In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
>
> > Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
> >>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
> >>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
> >>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
> >>>>> have guns, even violent people.
> >>>>
> >>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
> >>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
> >>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
> >>>
> >>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
> >>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
> >>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
> >>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
> >>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
> >>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
> >>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
> >>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
> >>
> >> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
> >> The
> >> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
> >
> >
> > You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
> > that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
> > regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
> > judgment, at least initially.
>
> "A well regulated militia".

Meaning the people.

In article <4ptecjpsd52lh2d7oid4huic4lb3l0nnpt@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:16:48?AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> ><66c77277$0$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >
> >> Why isn't cameltoe talking about hers?
> >
> >You want to talk to a cameltoe?
>
>
> Isn't it amazing, how misogynist these lamers are? Even *women*, who
> are MAGA, will say "he can grab my pussy any time he wants", and crap.
> What happened to this world?

Drag queens in the schools, men in womens sports, easy on crime
policies, etc...

In article <66c78473$0$4027808$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:37:52 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> <4ptecjpsd52lh2d7oid4huic4lb3l0nnpt@4ax.com>:
>
> > Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:16:48?AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c77277$0$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> Why isn't cameltoe talking about hers?
> >>
> >> You want to talk to a cameltoe?
> >
> >
> > Isn't it amazing, how misogynist these lamers are? Even *women*, who
> > are MAGA, will say "he can grab my pussy any time he wants", and crap.
> > What happened to this world?
>
> "It?s actually much better, because everyone who gets the congressional Medal
> of Honor, that?s soldiers, they?re either in very bad shape because they?ve
> been hit so many times by bullets, or they?re dead."
>
> A few years ago that would have been enough to end a presidential bid. Trump
> does such things often. The Republicans do not care... their whole platform
> these days is "PWN THE LIBS"... do things to actively harm others.

Walz lied. Fake valor.

Alan Bond wrote:
> He does these

Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A Terrell and
a dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400

Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

In article <404fcj5ii7qpfot9103qb61qhg5hrtkpcj@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >"It?s actually much better, because everyone who gets the congressional Medal
> >of Honor, that?s soldiers, they?re either in very bad shape because they?ve
> >been hit so many times by bullets, or they?re dead."
> >
> >A few years ago that would have been enough to end a presidential bid. Trump
> >does such things often. The Republicans do not care... their whole platform
> >these days is "PWN THE LIBS"... do things to actively harm others.
>
>
> The rules don't exist, for him, and yet he's proclaiming to be the
> candidate of law and order, while running against a prosecuting
> attorney, as a felon. Just wow.

Being an attorney doesn't mean they are honest.

Fani Willis comes to mind.

In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
> >>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> How do you know?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Very easy.
> >>>>
> >>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >>>
> >>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
> >>
> >> Cite someone who said that.
> >
> > As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
>
> All?
>
> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
> was coming back to bite him.

You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
rights. Tell us how you know that.

In article <XnsB1D68A1CD2A5F629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> news:va7hji$f7q9$1@dont-email.me:
>
> > On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> In article <kjgecjlcm4imt9o11lpd8vpl5n4svf8spv@4ax.com>,
> >> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>
> >>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:03:42 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >>Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>So you are against the police and law and order?
> >>> >>
> >>> >>No, and neither is Harris and Walz, Trump doesn't get to claim
> >>> >>ownership of that while *he* is the one having multiple felony
> >>> >>cases against him.
> >>> >
> >>> >Harris, as a prosecutor, took on everybody from transnational gangs
> >>> >to the big banks.
> >>> >
> >>> >Trump is scared shitless of her.
> >>> >
> >>> >Several Republicans spoke at the DNC.
> >>> >Jeff Duncan, former Georgia Lieutenant Governor "I am a
> >>> >Republican, but today I stand here as an American." "We had armed
> >>> >officers outside our house protecting us from OTHER REPUBLICANS."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> And people can't see what's before their very eyes, yes, they keep
> >>> defending Trump.
> >>
> >> I watched for the last 3 days what's about to come. It's scary.
> >>
> >>
> >> DNC = TRUMP
> >
> > It's frightening.
> > And notice how the demons attack Trump's character, personality, age,
> > etc, Anything but talking about Trump's "failed policies". That's
> > because they can't.
>
>
>
> How did Trump's "and Mexico will pay for it"
> policy work out?
>
>
> How did Trump's "I will eliminate the entire
> national debt" work out?
>
>
> How did Trump's "I will only appoint the best
> and the brightest" work out?

Maybe if the left didn't stand in his way the whole time.

In article <XnsB1D68BC64B1E6629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> news:va7o94$g5f1$3@dont-email.me:
>
>
> > 1. Trump needs to destroy Kamala in the debates which we all know will
> > be biased in favor of Kamala.
>
>
> You really think Trump won't
> chicken out of yet another debate?
>
>
>
> 2. Trump needs to hammer home the mess
> > 3.5 years of Biden/Kamala have made.
>
>
> You mean the rising stock market,
> the millions of new jobs created, the
> "help wanted" signs everywhere, the
> falling unemployment, the growers and
> construction firm begging illegals NOT
> to leave?
>
818.000 jobs that didn't exist. They lied.
>
>
> Republicans Urge Immigrants to Stay in Florida
> Jun 05, 2023
>
> https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-urge-immigrants-stay-florida-fearing-
> new-laws-impact-1804640
>
>
>
>
>
> Florida GOP lawmaker says the anti-
> immigration law he backed is causing
> a 'major problem' as migrant families
> are leaving the state
> Jun 6, 2023
>
> https://www.businessinsider.com/florida-gop-lawmaker-urges-immigrants-stay-
> voted-anti-immigration-bill-2023-6

On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <66c77117$0$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:18 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>> <va7r6a$gin0$2@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>> > On 2024-08-22, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>> What scares me are the idiots who believe in them.
>> >>
>> >> Indeed. The media is very powerful and when 84% or more of their
>> >> coverage of Harris is positive
>> >
>> > ... and 89% of the negative coverage goes in the tRUMP column so...
>>
>> Are you suggesting that the news should protect him and NOT cover his insanely
>> over the top horrible behavior, behavior that is far worse than anyone on the
>> other "team" (as you put it)?
>
> Whenever bad news about your side comes out it get swept under the rug.

1. Hunter laptop.
2. Russian collusion.
3. Biden being a cognitive train wreck.
4. Walz lying.
5. Kamala not having any policies listed on her website.
6. Kamala not having press conferences, unscripted ones.
7. Kamala flip flopping on fracking, war on fossil fuels, war on ICE etc.
8. The border disaster.
9. The soaring crime they try to hide by spinning numbers.
10 Her tax policy, especially unrealized gains being taxed.

All pretty much missing from the left wing MSM.
Oh but they are going to tax the hell out of corporations.
Gasser will love that one as he hates success and doesn't pay any income taxes.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <66c76a8d$0$4027808$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 8:31:04 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c759b9$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>> > In article <66c74a1b$0$5642$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 2:28:48 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >> <66c704d1$0$2873017$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >>
>> >>> In article <66c69fdc$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 6:10:45 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >>>> <66c6900e$0$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> In article <66c68703$1$3620703$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 4:21:23 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >>>>>> <66c6766b$0$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> In article <66c66885$0$3620717$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 3:04:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >>>>>>>> <66c66465$0$1895509$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> In article <aaiccjt4ugtqv8uurlbq6sld1bbsn6afe8@4ax.com>,
>> >>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who among us said a crazy person should have a gun?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's about ones who already *do* have gun(s), whether they should have
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "due process" while they shoot someone.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Take them away.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So you agree with Trump, and not Klaus, good, I'm with you.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> No American agrees there should be no due process.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> It's one thing if they appeal and show they aren't violent, and get
>> >>>>>>>>>> their guns back, but if there's a reasonable suspicion of violent
>> >>>>>>>>>> intent, with a gun owner, law enforcement shouldn't be burdened with
>> >>>>>>>>>> "due process", while the guns are still there to be shot at someone.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Only if he/she is a threat. I don't like the red light law because your
>> >>>>>>>>> neighbor can decide he doesn't like you and make a call.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> You fear you will come across as not stable enough. Understandable in your
>> >>>>>>>> case.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Well you can't refute so I guess I win this right?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I agree you might not come across as stable enough.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> You can't refute it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I do not refute the fact you might not come across as stable enough to own a
>> >>>> weapon. We have reached agreement.
>> >>
>> >> You ignored this and tried to push conflict.
>>
>> Oops you did it again.
>
> Do you always respond to yourself?

He does.
Especially when snit mixes up a bad batch of jenkem.
He really goes off the rails when that happens.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

In article <va89ih$inr6$7@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.com says...
>
> On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> > In article <66c76a8d$0$4027808$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 8:31:04 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c759b9$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >> > In article <66c74a1b$0$5642$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 2:28:48 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> >> <66c704d1$0$2873017$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >> >>
> >> >>> In article <66c69fdc$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 6:10:45 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> >>>> <66c6900e$0$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> In article <66c68703$1$3620703$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 4:21:23 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> >>>>>> <66c6766b$0$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> In article <66c66885$0$3620717$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 3:04:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> >>>>>>>> <66c66465$0$1895509$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> In article <aaiccjt4ugtqv8uurlbq6sld1bbsn6afe8@4ax.com>,
> >> >>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who among us said a crazy person should have a gun?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's about ones who already *do* have gun(s), whether they should have
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "due process" while they shoot someone.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Take them away.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> So you agree with Trump, and not Klaus, good, I'm with you.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> No American agrees there should be no due process.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> It's one thing if they appeal and show they aren't violent, and get
> >> >>>>>>>>>> their guns back, but if there's a reasonable suspicion of violent
> >> >>>>>>>>>> intent, with a gun owner, law enforcement shouldn't be burdened with
> >> >>>>>>>>>> "due process", while the guns are still there to be shot at someone.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Only if he/she is a threat. I don't like the red light law because your
> >> >>>>>>>>> neighbor can decide he doesn't like you and make a call.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> You fear you will come across as not stable enough. Understandable in your
> >> >>>>>>>> case.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Well you can't refute so I guess I win this right?
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I agree you might not come across as stable enough.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> You can't refute it.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I do not refute the fact you might not come across as stable enough to own a
> >> >>>> weapon. We have reached agreement.
> >> >>
> >> >> You ignored this and tried to push conflict.
> >>
> >> Oops you did it again.
> >
> > Do you always respond to yourself?
>
> He does.
> Especially when snit mixes up a bad batch of jenkem.
> He really goes off the rails when that happens.

Had to look it up. That's sick. I bet he's hooked on Kratom too.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Very easy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>>>
>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>>>>
>>>> Cite someone who said that.
>>>
>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
>>
>> All?
>>
>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
>> was coming back to bite him.
>
> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
> rights. Tell us how you know that.

You made that up.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
>> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
>>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
>>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
>>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
>>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
>>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
>>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
>>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
>>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
>>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
>>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
>>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
>>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
>>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
>>>>
>>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
>>>> The
>>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
>>>
>>>
>>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
>>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
>>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
>>> judgment, at least initially.
>>
>> "A well regulated militia".
>
> Meaning the people.

How are the people "well regulated"?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 12:24:14 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
<404fcj5ii7qpfot9103qb61qhg5hrtkpcj@4ax.com>:

> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "It’s actually much better, because everyone who gets the congressional Medal
>> of Honor, that’s soldiers, they’re either in very bad shape because they’ve
>> been hit so many times by bullets, or they’re dead."
>>
>> A few years ago that would have been enough to end a presidential bid. Trump
>> does such things often. The Republicans do not care... their whole platform
>> these days is "PWN THE LIBS"... do things to actively harm others.
>
>
> The rules don't exist, for him, and yet he's proclaiming to be the
> candidate of law and order, while running against a prosecuting
> attorney, as a felon. Just wow.

It is like the writers of the sitcom have gotten lazy.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 11:50:43 AM MST, ""Scout"" wrote
<va81r1$hpqt$12@dont-email.me>:

>
>
> "Snit" <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ballot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent
>>>>>>>>>> voting
>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very easy.
>>>>
>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>
>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>>
>> Cite someone who said that.
>
> Joel
>
>

Message ID?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <66c7c65d$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
> >>
> >>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
> >>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
> >>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
> >>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
> >>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
> >>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
> >>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
> >>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
> >>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
> >>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
> >>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
> >>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
> >>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
> >>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
> >>>>
> >>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
> >>>> The
> >>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
> >>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
> >>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
> >>> judgment, at least initially.
> >>
> >> "A well regulated militia".
> >
> > Meaning the people.
>
> How are the people "well regulated"?

Fuck with us and find out.

In article <66c7c656$1$3620711$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
> >>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Very easy.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cite someone who said that.
> >>>
> >>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
> >>
> >> All?
> >>
> >> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
> >> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
> >> was coming back to bite him.
> >
> > You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
> > rights. Tell us how you know that.
>
> You made that up.

I knew you would run.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:56 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c7c97d$0$2385540$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c7c65d$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
>>>> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
>>>>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
>>>>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
>>>>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
>>>>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
>>>>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
>>>>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
>>>>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
>>>>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
>>>>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
>>>>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
>>>>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
>>>>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
>>>>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
>>>>>> The
>>>>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
>>>>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
>>>>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
>>>>> judgment, at least initially.
>>>>
>>>> "A well regulated militia".
>>>
>>> Meaning the people.
>>
>> How are the people "well regulated"?
>
> Fuck with us and find out.

Good for you to admit that contrary to your many claims I have never "fucked"
with you.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c7c95e$0$2385537$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c7c656$1$3620711$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Very easy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cite someone who said that.
>>>>>
>>>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
>>>>
>>>> All?
>>>>
>>>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
>>>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
>>>> was coming back to bite him.
>>>
>>> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
>>> rights. Tell us how you know that.
>>
>> You made that up.
>
> I knew you would run.

You "know" many things that are not true. It is one of your many challenges.

But let us get back to the topic: you fabricated a story about how if Trump
won we would lose all "those" rights, and then you falsely attributed it to
me. Why?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <66c7ca9c$4$2385533$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:56 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c7c97d$0$2385540$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c7c65d$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >>>> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
> >>>>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
> >>>>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
> >>>>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
> >>>>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
> >>>>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
> >>>>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
> >>>>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
> >>>>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
> >>>>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
> >>>>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
> >>>>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
> >>>>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
> >>>>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
> >>>>>> The
> >>>>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
> >>>>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
> >>>>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
> >>>>> judgment, at least initially.
> >>>>
> >>>> "A well regulated militia".
> >>>
> >>> Meaning the people.
> >>
> >> How are the people "well regulated"?
> >
> > Fuck with us and find out.
>
> Good for you to admit that contrary to your many claims I have never "fucked"
> with you.

Huh?

In article <66c7cadb$1$1895496$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c7c95e$0$2385537$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c7c656$1$3620711$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
> >>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >>>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >>>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Very easy.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cite someone who said that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
> >>>>
> >>>> All?
> >>>>
> >>>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
> >>>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
> >>>> was coming back to bite him.
> >>>
> >>> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
> >>> rights. Tell us how you know that.
> >>
> >> You made that up.
> >
> > I knew you would run.
>
> You "know" many things that are not true. It is one of your many challenges.
>
> But let us get back to the topic: you fabricated a story about how if Trump
> won we would lose all "those" rights, and then you falsely attributed it to
> me. Why?

Hey, I'm trying to be like you.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:40:15 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c7cc61$0$1895504$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c7cadb$1$1895496$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c7c95e$0$2385537$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c7c656$1$3620711$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>>>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Very easy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cite someone who said that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
>>>>>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
>>>>>> was coming back to bite him.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
>>>>> rights. Tell us how you know that.
>>>>
>>>> You made that up.
>>>
>>> I knew you would run.
>>
>> You "know" many things that are not true. It is one of your many challenges.
>>
>> But let us get back to the topic: you fabricated a story about how if Trump
>> won we would lose all "those" rights, and then you falsely attributed it to
>> me. Why?
>
> Hey, I'm trying to be like you.

You are failing.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:39:34 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c7cc38$0$1895503$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c7ca9c$4$2385533$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:56 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c7c97d$0$2385540$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c7c65d$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
>>>>>> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
>>>>>>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
>>>>>>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
>>>>>>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
>>>>>>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
>>>>>>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
>>>>>>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
>>>>>>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
>>>>>>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
>>>>>>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
>>>>>>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
>>>>>>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
>>>>>>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
>>>>>>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
>>>>>>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
>>>>>>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
>>>>>>> judgment, at least initially.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "A well regulated militia".
>>>>>
>>>>> Meaning the people.
>>>>
>>>> How are the people "well regulated"?
>>>
>>> Fuck with us and find out.
>>
>> Good for you to admit that contrary to your many claims I have never "fucked"
>> with you.
>
> Huh?

You admitted I never have...

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <66c7cca3$0$1895508$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:40:15 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c7cc61$0$1895504$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c7cadb$1$1895496$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c7c95e$0$2385537$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c7c656$1$3620711$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
> >>>>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Very easy.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cite someone who said that.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> All?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
> >>>>>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
> >>>>>> was coming back to bite him.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
> >>>>> rights. Tell us how you know that.
> >>>>
> >>>> You made that up.
> >>>
> >>> I knew you would run.
> >>
> >> You "know" many things that are not true. It is one of your many challenges.
> >>
> >> But let us get back to the topic: you fabricated a story about how if Trump
> >> won we would lose all "those" rights, and then you falsely attributed it to
> >> me. Why?
> >
> > Hey, I'm trying to be like you.
>
> You are failing.

I guess I'm just not that stupid.

In article <66c7ccb4$0$1895492$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:39:34 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c7cc38$0$1895503$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c7ca9c$4$2385533$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:56 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c7c97d$0$2385540$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c7c65d$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >>>>>> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
> >>>>>>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
> >>>>>>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
> >>>>>>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
> >>>>>>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
> >>>>>>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
> >>>>>>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
> >>>>>>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
> >>>>>>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
> >>>>>>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
> >>>>>>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
> >>>>>>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
> >>>>>>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
> >>>>>>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
> >>>>>>>> The
> >>>>>>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
> >>>>>>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
> >>>>>>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
> >>>>>>> judgment, at least initially.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "A well regulated militia".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Meaning the people.
> >>>>
> >>>> How are the people "well regulated"?
> >>>
> >>> Fuck with us and find out.
> >>
> >> Good for you to admit that contrary to your many claims I have never "fucked"
> >> with you.
> >
> > Huh?
>
> You admitted I never have...

Huh?