Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:03:42 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>So you are against the police and law and order?
>>
>>No, and neither is Harris and Walz, Trump doesn't get to claim
>>ownership of that while *he* is the one having multiple felony cases
>>against him.
>
>Harris, as a prosecutor, took on everybody from transnational gangs to the big
>banks.
>
>Trump is scared shitless of her.
>
>Several Republicans spoke at the DNC.
>Jeff Duncan, former Georgia Lieutenant Governor "I am a Republican, but today I
>stand here as an American." "We had armed officers outside our house protecting
>us from OTHER REPUBLICANS."

And people can't see what's before their very eyes, yes, they keep
defending Trump.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <pbgecjhp67f2rt2745b6966iffqiml4lhj@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >> fraud,
> >
> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>
>
> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> they verify them as they're processed and counted.

LOL What a fucking joke.

In article <kjgecjlcm4imt9o11lpd8vpl5n4svf8spv@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:03:42 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>So you are against the police and law and order?
> >>
> >>No, and neither is Harris and Walz, Trump doesn't get to claim
> >>ownership of that while *he* is the one having multiple felony cases
> >>against him.
> >
> >Harris, as a prosecutor, took on everybody from transnational gangs to the big
> >banks.
> >
> >Trump is scared shitless of her.
> >
> >Several Republicans spoke at the DNC.
> >Jeff Duncan, former Georgia Lieutenant Governor "I am a Republican, but today I
> >stand here as an American." "We had armed officers outside our house protecting
> >us from OTHER REPUBLICANS."
>
>
> And people can't see what's before their very eyes, yes, they keep
> defending Trump.

I watched for the last 3 days what's about to come. It's scary.

DNC = TRUMP

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:

>>>>>> you expose yourself as an NRA asshole, wanting to protect violent
>>>>>>gun owners. Fuck your guns. Fuck violence. You're an ignorant,
>>>>>>redneck CRACKER.
>>>>>
>>>>>ROFLMAO
>>>>>
>>>>>You forgot ARMED redneck cracker. And you aren't.
>>>>
>>>>I'm not qualified to own a gun, I'm a diagnosed schizophrenic who's
>>>>had a suicide attempt some time ago.
>>>
>>>Too bad. Your failure, I mean.
>>
>>Speaking of "failure",
>
>Yes, we were speaking of you. If you ever need any pointers on how to
>get it right the next time, let me know.

Go fuck yourself, boomer cracker asshole, psychotic gun owner, retard.
You are a mistake of evolution, the self-evidence of white
supremacy-ism's lie. You're the spawn of the devil.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <2ogecjl0pg5pef5vh5i08hc4551e65c7mk@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
> >>find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
> >>boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
> >>who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
> >>have guns, even violent people.
> >
> >No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
> >relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
> >it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
>
>
> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.

But your ilk doesn't like the police.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>In article <rh8dcjdn9u3td6bai4nuiopb90nqipvapt@4ax.com>,
>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> ferris bueller <harris@sucks.4$$> wrote:
>>
>> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>> >> fraud, but that right there shows how he operates and thinks, he says
>> >> things that are stupid and ridiculous *but* that people will believe,
>> >> if he says it. He creates a false narrative, on all kinds of things,
>> >> when it serves his purposes. And dumbshit Skeeter, here, eats it up.
>> >
>> >Illegally extending national elections
>>
>> What does that even mean?
>>
>> > because of a phony chinese
>> >communist flu bug
>>
>> COVID did not come from the Wuhan lab, I dunno what you thought but
>> you were wrong, God created it deliberately because of Trump running
>> for reelection. Figure it out.
>
>Thanks for admitting how stupid you are.

And yet despite all the ASSumptions and speculation, there's not a
shred of hard evidence to link the outbreak of COVID to the lab. Four
years, and counting, later. Maybe you should think about it.

>> > when Trump was ahead - until the other candidate won
>> >had nothing to do with it, right?
>>
>> Just rubbish, no one was "ahead" other than having had more votes
>> being counted *so far*, at a given point, it's just retarded to assert
>> that you would assume the outcome, prior to counting all the votes.
>
>It's been proven.

Says who?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <pugecjhbjgf3ujvi0vllcvnatpum1087a0@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> you expose yourself as an NRA asshole, wanting to protect violent
> >>>>>>gun owners. Fuck your guns. Fuck violence. You're an ignorant,
> >>>>>>redneck CRACKER.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>ROFLMAO
> >>>>>
> >>>>>You forgot ARMED redneck cracker. And you aren't.
> >>>>
> >>>>I'm not qualified to own a gun, I'm a diagnosed schizophrenic who's
> >>>>had a suicide attempt some time ago.
> >>>
> >>>Too bad. Your failure, I mean.
> >>
> >>Speaking of "failure",
> >
> >Yes, we were speaking of you. If you ever need any pointers on how to
> >get it right the next time, let me know.
>
>
> Go fuck yourself, boomer cracker asshole, psychotic gun owner, retard.
> You are a mistake of evolution, the self-evidence of white
> supremacy-ism's lie. You're the spawn of the devil.

I love it when you get all upset. You stomp your feet and your racism
comes out.

In article <17hecj9m078oi1b3fs5nje8ufaqpgse74l@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <rh8dcjdn9u3td6bai4nuiopb90nqipvapt@4ax.com>,
> >joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >> ferris bueller <harris@sucks.4$$> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >> >> fraud, but that right there shows how he operates and thinks, he says
> >> >> things that are stupid and ridiculous *but* that people will believe,
> >> >> if he says it. He creates a false narrative, on all kinds of things,
> >> >> when it serves his purposes. And dumbshit Skeeter, here, eats it up.
> >> >
> >> >Illegally extending national elections
> >>
> >> What does that even mean?
> >>
> >> > because of a phony chinese
> >> >communist flu bug
> >>
> >> COVID did not come from the Wuhan lab, I dunno what you thought but
> >> you were wrong, God created it deliberately because of Trump running
> >> for reelection. Figure it out.
> >
> >Thanks for admitting how stupid you are.
>
>
> And yet despite all the ASSumptions and speculation, there's not a
> shred of hard evidence to link the outbreak of COVID to the lab. Four
> years, and counting, later. Maybe you should think about it.

No need. Where it came from is obvious. Ask liar Fauci.
>
>
> >> > when Trump was ahead - until the other candidate won
> >> >had nothing to do with it, right?
> >>
> >> Just rubbish, no one was "ahead" other than having had more votes
> >> being counted *so far*, at a given point, it's just retarded to assert
> >> that you would assume the outcome, prior to counting all the votes.
> >
> >It's been proven.
>
>
> Says who?

Me.

On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <kjgecjlcm4imt9o11lpd8vpl5n4svf8spv@4ax.com>,
> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>
>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:03:42 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>So you are against the police and law and order?
>> >>
>> >>No, and neither is Harris and Walz, Trump doesn't get to claim
>> >>ownership of that while *he* is the one having multiple felony cases
>> >>against him.
>> >
>> >Harris, as a prosecutor, took on everybody from transnational gangs to the big
>> >banks.
>> >
>> >Trump is scared shitless of her.
>> >
>> >Several Republicans spoke at the DNC.
>> >Jeff Duncan, former Georgia Lieutenant Governor "I am a Republican, but today I
>> >stand here as an American." "We had armed officers outside our house protecting
>> >us from OTHER REPUBLICANS."
>>
>>
>> And people can't see what's before their very eyes, yes, they keep
>> defending Trump.
>
> I watched for the last 3 days what's about to come. It's scary.
>
>
> DNC = TRUMP

It's frightening.
And notice how the demons attack Trump's character, personality, age, etc, Anything but talking
about Trump's "failed policies". That's because they can't.

They dare not bring up the policy discussion because the Biden/Harris policies for the last 4 years
are the main reason why the country is in the dumpster.
Abortion is the only policy they specifically mention. And they manage to lie about that as well.

If it wasn't so scary and boring it would be humerous especially when Buttigieg speaks of
billionaires running the country, getting tax breaks and so forth, only to be followed by the next
guest speaker, billionaire JB Pritzker !!!!!

The jokes keep writing themselves.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

On Aug 22, 2024 at 2:31:29 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c70572$0$2873008$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c6a0ab$0$3620714$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 7:04:58 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
>> <h17dcj518cvrmd0eps0b1p5kkkfbt93e1h@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>>> news:66c6648d$0$1895508$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>> In article <50eccj1fpek2tlb8dmd3t404caoq7ab61n@4ax.com>,
>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your analysis is valid, I believe. Trump has to be able to overcome
>>>>>> the larger base we have, as 2020 showed,
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean the fake ballots?
>>>>
>>>> What fake ballots?
>>>
>>>
>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>> fraud, but that right there shows how he operates and thinks, he says
>>> things that are stupid and ridiculous *but* that people will believe,
>>> if he says it.
>>
>> It is also insane given how much of the military votes by mail.
>
> The military is a very small portion of the vote.

And thus does not matter to Trump?

>>
>>> He creates a false narrative, on all kinds of things,
>>> when it serves his purposes. And dumbshit Skeeter, here, eats it up.
>>
>> As does Carroll. He just repeats what Fox and Trump and the like says and
>> shows no understanding.
>
> What makes you think your sources are telling thee truth?

I think it is extremely unlikely that multiple sources are using the same deep
fakes when they show Trump and NOBODY catches them.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 2:28:48 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c704d1$0$2873017$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c69fdc$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 6:10:45 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c6900e$0$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c68703$1$3620703$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 4:21:23 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c6766b$0$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <66c66885$0$3620717$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 3:04:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <66c66465$0$1895509$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <aaiccjt4ugtqv8uurlbq6sld1bbsn6afe8@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who among us said a crazy person should have a gun?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's about ones who already *do* have gun(s), whether they should have
>>>>>>>>>>>> "due process" while they shoot someone.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Take them away.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you agree with Trump, and not Klaus, good, I'm with you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No American agrees there should be no due process.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's one thing if they appeal and show they aren't violent, and get
>>>>>>>> their guns back, but if there's a reasonable suspicion of violent
>>>>>>>> intent, with a gun owner, law enforcement shouldn't be burdened with
>>>>>>>> "due process", while the guns are still there to be shot at someone.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Only if he/she is a threat. I don't like the red light law because your
>>>>>>> neighbor can decide he doesn't like you and make a call.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You fear you will come across as not stable enough. Understandable in your
>>>>>> case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well you can't refute so I guess I win this right?
>>>>
>>>> I agree you might not come across as stable enough.
>>>
>>> You can't refute it.
>>
>> I do not refute the fact you might not come across as stable enough to own a
>> weapon. We have reached agreement.

You ignored this and tried to push conflict.
>
> You are evading again.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>In article <2ogecjl0pg5pef5vh5i08hc4551e65c7mk@4ax.com>,
>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
>> >>find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
>> >>boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
>> >>who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
>> >>have guns, even violent people.
>> >
>> >No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
>> >relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
>> >it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
>>
>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
>
>But your ilk doesn't like the police.

Says who? I treat the police with respect, I wouldn't want their job,
I appreciate that they do it. There are bad apples, but I think most
are fine people.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>> >> fraud,
>> >
>> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>
>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>
>LOL What a fucking joke.

It's not a joke.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>In article <pugecjhbjgf3ujvi0vllcvnatpum1087a0@4ax.com>,
>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>> you expose yourself as an NRA asshole, wanting to protect violent
>> >>>>>>gun owners. Fuck your guns. Fuck violence. You're an ignorant,
>> >>>>>>redneck CRACKER.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>ROFLMAO
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>You forgot ARMED redneck cracker. And you aren't.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>I'm not qualified to own a gun, I'm a diagnosed schizophrenic who's
>> >>>>had a suicide attempt some time ago.
>> >>>
>> >>>Too bad. Your failure, I mean.
>> >>
>> >>Speaking of "failure",
>> >
>> >Yes, we were speaking of you. If you ever need any pointers on how to
>> >get it right the next time, let me know.
>>
>> Go fuck yourself, boomer cracker asshole, psychotic gun owner, retard.
>> You are a mistake of evolution, the self-evidence of white
>> supremacy-ism's lie. You're the spawn of the devil.
>
>I love it when you get all upset. You stomp your feet and your racism
>comes out.

And yet you have nothing to say about Klaus's abusiveness, because
you're not really interested in consistent critique, merely taking
potshots.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> fraud,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>> >> >> >> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >LOL What a fucking joke.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> It's not a joke.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>> >> >> >> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >How do you know?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>> >> >> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>> >> >> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>> >> >> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>> >> >
>> >> >It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>> >>
>> >> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>> >> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>> >
>> >Very easy.
>>
>> You are the botnet, I guess, just a drone of Trump's.
>
>So you admit I was right.

No, I'm saying that you swallow his imaginary evidence, to beLIEve
that the votes could be fraudulent on that scale.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66c73b0d$2$3620719$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <XnsB1D64F37214F7629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66c70517$0$2873019
>> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>> > In article <h17dcj518cvrmd0eps0b1p5kkkfbt93e1h@4ax.com>,
>> > joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>> >> >Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >news:66c6648d$0$1895508$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>> >> >> In article <50eccj1fpek2tlb8dmd3t404caoq7ab61n@4ax.com>,
>> >> >> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Your analysis is valid, I believe. Trump has to be able to
>> >> >>> overcome the larger base we have, as 2020 showed,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You mean the fake ballots?
>> >> >
>> >> > What fake ballots?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up
>> >> to fraud,
>> >
>> > It does.
>>
>>
>> Prove it.
>>

Well?

>>
>>
>>
>> Trump, While Attacking Mail Voting,
>> Casts Mail Ballot Again
>> August 19, 2020
>>
>> https://tinyurl.com/2trvz2xy
>
> Think about it moron.
>

Trump thinks voting by mail is fraud
AND encourages more mail in voting.

Do explain.

Trump pushes early and mail-in voting
June 4, 2024
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/04/politics/trump-mail-in-early-
voting/index.html

In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
> > joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How do you know?
> >>>>
> >>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>
> >>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>
> >>
> >> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >
> > Very easy.
>
> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.

Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.

Mitchell Holman wrote:
> https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/04/politics/trump-mail-in-early-
> voting/index.html

"The new effort, dubbed “Swamp The Vote USA,” comes as Republican
officials ramp up calls for their voter base to embrace early voting and
vote by mail options ahead of November’s election. The new initiative is
part of “Trump Force 47,” which is sponsored by the Republican National
Committee and is focused on turning out voters in battleground states.

“Republicans must win and we will use every appropriate tool to beat the
Democrats because they are destroying our country. Whether you vote
absentee, by mail, early in-person or on election day, we are going to
protect the vote. We make sure your ballot is secure and your voice is
heard,” Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, said in
a statement Tuesday."

Hoist by your own ballot box, leftard cornholer, LOL!

On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:07:43 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<v8qecj9oprhq880arpsku4a3nmb8ha43cu@4ax.com>:

> On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:22:43 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>> In article <kjgecjlcm4imt9o11lpd8vpl5n4svf8spv@4ax.com>,
>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:03:42 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you are against the police and law and order?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, and neither is Harris and Walz, Trump doesn't get to claim
>>>>>> ownership of that while *he* is the one having multiple felony cases
>>>>>> against him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Harris, as a prosecutor, took on everybody from transnational gangs to the big
>>>>> banks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump is scared shitless of her.
>>>>>
>>>>> Several Republicans spoke at the DNC.
>>>>> Jeff Duncan, former Georgia Lieutenant Governor "I am a Republican, but
>>>>> today I
>>>>> stand here as an American." "We had armed officers outside our house
>>>>> protecting
>>>>> us from OTHER REPUBLICANS."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And people can't see what's before their very eyes, yes, they keep
>>>> defending Trump.
>>>
>>> I watched for the last 3 days what's about to come. It's scary.
>>>
>>>
>>> DNC = TRUMP
>>
>> It's frightening.
>> And notice how the demons attack Trump's character, personality, age, etc,
>> Anything but talking
>> about Trump's "failed policies". That's because they can't.
>
> We do it all the time. Constantly. Here's one:
>
> "The Trump administration imposed nearly $80 billion worth of new taxes on
> Americans by levying tariffs on thousands of products valued at approximately
> $380 billion in 2018 and 2019, amounting to one of the largest tax increases in
> decades."
> "The Biden administration has kept most of the Trump administration tariffs in
> place, and in May 2024, announced tariff hikes on an additional $18 billion of
> Chinese goods, including semiconductors and electric vehicles, for an
> additional
> tax increase of $3.6 billion."
> Tax hikes: Trump 80B - Biden 3.6B

Wow. Excellent info... and startling.

>
>>
>> They dare not bring up the policy discussion because the Biden/Harris
>> policies for the last 4 years
>> are the main reason why the country is in the dumpster.
>> Abortion is the only policy they specifically mention. And they manage to lie
>> about that as well.
>
> Why isn't Trump talking about his policies?
>
> He doesn't dare and he knows it. After spending years bragging about how he
> got
> rid of Roe, now he can't run from it fast enough. He's running from Project
> 2025 too. Says he doesn't know anything about it despite the fact that at
> least
> half the co-authors over at Heritage worked in Trump's administration.

Including his VP pick if I recall correctly. The current VP pick. Not the old
VP his cult literally threatened to kill.

>
>> If it wasn't so scary and boring it would be humerous especially when
>> Buttigieg speaks of
>> billionaires running the country, getting tax breaks and so forth, only to be
>> followed by the next
>> guest speaker, billionaire JB Pritzker !!!!!
>
> Who stated quite clearly his sentiments on the billionaire class getting a
> skate.
>
>> The jokes keep writing themselves.
>
> Be careful what you ask for.
>
> "Obama mocked Trump’s “weird obsession with crowd sizes” and then made a
> measuring gesture with his hands that set the Internet on fire, with many
> interpreting it as a penis size joke."
>
> "“I see what he did there,” Klepper said. “That’s brutal. That’s the second
> time
> this summer the Secret Service has failed to protect Trump from a lethal
> attack.”
>
> Klepper brought in fellow “Daily Show” correspondent Ronny Chieng for a deeper
> analysis of “the dick joke heard ’round the Bean.”"
> <https://www.huffpost.com/entry/daily-show-trump-dick-jokes_n_66c6a8b1e4b0b9c7b3603de1>
>
> "That's the new Democratic strategy. Weird is out, small penises are in."
> "So "weird" is out?"
> "No, sorry. It's both. His penis is both small and weird."
> "That's it? No policy? It's just gonna be immature innuendo from now on?"
> "Ah, yes, dick jokes are a major attack line and they're only going to get
> bigger."
>
> "He was a mentally challenged loudmouth with a bad haircut and a twitter
> account: Forrest Trump"
>
> "If it weren't for money, Donald Trump's mother and two of his wives would be
> illegal immigrants."
>
> "Yesterday I couldn't spell 'precedent'. Today, I are one." (works for Bush
> too)
>
> Trump believes in traditional marriage. He's had three of them!
>
> "I found the place where Donald Trump grows his hair."
> <https://www.pinterest.com/pin/307441112047060917/>
>
> High speed NASA camera captures brain fart.
> <https://www.pinterest.com/pin/307441112048054144/>
>
> In the year 2045: "Grandpa, how did President Trump ever get elected?"
> "Well, we were a bit distracted back then. That's the year adult coloring
> books
> came out."
>
> [Michelle Obama] got a huge laugh when, referring to Trump’s comment that
> illegal immigrants are taking “black jobs”, said: “Who’s going to tell him that
> the job he’s currently seeking might just be one of those black jobs?
>
>
> --
> #NEVERtrump

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:16:48 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c77277$0$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> Why isn't cameltoe talking about hers?

You want to talk to a cameltoe?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Joel wrote:
> It's OK to hate me

I think it may be mandatory.

Chips Loral wrote:
> Joel wrote:
>> It's OK to hate me
>
> I think it may be mandatory.

i thought he was a build it yourself kit

% wrote:
> Chips Loral wrote:
>> Joel wrote:
>>> It's OK to hate me
>>
>> I think it may be mandatory.
>
> i thought he was a build it yourself kit

well light him up then and have at!

In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
> >>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> How do you know?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >>>
> >>> Very easy.
> >>
> >> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >
> > Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>
> Cite someone who said that.

As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.

In article <n2tecj5fbtam8m8ue08hjrsb9fl795hqsu@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >> >> >> >> >> >> fraud,
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >> >> >> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >LOL What a fucking joke.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> It's not a joke.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >> >> >> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >How do you know?
> >> >>
> >> >> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >> >> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >> >> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >> >> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >> >
> >> >It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>
> >> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >
> >Very easy.
>
>
> You are the botnet, I guess, just a drone of Trump's.

So you admit I was right.