On Aug 24, 2024 at 5:53:04 PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
<66ca8070$0$3068687$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> On 2024-08-24, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <66ca2cde$0$1895497$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Aug 24, 2024 at 9:50:19 AM MST, "Brent" wrote
>>> <vad30a$1f3dp$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>
>>>>> RFK Jr. or Rachel Levine ?
>>>>
>>>> No one wants leftist science.
>>>
>>> Science is science. It only seems "leftist" to those who have a bias against
>>> reality.
>>
>> Not when the left tries to twist the science.
>>>
>>>> RFK Jr. is the man for the job.
>>>> If RFK Jr. had been in charge during COVID millions would have survived to
>>>> vote for Trump in 2020 and today and Trump's brain cells wouldn't have been
>>>> decimated as they have been from repeated vaccine usage and booster abuse.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Damn vaccine and mask usage turned Trump into a blithering retard years-
>>>> ago.
>>
>>
>> RFK told the left to fuck off.
>>
> The progressives love to pull the science card, like the racist card, except
> when it doesn't back
> their points.

You are back with your sock. Not surprising. Laughing your ass off at the
mayhem you helped build.

In any case, I like to go with science and evidence, and I reject racism. My
points are informed by those things. Equal rights and evidence matter.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <luvkcj9ulce01dkd7do02g3mofigih6kl4@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <2imkcj9587huflbhgp2c88lfo74c9jg6jp@4ax.com>,
> >joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >> Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >> >On 8/24/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >> >> In article <vadjua$1hv0t$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >> >>> On 8/24/2024 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >> >>>> In article <vacuid$1ekq5$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I'll take the one who won't result in kids getting diseases because he
> >> >>>>> is anti-vaccine crank.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> You really do think in black and white. Old and worn out your remarks
> >> >>>> are.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Preventing childhood diseases is so worn out.
> >> >>
> >> >> Try talking sense instead of being condensing.
> >> >
> >> >Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as measles. He is a
> >> >nutjob.
> >>
> >> Kennedy isn't a credible candidate and his endorsement of DJT is not
> >> going to bring some great movement, to that. We will make Trump
> >> defeated again by voting and exposing the democratic power, that the
> >> people control.
> >
> >RFK told your side to go fuck itself..
> >
> >So you still haven't told me what rights Trump is going to take from
> >you.
>
>
> He isn't the only person I'm concerned with, on that.

Bot you seem to avoid tell me what rights he's going to take from you.
You made the claim.

In article <vae04r$1jkm6$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>
> On 8/24/2024 5:44 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vadlke$1hv0t$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>
> >> On 8/24/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vadjua$1hv0t$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8/24/2024 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vacuid$1ekq5$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/24/2024 8:28 AM, John Smyth wrote:
> >>>>>>> RFK Jr. or Rachel Levine ?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Look for yourself.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <https://truthsocial.com/@DonaldJTrumpJr/113017489481267734>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'll take the one who won't result in kids getting diseases because he
> >>>>>> is anti-vaccine crank.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You really do think in black and white. Old and worn out your remarks
> >>>>> are.
> >>>>
> >>>> Preventing childhood diseases is so worn out.
> >>>
> >>> Try talking sense instead of being condensing.
> >>
> >> Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as measles. He is a
> >> nutjob.
> >
> > So?
>
> WTF is wrong with you? You want kids to get measles?

Maybe we should stop the flooding the border with just anyone that have
diseases we got rid of long ago. Start at the source.

On Aug 24, 2024 at 6:36:46 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66ca8aaf$5$2385549$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <vae04r$1jkm6$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 8/24/2024 5:44 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vadlke$1hv0t$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vadjua$1hv0t$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vacuid$1ekq5$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/24/2024 8:28 AM, John Smyth wrote:
>>>>>>>>> RFK Jr. or Rachel Levine ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Look for yourself.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <https://truthsocial.com/@DonaldJTrumpJr/113017489481267734>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll take the one who won't result in kids getting diseases because he
>>>>>>>> is anti-vaccine crank.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You really do think in black and white. Old and worn out your remarks
>>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Preventing childhood diseases is so worn out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Try talking sense instead of being condensing.
>>>>
>>>> Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as measles. He is a
>>>> nutjob.
>>>
>>> So?
>>
>> WTF is wrong with you? You want kids to get measles?
>
> Maybe we should stop the flooding the border with just anyone that have
> diseases we got rid of long ago. Start at the source.

To address the statement made in your post, it’s important to consider the
following points based on evidence and factual data:

1. **Disease Transmission and Immigration**: Public health data shows that the
diseases mentioned—those thought to be "eradicated" in the past—are not
primarily brought in by immigrants. Most of these diseases have been
significantly reduced through widespread vaccination programs and public
health measures in the U.S. and other countries. When such diseases do
reappear, they are often linked to outbreaks in specific communities,
including areas with lower vaccination rates, regardless of the immigrant
status of the individuals.

2. **Health Screening of Immigrants**: The U.S. has strict health screening
protocols for immigrants. According to the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), all immigrants and refugees undergo mandatory health
examinations before they are allowed entry into the country. These screenings
are designed to detect and manage communicable diseases that could pose a
public health risk. Therefore, the likelihood of immigrants bringing in
eradicated diseases is very low.

3. **Source of Outbreaks**: Many recent outbreaks of diseases in the United
States, such as measles, have been linked to U.S. residents who travel abroad
and bring the diseases back, not to immigrants. For instance, the CDC reported
that the 2019 measles outbreaks in the U.S. were mostly caused by unvaccinated
individuals who traveled to countries where measles is still common and then
returned to the U.S., spreading the virus.

4. **Immigration and Public Health**: The idea of "flooding the border" is a
misconception. The vast majority of immigrants, including asylum seekers, go
through legal processes that include health checks. Public health is not
jeopardized by the controlled immigration process; rather, it can be
threatened by misinformation and lack of adequate public health measures
within the country itself.

5. **Historical Context and Xenophobia**: It’s also important to recognize
that blaming immigrants for the spread of disease has a long history rooted in
xenophobia and discrimination, rather than in scientific evidence. Such
rhetoric can lead to harmful stigmatization and social division, which does
not contribute to effective public health strategies.

By focusing on evidence-based public health practices, including vaccination,
proper health screenings, and education, we can more effectively prevent and
control diseases without resorting to unfounded and discriminatory
assumptions.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 24, 2024 at 6:34:23 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66ca8a21$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <luvkcj9ulce01dkd7do02g3mofigih6kl4@4ax.com>,
> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>> In article <2imkcj9587huflbhgp2c88lfo74c9jg6jp@4ax.com>,
>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>> Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <vadjua$1hv0t$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <vacuid$1ekq5$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll take the one who won't result in kids getting diseases because he
>>>>>>>>> is anti-vaccine crank.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You really do think in black and white. Old and worn out your remarks
>>>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Preventing childhood diseases is so worn out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try talking sense instead of being condensing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as measles. He is a
>>>>> nutjob.
>>>>
>>>> Kennedy isn't a credible candidate and his endorsement of DJT is not
>>>> going to bring some great movement, to that. We will make Trump
>>>> defeated again by voting and exposing the democratic power, that the
>>>> people control.
>>>
>>> RFK told your side to go fuck itself..
>>>
>>> So you still haven't told me what rights Trump is going to take from
>>> you.
>>
>>
>> He isn't the only person I'm concerned with, on that.
>
> Bot you seem to avoid tell me what rights he's going to take from you.
> You made the claim.

To address your request for specifics on what rights were perceived to be at
risk under former President Trump's administration, it is important to refer
to actual events and policies that were seen by many as attempts to limit
certain rights. Here are some examples:

1. **Freedom of the Press**: Former President Trump repeatedly called the
press "the enemy of the people," a phrase that raised concerns about
undermining the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of the press. His
administration attempted to block certain news organizations from press
briefings and revoked press credentials of reporters who asked challenging
questions, which many saw as efforts to limit press freedom.

2. **Freedom of Speech**: There were concerns about Trump's rhetoric and
actions potentially chilling free speech. For example, his administration
proposed changing libel laws to make it easier to sue journalists for
unfavorable coverage, which could discourage media outlets from reporting
critically on the government.

3. **Right to Peaceful Assembly**: During the protests following George
Floyd's death in 2020, there were several instances where peaceful protesters
were met with force by law enforcement. The clearing of Lafayette Square in
Washington, D.C., for a photo opportunity was widely criticized as an
overreach of power that violated the protesters' First Amendment rights.

4. **Equal Protection Under the Law**: The Trump administration's travel bans,
often referred to as the "Muslim ban," were seen by many as discriminatory
against Muslims and in violation of the principle of equal protection under
the law as enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment. Multiple courts initially
blocked the bans, and they were heavily litigated before a version was upheld
by the Supreme Court.

5. **Reproductive Rights**: The Trump administration took several actions that
were perceived as attempts to restrict reproductive rights, such as supporting
policies that aimed to defund Planned Parenthood and appointing conservative
judges, including Supreme Court Justices, who are seen as more likely to
overturn or restrict Roe v. Wade. This concerned many about the future of
reproductive rights in the U.S.

6. **LGBTQ+ Rights**: The Trump administration rolled back several protections
for LGBTQ+ individuals. This included a ban on transgender individuals serving
in the military and rolling back protections against discrimination for LGBTQ+
people in healthcare settings.

7. **Due Process Rights**: The administration's approach to immigration policy
raised concerns about due process rights, particularly with policies like
family separation at the border, which often left families without clear legal
recourse or due process in a timely manner.

These examples reflect specific concerns that various groups and individuals
had about potential encroachments on rights under former President Trump's
policies and actions. It's essential to understand that these concerns are
based on interpretations of how certain policies could affect constitutional
rights and how these were perceived by various communities and legal experts
at the time.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 24, 2024 at 5:55:39 PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
<66ca810b$1$3068677$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> On 2024-08-24, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> On 8/24/2024 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vacuid$1ekq5$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/24/2024 8:28 AM, John Smyth wrote:
>>>>> RFK Jr. or Rachel Levine ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Look for yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://truthsocial.com/@DonaldJTrumpJr/113017489481267734>
>>>>
>>>> I'll take the one who won't result in kids getting diseases because he
>>>> is anti-vaccine crank.
>>>
>>> You really do think in black and white. Old and worn out your remarks
>>> are.
>>
>> Preventing childhood diseases is so worn out.
>
> You had better dust off those hypodermics because due to illegal immigration
> diseases that were
> for the most part eradicated in the USA are now surfacing again.

The claim that illegal immigration is causing the resurgence of diseases that
were previously eradicated in the U.S. is not supported by evidence. Here are
several points to consider:

1. **Vaccination and Disease Control**: The resurgence of certain diseases,
like measles, in the U.S. is primarily due to declining vaccination rates
rather than illegal immigration. According to the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC), outbreaks of measles in recent years have been linked to
unvaccinated individuals and communities rather than to immigrants. Many
outbreaks begin with U.S. travelers who are exposed to diseases abroad and
bring them back to communities with low vaccination rates.

2. **Health Screenings for Immigrants**: Immigrants, including those who come
to the U.S. seeking asylum or refuge, are subject to rigorous health
screenings. The CDC and other public health agencies have guidelines for the
medical examination of immigrants and refugees to prevent the spread of
infectious diseases. These measures include vaccinations and screening for
communicable diseases before individuals are allowed to enter the country or
during the process of seeking asylum.

3. **Historical Context of Disease and Migration**: Throughout history,
diseases have spread through various means, including travel and trade, not
solely through immigration. For example, the 1918 influenza pandemic spread
globally without regard to borders, and more recent outbreaks of diseases like
Ebola or Zika have shown that disease transmission is complex and cannot be
attributed to a single source such as immigration.

4. **Misconceptions About "Eradicated" Diseases**: Not all diseases mentioned
were ever fully eradicated from the U.S.; rather, they were controlled through
public health measures like vaccination. Diseases such as tuberculosis (TB)
and measles have always had a presence in the U.S. but have been kept at low
levels through consistent public health efforts. When these diseases
re-emerge, it is often due to gaps in vaccination coverage or other public
health infrastructure, not solely immigration.

5. **Importance of Public Health Initiatives**: The best way to prevent the
spread of infectious diseases is through robust public health measures such as
vaccination, public education, and ensuring access to healthcare for all
residents, regardless of immigration status. Blaming immigration
oversimplifies a complex issue and distracts from the need to strengthen
public health systems and vaccination efforts.

In conclusion, the resurgence of certain diseases in the U.S. is more
accurately linked to factors like vaccine hesitancy and global travel rather
than illegal immigration. Public health strategies that focus on vaccination,
education, and healthcare access are key to preventing the spread of
infectious diseases.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 8/24/2024 6:36 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vae04r$1jkm6$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 8/24/2024 5:44 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vadlke$1hv0t$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vadjua$1hv0t$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vacuid$1ekq5$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/24/2024 8:28 AM, John Smyth wrote:
>>>>>>>>> RFK Jr. or Rachel Levine ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Look for yourself.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <https://truthsocial.com/@DonaldJTrumpJr/113017489481267734>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll take the one who won't result in kids getting diseases because he
>>>>>>>> is anti-vaccine crank.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You really do think in black and white. Old and worn out your remarks
>>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Preventing childhood diseases is so worn out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Try talking sense instead of being condensing.
>>>>
>>>> Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as measles. He is a
>>>> nutjob.
>>>
>>> So?
>>
>> WTF is wrong with you? You want kids to get measles?
>
> Maybe we should stop the flooding the border with just anyone that have
> diseases we got rid of long ago. Start at the source.

Red Herring. Say no to RFK, Jr.

In article <66ca8a03$0$3620715$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 24, 2024 at 5:53:04 PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
> <66ca8070$0$3068687$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > On 2024-08-24, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> In article <66ca2cde$0$1895497$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>
> >>> On Aug 24, 2024 at 9:50:19 AM MST, "Brent" wrote
> >>> <vad30a$1f3dp$2@dont-email.me>:
> >>>
> >>>>> RFK Jr. or Rachel Levine ?
> >>>>
> >>>> No one wants leftist science.
> >>>
> >>> Science is science. It only seems "leftist" to those who have a bias against
> >>> reality.
> >>
> >> Not when the left tries to twist the science.
> >>>
> >>>> RFK Jr. is the man for the job.
> >>>> If RFK Jr. had been in charge during COVID millions would have survived to
> >>>> vote for Trump in 2020 and today and Trump's brain cells wouldn't have been
> >>>> decimated as they have been from repeated vaccine usage and booster abuse.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Damn vaccine and mask usage turned Trump into a blithering retard years-
> >>>> ago.
> >>
> >>
> >> RFK told the left to fuck off.
> >>
> > The progressives love to pull the science card, like the racist card, except
> > when it doesn't back
> > their points.
>
> You are back with your sock. Not surprising. Laughing your ass off at the
> mayhem you helped build.
>
> In any case, I like to go with science and evidence, and I reject racism. My
> points are informed by those things. Equal rights and evidence matter.

Only you bring up race.

In article <66ca8cd6$2$1895494$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 24, 2024 at 6:36:46 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66ca8aaf$5$2385549$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <vae04r$1jkm6$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>
> >> On 8/24/2024 5:44 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vadlke$1hv0t$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8/24/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vadjua$1hv0t$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vacuid$1ekq5$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 8/24/2024 8:28 AM, John Smyth wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> RFK Jr. or Rachel Levine ?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Look for yourself.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> <https://truthsocial.com/@DonaldJTrumpJr/113017489481267734>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'll take the one who won't result in kids getting diseases because he
> >>>>>>>> is anti-vaccine crank.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You really do think in black and white. Old and worn out your remarks
> >>>>>>> are.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Preventing childhood diseases is so worn out.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Try talking sense instead of being condensing.
> >>>>
> >>>> Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as measles. He is a
> >>>> nutjob.
> >>>
> >>> So?
> >>
> >> WTF is wrong with you? You want kids to get measles?
> >
> > Maybe we should stop the flooding the border with just anyone that have
> > diseases we got rid of long ago. Start at the source.
>
> To address the statement made in your post, it?s important to consider the
> following points based on evidence and factual data:
>
> 1. **Disease Transmission and Immigration**: Public health data shows that the
> diseases mentioned?those thought to be "eradicated" in the past?are not
> primarily brought in by immigrants. Most of these diseases have been
> significantly reduced through widespread vaccination programs and public
> health measures in the U.S. and other countries. When such diseases do
> reappear, they are often linked to outbreaks in specific communities,
> including areas with lower vaccination rates, regardless of the immigrant
> status of the individuals.
>
> 2. **Health Screening of Immigrants**: The U.S. has strict health screening
> protocols for immigrants. According to the Centers for Disease Control and
> Prevention (CDC), all immigrants and refugees undergo mandatory health
> examinations before they are allowed entry into the country. These screenings
> are designed to detect and manage communicable diseases that could pose a
> public health risk. Therefore, the likelihood of immigrants bringing in
> eradicated diseases is very low.
>
> 3. **Source of Outbreaks**: Many recent outbreaks of diseases in the United
> States, such as measles, have been linked to U.S. residents who travel abroad
> and bring the diseases back, not to immigrants. For instance, the CDC reported
> that the 2019 measles outbreaks in the U.S. were mostly caused by unvaccinated
> individuals who traveled to countries where measles is still common and then
> returned to the U.S., spreading the virus.
>
> 4. **Immigration and Public Health**: The idea of "flooding the border" is a
> misconception. The vast majority of immigrants, including asylum seekers, go
> through legal processes that include health checks. Public health is not
> jeopardized by the controlled immigration process; rather, it can be
> threatened by misinformation and lack of adequate public health measures
> within the country itself.
>
> 5. **Historical Context and Xenophobia**: It?s also important to recognize
> that blaming immigrants for the spread of disease has a long history rooted in
> xenophobia and discrimination, rather than in scientific evidence. Such
> rhetoric can lead to harmful stigmatization and social division, which does
> not contribute to effective public health strategies.
>
> By focusing on evidence-based public health practices, including vaccination,
> proper health screenings, and education, we can more effectively prevent and
> control diseases without resorting to unfounded and discriminatory
> assumptions.

Well they aren't checking anyone out. So that is really a waste.

In article <66ca8d4a$0$1895499$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 24, 2024 at 6:34:23 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66ca8a21$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <luvkcj9ulce01dkd7do02g3mofigih6kl4@4ax.com>,
> > joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>> In article <2imkcj9587huflbhgp2c88lfo74c9jg6jp@4ax.com>,
> >>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>> Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <vadjua$1hv0t$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In article <vacuid$1ekq5$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'll take the one who won't result in kids getting diseases because he
> >>>>>>>>> is anti-vaccine crank.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You really do think in black and white. Old and worn out your remarks
> >>>>>>>> are.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Preventing childhood diseases is so worn out.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Try talking sense instead of being condensing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as measles. He is a
> >>>>> nutjob.
> >>>>
> >>>> Kennedy isn't a credible candidate and his endorsement of DJT is not
> >>>> going to bring some great movement, to that. We will make Trump
> >>>> defeated again by voting and exposing the democratic power, that the
> >>>> people control.
> >>>
> >>> RFK told your side to go fuck itself..
> >>>
> >>> So you still haven't told me what rights Trump is going to take from
> >>> you.
> >>
> >>
> >> He isn't the only person I'm concerned with, on that.
> >
> > Bot you seem to avoid tell me what rights he's going to take from you.
> > You made the claim.
>
> To address your request for specifics on what rights were perceived to be at
> risk under former President Trump's administration, it is important to refer
> to actual events and policies that were seen by many as attempts to limit
> certain rights. Here are some examples:
>
> 1. **Freedom of the Press**: Former President Trump repeatedly called the
> press "the enemy of the people," a phrase that raised concerns about
> undermining the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of the press. His
> administration attempted to block certain news organizations from press
> briefings and revoked press credentials of reporters who asked challenging
> questions, which many saw as efforts to limit press freedom.
>
> 2. **Freedom of Speech**: There were concerns about Trump's rhetoric and
> actions potentially chilling free speech. For example, his administration
> proposed changing libel laws to make it easier to sue journalists for
> unfavorable coverage, which could discourage media outlets from reporting
> critically on the government.
>
> 3. **Right to Peaceful Assembly**: During the protests following George
> Floyd's death in 2020, there were several instances where peaceful protesters
> were met with force by law enforcement. The clearing of Lafayette Square in
> Washington, D.C., for a photo opportunity was widely criticized as an
> overreach of power that violated the protesters' First Amendment rights.
>
> 4. **Equal Protection Under the Law**: The Trump administration's travel bans,
> often referred to as the "Muslim ban," were seen by many as discriminatory
> against Muslims and in violation of the principle of equal protection under
> the law as enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment. Multiple courts initially
> blocked the bans, and they were heavily litigated before a version was upheld
> by the Supreme Court.
>
> 5. **Reproductive Rights**: The Trump administration took several actions that
> were perceived as attempts to restrict reproductive rights, such as supporting
> policies that aimed to defund Planned Parenthood and appointing conservative
> judges, including Supreme Court Justices, who are seen as more likely to
> overturn or restrict Roe v. Wade. This concerned many about the future of
> reproductive rights in the U.S.
>
> 6. **LGBTQ+ Rights**: The Trump administration rolled back several protections
> for LGBTQ+ individuals. This included a ban on transgender individuals serving
> in the military and rolling back protections against discrimination for LGBTQ+
> people in healthcare settings.
>
> 7. **Due Process Rights**: The administration's approach to immigration policy
> raised concerns about due process rights, particularly with policies like
> family separation at the border, which often left families without clear legal
> recourse or due process in a timely manner.
>
> These examples reflect specific concerns that various groups and individuals
> had about potential encroachments on rights under former President Trump's
> policies and actions. It's essential to understand that these concerns are
> based on interpretations of how certain policies could affect constitutional
> rights and how these were perceived by various communities and legal experts
> at the time.

So you didn't lose any rights. I didn't think so.

In article <vae2t4$1jvtn$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>
> On 8/24/2024 6:36 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vae04r$1jkm6$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>
> >> On 8/24/2024 5:44 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vadlke$1hv0t$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8/24/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vadjua$1hv0t$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vacuid$1ekq5$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 8/24/2024 8:28 AM, John Smyth wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> RFK Jr. or Rachel Levine ?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Look for yourself.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> <https://truthsocial.com/@DonaldJTrumpJr/113017489481267734>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'll take the one who won't result in kids getting diseases because he
> >>>>>>>> is anti-vaccine crank.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You really do think in black and white. Old and worn out your remarks
> >>>>>>> are.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Preventing childhood diseases is so worn out.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Try talking sense instead of being condensing.
> >>>>
> >>>> Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as measles. He is a
> >>>> nutjob.
> >>>
> >>> So?
> >>
> >> WTF is wrong with you? You want kids to get measles?
> >
> > Maybe we should stop the flooding the border with just anyone that have
> > diseases we got rid of long ago. Start at the source.
>
> Red Herring. Say no to RFK, Jr.

Huh?

On 8/24/2024 7:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vae2t4$1jvtn$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 8/24/2024 6:36 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vae04r$1jkm6$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/24/2024 5:44 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vadlke$1hv0t$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vadjua$1hv0t$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vacuid$1ekq5$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/24/2024 8:28 AM, John Smyth wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> RFK Jr. or Rachel Levine ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Look for yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://truthsocial.com/@DonaldJTrumpJr/113017489481267734>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll take the one who won't result in kids getting diseases because he
>>>>>>>>>> is anti-vaccine crank.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You really do think in black and white. Old and worn out your remarks
>>>>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Preventing childhood diseases is so worn out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Try talking sense instead of being condensing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as measles. He is a
>>>>>> nutjob.
>>>>>
>>>>> So?
>>>>
>>>> WTF is wrong with you? You want kids to get measles?
>>>
>>> Maybe we should stop the flooding the border with just anyone that have
>>> diseases we got rid of long ago. Start at the source.
>>
>> Red Herring. Say no to RFK, Jr.
>
> Huh?

What part of "Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as
measles. He is a nutjob" did you not understand?

This entire thread is about whether we should have Kennedy or Levine as
the Secretary of Health. Say no to Kennedy.

On Aug 24, 2024 at 7:28:09 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66ca96ae$0$2759$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66ca8a03$0$3620715$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 24, 2024 at 5:53:04 PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
>> <66ca8070$0$3068687$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> On 2024-08-24, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <66ca2cde$0$1895497$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 24, 2024 at 9:50:19 AM MST, "Brent" wrote
>>>>> <vad30a$1f3dp$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> RFK Jr. or Rachel Levine ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No one wants leftist science.
>>>>>
>>>>> Science is science. It only seems "leftist" to those who have a bias against
>>>>> reality.
>>>>
>>>> Not when the left tries to twist the science.
>>>>>
>>>>>> RFK Jr. is the man for the job.
>>>>>> If RFK Jr. had been in charge during COVID millions would have survived to
>>>>>> vote for Trump in 2020 and today and Trump's brain cells wouldn't have been
>>>>>> decimated as they have been from repeated vaccine usage and booster abuse.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Damn vaccine and mask usage turned Trump into a blithering retard years-
>>>>>> ago.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> RFK told the left to fuck off.
>>>>
>>> The progressives love to pull the science card, like the racist card, except
>>> when it doesn't back
>>> their points.
>>
>> You are back with your sock. Not surprising. Laughing your ass off at the
>> mayhem you helped build.
>>
>> In any case, I like to go with science and evidence, and I reject racism. My
>> points are informed by those things. Equal rights and evidence matter.
>
> Only you bring up race.

Carroll has repeatedly said he will excuse rich white guys and vilify poor
people of color. And you back him.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> The Constitutional Sheriff wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>>> On 8/24/2024 8:28 AM, John Smyth wrote:
>>>> RFK Jr. or Rachel Levine ?
>>>>
>>>> Look for yourself.
>>>>
>>>> <https://truthsocial.com/@DonaldJTrumpJr/113017489481267734>
>>>
>>> I'll take the one who won't result in kids getting diseases because he
>>> is anti-vaccine crank.
>>
>> Vaccines are bad. Vaccine and all those COVID boosters turned Trump's
>> brain to mush along with all that oxygen loss because he wore a mask.
>
> Thank vaccines for not expiring from measles, mumps, and suffering from polio.

Modern sanitation did most of the work in eradicating polio.

Siri Cruise wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> Vaccines are bad.  Vaccine and all those COVID boosters turned Trump's
>>> brain to mush along with all that oxygen loss because he wore a mask.
>> Thank vaccines for not expiring from measles, mumps, and suffering from polio.
>
> Vaccines are our greatest invention. Thanks to vaccines almost all the children
> a man and woman have will survive to adulthood. It means the parents can be
> emotionally involved with their children, they can love, with little fear their
> hearts will be ripped out.
>
> It also means a wife can have fewer pregnancies, which reduces her risk of dying
> in childbirth. Her husband can risk loving her.
>
> Vaccines have made families more loving. A great invention.
>
> I was so happy when the COVID vaccine was approved for children. Mothers could
> send their children to school with a decent chance they would come home alive.
>

Shut up, you unrepentant faggot. Children are MORE at risk from the poison
clot shots than they EVER were from COVID itself.

On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 18:46:13 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>So you still haven't told me what rights Trump is going to take from
>you.

You've been told repeatedly but you're evidently too stupid to understand.

NP: Loverboy - Working For The Weekend

--
#NEVERtrump

On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 18:07:38 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On 8/24/2024 5:44 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <vadlke$1hv0t$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>
>>> On 8/24/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <vadjua$1hv0t$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <vacuid$1ekq5$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 8/24/2024 8:28 AM, John Smyth wrote:
>>>>>>>> RFK Jr. or Rachel Levine ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Look for yourself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <https://truthsocial.com/@DonaldJTrumpJr/113017489481267734>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll take the one who won't result in kids getting diseases because he
>>>>>>> is anti-vaccine crank.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You really do think in black and white. Old and worn out your remarks
>>>>>> are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Preventing childhood diseases is so worn out.
>>>>
>>>> Try talking sense instead of being condensing.
>>>
>>> Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as measles. He is a
>>> nutjob.
>>
>> So?
>
>WTF is wrong with you? You want kids to get measles?

Only his own kids.

And mumps and smallpox and, if they survive those, a dose of diptheria to take
the edge off the polio.

NP: Loverboy - Turn Me Loose

--
#NEVERtrump

On 25 Aug 2024 00:53:04 GMT, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com>
wrote:

>The progressives love to pull the science card, like the racist card, except when it doesn't back
>their points.

Conservatives don't pull the science card at all because they still think they
can prevent and cure disease through wanting it hard enough.

Wish in one hand, shit in the other.

Donald Trump "is about me, myself and I." -- Bill Clinton

--
#NEVERtrump

On 25/08/2024 11:11, Governor Swill wrote:
> On 25 Aug 2024 00:53:04 GMT, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The progressives love to pull the science card, like the racist card, except when it doesn't back
>> their points.
>
> Conservatives don't pull the science card at all because they still think they
> can prevent and cure disease through wanting it hard enough.
>
> Wish in one hand, shit in the other.
>
> Donald Trump "is about me, myself and I." -- Bill Clinton
>
> --
> #NEVERtrump

God is on Trump's side!

Josh Rosenbluth wrote:

>>>>>>> Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as measles. He is a
>>>>>>> nutjob.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So?
>>>>>
>>>>> WTF is wrong with you? You want kids to get measles?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we should stop the flooding the border with just anyone that have
>>>> diseases we got rid of long ago. Start at the source.
>>>
>>> Red Herring. Say no to RFK, Jr.
>>
>> Huh?
>
>What part of "Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as
>measles. He is a nutjob" did you not understand?

You can't tell that "Skeeter" is a shameless idiot?

--
"First you accuse me of pulling [the covid mortality estimate] out of
my ass." - lying asshole "-hh", lying shamelessly (after me saying:
The total nonsense, clueless "estimate".)

On 2024-08-25, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <66ca8d4a$0$1895499$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 24, 2024 at 6:34:23 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66ca8a21$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>> > In article <luvkcj9ulce01dkd7do02g3mofigih6kl4@4ax.com>,
>> > joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> In article <2imkcj9587huflbhgp2c88lfo74c9jg6jp@4ax.com>,
>> >>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> >>>> Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >>>>>> In article <vadjua$1hv0t$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>> >>>>>>> On 8/24/2024 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> In article <vacuid$1ekq5$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I'll take the one who won't result in kids getting diseases because he
>> >>>>>>>>> is anti-vaccine crank.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> You really do think in black and white. Old and worn out your remarks
>> >>>>>>>> are.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Preventing childhood diseases is so worn out.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Try talking sense instead of being condensing.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as measles. He is a
>> >>>>> nutjob.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Kennedy isn't a credible candidate and his endorsement of DJT is not
>> >>>> going to bring some great movement, to that. We will make Trump
>> >>>> defeated again by voting and exposing the democratic power, that the
>> >>>> people control.
>> >>>
>> >>> RFK told your side to go fuck itself..
>> >>>
>> >>> So you still haven't told me what rights Trump is going to take from
>> >>> you.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> He isn't the only person I'm concerned with, on that.
>> >
>> > Bot you seem to avoid tell me what rights he's going to take from you.
>> > You made the claim.
>>
>> To address your request for specifics on what rights were perceived to be at
>> risk under former President Trump's administration, it is important to refer
>> to actual events and policies that were seen by many as attempts to limit
>> certain rights. Here are some examples:
>>
>> 1. **Freedom of the Press**: Former President Trump repeatedly called the
>> press "the enemy of the people," a phrase that raised concerns about
>> undermining the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of the press. His
>> administration attempted to block certain news organizations from press
>> briefings and revoked press credentials of reporters who asked challenging
>> questions, which many saw as efforts to limit press freedom.
>>
>> 2. **Freedom of Speech**: There were concerns about Trump's rhetoric and
>> actions potentially chilling free speech. For example, his administration
>> proposed changing libel laws to make it easier to sue journalists for
>> unfavorable coverage, which could discourage media outlets from reporting
>> critically on the government.
>>
>> 3. **Right to Peaceful Assembly**: During the protests following George
>> Floyd's death in 2020, there were several instances where peaceful protesters
>> were met with force by law enforcement. The clearing of Lafayette Square in
>> Washington, D.C., for a photo opportunity was widely criticized as an
>> overreach of power that violated the protesters' First Amendment rights.
>>
>> 4. **Equal Protection Under the Law**: The Trump administration's travel bans,
>> often referred to as the "Muslim ban," were seen by many as discriminatory
>> against Muslims and in violation of the principle of equal protection under
>> the law as enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment. Multiple courts initially
>> blocked the bans, and they were heavily litigated before a version was upheld
>> by the Supreme Court.
>>
>> 5. **Reproductive Rights**: The Trump administration took several actions that
>> were perceived as attempts to restrict reproductive rights, such as supporting
>> policies that aimed to defund Planned Parenthood and appointing conservative
>> judges, including Supreme Court Justices, who are seen as more likely to
>> overturn or restrict Roe v. Wade. This concerned many about the future of
>> reproductive rights in the U.S.
>>
>> 6. **LGBTQ+ Rights**: The Trump administration rolled back several protections
>> for LGBTQ+ individuals. This included a ban on transgender individuals serving
>> in the military and rolling back protections against discrimination for LGBTQ+
>> people in healthcare settings.
>>
>> 7. **Due Process Rights**: The administration's approach to immigration policy
>> raised concerns about due process rights, particularly with policies like
>> family separation at the border, which often left families without clear legal
>> recourse or due process in a timely manner.
>>
>> These examples reflect specific concerns that various groups and individuals
>> had about potential encroachments on rights under former President Trump's
>> policies and actions. It's essential to understand that these concerns are
>> based on interpretations of how certain policies could affect constitutional
>> rights and how these were perceived by various communities and legal experts
>> at the time.
>
> So you didn't lose any rights. I didn't think so.

It looks like you've broken snit.
He's in repeat-o-matic Rainman mode again.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

On Aug 25, 2024 at 5:15:26 AM MST, "chrisv" wrote
<308mcjttggqp8p857c9qoei8b2nuobgmvd@4ax.com>:

> Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as measles. He is a
>>>>>>>> nutjob.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WTF is wrong with you? You want kids to get measles?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe we should stop the flooding the border with just anyone that have
>>>>> diseases we got rid of long ago. Start at the source.
>>>>
>>>> Red Herring. Say no to RFK, Jr.
>>>
>>> Huh?
>>
>> What part of "Kennedy opposes childhood vaccines for diseases such as
>> measles. He is a nutjob" did you not understand?
>
> You can't tell that "Skeeter" is a shameless idiot?

He absolutely is. Same with Pothead and Carroll.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 25, 2024 at 4:54:36 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<lj0kbsFo1edU1@mid.individual.net>:

> On 25/08/2024 11:11, Governor Swill wrote:
>> On 25 Aug 2024 00:53:04 GMT, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The progressives love to pull the science card, like the racist card, except
>>> when it doesn't back
>>> their points.
>>
>> Conservatives don't pull the science card at all because they still think they
>> can prevent and cure disease through wanting it hard enough.
>>
>> Wish in one hand, shit in the other.
>>
>> Donald Trump "is about me, myself and I." -- Bill Clinton
>>
>> --
>> #NEVERtrump
>
> God is on Trump's side!

Huh? I never thought you believed God was so against what Jesus is said to
have preached in the Bible.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 25, 2024 at 3:06:43 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<9g0mcj1e3o2lg31c8svgc0s4ib3icqmfoc@4ax.com>:

> On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 18:46:13 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So you still haven't told me what rights Trump is going to take from
>> you.
>
> You've been told repeatedly but you're evidently too stupid to understand.

That is the crux of the problem -- Skeeter asks questions but is not equipped
to understand the answer, even when simple. Trump and the SCOTUS took away a
federally protected right. Period. It is not hard to understand but it goes
over his head.
>
> NP: Loverboy - Working For The Weekend
>
> --
> #NEVERtrump

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 25 Aug 2024 15:58:28 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Aug 25, 2024 at 8:57:30?AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
><66cb546a$1$1895502$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
>> In article <66cb40a1$0$2753$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Aug 25, 2024 at 3:06:43 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>> <9g0mcj1e3o2lg31c8svgc0s4ib3icqmfoc@4ax.com>:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 18:46:13 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So you still haven't told me what rights Trump is going to take from
>>>>> you.
>>>>
>>>> You've been told repeatedly but you're evidently too stupid to understand.
>>>
>>> That is the crux of the problem -- Skeeter asks questions but is not equipped
>>> to understand the answer, even when simple. Trump and the SCOTUS took away a
>>> federally protected right. Period. It is not hard to understand but it goes
>>> over his head.
>>>>
>> Nothing was banned. The people decide. As it should be.
>
>How many times will you go out of your way to prove me right? LOL!

Maybe he doesn't realize how stupid this line of posting makes him look.

A Houston woman was fired for taking a personal phone call worked in payroll.
She logged into her computer and printed off 100 copies of the salaries of all
the employees. As she was being escorted out of the building, she turned and
yelled, "I left copies of everybody's salaries stacked by the printer." The
boss, who employed friends and relatives for as much as double what the other
employees were paid, was in a panic as employees began reading out the salaries
and arguing with him and each other about them.

--
#NEVERtrump