems to be a pattern for the Harris campaign. They
>>> won’t allow Harris to do interviews, they won’t allow her to do
>>> press conferences, and now they want to give her a cheat-sheet for
>>> the debate. My guess is that they’re looking for a way to get out
>>> of any debate with President Trump."
>>>
>>>
>>> Harris has not held a press conference, done or committed to a
>>> long-form interview, barely takes reporters' questions, and has only
>>> agreed to one debate against Trump—one she apparently wants
>>> entirely on her terms.
>>>
>>> Harris has also said she wants "hot mics," which her campaign said
>>> was, in essence, to catch Trump saying something off hand, something
>>> critical, that she could use against him. "Our understanding is that
>>> Trump’s handlers prefer the muted microphone because they don’t
>>> think their candidate can act presidential for 90 minutes on his
>>> own," said campaign senior comms adviser Brian Fallon. "We suspect
>>> Trump’s team has not even told their boss about this dispute
>>> because it would be too embarrassing to admit they don’t think he
>>> can handle himself against Vice President Harris without the benefit
>>> of a mute button."
>>>
>>> Trump has been amenable not only to the ABC debate, which he agreed
>>> to with President Joe Biden, who has since been pushed off of his
>>> party's ticket, but he agreed to all of Biden's terms for their CNN
>>> debate on June 27, which preceded the Democrat Party's replacing
>>> Biden with Harris. Fallon claimed that Miller's assertion about the
>>> requested rules change was false. "All three parties (Trump, Harris
>>> and ABC) have agreed to standing and no notes, and we never sought
>>> otherwise," he said.
>>>
>>> However, as Politico notes, "At the time they accepted ABC’s
>>> invitation, the Harris campaign did so while making clear to the
>>> network that the rules themselves were up for debate. And if this
>>> current snag is any indication, that debate is far from settled."
>>>
>>> "I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning," Trump said on Sunday, "both
>>> lightweight reporter Jonathan Carl’s (K?) ridiculous and biased
>>> interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and their so-called
>>> Panel of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I do the Debate against
>>> Kamala Harris on that network? Will panelist Donna Brazil give the
>>> questions to the Marxist Candidate like she did for Crooked Hillary
>>> Clinton?
>>>
>>>
>>> Will Kamala’s best friend, who heads up ABC, do likewise. Where is
>>> Liddle’ George Slopadopolus hanging out now? Will he be involved.
>>>
>>> They’ve got a lot of questions to answer!!! Why did Harris turn
>>> down Fox, NBC, CBS, and even CNN? Stay tuned!!!"
>>>
>> Actually Kamala's strategy is a good one especially for the low
>> information voter who gets her news from CNN, MSNBC, NPR etc.
>>
>> Hear me out.
>>
>> So, if Trump says nope I am not agreeing to those terms then the
>> media will portray him as a weak chicken.
>> In fact that is already happening.
>>
>> If Trump agrees to the terms, Kamala will cheat like a card counter
>> in Vegas only without the intelligence.
>> She will have the questions and answers ahead of time and that is
>> what her notes will contain. Kamala's strategy is to stay away from
>> the media and do teleprompter canned speeches because that is all she
>> is capable of. Kamala is incapable of thinking extemporaneously. When
>> she tries she ends up creating a word salad that makes no sense.
>> But Trump needs to smoke her out so that is where the debates come
>> in. So it's really lose-lose for Trump if he agrees to her terms
>> IMHO.
>>
>> And as far as Kamala is concerned does she think she can pull this
>> same sort of crap with Xi? He will destroy her and the USA along with
>> her.
>
> That's correct. However, what Trump should do is say 'okay, I agree to
> that, but only if you debate me on Fox under the original terms of the
> ABC debate, which you are now changing. Otherwise, we debate on ABC
> under the already established terms. Your move, cackling coot'
>
>

Trump agreed to the debate,
then he pulled out of the dabate,
then he agreed to the debate, and
now he preparing to pull out of
the debate.

Is this the sort of "decisive
leadership" we can expect from him?

On 8/27/2024 9:25 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> Yak <yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:vakgh8$2vli3$2@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 8/26/2024 4:40 PM, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2024-08-26, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Here we go again.
>>>> Trump should walk from this one.
>>>>
>>>> <https://thepostmillennial.com/kamalas-campaign-demands-seated-debate
>>>> -with-notes-for-sept-10-abc-event-report>
>>>>
>>>> 'Kamala's campaign demands seated debate, with notes, for Sept. 10
>>>> ABC event: report'
>>>>
>>>> '"The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN rules,
>>>> asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We
>>>> said no changes to the agreed upon rules."'
>>>>
>>>> 'Kamala Harris wants to change the rules of the upcoming, Sept. 10
>>>> presidential debate to be held on ABC. Instead of a normal, standing
>>>> debate, Harris wants the candidates to be seated, and instead of
>>>> both candidates speaking contemporaneously, drawing on facts and
>>>> figures they know, she wants to have notes, as though it's some kind
>>>> of open-book test in a freshman lecture class.
>>>>
>>>> The Trump campaign's Jason Miller spoke to Politico Playbook, saying
>>>> "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate under the exact
>>>> same terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp, after having already
>>>> agreed to the CNN rules, asked for a seated debate, with notes, and
>>>> opening statements. We said no changes to the agreed upon rules."
>>>>
>>>> "If Kamala Harris isn’t smart enough to repeat the messaging points
>>>> her handlers want her to memorize, that’s their problem," Miller
>>>> said. "This seems to be a pattern for the Harris campaign. They
>>>> won’t allow Harris to do interviews, they won’t allow her to do
>>>> press conferences, and now they want to give her a cheat-sheet for
>>>> the debate. My guess is that they’re looking for a way to get out
>>>> of any debate with President Trump."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Harris has not held a press conference, done or committed to a
>>>> long-form interview, barely takes reporters' questions, and has only
>>>> agreed to one debate against Trump—one she apparently wants
>>>> entirely on her terms.
>>>>
>>>> Harris has also said she wants "hot mics," which her campaign said
>>>> was, in essence, to catch Trump saying something off hand, something
>>>> critical, that she could use against him. "Our understanding is that
>>>> Trump’s handlers prefer the muted microphone because they don’t
>>>> think their candidate can act presidential for 90 minutes on his
>>>> own," said campaign senior comms adviser Brian Fallon. "We suspect
>>>> Trump’s team has not even told their boss about this dispute
>>>> because it would be too embarrassing to admit they don’t think he
>>>> can handle himself against Vice President Harris without the benefit
>>>> of a mute button."
>>>>
>>>> Trump has been amenable not only to the ABC debate, which he agreed
>>>> to with President Joe Biden, who has since been pushed off of his
>>>> party's ticket, but he agreed to all of Biden's terms for their CNN
>>>> debate on June 27, which preceded the Democrat Party's replacing
>>>> Biden with Harris. Fallon claimed that Miller's assertion about the
>>>> requested rules change was false. "All three parties (Trump, Harris
>>>> and ABC) have agreed to standing and no notes, and we never sought
>>>> otherwise," he said.
>>>>
>>>> However, as Politico notes, "At the time they accepted ABC’s
>>>> invitation, the Harris campaign did so while making clear to the
>>>> network that the rules themselves were up for debate. And if this
>>>> current snag is any indication, that debate is far from settled."
>>>>
>>>> "I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning," Trump said on Sunday, "both
>>>> lightweight reporter Jonathan Carl’s (K?) ridiculous and biased
>>>> interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and their so-called
>>>> Panel of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I do the Debate against
>>>> Kamala Harris on that network? Will panelist Donna Brazil give the
>>>> questions to the Marxist Candidate like she did for Crooked Hillary
>>>> Clinton?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Will Kamala’s best friend, who heads up ABC, do likewise. Where is
>>>> Liddle’ George Slopadopolus hanging out now? Will he be involved.
>>>>
>>>> They’ve got a lot of questions to answer!!! Why did Harris turn
>>>> down Fox, NBC, CBS, and even CNN? Stay tuned!!!"
>>>>
>>> Actually Kamala's strategy is a good one especially for the low
>>> information voter who gets her news from CNN, MSNBC, NPR etc.
>>>
>>> Hear me out.
>>>
>>> So, if Trump says nope I am not agreeing to those terms then the
>>> media will portray him as a weak chicken.
>>> In fact that is already happening.
>>>
>>> If Trump agrees to the terms, Kamala will cheat like a card counter
>>> in Vegas only without the intelligence.
>>> She will have the questions and answers ahead of time and that is
>>> what her notes will contain. Kamala's strategy is to stay away from
>>> the media and do teleprompter canned speeches because that is all she
>>> is capable of. Kamala is incapable of thinking extemporaneously. When
>>> she tries she ends up creating a word salad that makes no sense.
>>> But Trump needs to smoke her out so that is where the debates come
>>> in. So it's really lose-lose for Trump if he agrees to her terms
>>> IMHO.
>>>
>>> And as far as Kamala is concerned does she think she can pull this
>>> same sort of crap with Xi? He will destroy her and the USA along with
>>> her.
>>
>> That's correct. However, what Trump should do is say 'okay, I agree to
>> that, but only if you debate me on Fox under the original terms of the
>> ABC debate, which you are now changing. Otherwise, we debate on ABC
>> under the already established terms. Your move, cackling coot'
>>
>>
>
>
> Trump agreed to the debate,

With Biden.

> then he pulled out of the dabate,

Because the coup worked to remove a president considered so great that
he should have a mug on Mt. Rushmore, but he's not quite great enough to
run for re-election, replaced by someone who never won a delegate and a
mere months ago was considered toxic, and polling worse than
belly-button lint.

> then he agreed to the debate,

Under the same terms as the CNN debate, which Harris also agreed to.

>and
> now he preparing to pull out of
> the debate.

Harris is trying to change the terms. Or is this yet another example of
her waffling.

> Is this the sort of "decisive
> leadership" we can expect from him?

Doubtful. Curious though as to why Harris is now requesting multiple
different terms than originally agreed to. Perhaps her debate prep isn't
going so well.

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

In article <tecrcjh1321b6kabsg9t2bipos3h9tehck@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:40:22 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
> >If Trump agrees to the terms, Kamala will cheat like a card counter in Vegas only without the
> >intelligence.
>
> So you admit Trump is going to lose?

and the loony lib spins it again.

In article <XnsB1DADD84CAEEB629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> news:vaip7m$2jkpe$3@dont-email.me:
>
> > On 2024-08-26, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Here we go again.
> >> Trump should walk from this one.
> >>
> >><https://thepostmillennial.com/kamalas-campaign-demands-seated-debate-w
> >>ith-notes-for-sept-10-abc-event-report>
> >>
> >> 'Kamala's campaign demands seated debate, with notes, for Sept. 10
> >> ABC event: report'
> >>
> >> '"The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN rules,
> >> asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We
> >> said no changes to the agreed upon rules."'
> >>
> >> 'Kamala Harris wants to change the rules of the upcoming, Sept. 10
> >> presidential debate to be held on ABC. Instead of a normal, standing
> >> debate, Harris wants the candidates to be seated, and instead of both
> >> candidates speaking contemporaneously, drawing on facts and figures
> >> they know, she wants to have notes, as though it's some kind of
> >> open-book test in a freshman lecture class.
> >>
> >> The Trump campaign's Jason Miller spoke to Politico Playbook, saying
> >> "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate under the exact
> >> same terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp, after having already
> >> agreed to the CNN rules, asked for a seated debate, with notes, and
> >> opening statements. We said no changes to the agreed upon rules."
> >>
> >> "If Kamala Harris isnÂ?t smart enough to repeat the messaging points
> >> her handlers want her to memorize, thatÂ?s their problem," Miller
> >> said. "This seems to be a pattern for the Harris campaign. They
> >> wonÂ?t allow Harris to do interviews, they wonÂ?t allow her to do
> >> press conferences, and now they want to give her a cheat-sheet for
> >> the debate. My guess is that theyÂ?re looking for a way to get out of
> >> any debate with President Trump."
> >>
> >>
> >> Harris has not held a press conference, done or committed to a
> >> long-form interview, barely takes reporters' questions, and has only
> >> agreed to one debate against TrumpÂ?one she apparently wants entirely
> >> on her terms.
> >>
> >> Harris has also said she wants "hot mics," which her campaign said
> >> was, in essence, to catch Trump saying something off hand, something
> >> critical, that she could use against him. "Our understanding is that
> >> TrumpÂ?s handlers prefer the muted microphone because they donÂ?t
> >> think their candidate can act presidential for 90 minutes on his
> >> own," said campaign senior comms adviser Brian Fallon. "We suspect
> >> TrumpÂ?s team has not even told their boss about this dispute because
> >> it would be too embarrassing to admit they donÂ?t think he can handle
> >> himself against Vice President Harris without the benefit of a mute
> >> button."
> >>
> >> Trump has been amenable not only to the ABC debate, which he agreed
> >> to with President Joe Biden, who has since been pushed off of his
> >> party's ticket, but he agreed to all of Biden's terms for their CNN
> >> debate on June 27, which preceded the Democrat Party's replacing
> >> Biden with Harris. Fallon claimed that Miller's assertion about the
> >> requested rules change was false. "All three parties (Trump, Harris
> >> and ABC) have agreed to standing and no notes, and we never sought
> >> otherwise," he said.
> >>
> >> However, as Politico notes, "At the time they accepted ABCÂ?s
> >> invitation, the Harris campaign did so while making clear to the
> >> network that the rules themselves were up for debate. And if this
> >> current snag is any indication, that debate is far from settled."
> >>
> >> "I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning," Trump said on Sunday, "both
> >> lightweight reporter Jonathan CarlÂ?s (K?) ridiculous and biased
> >> interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and their so-called
> >> Panel of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I do the Debate against
> >> Kamala Harris on that network? Will panelist Donna Brazil give the
> >> questions to the Marxist Candidate like she did for Crooked Hillary
> >> Clinton?
> >>
> >>
> >> Will KamalaÂ?s best friend, who heads up ABC, do likewise. Where is
> >> LiddleÂ? George Slopadopolus hanging out now? Will he be involved.
> >>
> >> TheyÂ?ve got a lot of questions to answer!!! Why did Harris turn down
> >> Fox, NBC, CBS, and even CNN? Stay tuned!!!"
> >>
> > Actually Kamala's strategy is a good one especially for the low
> > information voter who gets her news from CNN, MSNBC, NPR etc.
> >
> > Hear me out.
> >
> > So, if Trump says nope I am not agreeing to those terms then the media
> > will portray him as a weak chicken.
>
>
> And Trump IS a weak chicken.

Nothing original as usual.
>
>
> > In fact that is already happening.
> >
> > If Trump agrees to the terms,
>
>
> Trump ALREADY agreed to the terms.
>
> Now he is chickening out.

Nope. Harris wants to make all the rules. That isn't right.
>
>
>
> > Kamala will cheat like a card counter in
> > Vegas only without the intelligence.
>
>
> No one gets to "cheat" at a debate.
>
> (Well, there was Bush and that weird
> box on his back when debating Kerry)

She will be given the questions ahead of time.
>
>
>
>
> > She will have the questions and answers ahead of time and that is what
> > her notes will contain. Kamala's strategy is to stay away from the
> > media and do teleprompter canned speeches because that is all she is
> > capable of. Kamala is incapable of thinking extemporaneously.
>
>
> Yes, trial prosecutors know nothing
> about quick responses and thinking on
> their feet, no sirree.

Just because you are something doesn't mean you're good at it.
>
>
>
> > When she
> > tries she ends up creating a word salad that makes no sense.
>
>
> Then why is Trump afraid of a debate with her?

Because she wants to set all the rules. Are you ok with that?

In article <XnsB1DB5433DADCA629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> Yak <yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:vakgh8$2vli3$2@dont-email.me:
>
> > On 8/26/2024 4:40 PM, pothead wrote:
> >> On 2024-08-26, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Here we go again.
> >>> Trump should walk from this one.
> >>>
> >>> <https://thepostmillennial.com/kamalas-campaign-demands-seated-debate
> >>> -with-notes-for-sept-10-abc-event-report>
> >>>
> >>> 'Kamala's campaign demands seated debate, with notes, for Sept. 10
> >>> ABC event: report'
> >>>
> >>> '"The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN rules,
> >>> asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We
> >>> said no changes to the agreed upon rules."'
> >>>
> >>> 'Kamala Harris wants to change the rules of the upcoming, Sept. 10
> >>> presidential debate to be held on ABC. Instead of a normal, standing
> >>> debate, Harris wants the candidates to be seated, and instead of
> >>> both candidates speaking contemporaneously, drawing on facts and
> >>> figures they know, she wants to have notes, as though it's some kind
> >>> of open-book test in a freshman lecture class.
> >>>
> >>> The Trump campaign's Jason Miller spoke to Politico Playbook, saying
> >>> "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate under the exact
> >>> same terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp, after having already
> >>> agreed to the CNN rules, asked for a seated debate, with notes, and
> >>> opening statements. We said no changes to the agreed upon rules."
> >>>
> >>> "If Kamala Harris isnÂ?t smart enough to repeat the messaging points
> >>> her handlers want her to memorize, thatÂ?s their problem," Miller
> >>> said. "This seems to be a pattern for the Harris campaign. They
> >>> wonÂ?t allow Harris to do interviews, they wonÂ?t allow her to do
> >>> press conferences, and now they want to give her a cheat-sheet for
> >>> the debate. My guess is that theyÂ?re looking for a way to get out
> >>> of any debate with President Trump."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Harris has not held a press conference, done or committed to a
> >>> long-form interview, barely takes reporters' questions, and has only
> >>> agreed to one debate against TrumpÂ?one she apparently wants
> >>> entirely on her terms.
> >>>
> >>> Harris has also said she wants "hot mics," which her campaign said
> >>> was, in essence, to catch Trump saying something off hand, something
> >>> critical, that she could use against him. "Our understanding is that
> >>> TrumpÂ?s handlers prefer the muted microphone because they donÂ?t
> >>> think their candidate can act presidential for 90 minutes on his
> >>> own," said campaign senior comms adviser Brian Fallon. "We suspect
> >>> TrumpÂ?s team has not even told their boss about this dispute
> >>> because it would be too embarrassing to admit they donÂ?t think he
> >>> can handle himself against Vice President Harris without the benefit
> >>> of a mute button."
> >>>
> >>> Trump has been amenable not only to the ABC debate, which he agreed
> >>> to with President Joe Biden, who has since been pushed off of his
> >>> party's ticket, but he agreed to all of Biden's terms for their CNN
> >>> debate on June 27, which preceded the Democrat Party's replacing
> >>> Biden with Harris. Fallon claimed that Miller's assertion about the
> >>> requested rules change was false. "All three parties (Trump, Harris
> >>> and ABC) have agreed to standing and no notes, and we never sought
> >>> otherwise," he said.
> >>>
> >>> However, as Politico notes, "At the time they accepted ABCÂ?s
> >>> invitation, the Harris campaign did so while making clear to the
> >>> network that the rules themselves were up for debate. And if this
> >>> current snag is any indication, that debate is far from settled."
> >>>
> >>> "I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning," Trump said on Sunday, "both
> >>> lightweight reporter Jonathan CarlÂ?s (K?) ridiculous and biased
> >>> interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and their so-called
> >>> Panel of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I do the Debate against
> >>> Kamala Harris on that network? Will panelist Donna Brazil give the
> >>> questions to the Marxist Candidate like she did for Crooked Hillary
> >>> Clinton?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Will KamalaÂ?s best friend, who heads up ABC, do likewise. Where is
> >>> LiddleÂ? George Slopadopolus hanging out now? Will he be involved.
> >>>
> >>> TheyÂ?ve got a lot of questions to answer!!! Why did Harris turn
> >>> down Fox, NBC, CBS, and even CNN? Stay tuned!!!"
> >>>
> >> Actually Kamala's strategy is a good one especially for the low
> >> information voter who gets her news from CNN, MSNBC, NPR etc.
> >>
> >> Hear me out.
> >>
> >> So, if Trump says nope I am not agreeing to those terms then the
> >> media will portray him as a weak chicken.
> >> In fact that is already happening.
> >>
> >> If Trump agrees to the terms, Kamala will cheat like a card counter
> >> in Vegas only without the intelligence.
> >> She will have the questions and answers ahead of time and that is
> >> what her notes will contain. Kamala's strategy is to stay away from
> >> the media and do teleprompter canned speeches because that is all she
> >> is capable of. Kamala is incapable of thinking extemporaneously. When
> >> she tries she ends up creating a word salad that makes no sense.
> >> But Trump needs to smoke her out so that is where the debates come
> >> in. So it's really lose-lose for Trump if he agrees to her terms
> >> IMHO.
> >>
> >> And as far as Kamala is concerned does she think she can pull this
> >> same sort of crap with Xi? He will destroy her and the USA along with
> >> her.
> >
> > That's correct. However, what Trump should do is say 'okay, I agree to
> > that, but only if you debate me on Fox under the original terms of the
> > ABC debate, which you are now changing. Otherwise, we debate on ABC
> > under the already established terms. Your move, cackling coot'
> >
> >
>
>
> Trump agreed to the debate,
> then he pulled out of the dabate,
> then he agreed to the debate, and
> now he preparing to pull out of
> the debate.
>
> Is this the sort of "decisive
> leadership" we can expect from him?

They want to keep changing the rules. No rules and Trump would bury her
like he did Joe.

Yak wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 8/27/2024 9:25 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> Is this the sort of "decisive
>> leadership" we can expect from him?
>
> Doubtful. Curious though as to why Harris is now requesting multiple
> different terms than originally agreed to. Perhaps her debate prep isn't
> going so well.

Lol. She was a prosecutor and an attorney general. One thing lawyers know well
is how to debate. :-D

You yak too much.

Anyway, the terms would apply to both sides: Harris vs the Yammering Sphincter.

--
You will be winged by an anti-aircraft battery.

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:41:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Lol. She was a prosecutor and an attorney general. One thing lawyers
> know well is how to debate. :-D

She did so well in the 2019 debates she folded her tent and went home
after the fifth.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-failed-bar-exam-on-first-
try/

" In July 1989, according to the Los Angeles Times, 59.5% of people passed
and won the right to practice law from the July 1989 exams, and the pass
rate was 72.2% among the 4,909 people taking the exam for the first time."

Presumably Harris took the July 1989 test and wasn't among the 72.2% who
passed.

"In February 1990, the likely date Harris took the bar exam for a second
time, the pass rate was 45.9%."

I think snopes is hedging a bit. As I read the quote from the LA Times
first time takers do quite a bit better compared to all the people taking
the exam. That would indicate the overall pass rate is dependent on how
many previous failures try again and fail again. That doesn't necessarily
mean the test Harris passed was harder than the one she failed. A more
meaningful comparison would be how many first timers passed the February
exam.

The prosecutor and AG ploy has its dangers if you look at who she did or
did not prosecute.

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 09:54:55 -0400, Yak <yak@inbox.com> wrote:

>Doubtful. Curious though as to why Harris is now requesting multiple
>different terms than originally agreed to. Perhaps her debate prep isn't
>going so well.

More likely it's psyops to further rattle Trump who's been showing the strain
lately.

3 tricks police use to trespass
<https://www.youtube.com/shorts/M49FIKNxAYA>
Cops asking the wrong questions
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/rHAGXLWLFMY
Cops running a scam with a DUI attorney
<https://www.youtube.com/shorts/a_CKz27dbSU>

--
#NEVERtrump

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66cdeddf$1$212404$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

>
> Just because someone is something doesn't mean they are good at it.

Case in point, Trump the "successful businessman"

34 felony convictions

13 failed businesses

6 bankruptcies

1 fraudulent charity

1 fraudulent "university"

Dozens of lawsuits from
defrauded investors,
defrauded suppliers,
defrauded lawyers.

No American banks will do
business with him.

A long record of sending
American jobs overseas, a
long record of replacing
American workers with
immigrants.

Even his own daughter won't
campaign for him.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66cde560$1$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <XnsB1DB5433DADCA629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> Yak <yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:vakgh8$2vli3$2@dont-email.me:
>>
>> > On 8/26/2024 4:40 PM, pothead wrote:
>> >> On 2024-08-26, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Here we go again.
>> >>> Trump should walk from this one.
>> >>>
>> >>> <https://thepostmillennial.com/kamalas-campaign-demands-seated-deb
>> >>> ate -with-notes-for-sept-10-abc-event-report>
>> >>>
>> >>> 'Kamala's campaign demands seated debate, with notes, for Sept.
>> >>> 10 ABC event: report'
>> >>>
>> >>> '"The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN rules,
>> >>> asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We
>> >>> said no changes to the agreed upon rules."'
>> >>>
>> >>> 'Kamala Harris wants to change the rules of the upcoming, Sept.
>> >>> 10 presidential debate to be held on ABC. Instead of a normal,
>> >>> standing debate, Harris wants the candidates to be seated, and
>> >>> instead of both candidates speaking contemporaneously, drawing on
>> >>> facts and figures they know, she wants to have notes, as though
>> >>> it's some kind of open-book test in a freshman lecture class.
>> >>>
>> >>> The Trump campaign's Jason Miller spoke to Politico Playbook,
>> >>> saying "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate under
>> >>> the exact same terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp, after
>> >>> having already agreed to the CNN rules, asked for a seated
>> >>> debate, with notes, and opening statements. We said no changes to
>> >>> the agreed upon rules."
>> >>>
>> >>> "If Kamala Harris isn�?t smart enough to repeat the messaging
>> >>> points her handlers want her to memorize, that�?s their problem,"
>> >>> Miller said. "This seems to be a pattern for the Harris campaign.
>> >>> They won�?t allow Harris to do interviews, they won�?t allow her
>> >>> to do press conferences, and now they want to give her a
>> >>> cheat-sheet for the debate. My guess is that they�?re looking for
>> >>> a way to get out of any debate with President Trump."
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Harris has not held a press conference, done or committed to a
>> >>> long-form interview, barely takes reporters' questions, and has
>> >>> only agreed to one debate against Trump�?one she apparently wants
>> >>> entirely on her terms.
>> >>>
>> >>> Harris has also said she wants "hot mics," which her campaign
>> >>> said was, in essence, to catch Trump saying something off hand,
>> >>> something critical, that she could use against him. "Our
>> >>> understanding is that Trump�?s handlers prefer the muted
>> >>> microphone because they don�?t think their candidate can act
>> >>> presidential for 90 minutes on his own," said campaign senior
>> >>> comms adviser Brian Fallon. "We suspect Trump�?s team has not
>> >>> even told their boss about this dispute because it would be too
>> >>> embarrassing to admit they don�?t think he can handle himself
>> >>> against Vice President Harris without the benefit of a mute
>> >>> button."
>> >>>
>> >>> Trump has been amenable not only to the ABC debate, which he
>> >>> agreed to with President Joe Biden, who has since been pushed off
>> >>> of his party's ticket, but he agreed to all of Biden's terms for
>> >>> their CNN debate on June 27, which preceded the Democrat Party's
>> >>> replacing Biden with Harris. Fallon claimed that Miller's
>> >>> assertion about the requested rules change was false. "All three
>> >>> parties (Trump, Harris and ABC) have agreed to standing and no
>> >>> notes, and we never sought otherwise," he said.
>> >>>
>> >>> However, as Politico notes, "At the time they accepted ABC�?s
>> >>> invitation, the Harris campaign did so while making clear to the
>> >>> network that the rules themselves were up for debate. And if this
>> >>> current snag is any indication, that debate is far from settled."
>> >>>
>> >>> "I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning," Trump said on Sunday,
>> >>> "both lightweight reporter Jonathan Carl�?s (K?) ridiculous and
>> >>> biased interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and their
>> >>> so-called Panel of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I do the
>> >>> Debate against Kamala Harris on that network? Will panelist Donna
>> >>> Brazil give the questions to the Marxist Candidate like she did
>> >>> for Crooked Hillary Clinton?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Will Kamala�?s best friend, who heads up ABC, do likewise. Where
>> >>> is Liddle�? George Slopadopolus hanging out now? Will he be
>> >>> involved.
>> >>>
>> >>> They�?ve got a lot of questions to answer!!! Why did Harris turn
>> >>> down Fox, NBC, CBS, and even CNN? Stay tuned!!!"
>> >>>
>> >> Actually Kamala's strategy is a good one especially for the low
>> >> information voter who gets her news from CNN, MSNBC, NPR etc.
>> >>
>> >> Hear me out.
>> >>
>> >> So, if Trump says nope I am not agreeing to those terms then the
>> >> media will portray him as a weak chicken.
>> >> In fact that is already happening.
>> >>
>> >> If Trump agrees to the terms, Kamala will cheat like a card
>> >> counter in Vegas only without the intelligence.
>> >> She will have the questions and answers ahead of time and that is
>> >> what her notes will contain. Kamala's strategy is to stay away
>> >> from the media and do teleprompter canned speeches because that is
>> >> all she is capable of. Kamala is incapable of thinking
>> >> extemporaneously. When she tries she ends up creating a word salad
>> >> that makes no sense. But Trump needs to smoke her out so that is
>> >> where the debates come in. So it's really lose-lose for Trump if
>> >> he agrees to her terms IMHO.
>> >>
>> >> And as far as Kamala is concerned does she think she can pull this
>> >> same sort of crap with Xi? He will destroy her and the USA along
>> >> with her.
>> >
>> > That's correct. However, what Trump should do is say 'okay, I agree
>> > to that, but only if you debate me on Fox under the original terms
>> > of the ABC debate, which you are now changing. Otherwise, we debate
>> > on ABC under the already established terms. Your move, cackling
>> > coot'
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> Trump agreed to the debate,
>> then he pulled out of the dabate,
>> then he agreed to the debate, and
>> now he preparing to pull out of
>> the debate.
>>
>> Is this the sort of "decisive
>> leadership" we can expect from him?
>
> They want to keep changing the rules. No rules and Trump would bury
> her like he did Joe.
>

Trump will bail out of the debate,
as he has done so many times before.

In article <XnsB1DB8756069CF629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> news:66cdeddf$1$212404$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
>
> >
> > Just because someone is something doesn't mean they are good at it.
>
>
> Case in point, Trump the "successful businessman"
>
>
> 34 felony convictions
>
> 13 failed businesses
>
> 6 bankruptcies
>
> 1 fraudulent charity
>
> 1 fraudulent "university"
>
> Dozens of lawsuits from
> defrauded investors,
> defrauded suppliers,
> defrauded lawyers.
>
> No American banks will do
> business with him.
>
> A long record of sending
> American jobs overseas, a
> long record of replacing
> American workers with
> immigrants.
>
> Even his own daughter won't
> campaign for him.

and could buy and sell you.

In article <XnsB1DB87887DD17629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> news:66cde560$1$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
> > In article <XnsB1DB5433DADCA629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> Yak <yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:vakgh8$2vli3$2@dont-email.me:
> >>
> >> > On 8/26/2024 4:40 PM, pothead wrote:
> >> >> On 2024-08-26, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> Here we go again.
> >> >>> Trump should walk from this one.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> <https://thepostmillennial.com/kamalas-campaign-demands-seated-deb
> >> >>> ate -with-notes-for-sept-10-abc-event-report>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 'Kamala's campaign demands seated debate, with notes, for Sept.
> >> >>> 10 ABC event: report'
> >> >>>
> >> >>> '"The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN rules,
> >> >>> asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We
> >> >>> said no changes to the agreed upon rules."'
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 'Kamala Harris wants to change the rules of the upcoming, Sept.
> >> >>> 10 presidential debate to be held on ABC. Instead of a normal,
> >> >>> standing debate, Harris wants the candidates to be seated, and
> >> >>> instead of both candidates speaking contemporaneously, drawing on
> >> >>> facts and figures they know, she wants to have notes, as though
> >> >>> it's some kind of open-book test in a freshman lecture class.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The Trump campaign's Jason Miller spoke to Politico Playbook,
> >> >>> saying "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate under
> >> >>> the exact same terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp, after
> >> >>> having already agreed to the CNN rules, asked for a seated
> >> >>> debate, with notes, and opening statements. We said no changes to
> >> >>> the agreed upon rules."
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "If Kamala Harris isnÂ?t smart enough to repeat the messaging
> >> >>> points her handlers want her to memorize, thatÂ?s their problem,"
> >> >>> Miller said. "This seems to be a pattern for the Harris campaign.
> >> >>> They wonÂ?t allow Harris to do interviews, they wonÂ?t allow her
> >> >>> to do press conferences, and now they want to give her a
> >> >>> cheat-sheet for the debate. My guess is that theyÂ?re looking for
> >> >>> a way to get out of any debate with President Trump."
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Harris has not held a press conference, done or committed to a
> >> >>> long-form interview, barely takes reporters' questions, and has
> >> >>> only agreed to one debate against TrumpÂ?one she apparently wants
> >> >>> entirely on her terms.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Harris has also said she wants "hot mics," which her campaign
> >> >>> said was, in essence, to catch Trump saying something off hand,
> >> >>> something critical, that she could use against him. "Our
> >> >>> understanding is that TrumpÂ?s handlers prefer the muted
> >> >>> microphone because they donÂ?t think their candidate can act
> >> >>> presidential for 90 minutes on his own," said campaign senior
> >> >>> comms adviser Brian Fallon. "We suspect TrumpÂ?s team has not
> >> >>> even told their boss about this dispute because it would be too
> >> >>> embarrassing to admit they donÂ?t think he can handle himself
> >> >>> against Vice President Harris without the benefit of a mute
> >> >>> button."
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Trump has been amenable not only to the ABC debate, which he
> >> >>> agreed to with President Joe Biden, who has since been pushed off
> >> >>> of his party's ticket, but he agreed to all of Biden's terms for
> >> >>> their CNN debate on June 27, which preceded the Democrat Party's
> >> >>> replacing Biden with Harris. Fallon claimed that Miller's
> >> >>> assertion about the requested rules change was false. "All three
> >> >>> parties (Trump, Harris and ABC) have agreed to standing and no
> >> >>> notes, and we never sought otherwise," he said.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> However, as Politico notes, "At the time they accepted ABCÂ?s
> >> >>> invitation, the Harris campaign did so while making clear to the
> >> >>> network that the rules themselves were up for debate. And if this
> >> >>> current snag is any indication, that debate is far from settled."
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning," Trump said on Sunday,
> >> >>> "both lightweight reporter Jonathan CarlÂ?s (K?) ridiculous and
> >> >>> biased interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and their
> >> >>> so-called Panel of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I do the
> >> >>> Debate against Kamala Harris on that network? Will panelist Donna
> >> >>> Brazil give the questions to the Marxist Candidate like she did
> >> >>> for Crooked Hillary Clinton?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Will KamalaÂ?s best friend, who heads up ABC, do likewise. Where
> >> >>> is LiddleÂ? George Slopadopolus hanging out now? Will he be
> >> >>> involved.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> TheyÂ?ve got a lot of questions to answer!!! Why did Harris turn
> >> >>> down Fox, NBC, CBS, and even CNN? Stay tuned!!!"
> >> >>>
> >> >> Actually Kamala's strategy is a good one especially for the low
> >> >> information voter who gets her news from CNN, MSNBC, NPR etc.
> >> >>
> >> >> Hear me out.
> >> >>
> >> >> So, if Trump says nope I am not agreeing to those terms then the
> >> >> media will portray him as a weak chicken.
> >> >> In fact that is already happening.
> >> >>
> >> >> If Trump agrees to the terms, Kamala will cheat like a card
> >> >> counter in Vegas only without the intelligence.
> >> >> She will have the questions and answers ahead of time and that is
> >> >> what her notes will contain. Kamala's strategy is to stay away
> >> >> from the media and do teleprompter canned speeches because that is
> >> >> all she is capable of. Kamala is incapable of thinking
> >> >> extemporaneously. When she tries she ends up creating a word salad
> >> >> that makes no sense. But Trump needs to smoke her out so that is
> >> >> where the debates come in. So it's really lose-lose for Trump if
> >> >> he agrees to her terms IMHO.
> >> >>
> >> >> And as far as Kamala is concerned does she think she can pull this
> >> >> same sort of crap with Xi? He will destroy her and the USA along
> >> >> with her.
> >> >
> >> > That's correct. However, what Trump should do is say 'okay, I agree
> >> > to that, but only if you debate me on Fox under the original terms
> >> > of the ABC debate, which you are now changing. Otherwise, we debate
> >> > on ABC under the already established terms. Your move, cackling
> >> > coot'
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Trump agreed to the debate,
> >> then he pulled out of the dabate,
> >> then he agreed to the debate, and
> >> now he preparing to pull out of
> >> the debate.
> >>
> >> Is this the sort of "decisive
> >> leadership" we can expect from him?
> >
> > They want to keep changing the rules. No rules and Trump would bury
> > her like he did Joe.
> >
>
> Trump will bail out of the debate,
> as he has done so many times before.

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 18:27:14 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:

>Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>news:66cdeddf$1$212404$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
>
>>
>> Just because someone is something doesn't mean they are good at it.
>
>
> Case in point, Trump the "successful businessman"
>
>
> 34 felony convictions
>
> 13 failed businesses
>
> 6 bankruptcies
>
> 1 fraudulent charity
>
> 1 fraudulent "university"
>
> Dozens of lawsuits from
>defrauded investors,
>defrauded suppliers,
>defrauded lawyers.
>
> No American banks will do
>business with him.
>
> A long record of sending
>American jobs overseas, a
>long record of replacing
>American workers with
>immigrants.
>
> Even his own daughter won't
>campaign for him.

Or his niece Mary or his nephew Fred.

Helping other people
<https://www.youtube.com/shorts/wSPNvCyUKj0>
--
#NEVERtrump

rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:41:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Lol. She was a prosecutor and an attorney general. One thing lawyers
>> know well is how to debate. :-D
>
> She did so well in the 2019 debates she folded her tent and went home
> after the fifth.

You are confusing popularity with competence.

> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-failed-bar-exam-on-first-try/

You hurt your own cause here.

> " In July 1989, according to the Los Angeles Times, 59.5% of people passed
> and won the right to practice law from the July 1989 exams, and the pass
> rate was 72.2% among the 4,909 people taking the exam for the first time."

That bar exam was noted for its difficulty and inapplicability to actual law.

Why do you dismiss her? She's obviously intelligent, willing to push through
obstacles, and a capable speaker.

--
Q: How many Marxists does it take to screw in a light bulb?
A: None: The light bulb contains the seeds of its own revolution.

On 2024-08-28, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:41:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Lol. She was a prosecutor and an attorney general. One thing lawyers
>>> know well is how to debate. :-D
>>
>> She did so well in the 2019 debates she folded her tent and went home
>> after the fifth.
>
> You are confusing popularity with competence.
>
>> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-failed-bar-exam-on-first-try/
>
> You hurt your own cause here.
>
>> " In July 1989, according to the Los Angeles Times, 59.5% of people passed
>> and won the right to practice law from the July 1989 exams, and the pass
>> rate was 72.2% among the 4,909 people taking the exam for the first time."
>
> That bar exam was noted for its difficulty and inapplicability to actual law.
>
> Why do you dismiss her? She's obviously intelligent, willing to push through
> obstacles, and a capable speaker.
>

You are brainwashed. May I suggest getting deprogrammed?

--
Charlie Glock
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms"
- Thomas Jefferson 1776

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66ce5d54$0$2753
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <XnsB1DB8756069CF629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>> news:66cdeddf$1$212404$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Just because someone is something doesn't mean they are good at it.
>>
>>
>> Case in point, Trump the "successful businessman"
>>
>>
>> 34 felony convictions
>>
>> 13 failed businesses
>>
>> 6 bankruptcies
>>
>> 1 fraudulent charity
>>
>> 1 fraudulent "university"
>>
>> Dozens of lawsuits from
>> defrauded investors,
>> defrauded suppliers,
>> defrauded lawyers.
>>
>> No American banks will do
>> business with him.
>>
>> A long record of sending
>> American jobs overseas, a
>> long record of replacing
>> American workers with
>> immigrants.
>>
>> Even his own daughter won't
>> campaign for him.
>
> and could buy and sell you.

I am not for sale.

Have you bought your Trump Bible yet?

You know he wants you to..............

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66ce5d9a$1$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <XnsB1DB87887DD17629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>> news:66cde560$1$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>> > In article <XnsB1DB5433DADCA629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
>> > says...
>> >>
>> >> Yak <yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:vakgh8$2vli3$2@dont-email.me:
>> >>
>> >> > On 8/26/2024 4:40 PM, pothead wrote:
>> >> >> On 2024-08-26, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> Here we go again.
>> >> >>> Trump should walk from this one.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> <https://thepostmillennial.com/kamalas-campaign-demands-seated-
>> >> >>> deb ate -with-notes-for-sept-10-abc-event-report>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> 'Kamala's campaign demands seated debate, with notes, for
>> >> >>> Sept. 10 ABC event: report'
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> '"The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN
>> >> >>> rules, asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening
>> >> >>> statements. We said no changes to the agreed upon rules."'
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> 'Kamala Harris wants to change the rules of the upcoming,
>> >> >>> Sept. 10 presidential debate to be held on ABC. Instead of a
>> >> >>> normal, standing debate, Harris wants the candidates to be
>> >> >>> seated, and instead of both candidates speaking
>> >> >>> contemporaneously, drawing on facts and figures they know, she
>> >> >>> wants to have notes, as though it's some kind of open-book
>> >> >>> test in a freshman lecture class.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> The Trump campaign's Jason Miller spoke to Politico Playbook,
>> >> >>> saying "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate
>> >> >>> under the exact same terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp,
>> >> >>> after having already agreed to the CNN rules, asked for a
>> >> >>> seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We said no
>> >> >>> changes to the agreed upon rules."
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> "If Kamala Harris isn�?t smart enough to repeat the messaging
>> >> >>> points her handlers want her to memorize, that�?s their
>> >> >>> problem," Miller said. "This seems to be a pattern for the
>> >> >>> Harris campaign. They won�?t allow Harris to do interviews,
>> >> >>> they won�?t allow her to do press conferences, and now they
>> >> >>> want to give her a cheat-sheet for the debate. My guess is
>> >> >>> that they�?re looking for a way to get out of any debate with
>> >> >>> President Trump."
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Harris has not held a press conference, done or committed to a
>> >> >>> long-form interview, barely takes reporters' questions, and
>> >> >>> has only agreed to one debate against Trump�?one she
>> >> >>> apparently wants entirely on her terms.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Harris has also said she wants "hot mics," which her campaign
>> >> >>> said was, in essence, to catch Trump saying something off
>> >> >>> hand, something critical, that she could use against him. "Our
>> >> >>> understanding is that Trump�?s handlers prefer the muted
>> >> >>> microphone because they don�?t think their candidate can act
>> >> >>> presidential for 90 minutes on his own," said campaign senior
>> >> >>> comms adviser Brian Fallon. "We suspect Trump�?s team has not
>> >> >>> even told their boss about this dispute because it would be
>> >> >>> too embarrassing to admit they don�?t think he can handle
>> >> >>> himself against Vice President Harris without the benefit of a
>> >> >>> mute button."
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Trump has been amenable not only to the ABC debate, which he
>> >> >>> agreed to with President Joe Biden, who has since been pushed
>> >> >>> off of his party's ticket, but he agreed to all of Biden's
>> >> >>> terms for their CNN debate on June 27, which preceded the
>> >> >>> Democrat Party's replacing Biden with Harris. Fallon claimed
>> >> >>> that Miller's assertion about the requested rules change was
>> >> >>> false. "All three parties (Trump, Harris and ABC) have agreed
>> >> >>> to standing and no notes, and we never sought otherwise," he
>> >> >>> said.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> However, as Politico notes, "At the time they accepted ABC�?s
>> >> >>> invitation, the Harris campaign did so while making clear to
>> >> >>> the network that the rules themselves were up for debate. And
>> >> >>> if this current snag is any indication, that debate is far
>> >> >>> from settled."
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> "I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning," Trump said on Sunday,
>> >> >>> "both lightweight reporter Jonathan Carl�?s (K?) ridiculous
>> >> >>> and biased interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and
>> >> >>> their so-called Panel of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I
>> >> >>> do the Debate against Kamala Harris on that network? Will
>> >> >>> panelist Donna Brazil give the questions to the Marxist
>> >> >>> Candidate like she did for Crooked Hillary Clinton?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Will Kamala�?s best friend, who heads up ABC, do likewise.
>> >> >>> Where is Liddle�? George Slopadopolus hanging out now? Will he
>> >> >>> be involved.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> They�?ve got a lot of questions to answer!!! Why did Harris
>> >> >>> turn down Fox, NBC, CBS, and even CNN? Stay tuned!!!"
>> >> >>>
>> >> >> Actually Kamala's strategy is a good one especially for the low
>> >> >> information voter who gets her news from CNN, MSNBC, NPR etc.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hear me out.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So, if Trump says nope I am not agreeing to those terms then
>> >> >> the media will portray him as a weak chicken.
>> >> >> In fact that is already happening.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If Trump agrees to the terms, Kamala will cheat like a card
>> >> >> counter in Vegas only without the intelligence.
>> >> >> She will have the questions and answers ahead of time and that
>> >> >> is what her notes will contain. Kamala's strategy is to stay
>> >> >> away from the media and do teleprompter canned speeches because
>> >> >> that is all she is capable of. Kamala is incapable of thinking
>> >> >> extemporaneously. When she tries she ends up creating a word
>> >> >> salad that makes no sense. But Trump needs to smoke her out so
>> >> >> that is where the debates come in. So it's really lose-lose for
>> >> >> Trump if he agrees to her terms IMHO.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And as far as Kamala is concerned does she think she can pull
>> >> >> this same sort of crap with Xi? He will destroy her and the USA
>> >> >> along with her.
>> >> >
>> >> > That's correct. However, what Trump should do is say 'okay, I
>> >> > agree to that, but only if you debate me on Fox under the
>> >> > original terms of the ABC debate, which you are now changing.
>> >> > Otherwise, we debate on ABC under the already established terms.
>> >> > Your move, cackling coot'
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Trump agreed to the debate,
>> >> then he pulled out of the dabate,
>> >> then he agreed to the debate, and
>> >> now he preparing to pull out of
>> >> the debate.
>> >>
>> >> Is this the sort of "decisive
>> >> leadership" we can expect from him?
>> >
>> > They want to keep changing the rules. No rules and Trump would bury
>> > her like he did Joe.
>> >
>>
>> Trump will bail out of the debate,
>> as he has done so many times before.
>
> No he hasn't. Liar.

In article <XnsB1DBD421378BC629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66ce5d54$0$2753
> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
> > In article <XnsB1DB8756069CF629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> >> news:66cdeddf$1$212404$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Just because someone is something doesn't mean they are good at it.
> >>
> >>
> >> Case in point, Trump the "successful businessman"
> >>
> >>
> >> 34 felony convictions
> >>
> >> 13 failed businesses
> >>
> >> 6 bankruptcies
> >>
> >> 1 fraudulent charity
> >>
> >> 1 fraudulent "university"
> >>
> >> Dozens of lawsuits from
> >> defrauded investors,
> >> defrauded suppliers,
> >> defrauded lawyers.
> >>
> >> No American banks will do
> >> business with him.
> >>
> >> A long record of sending
> >> American jobs overseas, a
> >> long record of replacing
> >> American workers with
> >> immigrants.
> >>
> >> Even his own daughter won't
> >> campaign for him.
> >
> > and could buy and sell you.
>
>
> I am not for sale.

You shouldn't need to be, You sold your soul to the Democrats.
>
> Have you bought your Trump Bible yet?
>
> You know he wants you to..............

So old and worn out. I have a Trump hat and that's it.

In article <XnsB1DBD4517369D629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> news:66ce5d9a$1$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
> > In article <XnsB1DB87887DD17629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> >> news:66cde560$1$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
> >>
> >> > In article <XnsB1DB5433DADCA629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
> >> > says...
> >> >>
> >> >> Yak <yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:vakgh8$2vli3$2@dont-email.me:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On 8/26/2024 4:40 PM, pothead wrote:
> >> >> >> On 2024-08-26, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> Here we go again.
> >> >> >>> Trump should walk from this one.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> <https://thepostmillennial.com/kamalas-campaign-demands-seated-
> >> >> >>> deb ate -with-notes-for-sept-10-abc-event-report>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> 'Kamala's campaign demands seated debate, with notes, for
> >> >> >>> Sept. 10 ABC event: report'
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> '"The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN
> >> >> >>> rules, asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening
> >> >> >>> statements. We said no changes to the agreed upon rules."'
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> 'Kamala Harris wants to change the rules of the upcoming,
> >> >> >>> Sept. 10 presidential debate to be held on ABC. Instead of a
> >> >> >>> normal, standing debate, Harris wants the candidates to be
> >> >> >>> seated, and instead of both candidates speaking
> >> >> >>> contemporaneously, drawing on facts and figures they know, she
> >> >> >>> wants to have notes, as though it's some kind of open-book
> >> >> >>> test in a freshman lecture class.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> The Trump campaign's Jason Miller spoke to Politico Playbook,
> >> >> >>> saying "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate
> >> >> >>> under the exact same terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp,
> >> >> >>> after having already agreed to the CNN rules, asked for a
> >> >> >>> seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We said no
> >> >> >>> changes to the agreed upon rules."
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> "If Kamala Harris isnÂ?t smart enough to repeat the messaging
> >> >> >>> points her handlers want her to memorize, thatÂ?s their
> >> >> >>> problem," Miller said. "This seems to be a pattern for the
> >> >> >>> Harris campaign. They wonÂ?t allow Harris to do interviews,
> >> >> >>> they wonÂ?t allow her to do press conferences, and now they
> >> >> >>> want to give her a cheat-sheet for the debate. My guess is
> >> >> >>> that theyÂ?re looking for a way to get out of any debate with
> >> >> >>> President Trump."
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Harris has not held a press conference, done or committed to a
> >> >> >>> long-form interview, barely takes reporters' questions, and
> >> >> >>> has only agreed to one debate against TrumpÂ?one she
> >> >> >>> apparently wants entirely on her terms.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Harris has also said she wants "hot mics," which her campaign
> >> >> >>> said was, in essence, to catch Trump saying something off
> >> >> >>> hand, something critical, that she could use against him. "Our
> >> >> >>> understanding is that TrumpÂ?s handlers prefer the muted
> >> >> >>> microphone because they donÂ?t think their candidate can act
> >> >> >>> presidential for 90 minutes on his own," said campaign senior
> >> >> >>> comms adviser Brian Fallon. "We suspect TrumpÂ?s team has not
> >> >> >>> even told their boss about this dispute because it would be
> >> >> >>> too embarrassing to admit they donÂ?t think he can handle
> >> >> >>> himself against Vice President Harris without the benefit of a
> >> >> >>> mute button."
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Trump has been amenable not only to the ABC debate, which he
> >> >> >>> agreed to with President Joe Biden, who has since been pushed
> >> >> >>> off of his party's ticket, but he agreed to all of Biden's
> >> >> >>> terms for their CNN debate on June 27, which preceded the
> >> >> >>> Democrat Party's replacing Biden with Harris. Fallon claimed
> >> >> >>> that Miller's assertion about the requested rules change was
> >> >> >>> false. "All three parties (Trump, Harris and ABC) have agreed
> >> >> >>> to standing and no notes, and we never sought otherwise," he
> >> >> >>> said.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> However, as Politico notes, "At the time they accepted ABCÂ?s
> >> >> >>> invitation, the Harris campaign did so while making clear to
> >> >> >>> the network that the rules themselves were up for debate. And
> >> >> >>> if this current snag is any indication, that debate is far
> >> >> >>> from settled."
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> "I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning," Trump said on Sunday,
> >> >> >>> "both lightweight reporter Jonathan CarlÂ?s (K?) ridiculous
> >> >> >>> and biased interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and
> >> >> >>> their so-called Panel of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I
> >> >> >>> do the Debate against Kamala Harris on that network? Will
> >> >> >>> panelist Donna Brazil give the questions to the Marxist
> >> >> >>> Candidate like she did for Crooked Hillary Clinton?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Will KamalaÂ?s best friend, who heads up ABC, do likewise.
> >> >> >>> Where is LiddleÂ? George Slopadopolus hanging out now? Will he
> >> >> >>> be involved.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> TheyÂ?ve got a lot of questions to answer!!! Why did Harris
> >> >> >>> turn down Fox, NBC, CBS, and even CNN? Stay tuned!!!"
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> Actually Kamala's strategy is a good one especially for the low
> >> >> >> information voter who gets her news from CNN, MSNBC, NPR etc.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hear me out.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> So, if Trump says nope I am not agreeing to those terms then
> >> >> >> the media will portray him as a weak chicken.
> >> >> >> In fact that is already happening.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If Trump agrees to the terms, Kamala will cheat like a card
> >> >> >> counter in Vegas only without the intelligence.
> >> >> >> She will have the questions and answers ahead of time and that
> >> >> >> is what her notes will contain. Kamala's strategy is to stay
> >> >> >> away from the media and do teleprompter canned speeches because
> >> >> >> that is all she is capable of. Kamala is incapable of thinking
> >> >> >> extemporaneously. When she tries she ends up creating a word
> >> >> >> salad that makes no sense. But Trump needs to smoke her out so
> >> >> >> that is where the debates come in. So it's really lose-lose for
> >> >> >> Trump if he agrees to her terms IMHO.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> And as far as Kamala is concerned does she think she can pull
> >> >> >> this same sort of crap with Xi? He will destroy her and the USA
> >> >> >> along with her.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > That's correct. However, what Trump should do is say 'okay, I
> >> >> > agree to that, but only if you debate me on Fox under the
> >> >> > original terms of the ABC debate, which you are now changing.
> >> >> > Otherwise, we debate on ABC under the already established terms.
> >> >> > Your move, cackling coot'
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Trump agreed to the debate,
> >> >> then he pulled out of the dabate,
> >> >> then he agreed to the debate, and
> >> >> now he preparing to pull out of
> >> >> the debate.
> >> >>
> >> >> Is this the sort of "decisive
> >> >> leadership" we can expect from him?
> >> >
> >> > They want to keep changing the rules. No rules and Trump would bury
> >> > her like he did Joe.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Trump will bail out of the debate,
> >> as he has done so many times before.
> >
> > No he hasn't. Liar.
>
>
>
>
> Donald Trump Will Skip the Fox News Debate
> Jan 26, 2016
> http://tinyurl.com/zxh3td5
>
>
>
> Donald Trump skipped the GOP debate again.
> September 28, 2023
> https://tinyurl.com/bdd8thh5
>
>
> Haley and DeSantis Slam Trump for Skipping GOP Debate
> jan 11 2024
> https://tinyurl.com/bdhxsus8
>
>
> Trump says he won't take part in Republican debates
> August 20, 2023
> https://tinyurl.com/ycxjsas3
>
>
> Why is Donald Trump skipping another
> Republican presidential debate?
> Nov 08, 2023
> https://tinyurl.com/4s6azv5k
>
>
>
> Presidential debate in Miami canceled after
> Trump refuses to participate virtually
> OCT 8 2020
> https://tinyurl.com/2nm72vbw

On 2024-08-28, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <XnsB1DBD421378BC629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66ce5d54$0$2753
>> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>> > In article <XnsB1DB8756069CF629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
>> > says...
>> >>
>> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>> >> news:66cdeddf$1$212404$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Just because someone is something doesn't mean they are good at it.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Case in point, Trump the "successful businessman"
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 34 felony convictions
>> >>
>> >> 13 failed businesses
>> >>
>> >> 6 bankruptcies
>> >>
>> >> 1 fraudulent charity
>> >>
>> >> 1 fraudulent "university"
>> >>
>> >> Dozens of lawsuits from
>> >> defrauded investors,
>> >> defrauded suppliers,
>> >> defrauded lawyers.
>> >>
>> >> No American banks will do
>> >> business with him.
>> >>
>> >> A long record of sending
>> >> American jobs overseas, a
>> >> long record of replacing
>> >> American workers with
>> >> immigrants.
>> >>
>> >> Even his own daughter won't
>> >> campaign for him.
>> >
>> > and could buy and sell you.
>>
>>
>> I am not for sale.
>
> You shouldn't need to be, You sold your soul to the Democrats.
>>
>> Have you bought your Trump Bible yet?
>>
>> You know he wants you to..............
>
> So old and worn out. I have a Trump hat and that's it.
>

I probably shouldn't admit this, but I had a Trump Yeti imitation cafe tumbler
Someone gave it to me, brand new.
It leaked.
Lol !
FWIW, Yeti is the one and only to buy.

--
pothead
Kamala Harris Is A Marxist
Tampon Tim Walz Is A Radical Left Wing Nutjob
They Are A Match Made In Heaven

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 20:50:00 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Why do you dismiss her? She's obviously intelligent, willing to push
> through obstacles, and a capable speaker.

I'm sorry, we exist in two different realities.

On 2024-08-27, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:41:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Lol. She was a prosecutor and an attorney general. One thing lawyers
>> know well is how to debate. :-D
>
> She did so well in the 2019 debates she folded her tent and went home
> after the fifth.

She's trying to weasel out of the debates, just like she's weaseling out of
interviews and press conferences. She's letting the MSM carry water for her
(like Biden before her). This is a woman who ran for president and did not
win a single delegate, not even in her home state of California. There are
many stupid lawyers. She's just one more. I think Chris A is a little
enamored with "professionals." There are many incompetent "professionals."

> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-failed-bar-exam-on-first-
> try/
>
> " In July 1989, according to the Los Angeles Times, 59.5% of people passed
> and won the right to practice law from the July 1989 exams, and the pass
> rate was 72.2% among the 4,909 people taking the exam for the first time."
>
> Presumably Harris took the July 1989 test and wasn't among the 72.2% who
> passed.
>
> "In February 1990, the likely date Harris took the bar exam for a second
> time, the pass rate was 45.9%."
>
> I think snopes is hedging a bit. As I read the quote from the LA Times
> first time takers do quite a bit better compared to all the people taking
> the exam. That would indicate the overall pass rate is dependent on how
> many previous failures try again and fail again. That doesn't necessarily
> mean the test Harris passed was harder than the one she failed. A more
> meaningful comparison would be how many first timers passed the February
> exam.
>
> The prosecutor and AG ploy has its dangers if you look at who she did or
> did not prosecute.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien