Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66c88c10$0$1428338
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <XnsB1D7511C1E673629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:sjbgcjh4fhhovo35f02cm684uhla5foda5@4ax.com:
>>
>> > On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:52:28 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<noemail@aol.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>> >>news:va7o94$g5f1$3@dont-email.me:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> 1. Trump needs to destroy Kamala in the debates which we all know
>> >>> will be biased in favor of Kamala.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You really think Trump won't
>> >>chicken out of yet another debate?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>2. Trump needs to hammer home the mess
>> >>> 3.5 years of Biden/Kamala have made.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You mean the rising stock market,
>> >>the millions of new jobs created, the
>> >>"help wanted" signs everywhere, the
>> >>falling unemployment, the growers and
>> >>construction firm begging illegals NOT
>> >>to leave?
>> >
>> > Turns out the following is true. Since Poppy Bush was inaugurated,
>> > Republican Presidents have added 1 million new jobs, Democrats 50
>> > million. Add to this that all three Republicans ended their terms in
>> > an economic downturn and all three Democrats left behind a boom.
>> >
>> > "I didn't believe this, so I triple checked it. Since the end of
the
>> > Cold War, America has created 51 million new jobs. So, what's the
>> > score? Democrats 50, Republicans 1." - Bill Clinton
>> >
>> > WAPO fact check: "Bureau of Labor Statistics data show that nearly
50
>> > million jobs were created from November 1989 [when the Berlin wall
>> > fell] through July of this year.
>> >
>> > By starting during George H.W. Bush?s term, Clinton skips over
Ronald
>> > Reagan, a Republican who oversaw the creation of 16 million jobs.
>> > Instead, the period covered by his statistic included three
>> > Republicans ? Bush, his son George W. Bush and Trump ? who had poor
>> > jobs records.
>> >
>> > About 1 million jobs were created from November 1989 to the end of
the
>> > first Bush term, 1.4 million under his son, and then a negative 2.7
>> > million under Trump (because of the pandemic). All three Republicans
>> > ended their terms with the country in economic downturns."
>> >
>> > "By contrast, 22.9 million jobs were created under Clinton, 11.6
>> > million under Barack Obama and 15.8 million under President Joe
>> > Biden."
>>
>>
>> And according to Trump every one
>> of those jobs was given to an illegal.
>
> He never said that.

Have 100% of new jobs gone to migrants,
as Trump claimed?
Aug. 16, 2024

Republican presidential nominee
Donald Trump inspired some head
scratching Thursday with one
particular comment � that
"virtually 100% of the net job
creation in the last year has
gone to migrants."

Speaking at a news conference
in New Jersey, the former
president added that the figure
is "actually beyond the number
of 100%."

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/have-100-of-new-jobs-gone-to-migrants-
as-trump-claimed-here-are-the-facts-c324d1b2

In article <66c8bdeb$1$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 23, 2024 at 9:49:28 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c8bd7f$0$1428124$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c8accb$0$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 23, 2024 at 8:33:03 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c8abaf$0$3620715$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c8a5c7$0$3068695$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 23, 2024 at 8:02:28 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c8a485$0$212408$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <66c898fa$1$1895500$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 23, 2024 at 4:53:17 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>> <66c87801$1$5671$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <66c811cf$1$1783$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 9:28:03 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> >>>>>>>> <9r3gcjdan5ntudlv2pc2mh4spdvjhj44b1@4ax.com>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:20:02 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> He also cannot explain how 3 weeks ago Harris was against fracking, against
> >>>>>>>>>> offshore oil drilling,
> >>>>>>>>>> against ICE and so forth and now all of a sudden she flip flops. All within a
> >>>>>>>>>> couple of weeks.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It's called "tacking to center". All US politicians in their primaries run to
> >>>>>>>>> the extreme. Dems hard left, Cons extreme right. But in the GENERAL election,
> >>>>>>>>> they tack back to center and that is usually where they govern from.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This is even assuming the claims are true. My life has been busy and I have
> >>>>>>>> not been closely following things... so maybe it is but I would not trust
> >>>>>>>> Pothead if he told me water was wet.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Of course. You always deny the truth.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yet you have no example of my doing so. Meanwhile you insist Fox did not exist
> >>>>>> when Glenn Beck told a lie about global cooling ON FOX NEWS!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> How could Fox News not exist when he was on Fox news telling the lie?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It didn't. I was very young when that lie was started. No Fox.
> >>>>
> >>>> Glenn Beck, of Fox News, told the lie about Newsweek sharing a story in 1975
> >>>> about a coming ice age and presented it as if this was the mainstream
> >>>> scientific view (2 Sept 2009).
> >>>>
> >>>> There was a story about global cooling, but:
> >>>> -----
> >>>> the article did not state the cause of cooling; it stated that "what causes
> >>>> the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery" and cited the NAS
> >>>> conclusion that "not only are the basic scientific questions largely
> >>>> unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key
> >>>> questions."
> >>>> ----
> >>>> Even if they story had made other claims, this would not suggest it was
> >>>> supported by any scientific consensus. Fox lied.
> >>>>
> >>>> As far as I know that is the origin of the lie. To say Fox did not exist when
> >>>> Beck told that lie ON FOX NEWS is absurd.
> >>>
> >>> Fox didn't exist when the lie came out.
> >>
> >> Who do you think told the lie you parroted before them?
> >
> > Answered many times already. You know you are wrong so you resort to
> > this.
>
> Who do you think told the lie you parroted before them?

I already answered that. You snipped and ran.

In article <baghcjl11g76kpto1448t5glli97aa1ui2@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On 23 Aug 2024 15:07:51 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Glenn Beck, of Fox News, told the lie about Newsweek sharing a story in 1975
> >about a coming ice age and presented it as if this was the mainstream
> >scientific view (2 Sept 2009).
> >
> >There was a story about global cooling, but:
> >-----
> >the article did not state the cause of cooling; it stated that "what causes
> >the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery" and cited the NAS
> >conclusion that "not only are the basic scientific questions largely
> >unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key
> >questions."
> >----
> >Even if they story had made other claims, this would not suggest it was
> >supported by any scientific consensus. Fox lied.
> >
> >As far as I know that is the origin of the lie. To say Fox did not exist when
> >Beck told that lie ON FOX NEWS is absurd.
>
> Global cooling was indeed an issue in the Seventies though briefly and little
> research was being done.

But the hoax was still there and no Fox.
>
> The concept was that sulphur, unburned hydrocarbons and other combustion
> byproducts were rising high in the atmosphere and reflecting sunlight.
>
> Later, as the air became cleaner, the truth of warming began to be discovered.

What a joke.
>
> All the bathrooms on airplanes are gender neutral. So ... that must be why
> Republicans are always shitting their pants when they fly.

This is all the left has.

Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
news:t2hhcjhhh4sl6ebt704j7rcqelh6djcu8o@4ax.com:

> On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:08:06 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
>>news:8qcgcj5cfieo28q09j9e6dakff3nkohiuu@4ax.com:
>>
>>>
>>> "When they said it would take 11 months to reopen the port of
>>> Baltimore, we got it done in 11 weeks." -- Wes Moore, Governor of
>>> Maryland
>>
>>
>> Thanks to union workers.
>>
>
>
> DNC update: Lots of union support at the convention.
>
> Shawn Fain, President UAW: I want to say thank you to Joe Biden for
> making history by walking the picket line with the UAW.
>
> This election comes down to one question: which side are you on? On
> one side we have Kamala Harris and Tim Walz who have stood shoulder to
> shoulder with the working class. On the other side, we have Trump and
> Vance, two lap dogs for the billionaire class who only serve
> themselves.
>
> Kamala Harris is one of us and Donald Trump is a scab. When our
> workers went out on strike against GM for 40 days, Trump did nothing.
> You know who rubbed shoulders with us in the picket line? Kamala
> Harris.
>
> Fain wore a "TRUMP IS A SCAB" tshirt.
>
>
> --
> #NEVERtrump
>

Trump doen't just want his stuff
made by union workers, he doesn't want
his stuff made by AMERICANS.

Trump 2020 banners made in China during
"Made in America" week
July 27, 2018
http://tinyurl.com/y9m3go4d

Donald Trump suits and ties are made in China
March 8, 2016
http://tinyurl.com/jdlk8eu

Donald Trump Once Again Blasted for Having
Products Made in China
August 11, 2020
https://tinyurl.com/3522ynfx

Trump Is Selling New Merchandise Made in China
Nov. 28, 2017
https://tinyurl.com/232mru6f

Donald Trump: I Never Disputed That Some of My
Clothing Line Was Made in Mexico
October 19, 2015
http://tinyurl.com/jkf92lv

Donald Trump's Menswear Line Is Made in Mexico
Aug 24, 2015
http://tinyurl.com/oos7nfo

Donald Trump suits and ties are made in China
March 8, 2016
http://tinyurl.com/jdlk8eu

Donald Trump shirts are made in Bangledesh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYoOPgeTMQc

Trump Inauguration hats made in Vietnam
http://tinyurl.com/gkset93

In article <ppghcj5pq231bfj0gcksu163rniat280ig@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:06:26 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
> >news:sjbgcjh4fhhovo35f02cm684uhla5foda5@4ax.com:
> >
> >> On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:52:28 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> >>>news:va7o94$g5f1$3@dont-email.me:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> 1. Trump needs to destroy Kamala in the debates which we all know
> >>>> will be biased in favor of Kamala.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You really think Trump won't
> >>>chicken out of yet another debate?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>2. Trump needs to hammer home the mess
> >>>> 3.5 years of Biden/Kamala have made.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You mean the rising stock market,
> >>>the millions of new jobs created, the
> >>>"help wanted" signs everywhere, the
> >>>falling unemployment, the growers and
> >>>construction firm begging illegals NOT
> >>>to leave?
> >>
> >> Turns out the following is true. Since Poppy Bush was inaugurated,
> >> Republican Presidents have added 1 million new jobs, Democrats 50
> >> million. Add to this that all three Republicans ended their terms in
> >> an economic downturn and all three Democrats left behind a boom.
> >>
> >> "I didn't believe this, so I triple checked it. Since the end of the
> >> Cold War, America has created 51 million new jobs. So, what's the
> >> score? Democrats 50, Republicans 1." - Bill Clinton
> >>
> >> WAPO fact check: "Bureau of Labor Statistics data show that nearly 50
> >> million jobs were created from November 1989 [when the Berlin wall
> >> fell] through July of this year.
> >>
> >> By starting during George H.W. Bush?s term, Clinton skips over Ronald
> >> Reagan, a Republican who oversaw the creation of 16 million jobs.
> >> Instead, the period covered by his statistic included three
> >> Republicans ? Bush, his son George W. Bush and Trump ? who had poor
> >> jobs records.
> >>
> >> About 1 million jobs were created from November 1989 to the end of the
> >> first Bush term, 1.4 million under his son, and then a negative 2.7
> >> million under Trump (because of the pandemic). All three Republicans
> >> ended their terms with the country in economic downturns."
> >>
> >> "By contrast, 22.9 million jobs were created under Clinton, 11.6
> >> million under Barack Obama and 15.8 million under President Joe
> >> Biden."
> >
> >
> > And according to Trump every one
> >of those jobs was given to an illegal.
> >
> >
>
> Except for the lazy ones that come here for all the freebies.

So most of them then.
>
>
> "So, illegal immigrants are coming here to take all our jobs *and* they're too
> lazy to work.
>
> "Got it."
>
>
> "A Russian soldier captured by Ukraine recorded himself looting an abandoned
> house in the Kursk region."
> <https://x.com/ChrisO_wiki/status/1823003072177553458>

In article <qtghcjhqsb1e0ka313ec4nn14uikbs3f06@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On 23 Aug 2024 14:35:16 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55:19?PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> ><0hcgcj9uh1cq2qhlre7ggm9p95onav4bqg@4ax.com>:
> >
> >> On 22 Aug 2024 18:33:23 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:37:52?AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >>> <4ptecjpsd52lh2d7oid4huic4lb3l0nnpt@4ax.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:16:48?AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>> <66c77277$0$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Why isn't cameltoe talking about hers?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You want to talk to a cameltoe?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Isn't it amazing, how misogynist these lamers are? Even *women*, who
> >>>> are MAGA, will say "he can grab my pussy any time he wants", and crap.
> >>>> What happened to this world?
> >>>
> >>> "It?s actually much better, because everyone who gets the congressional Medal
> >>> of Honor, that?s soldiers, they?re either in very bad shape because they?ve
> >>> been hit so many times by bullets, or they?re dead."
> >>>
> >>> A few years ago that would have been enough to end a presidential bid. Trump
> >>> does such things often. The Republicans do not care... their whole platform
> >>> these days is "PWN THE LIBS"... do things to actively harm others.
> >>
> >> "Do things to actively harm others." That's MAGA in a nutshell.
> >
> >Right. They get off on it.
> >
> >>
> >> Wes Moore, Governor of Maryland: "I joined the Army when I was 17. In fact, I
> >> was too young to sign the paperwork so my mom had to sign the paperwork for me
> >> because I don't have bone spurs."
> >
> >Damn!
>
> It was the best party convention I've ever seen in my life. Lots of excitement
> and enthusiasm. Smiling faces everywhere. They know their enemy is weak but
> can be treacherous.

It was all about free shit and TRump

oh and JOY JOY JOY
>
> "Ukraine Reportedly Digging Trenches in Kursk ? Here For the Long Haul?"
> <https://www.kyivpost.com/post/37252>

On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
>>>>> suit.
>>>>
>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
>>>>
>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
>>>>
>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
>>>
>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
>>
>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
>
> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
> should be.

You watched what?

In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>
> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >
> > of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
> > suit.
>
> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
>
> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
> voting in the majority on both aspects.
>
> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.

ID proof or no vote. As it should be.

In article <66c8accb$0$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 23, 2024 at 8:33:03 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c8abaf$0$3620715$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c8a5c7$0$3068695$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 23, 2024 at 8:02:28 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c8a485$0$212408$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c898fa$1$1895500$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 23, 2024 at 4:53:17 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c87801$1$5671$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <66c811cf$1$1783$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 9:28:03 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> >>>>>> <9r3gcjdan5ntudlv2pc2mh4spdvjhj44b1@4ax.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:20:02 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> He also cannot explain how 3 weeks ago Harris was against fracking, against
> >>>>>>>> offshore oil drilling,
> >>>>>>>> against ICE and so forth and now all of a sudden she flip flops. All within a
> >>>>>>>> couple of weeks.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It's called "tacking to center". All US politicians in their primaries run to
> >>>>>>> the extreme. Dems hard left, Cons extreme right. But in the GENERAL election,
> >>>>>>> they tack back to center and that is usually where they govern from.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is even assuming the claims are true. My life has been busy and I have
> >>>>>> not been closely following things... so maybe it is but I would not trust
> >>>>>> Pothead if he told me water was wet.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> Of course. You always deny the truth.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yet you have no example of my doing so. Meanwhile you insist Fox did not exist
> >>>> when Glenn Beck told a lie about global cooling ON FOX NEWS!
> >>>>
> >>>> How could Fox News not exist when he was on Fox news telling the lie?
> >>>
> >>> It didn't. I was very young when that lie was started. No Fox.
> >>
> >> Glenn Beck, of Fox News, told the lie about Newsweek sharing a story in 1975
> >> about a coming ice age and presented it as if this was the mainstream
> >> scientific view (2 Sept 2009).
> >>
> >> There was a story about global cooling, but:
> >> -----
> >> the article did not state the cause of cooling; it stated that "what causes
> >> the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery" and cited the NAS
> >> conclusion that "not only are the basic scientific questions largely
> >> unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key
> >> questions."
> >> ----
> >> Even if they story had made other claims, this would not suggest it was
> >> supported by any scientific consensus. Fox lied.
> >>
> >> As far as I know that is the origin of the lie. To say Fox did not exist when
> >> Beck told that lie ON FOX NEWS is absurd.
> >
> > Fox didn't exist when the lie came out.
>
> Who do you think told the lie you parroted before them?

Answered many times already. You know you are wrong so you resort to
this.

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vaa8g4$v0om$22@dont-email.me:

>
>
> "Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:gp5gcjl2aid0v6iehgn1ajb452mrnn69it@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:41:48 -0500, "Scout"
>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:66c76a9d$0$1784$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>> In article <o5oecj984n339rsldv12b3tekglth4ddgg@4ax.com>,
>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots
>>>>> >> >> >> >> opened
>>>>> >> >> >> >> it up to
>>>>> >> >> >> >> fraud,
>>>>> >> >> >> >
>>>>> >> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone
>>>>> >> >> >> else's ballot,
>>>>> >> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >> >> >LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> It's not a joke.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent
>>>>> >> voting
>>>>> >> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >How do you know?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing
>>>>> Trump's lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot.
>>>>> It's a sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not
>>>>> that easy to have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>
>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>
>>>Here's an interesting case:
>>>
>>>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/voter-fraud-california-man-finds-doze
>>>ns-of-ballots-stacked-outside-home
>>>
>>>But we're told this is 'unimportant' that evidence of mass fraud
>>>doesn't count according to Joel until someone PROVES it alter the
>>>election.
>>>
>>>Then of course, we have attempts like this, which we're told to
>>>ignore until
>>>AFTER it has been shown to have changed an election.... and be PROVEN
>>>to have done so.
>>>
>>>https://abc13.com/texas-vote-by-mail-fraud-ken-paxton-in-ballot-gregg-
>>>county-commission-arrested/6544331/
>>
>>
>> "Iowa official's wife convicted of 52 counts of voter fraud in
>> ballot-stuffing
>> scheme"
>> <https://apnews.com/article/iowa-ballot-box-stuffing-18432099d65be5e95
>> aa5e5cd83b589e1>
>
> Super, now that we both agree that election fraud DOES take place..
> why shouldn't we do anything about it?

What do you propose doing about it?

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66c8bea5$0$1427989$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> > In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to
>> >>> follow suit.
>> >>
>> >> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
>> >> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged
>> >> in court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the
>> >> law which requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
>> >>
>> >> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to
>> >> remain in effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have
>> >> stopped the entire law from going into effect. Roberts and
>> >> Kavanaugh split the baby, voting in the majority on both aspects.
>> >>
>> >> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
>> >
>> > ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
>>
>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce
>> its law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
>
> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
> should be.
>

What ID did Trump present when HE voted by mail?

In article <vaaihu$10dgt$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>
> On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>
> >> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
> >>>>> suit.
> >>>>
> >>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
> >>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
> >>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
> >>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
> >>>>
> >>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
> >>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
> >>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
> >>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
> >>>>
> >>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
> >>>
> >>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
> >>
> >> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
> >> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
> >
> > They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
> > should be.
>
> You watched what?

The story about what AZ is doing. Please try to keep up.

In article <XnsB1D788A1A9D31629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
> news:vaa8g4$v0om$22@dont-email.me:
>
> >
> >
> > "Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:gp5gcjl2aid0v6iehgn1ajb452mrnn69it@4ax.com...
> >> On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:41:48 -0500, "Scout"
> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:66c76a9d$0$1784$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> >>>> In article <o5oecj984n339rsldv12b3tekglth4ddgg@4ax.com>,
> >>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> >> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots
> >>>>> >> >> >> >> opened
> >>>>> >> >> >> >> it up to
> >>>>> >> >> >> >> fraud,
> >>>>> >> >> >> >
> >>>>> >> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>> >> >> >>
> >>>>> >> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone
> >>>>> >> >> >> else's ballot,
> >>>>> >> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>> >> >> >
> >>>>> >> >> >LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>>> >> >> It's not a joke.
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent
> >>>>> >> voting
> >>>>> >> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >How do you know?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing
> >>>>> Trump's lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot.
> >>>>> It's a sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not
> >>>>> that easy to have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>>
> >>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>>
> >>>Here's an interesting case:
> >>>
> >>>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/voter-fraud-california-man-finds-doze
> >>>ns-of-ballots-stacked-outside-home
> >>>
> >>>But we're told this is 'unimportant' that evidence of mass fraud
> >>>doesn't count according to Joel until someone PROVES it alter the
> >>>election.
> >>>
> >>>Then of course, we have attempts like this, which we're told to
> >>>ignore until
> >>>AFTER it has been shown to have changed an election.... and be PROVEN
> >>>to have done so.
> >>>
> >>>https://abc13.com/texas-vote-by-mail-fraud-ken-paxton-in-ballot-gregg-
> >>>county-commission-arrested/6544331/
> >>
> >>
> >> "Iowa official's wife convicted of 52 counts of voter fraud in
> >> ballot-stuffing
> >> scheme"
> >> <https://apnews.com/article/iowa-ballot-box-stuffing-18432099d65be5e95
> >> aa5e5cd83b589e1>
> >
> > Super, now that we both agree that election fraud DOES take place..
> > why shouldn't we do anything about it?
>
>
> What do you propose doing about it?

Do you ever have any original thoughts?

In article <XnsB1D788DF3C15B629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> news:66c8bea5$0$1427989$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
> > In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>
> >> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >> > In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to
> >> >>> follow suit.
> >> >>
> >> >> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
> >> >> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged
> >> >> in court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the
> >> >> law which requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
> >> >>
> >> >> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to
> >> >> remain in effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have
> >> >> stopped the entire law from going into effect. Roberts and
> >> >> Kavanaugh split the baby, voting in the majority on both aspects.
> >> >>
> >> >> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
> >> >
> >> > ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
> >>
> >> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce
> >> its law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
> >
> > They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
> > should be.
> >
>
> What ID did Trump present when HE voted by mail?

Whoosh!

On 8/23/2024 12:41 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vaaihu$10dgt$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
>>>>>>> suit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
>>>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
>>>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
>>>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
>>>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
>>>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
>>>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
>>>>>
>>>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
>>>>
>>>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
>>>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
>>>
>>> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
>>> should be.
>>
>> You watched what?
>
> The story about what AZ is doing. Please try to keep up.

You did not watch Arizona requiring people to prove citizenship before
they vote.

In article <XnsB1D77FEC479C5629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:t2hhcjhhh4sl6ebt704j7rcqelh6djcu8o@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:08:06 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>news:8qcgcj5cfieo28q09j9e6dakff3nkohiuu@4ax.com:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> "When they said it would take 11 months to reopen the port of
> >>> Baltimore, we got it done in 11 weeks." -- Wes Moore, Governor of
> >>> Maryland
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks to union workers.
> >>
> >
> >
> > DNC update: Lots of union support at the convention.
> >
> > Shawn Fain, President UAW: I want to say thank you to Joe Biden for
> > making history by walking the picket line with the UAW.
> >
> > This election comes down to one question: which side are you on? On
> > one side we have Kamala Harris and Tim Walz who have stood shoulder to
> > shoulder with the working class. On the other side, we have Trump and
> > Vance, two lap dogs for the billionaire class who only serve
> > themselves.
> >
> > Kamala Harris is one of us and Donald Trump is a scab. When our
> > workers went out on strike against GM for 40 days, Trump did nothing.
> > You know who rubbed shoulders with us in the picket line? Kamala
> > Harris.
> >
> > Fain wore a "TRUMP IS A SCAB" tshirt.
> >
> >
> > --
> > #NEVERtrump
> >
>
>
> Trump doen't just want his stuff
> made by union workers, he doesn't want
> his stuff made by AMERICANS.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Trump 2020 banners made in China during
> "Made in America" week
> July 27, 2018
> http://tinyurl.com/y9m3go4d
>
>
> Donald Trump suits and ties are made in China
> March 8, 2016
> http://tinyurl.com/jdlk8eu
>
>
>
> Donald Trump Once Again Blasted for Having
> Products Made in China
> August 11, 2020
> https://tinyurl.com/3522ynfx
>
>
>
> Trump Is Selling New Merchandise Made in China
> Nov. 28, 2017
> https://tinyurl.com/232mru6f
>
>
>
> Donald Trump: I Never Disputed That Some of My
> Clothing Line Was Made in Mexico
> October 19, 2015
> http://tinyurl.com/jkf92lv
>
>
>
> Donald Trump's Menswear Line Is Made in Mexico
> Aug 24, 2015
> http://tinyurl.com/oos7nfo
>
>
>
> Donald Trump suits and ties are made in China
> March 8, 2016
> http://tinyurl.com/jdlk8eu
>
>
> Donald Trump shirts are made in Bangledesh
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYoOPgeTMQc
>
>
> Trump Inauguration hats made in Vietnam
> http://tinyurl.com/gkset93

You don't have much of a life do you?

In article <vaaphi$1184b$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>
> On 8/23/2024 12:41 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vaaihu$10dgt$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>
> >> On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
> >>>>>>> suit.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
> >>>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
> >>>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
> >>>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
> >>>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
> >>>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
> >>>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
> >>>>
> >>>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
> >>>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
> >>>
> >>> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
> >>> should be.
> >>
> >> You watched what?
> >
> > The story about what AZ is doing. Please try to keep up.
>
> You did not watch Arizona requiring people to prove citizenship before
> they vote.

It was on the news this morning.

On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:12:30 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<0lghcjt2nicj8tlbti4762s2ffngv3ufg5@4ax.com>:

> On 23 Aug 2024 04:36:50 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 9:23:48?PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>> <3l3gcj1mb07s3dqmdtc1r524n5okdlbknm@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> On 22 Aug 2024 17:06:47 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> --
>>> #NEVERtrump
>>
>> I sometimes wonder if they know what they reveal with their comments.
>
> I don't think so. One of the reasons they dislike giving cites is because so
> often their cites prove them wrong. So, rather than actually read cites and
> use
> those which best suit their position, the whine and babble that they're right
> and don't need any proof.

Right. And then demand others prove THEIR points, even when the other does not
agree. Or make points and falsely attribute them to their victims and demand
they back THAT point.
>
> "As Ukrainian forces advance in the Kursk region, law and order in frontline
> Russian-held areas is reported to have collapsed completely. "Rampant looting"
> is said have broken out – being done by the Russians themselves – while local
> residents say they feel abandoned."
> <https://x.com/ChrisO_wiki/status/1822953065940406661>
>
>
> --
> #NEVERtrump

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:16:55 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<qtghcjhqsb1e0ka313ec4nn14uikbs3f06@4ax.com>:

> On 23 Aug 2024 14:35:16 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55:19?PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>> <0hcgcj9uh1cq2qhlre7ggm9p95onav4bqg@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> On 22 Aug 2024 18:33:23 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:37:52?AM MST, "Joel" wrote
>>>> <4ptecjpsd52lh2d7oid4huic4lb3l0nnpt@4ax.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:16:48?AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <66c77277$0$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why isn't cameltoe talking about hers?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You want to talk to a cameltoe?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't it amazing, how misogynist these lamers are? Even *women*, who
>>>>> are MAGA, will say "he can grab my pussy any time he wants", and crap.
>>>>> What happened to this world?
>>>>
>>>> "It?s actually much better, because everyone who gets the congressional Medal
>>>> of Honor, that?s soldiers, they?re either in very bad shape because they?ve
>>>> been hit so many times by bullets, or they?re dead."
>>>>
>>>> A few years ago that would have been enough to end a presidential bid. Trump
>>>> does such things often. The Republicans do not care... their whole platform
>>>> these days is "PWN THE LIBS"... do things to actively harm others.
>>>
>>> "Do things to actively harm others." That's MAGA in a nutshell.
>>
>> Right. They get off on it.
>>
>>>
>>> Wes Moore, Governor of Maryland: "I joined the Army when I was 17. In fact, I
>>> was too young to sign the paperwork so my mom had to sign the paperwork for me
>>> because I don't have bone spurs."
>>
>> Damn!
>
> It was the best party convention I've ever seen in my life. Lots of excitement
> and enthusiasm. Smiling faces everywhere. They know their enemy is weak but
> can be treacherous.

I wish I had more time to be watching.
>
> "Ukraine Reportedly Digging Trenches in Kursk – Here For the Long Haul?"
> <https://www.kyivpost.com/post/37252>
> --
> #NEVERtrump

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:10:25 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<oighcj1100r6uvsuiqtc5dttuhi4srbksj@4ax.com>:

> On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 14:14:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "Person: Doesn't that blade of grass over there look like it's red?
>> Snit: Define red.
>> Person: Red, you know, like a fire engine.
>> Snit: Fire engines where I live are yellow.
>> Person: Ok, red like blood.
>> Snit: Blood isn't really red.
>> Person: Sigh, ok, red like a red rose.
>> Snit: What kind of rose?
>> Person: I don't know, a fucking red rose.
>> Snit: Why are you getting vulgar with me?
>> Person: Because you are an idiot.
>> Snit: You attack me because you have nothing to say.
>> Person: I've been trying to say something to you for two days now.
>> You don't listen.
>> Snit: Define something.
>> Person: Are you some kind of asshole?
>> Snit: Why are you attacking me.
>> Person: I'm tired of playing your idiotic game.
>> Snit: You ran away. I won.
>> Person: dead silence.
>
> Snit really *is* giving you a boner, isn't he?

Those who troll can't stand that they cannot quote me doing as they accuse and
I refuse to sink to their level.
>
> "Old Habits Die Hard – Russian Troops Loot Abandoned Villages in Kursk"
> <https://www.kyivpost.com/post/37323>
>
>
> --
> #NEVERtrump

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:07:43 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<baghcjl11g76kpto1448t5glli97aa1ui2@4ax.com>:

> On 23 Aug 2024 15:07:51 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Glenn Beck, of Fox News, told the lie about Newsweek sharing a story in 1975
>> about a coming ice age and presented it as if this was the mainstream
>> scientific view (2 Sept 2009).
>>
>> There was a story about global cooling, but:
>> -----
>> the article did not state the cause of cooling; it stated that "what causes
>> the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery" and cited the NAS
>> conclusion that "not only are the basic scientific questions largely
>> unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key
>> questions."
>> ----
>> Even if they story had made other claims, this would not suggest it was
>> supported by any scientific consensus. Fox lied.
>>
>> As far as I know that is the origin of the lie. To say Fox did not exist when
>> Beck told that lie ON FOX NEWS is absurd.
>
> Global cooling was indeed an issue in the Seventies though briefly and little
> research was being done.

It was part of the research but never the mainstream concern. We knew we were
having detrimental impacts but were still investigating the overall system.
>
> The concept was that sulphur, unburned hydrocarbons and other combustion
> byproducts were rising high in the atmosphere and reflecting sunlight.
>
> Later, as the air became cleaner, the truth of warming began to be discovered.

We learned more over time. That is how science SHOULD work. Right. But there
was no consensus on cooling. That was a Fox lie he parroted.
>
> All the bathrooms on airplanes are gender neutral. So ... that must be why
> Republicans are always shitting their pants when they fly.

LOL! Good point.
>
>
> --
> #NEVERtrump

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <66c8eed5$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:16:55 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> <qtghcjhqsb1e0ka313ec4nn14uikbs3f06@4ax.com>:
>
> > On 23 Aug 2024 14:35:16 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55:19?PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> >> <0hcgcj9uh1cq2qhlre7ggm9p95onav4bqg@4ax.com>:
> >>
> >>> On 22 Aug 2024 18:33:23 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:37:52?AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >>>> <4ptecjpsd52lh2d7oid4huic4lb3l0nnpt@4ax.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:16:48?AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>> <66c77277$0$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Why isn't cameltoe talking about hers?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You want to talk to a cameltoe?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Isn't it amazing, how misogynist these lamers are? Even *women*, who
> >>>>> are MAGA, will say "he can grab my pussy any time he wants", and crap.
> >>>>> What happened to this world?
> >>>>
> >>>> "It?s actually much better, because everyone who gets the congressional Medal
> >>>> of Honor, that?s soldiers, they?re either in very bad shape because they?ve
> >>>> been hit so many times by bullets, or they?re dead."
> >>>>
> >>>> A few years ago that would have been enough to end a presidential bid. Trump
> >>>> does such things often. The Republicans do not care... their whole platform
> >>>> these days is "PWN THE LIBS"... do things to actively harm others.
> >>>
> >>> "Do things to actively harm others." That's MAGA in a nutshell.
> >>
> >> Right. They get off on it.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Wes Moore, Governor of Maryland: "I joined the Army when I was 17. In fact, I
> >>> was too young to sign the paperwork so my mom had to sign the paperwork for me
> >>> because I don't have bone spurs."
> >>
> >> Damn!
> >
> > It was the best party convention I've ever seen in my life. Lots of excitement
> > and enthusiasm. Smiling faces everywhere. They know their enemy is weak but
> > can be treacherous.
>
> I wish I had more time to be watching.
> >
> > "Ukraine Reportedly Digging Trenches in Kursk ? Here For the Long Haul?"
> > <https://www.kyivpost.com/post/37252>
> > --
> > #NEVERtrump

JOY JOY JOY

TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP

In article <66c8ee9a$0$1429089$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:12:30 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> <0lghcjt2nicj8tlbti4762s2ffngv3ufg5@4ax.com>:
>
> > On 23 Aug 2024 04:36:50 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 9:23:48?PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> >> <3l3gcj1mb07s3dqmdtc1r524n5okdlbknm@4ax.com>:
> >>
> >>> On 22 Aug 2024 17:06:47 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> <snip>
> >>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> #NEVERtrump
> >>
> >> I sometimes wonder if they know what they reveal with their comments.
> >
> > I don't think so. One of the reasons they dislike giving cites is because so
> > often their cites prove them wrong. So, rather than actually read cites and
> > use
> > those which best suit their position, the whine and babble that they're right
> > and don't need any proof.
>
> Right. And then demand others prove THEIR points, even when the other does not
> agree. Or make points and falsely attribute them to their victims and demand
> they back THAT point.
> >
"victims"

LOL You poor thing.

In article <66c8ef23$0$1428140$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:07:43 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> <baghcjl11g76kpto1448t5glli97aa1ui2@4ax.com>:
>
> > On 23 Aug 2024 15:07:51 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Glenn Beck, of Fox News, told the lie about Newsweek sharing a story in 1975
> >> about a coming ice age and presented it as if this was the mainstream
> >> scientific view (2 Sept 2009).
> >>
> >> There was a story about global cooling, but:
> >> -----
> >> the article did not state the cause of cooling; it stated that "what causes
> >> the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery" and cited the NAS
> >> conclusion that "not only are the basic scientific questions largely
> >> unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key
> >> questions."
> >> ----
> >> Even if they story had made other claims, this would not suggest it was
> >> supported by any scientific consensus. Fox lied.
> >>
> >> As far as I know that is the origin of the lie. To say Fox did not exist when
> >> Beck told that lie ON FOX NEWS is absurd.
> >
> > Global cooling was indeed an issue in the Seventies though briefly and little
> > research was being done.
>
> It was part of the research but never the mainstream concern. We knew we were
> having detrimental impacts but were still investigating the overall system.
> >
> > The concept was that sulphur, unburned hydrocarbons and other combustion
> > byproducts were rising high in the atmosphere and reflecting sunlight.
> >
> > Later, as the air became cleaner, the truth of warming began to be discovered.
>
> We learned more over time. That is how science SHOULD work. Right. But there
> was no consensus on cooling. That was a Fox lie he parroted.

Fox wasn't around when that lie was told. Why are you ignoring the Ozone
hoax? I am right and that bothers you.
> >
> > All the bathrooms on airplanes are gender neutral. So ... that must be why
> > Republicans are always shitting their pants when they fly.
>
> LOL! Good point.
> >
> >
> > --
> > #NEVERtrump

On 8/23/2024 1:17 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vaaphi$1184b$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 8/23/2024 12:41 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vaaihu$10dgt$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
>>>>>>>>> suit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
>>>>>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
>>>>>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
>>>>>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
>>>>>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
>>>>>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
>>>>>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
>>>>>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
>>>>> should be.
>>>>
>>>> You watched what?
>>>
>>> The story about what AZ is doing. Please try to keep up.
>>
>> You did not watch Arizona requiring people to prove citizenship before
>> they vote.
>
> It was on the news this morning.

You did not watch closely. Repeating, Arizona can require proof of
citizenship when you *REGISTER* to vote. They may not require proof of
citizenship when you *ACTUALLY* vote.