In article <qtv74jlht88u568a2l8jhk502sbe2lfb63@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> >On 2024-05-14, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Methinks you [Joel Crump] fuck men.
> >
> >Methinks he lets men fuck him.
> >Yuck.
>
>
> So you're echoing that lamebrain who called me "rumpy-pumpy Crumpy"?

No it didn't sound like that at all. How is your girlfriend with the
dick doing?

On 14 May 2024, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> posted some
news:v20tmk$f3ai$7@dont-email.me:

> On 2024-05-14, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <63l74j9v3s74kbi8b3e6liqtlshndfi4gj@4ax.com>,
>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>> >In article <8nf74j1prcubdoludttffgkr9t53fcb5cc@4ax.com>,
>>> >joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
>
>>> >> tim allen <tim@iheartradio.com> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >You're thinking of obama and his retard voters
>>> >>
>>> >> Oh yeah, those rough years with Obama, heh. Literally nothing
>>> >> bad happened, you just had to see a black face as president.
>>> >> *That* is your beef. The color of his skin, his DNA. Racist
>>> >> prick. Grow up.
>>> >
>>> >You said all that not him. You libs "assume" everything.
>>>
>>>
>>> And yet you can't let him reply to me, himself, isn't it
>>> interesting. Maybe he has some specific problem with what happened
>>> under Obama's watch, that he'll remind me of, and make me look
>>> stupid, but you took it upon yourself to jump in, and act like I
>>> couldn't possibly know what I was talking about. Methinks you're
>>> defensive.
>>
>> Methinks you fuck men.
>
> Methinks he lets men fuck him.
> Yuck.

The smell must be terrible.

In news:tto74j5oq5bq933v60op8d974noiupu14n@4ax.com, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
typed:

> Biden is hardly radical, he's done some token things to recognize the
> progressives, who helped save us from a dictator in 2020, ....

SCOTUS: "You can't transfer student loans to the taxpayers."
POTATUS: "Fuck ya! I'm gonna do it!"

Congress: "Send this aid to Israel."
POTATUS: "Fuck ya! I'm ain't gonna do it!"

Who's the dictator?

"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:

>> Biden is hardly radical, he's done some token things to recognize the
>> progressives, who helped save us from a dictator in 2020, ....
>
>SCOTUS: "You can't transfer student loans to the taxpayers."
>POTATUS: "Fuck ya! I'm gonna do it!"
>
>Congress: "Send this aid to Israel."
>POTATUS: "Fuck ya! I'm ain't gonna do it!"
>
>Who's the dictator?

Your news sources are as great as your NNTP newsreader.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Joel wrote:

> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> > In article <63l74j9v3s74kbi8b3e6liqtlshndfi4gj@4ax.com>,
> > joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> >In article <8nf74j1prcubdoludttffgkr9t53fcb5cc@4ax.com>,
> >> >joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >> >> tim allen <tim@iheartradio.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >You're thinking of obama and his retard voters
> >> >>
> >> >> Oh yeah, those rough years with Obama, heh. Literally nothing
> bad >> >> happened, you just had to see a black face as president.
> That is >> >> your beef. The color of his skin, his DNA. Racist
> prick. Grow up. >> >
> >> >You said all that not him. You libs "assume" everything.
> >>
> >> And yet you can't let him reply to me, himself, isn't it
> interesting. >> Maybe he has some specific problem with what
> happened under Obama's >> watch, that he'll remind me of, and make me
> look stupid, but you took >> it upon yourself to jump in, and act
> like I couldn't possibly know >> what I was talking about. Methinks
> you're defensive.
> >
> > Methinks you fuck men.
>
>
> Is that relevant, to this?

Of course it is.

On 14 May 2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
news:dj284j1eqvjurhdhnqirbd1v2lpnj83dpq@4ax.com:

> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>>> Biden is hardly radical, he's done some token things to recognize the
>>> progressives, who helped save us from a dictator in 2020, ....
>>
>>SCOTUS: "You can't transfer student loans to the taxpayers."
>>POTATUS: "Fuck ya! I'm gonna do it!"
>>
>>Congress: "Send this aid to Israel."
>>POTATUS: "Fuck ya! I'm ain't gonna do it!"
>>
>>Who's the dictator?
>
>
> Your news sources are as great as your NNTP newsreader.

"Stress, confusion and uncertainty as borrowers navigate Biden debt relief
plans"

"A Gen Xer who got $250,000 in student loans forgiven said he can now
finally start saving for retirement � and consider his dream of studying
in India"

What Biden did with student loans is criminal. If he wants to forgive
federally funded student loans, let the overpaid federal union workers
cough up the bucks from their paychecks. Leave mine alone.

pothead wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2024-05-14, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <8nf74j1prcubdoludttffgkr9t53fcb5cc@4ax.com>,
>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> tim allen <tim@iheartradio.com> wrote:
>>> >On 5/14/2024 5:38 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> >> Maximus wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> >>
>>> >>> having mentally ill persons voting is madness
>>> >>
>>> >> 70 million plus of them voted for 45.
>>> >
>>> >You're thinking of obama and his retard voters
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh yeah, those rough years with Obama, heh. Literally nothing bad
>>> happened, you just had to see a black face as president. *That* is
>>> your beef. The color of his skin, his DNA. Racist prick. Grow up.
>>
>> You said all that not him. You libs "assume" everything.
>
> I voted for Obama twice in fact because I felt he was the better candidate at the time.
>
> However, Obama DID do a lot of damage.
>
> <https://www.hoover.org/research/barack-obamas-failed-presidency>

Hoover.org :-D

--
Don't worry. Life's too long.
-- Vincent Sardi, Jr.

Skeeter wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> In article <v20h4k$cafi$2@dont-email.me>, OFeem1987@teleworm.us says...
>>
>> tim allen wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>> > On 5/14/2024 5:38 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> >> Maximus wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> >>
>> >>> having mentally ill persons voting is madness
>> >>
>> >> 70 million plus of them voted for 45.
>> >
>> > You're thinking of obama and his retard voters
>>
>> Nah, I'm thinking of people who think 45 is competent, has a moral compass,
>> and gives a rat's ass about them.
>>
>> Obama did a decent job. Like all prexies, screwed up on some things.
>> An intelligent man.
>>
>> 45 was and is an unmitigated disaster. "Remember President Jimmy Connors?"
>> "Wonderful guy Hannibal Lecter". "Bomb the hurricane with nukes."
>> "Inject bleach." "I am Tariff Man!"
>>
>> LMAO
>
> You are sucking up the out of context bullshit your MSM tells you.

Nah, I can look at facts rather than punditry. Trump's own words.

> Why is he ahead in the polls?

Because polls use a self-selecting sample of people. That's why they predicted
a win for Hillary, a 2020 landslide for Biden, a 2022 red wave, and were wrong
about them all.

My guess is that people who think Trump is Jesus' pick are more excited about
showing their love by giving Trump the nod over a somewhat anodyne Biden..

--
Today is the first day of the rest of the mess.

Skeeter wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> In article <h8l74j5t894ocsfqbogfch10omdjnfkkhc@4ax.com>,
> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Why
>> >is he [Donald J. Trump] ahead in the polls [for the 2024 U.S. presidential election]?
>>
>> The botnet. You haven't figured *that* out, by now?
>
> Yea. But you still think Bidens win was fair and square?

Absolutely. Too much evidence to say anything different.

> Why are tons of
> people showing at his rallies?

Rally crowds do not predict elections.

--
"I wonder", he said to himself, "what's in a book while it's closed. Oh, I
know it's full of letters printed on paper, but all the same, something must
be happening, because as soon as I open it, there's a whole story with people
I don't know yet and all kinds of adventures and battles."
-- Bastian B. Bux

chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> tim allen wrote:
>
>> You're thinking of obama and his retard voters
>
> Obama wasn't a radical leftist. Unlike Brandon.

Biden, a radical leftist?

LMAO

--
You are capable of planning your future.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>>
>> Obama wasn't a radical leftist. Unlike Brandon.
>
>Biden, a radical leftist?

Yes.

>LMAO

Snittish "LMAO" and ":-D" are your favorite "arguments", it seems.

--
"Observation - many people here claim 'choice' but then are
confrontational with everyone who made a different 'choice.'" -
trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", lying shamelessly

chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> Obama wasn't a radical leftist. Unlike Brandon.
>>
>>Biden, a radical leftist?
>
> Yes.
>
>>LMAO
>
> Snittish "LMAO" and ":-D" are your favorite "arguments", it seems.

Tough cookies.

It's funny how, over the years, "liberal" has become as pejorative as "commie"
used to be. And anybody to the left of the right is "a radical leftist".

A small example:

https://theloop.ecpr.eu/the-radical-left-today-is-not-radical-and-why-that-matters/

Some of the most successful radical-left parties of the past decade are not
really radical, argues Vladimir Bortun. These parties do not display the
anti-capitalism that defines the radical left, but rather a socioeconomic
agenda akin to post-WWII social democracy. Labelling this neo-reformist
left 'radical' is deeply problematic, conceptually and politically.

. . .

Terminology matters

It’s about basic conceptual and analytic consistency. If parties are not
radical left – as many scholars acknowledge already – then they should not
be described as such. The fact that most of the literature and mainstream
media continue to do so just shows how far to the right the neoliberal
paradigm has moved the political spectrum.

Of course, one can argue this stuff from many angles.

But my main point was finding that title applied to "Sleepy Joe" to be quite
humorous.

--
You will engage in a profitable business activity.

"Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> wrote:
>Joel wrote:
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Methinks you fuck men.
>>
>> Is that relevant, to this?
>
>Of course it is.

Because you're a dipshit on 2024 Usenet, and still clinging to
homophobia, I suppose.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Tue, 14 May 2024 17:25:03 -0400, Joel wrote:

> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>In article <63l74j9v3s74kbi8b3e6liqtlshndfi4gj@4ax.com>,
>>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>> >In article <8nf74j1prcubdoludttffgkr9t53fcb5cc@4ax.com>,
>>> >joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>> >> tim allen <tim@iheartradio.com> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >You're thinking of obama and his retard voters
>>> >>
>>> >> Oh yeah, those rough years with Obama, heh. Literally nothing bad
>>> >> happened, you just had to see a black face as president. *That* is
>>> >> your beef. The color of his skin, his DNA. Racist prick. Grow
>>> >> up.
>>> >
>>> >You said all that not him. You libs "assume" everything.
>>>
>>> And yet you can't let him reply to me, himself, isn't it interesting.
>>> Maybe he has some specific problem with what happened under Obama's
>>> watch, that he'll remind me of, and make me look stupid, but you took
>>> it upon yourself to jump in, and act like I couldn't possibly know
>>> what I was talking about. Methinks you're defensive.
>>
>>Methinks you fuck men.
>
>
> Is that relevant, to this?

Argumentum ad hominem literally means “argument directed at
the man”; there are two varieties.

The first is the abusive form. If you refuse to accept a
statement, and justify your refusal by criticizing the person
who made the statement, then you are guilty of abusive
argumentum ad hominem. For example:

“You claim that atheists can be moral–yet I happen to know
that you abandoned your wife and children.”

This is a fallacy because the truth of an assertion doesn’t
depend on the virtues of the person asserting it.

https://infidels.org/library/modern/constructing-a-logical-argument/#hominem

--
I am not a lawyer; I am The Ref.

On 5/15/2024 1:30 AM, Joel Lambdin wrote:
> On 14 May 2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
> news:dj284j1eqvjurhdhnqirbd1v2lpnj83dpq@4ax.com:
>
>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Biden is hardly radical, he's done some token things to recognize the
>>>> progressives, who helped save us from a dictator in 2020, ....
>>>
>>> SCOTUS: "You can't transfer student loans to the taxpayers."
>>> POTATUS: "Fuck ya! I'm gonna do it!"
>>>
>>> Congress: "Send this aid to Israel."
>>> POTATUS: "Fuck ya! I'm ain't gonna do it!"
>>>
>>> Who's the dictator?
>>
>>
>> Your news sources are as great as your NNTP newsreader.
>
> "Stress, confusion and uncertainty as borrowers navigate Biden debt relief
> plans"
>
> "A Gen Xer who got $250,000 in student loans forgiven said he can now
> finally start saving for retirement — and consider his dream of studying
> in India"

I read about that earlier. That's ridiculous. A "music" student
running up an education debt that high? Most musicians fall in the
category of starving artists. He couldn't fit something that would make
him a productive member of society in there?

> What Biden did with student loans is criminal. If he wants to forgive
> federally funded student loans, let the overpaid federal union workers
> cough up the bucks from their paychecks. Leave mine alone.

On 5/15/2024 5:28 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> pothead wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2024-05-14, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>> In article <8nf74j1prcubdoludttffgkr9t53fcb5cc@4ax.com>,
>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> tim allen <tim@iheartradio.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 5/14/2024 5:38 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>> Maximus wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> having mentally ill persons voting is madness
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 70 million plus of them voted for 45.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're thinking of obama and his retard voters
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh yeah, those rough years with Obama, heh. Literally nothing bad
>>>> happened, you just had to see a black face as president. *That* is
>>>> your beef. The color of his skin, his DNA. Racist prick. Grow up.
>>>
>>> You said all that not him. You libs "assume" everything.
>>
>> I voted for Obama twice in fact because I felt he was the better candidate at the time.
>>
>> However, Obama DID do a lot of damage.
>>
>> <https://www.hoover.org/research/barack-obamas-failed-presidency>
>
> Hoover.org :-D

Libya.

Also, his flapping positions on immigration started the global migratory
chaos that is still festering today. The Jews probably thought it was
funny as Hell when that stupid woman running Germany kicked working
citizens out of their apartments, giving them to migrant Africans with
zero skills.

In article <v21rq7$36v91$1@news.mixmin.net>,
scumbag@musician.freeloader.com says...
>
> On 14 May 2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
> news:dj284j1eqvjurhdhnqirbd1v2lpnj83dpq@4ax.com:
>
> > "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> Biden is hardly radical, he's done some token things to recognize the
> >>> progressives, who helped save us from a dictator in 2020, ....
> >>
> >>SCOTUS: "You can't transfer student loans to the taxpayers."
> >>POTATUS: "Fuck ya! I'm gonna do it!"
> >>
> >>Congress: "Send this aid to Israel."
> >>POTATUS: "Fuck ya! I'm ain't gonna do it!"
> >>
> >>Who's the dictator?
> >
> >
> > Your news sources are as great as your NNTP newsreader.
>
> "Stress, confusion and uncertainty as borrowers navigate Biden debt relief
> plans"
>
> "A Gen Xer who got $250,000 in student loans forgiven said he can now
> finally start saving for retirement ? and consider his dream of studying
> in India"
>
> What Biden did with student loans is criminal. If he wants to forgive
> federally funded student loans, let the overpaid federal union workers
> cough up the bucks from their paychecks. Leave mine alone.

Make the students work to pay them off. Like a stint in the military.

In article <v22a83$s47i$4@dont-email.me>, OFeem1987@teleworm.us says...
>
> Skeeter wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
> > In article <v20h4k$cafi$2@dont-email.me>, OFeem1987@teleworm.us says...
> >>
> >> tim allen wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >>
> >> > On 5/14/2024 5:38 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> >> >> Maximus wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >> >>
> >> >>> having mentally ill persons voting is madness
> >> >>
> >> >> 70 million plus of them voted for 45.
> >> >
> >> > You're thinking of obama and his retard voters
> >>
> >> Nah, I'm thinking of people who think 45 is competent, has a moral compass,
> >> and gives a rat's ass about them.
> >>
> >> Obama did a decent job. Like all prexies, screwed up on some things.
> >> An intelligent man.
> >>
> >> 45 was and is an unmitigated disaster. "Remember President Jimmy Connors?"
> >> "Wonderful guy Hannibal Lecter". "Bomb the hurricane with nukes."
> >> "Inject bleach." "I am Tariff Man!"
> >>
> >> LMAO
> >
> > You are sucking up the out of context bullshit your MSM tells you.
>
> Nah, I can look at facts rather than punditry. Trump's own words.

He is still taken out of context.
>
> > Why is he ahead in the polls?
>
> Because polls use a self-selecting sample of people. That's why they predicted
> a win for Hillary, a 2020 landslide for Biden, a 2022 red wave, and were wrong
> about them all.
>
Uh Ok.

> My guess is that people who think Trump is Jesus' pick are more excited about
> showing their love by giving Trump the nod over a somewhat anodyne Biden..

Huh?

In article <v22aas$s47i$5@dont-email.me>, OFeem1987@teleworm.us says...
>
> Skeeter wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
> > In article <h8l74j5t894ocsfqbogfch10omdjnfkkhc@4ax.com>,
> > joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Why
> >> >is he [Donald J. Trump] ahead in the polls [for the 2024 U.S. presidential election]?
> >>
> >> The botnet. You haven't figured *that* out, by now?
> >
> > Yea. But you still think Bidens win was fair and square?
>
> Absolutely. Too much evidence to say anything different.

Where?
>
> > Why are tons of
> > people showing at his rallies?
>
> Rally crowds do not predict elections.

Uh huh.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>It's funny how, over the years, "liberal" has become as pejorative as "commie"
>used to be. And anybody to the left of the right is "a radical leftist".

That's actually what leftists do, and they are *far* worse. Brandon
himself has called voting for Republicans "white supremacy"! If you
think that biological males should not be competing against girls,
you're a "hater". Factually true speech is denounced as "violence".

You couldn't make this shit up.

Liberals weren't pro-terrorist. They didn't hate America. They
didn't for mutilating confused children. They weren't for allowing
illegal aliens to pour into our country. I could go on.

chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>It's funny how, over the years, "liberal" has become as pejorative as "commie"
>>used to be. And anybody to the left of the right is "a radical leftist".
>
> That's actually what leftists do, and they are *far* worse. Brandon
> himself has called voting for Republicans "white supremacy"! If you
> think that biological males should not be competing against girls,
> you're a "hater". Factually true speech is denounced as "violence".
>
> You couldn't make this shit up.
>
> Liberals weren't pro-terrorist. They didn't hate America. They
> didn't for mutilating confused children. They weren't for allowing
> illegal aliens to pour into our country. I could go on.

Don't. I've already had a surfeit of wackery.

--
Celebrate Hannibal Day this year. Take an elephant to lunch.

Joel wrote:

> "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Joel wrote:
> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Methinks you fuck men.
> >>
> >> Is that relevant, to this?
> >
> > Of course it is.
>
>
> Because you're a dipshit on 2024 Usenet, and still clinging to
> homophobia, I suppose.

You queers are thoroughly disgusting. How many men's assholes have you
licked out so far this week, Joel?

"Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> wrote:
>Joel wrote:
>> "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Joel wrote:
>> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Methinks you fuck men.
>> >>
>> >> Is that relevant, to this?
>> >
>> > Of course it is.
>>
>> Because you're a dipshit on 2024 Usenet, and still clinging to
>> homophobia, I suppose.
>
>You queers are thoroughly disgusting. How many men's assholes have you
>licked out so far this week, Joel?

This *week*? I have not had sexual relations with any people in a
long time.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Joel wrote:

> "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Joel wrote:
> >> "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Joel wrote:
> >> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Methinks you fuck men.
> >> >>
> >> >> Is that relevant, to this?
> >> >
> >> > Of course it is.
> >>
> >> Because you're a dipshit on 2024 Usenet, and still clinging to
> >> homophobia, I suppose.
> >
> > You queers are thoroughly disgusting. How many men's assholes have
> > you licked out so far this week, Joel?
>
>
> This week? I have not had sexual relations with any people in a
> long time.

Same here, but that's because I'm too old to care about it anymore. Not
enough testosterone production, I s'pose.

"Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> wrote:

>> > You queers are thoroughly disgusting. How many men's assholes have
>> > you licked out so far this week, Joel?
>>
>> This week? I have not had sexual relations with any people in a
>> long time.
>
>Same here, but that's because I'm too old to care about it anymore. Not
>enough testosterone production, I s'pose.

When my GF and I meet, in person, I'll want to, but I'm in no rush for
it.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.