On 2024-08-20, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <poa9cjpqj53q3s88in7l6stv85vuh9qph0@4ax.com>,
> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >In article <3d89cjhvmfgoq3kr51hko3sqoqdors7o6q@4ax.com>,
>> >joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> >> Pierre Delecto <romneysrhinoblaster@delecto.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> It's pretty simple, dude, you are wanting what Trump said to be cool,
>> >> >> as long as it doesn't mean, what it says. You are on both sides of
>> >> >> the thing because you beLIEve anything Trump says.
>> >> >
>> >> >You call Trump a liar, yet believe him when he smakes a crack about
>> >> >being a dictator. Talk about being on both sides of the thing.
>> >>
>> >> False. He's done a lot more than make a crack about it.
>> >
>> >No. He made one statement that you fucks took out of context.
>>
>>
>> This began before that statement.
>
> What statement are you talking about? Did you watch the whole speech
> while it was happening? Or did you watch what MSM wanted you to watch?

Honestly, I fell asleep.
Never made it to Joe's funeral.

--
Charlie Glock
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms"
- Thomas Jefferson 1776

On 2024-08-20, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>>>The constitution doesn't give one the right to commit atrocities,
>>>>>that's what Trump was talking about, someone who is a threat having
>>>>>firearms, you're apparently fine with such.
>>>>
>>>>No it wasn't you stupid fuck.
>>>
>>>You sure are getting your panties in a bunch about this.
>>
>>I know totalitarians such as yourself rejoice when someone says
>>they'll get rid of due process...https://youtu.be/NvrpuBAMddw?si=GMFhxCHidlzCzN2h
>>
>>... until they say they're going to start rounding up you faggots.
>
>
> Are you this retarded, seriously? Dangerous people should have their
> guns taken away, without the need for some "due process" that allows
> them to kill someone. The burden is on gun supporters to show why
> these instruments of violence are like milk and peanut butter, you
> redneck imbecile, drink a fuckin' Pepsi and join consensus reality,
> cracker.
>
Sure.
But who determines who is dangerous?
Remember Biden's DOJ labeled parents speaking up at school board meetings as domestic terrorists.
So?

--
Charlie Glock
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms"
- Thomas Jefferson 1776

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:

>>>>>>The constitution doesn't give one the right to commit atrocities,
>>>>>>that's what Trump was talking about, someone who is a threat having
>>>>>>firearms, you're apparently fine with such.
>>>>>
>>>>>No it wasn't you stupid fuck.
>>>>
>>>>You sure are getting your panties in a bunch about this.
>>>
>>>I know totalitarians such as yourself rejoice when someone says
>>>they'll get rid of due process...
>>>
>>>... until they say they're going to start rounding up you faggots.
>>
>>Are you this retarded, seriously? Dangerous people should have their
>>guns taken away, without the need for some "due process" that allows
>>them to kill someone.
>
>You are the reason we have guns.

So you're a coward, we get it, gun-owning boomer retard.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>The constitution doesn't give one the right to commit atrocities,
>>>>that's what Trump was talking about, someone who is a threat having
>>>>firearms, you're apparently fine with such.
>>>
>>>No it wasn't you stupid fuck.
>>
>>You sure are getting your panties in a bunch about this. Usually
>>you're so cocky and cool, but now that Trump might actually be
>>rational about guns, you turn into an ideological imbecile.
>
>Hilarious!

Thanks.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

>>Are you this retarded, seriously? Dangerous people should have their
>>guns taken away, without the need for some "due process" that allows
>>them to kill someone.
>
>Um, no. There must always be due process. The process needs to be defined by law. It
>can be a 'shortcut' process or a longer one, but law can be made to define what the due
>process is. And, IINM, it's contained in the Red Flag Act.

If the "due process" is merely a cop using his/her judgment, fine. But
they should be empowered to take guns away from unstable people.

>>The burden is on gun supporters to show why
>>these instruments of violence are like milk and peanut butter, you
>>redneck imbecile, drink a fuckin' Pepsi and join consensus reality,
>>cracker.
>
>Yeah, that's how you win friends and influence people.

It's Usenet.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:

>Give Joel a recently cleaned and disassembled gun, some ammunition and inform him that the
>Muslims are one their way to toss hima and his he/she lover off the tallest building in Silver
>Spring Maryland for obvious reasons, and see how well he fares.

I'm actually in Glenmont, Silver Spring is just the town name people
here use because the main post office is in Silver Spring. But I'm
not losing sleep over what people in another country think about my
relationship.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>citizen winston smith <sss@example.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Dangerous people should have their
>>>>> guns taken away, without the need for some "due process" that allows
>>>>> them to kill someone.
>>>>
>>>>Damn the militias and self-defense then and full speed ahead to
>>>>totalitarian communism.
>>>>
>>>>Paul Revere was a "dangerous" patriot.
>>>
>>>Do you support violence?
>>
>>Against people that don't like due process, yes.
>>
>>Lots of it
>
>
>How does it make sense to you, to allow a crazy person to possess
>guns, while being assessed for their craziness?

How does it make sense to you that the government can take away your
rights any time they want to for as long as they want to and you don't
have a say?

How about we lock you up in an insane asylum for claiming you're Jesus
and let you sit there for a few years until we get around to deciding
your fate?

I mean, unless you were an insane totalitarian, which, I'm guess you
are.

You're quite the stupid little fucktard, aren't you?
In the Parking Lot of the Jolly Kone
Is where I’ll suck on your hard bone
Fellatio done with your consent
It won’t cost you one red cent
I gobble cock all day for free!
Why, you can even sodomize me!
I’ll make you scream like a banshee
‘Cause cock-sucking is my specialty!
You’ll find me there 'most every night
And don’t you worry- I won’t bite!
Feeling horny? Got lots of stress?
Look for the dwarf that’s wearing a dress!

©2024 Rudy Canoza Cock Sucking Services

Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>On 2024-08-20, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>The constitution doesn't give one the right to commit atrocities,
>>>>>>that's what Trump was talking about, someone who is a threat having
>>>>>>firearms, you're apparently fine with such.
>>>>>
>>>>>No it wasn't you stupid fuck.
>>>>
>>>>You sure are getting your panties in a bunch about this.
>>>
>>>I know totalitarians such as yourself rejoice when someone says
>>>they'll get rid of due process...https://youtu.be/NvrpuBAMddw?si=GMFhxCHidlzCzN2h
>>>
>>>... until they say they're going to start rounding up you faggots.
>>
>> Are you this retarded, seriously? Dangerous people should have their
>> guns taken away, without the need for some "due process" that allows
>> them to kill someone. The burden is on gun supporters to show why
>> these instruments of violence are like milk and peanut butter, you
>> redneck imbecile, drink a fuckin' Pepsi and join consensus reality,
>> cracker.
>>
>Sure.
>But who determines who is dangerous?
>Remember Biden's DOJ labeled parents speaking up at school board meetings as domestic terrorists.
>So?

Crazy, violent people possessing guns == dangerous.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-08-20, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>
>>Give Joel a recently cleaned and disassembled gun, some ammunition and inform him that the
>>Muslims are one their way to toss hima and his he/she lover off the tallest building in Silver
>>Spring Maryland for obvious reasons, and see how well he fares.
>
>
> I'm actually in Glenmont, Silver Spring is just the town name people
> here use because the main post office is in Silver Spring. But I'm
> not losing sleep over what people in another country think about my
> relationship.
>
For me, I don't care about your relationship Joel. Just don't try to convince me that it is normal
behavior because it is not.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Rudy Canoza <rc.@hendrie.com> wrote:
>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>citizen winston smith <sss@example.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Dangerous people should have their
>>>>>> guns taken away, without the need for some "due process" that allows
>>>>>> them to kill someone.
>>>>>
>>>>>Damn the militias and self-defense then and full speed ahead to
>>>>>totalitarian communism.
>>>>>
>>>>>Paul Revere was a "dangerous" patriot.
>>>>
>>>>Do you support violence?
>>>
>>>Against people that don't like due process, yes.
>>>
>>>Lots of it
>>
>>How does it make sense to you, to allow a crazy person to possess
>>guns, while being assessed for their craziness?

Klaus nymshifted and wrote:

>How does it make sense to you that the government can take away your
>rights any time they want to for as long as they want to and you don't
>have a say?
>
>How about we lock you up in an insane asylum for claiming you're Jesus
>and let you sit there for a few years until we get around to deciding
>your fate?
>
>I mean, unless you were an insane totalitarian, which, I'm guess you
>are.
>
>You're quite the stupid little fucktard, aren't you?
>In the Parking Lot of the Jolly Kone
>Is where I’ll suck on your hard bone
>Fellatio done with your consent
>It won’t cost you one red cent
>I gobble cock all day for free!
>Why, you can even sodomize me!
>I’ll make you scream like a banshee
>‘Cause cock-sucking is my specialty!
>You’ll find me there 'most every night
>And don’t you worry- I won’t bite!
>Feeling horny? Got lots of stress?
>Look for the dwarf that’s wearing a dress!
>
>©2024 Rudy Canoza Cock Sucking Services

Retardation.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>On 2024-08-20, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Give Joel a recently cleaned and disassembled gun, some ammunition and inform him that the
>>>Muslims are one their way to toss hima and his he/she lover off the tallest building in Silver
>>>Spring Maryland for obvious reasons, and see how well he fares.
>>
>> I'm actually in Glenmont, Silver Spring is just the town name people
>> here use because the main post office is in Silver Spring. But I'm
>> not losing sleep over what people in another country think about my
>> relationship.
>>
>For me, I don't care about your relationship Joel. Just don't try to convince me that it is normal
>behavior because it is not.

Kinda like how they talked about people smoking cannabis, "pothead"?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-08-20, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>On 2024-08-20, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Give Joel a recently cleaned and disassembled gun, some ammunition and inform him that the
>>>>Muslims are one their way to toss hima and his he/she lover off the tallest building in Silver
>>>>Spring Maryland for obvious reasons, and see how well he fares.
>>>
>>> I'm actually in Glenmont, Silver Spring is just the town name people
>>> here use because the main post office is in Silver Spring. But I'm
>>> not losing sleep over what people in another country think about my
>>> relationship.
>>>
>>For me, I don't care about your relationship Joel. Just don't try to convince me that it is normal
>>behavior because it is not.
>
>
> Kinda like how they talked about people smoking cannabis, "pothead"?
>

Since I do not partake, people can do what they want.
It's just a nym.
Nothing more.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>On 2024-08-20, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>On 2024-08-20, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Give Joel a recently cleaned and disassembled gun, some ammunition and inform him that the
>>>>>Muslims are one their way to toss hima and his he/she lover off the tallest building in Silver
>>>>>Spring Maryland for obvious reasons, and see how well he fares.
>>>>
>>>> I'm actually in Glenmont, Silver Spring is just the town name people
>>>> here use because the main post office is in Silver Spring. But I'm
>>>> not losing sleep over what people in another country think about my
>>>> relationship.
>>>>
>>>For me, I don't care about your relationship Joel. Just don't try to convince me that it is normal
>>>behavior because it is not.
>>
>> Kinda like how they talked about people smoking cannabis, "pothead"?
>
>Since I do not partake, people can do what they want.
>It's just a nym.
>Nothing more.

Ah.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <lp2acjtesivkcfvoi6mdkhcv5fl1dgfqnt@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
> >>citizen winston smith <sss@example.de> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Dangerous people should have their
> >>>> guns taken away, without the need for some "due process" that allows
> >>>> them to kill someone.
> >>>
> >>>Damn the militias and self-defense then and full speed ahead to
> >>>totalitarian communism.
> >>>
> >>>Paul Revere was a "dangerous" patriot.
> >>
> >>Do you support violence?
> >
> >Against people that don't like due process, yes.
> >
> >Lots of it
>
>
> How does it make sense to you, to allow a crazy person to possess
> guns, while being assessed for their craziness? Is law enforcement
> that out of control, that you think they're going to pry into your
> life and take your guns for no reason? You're a fucking idiot, Trump
> was actually on the right track, for once.

Who among us said a crazy person should have a gun?

In article <023acjh64iobdvfj55gr5j0t98o9jar4q6@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>Are you this retarded, seriously? Dangerous people should have their
> >>guns taken away, without the need for some "due process" that allows
> >>them to kill someone.
> >
> >Um, no. There must always be due process. The process needs to be defined by law. It
> >can be a 'shortcut' process or a longer one, but law can be made to define what the due
> >process is. And, IINM, it's contained in the Red Flag Act.
>
>
> If the "due process" is merely a cop using his/her judgment, fine. But
> they should be empowered to take guns away from unstable people.

They are.
>
>
> >>The burden is on gun supporters to show why
> >>these instruments of violence are like milk and peanut butter, you
> >>redneck imbecile, drink a fuckin' Pepsi and join consensus reality,
> >>cracker.
> >
> >Yeah, that's how you win friends and influence people.
>
>
> It's Usenet.

In article <m95acjd6tdnmafq7fcucumnttt1iblaie3@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> >On 2024-08-20, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Give Joel a recently cleaned and disassembled gun, some ammunition and inform him that the
> >>>Muslims are one their way to toss hima and his he/she lover off the tallest building in Silver
> >>>Spring Maryland for obvious reasons, and see how well he fares.
> >>
> >> I'm actually in Glenmont, Silver Spring is just the town name people
> >> here use because the main post office is in Silver Spring. But I'm
> >> not losing sleep over what people in another country think about my
> >> relationship.
> >>
> >For me, I don't care about your relationship Joel. Just don't try to convince me that it is normal
> >behavior because it is not.
>
>
> Kinda like how they talked about people smoking cannabis, "pothead"?

Who is they and what did they say?

On Aug 20, 2024 at 3:18:02 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<va34mq$3hmib$1@dont-email.me>:

> On 2024-08-20, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>> On 2024-08-20, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Give Joel a recently cleaned and disassembled gun, some ammunition and
>>>>> inform him that the
>>>>> Muslims are one their way to toss hima and his he/she lover off the
>>>>> tallest building in Silver
>>>>> Spring Maryland for obvious reasons, and see how well he fares.
>>>>
>>>> I'm actually in Glenmont, Silver Spring is just the town name people
>>>> here use because the main post office is in Silver Spring. But I'm
>>>> not losing sleep over what people in another country think about my
>>>> relationship.
>>>>
>>> For me, I don't care about your relationship Joel. Just don't try to
>>> convince me that it is normal
>>> behavior because it is not.
>>
>>
>> Kinda like how they talked about people smoking cannabis, "pothead"?
>>
>
> Since I do not partake, people can do what they want.
> It's just a nym.
> Nothing more.

Your behavior suggests otherwise.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>> How does it make sense to you, to allow a crazy person to possess
>> guns, while being assessed for their craziness? Is law enforcement
>> that out of control, that you think they're going to pry into your
>> life and take your guns for no reason? You're a fucking idiot, Trump
>> was actually on the right track, for once.
>
>Who among us said a crazy person should have a gun?

It's about ones who already *do* have gun(s), whether they should have
"due process" while they shoot someone.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66c4f98f$0$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <XnsB1D4829D1845A629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66c4a9b3$1$1895497
>> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>> > In article <XnsB1D450B0979C0629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
>> > says...
>> >>
>> >> Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
>> >> news:7on7cj1begikjom3udvseondmllk0ge3qp@4ax.com:
>> >>
>> >> > Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>In article <09i7cj9k82uhh1g3d47i1l6bik3qdk3r6o@4ax.com>,
>> >> >>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> >> >>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.
>> @gmail.com>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>> >> >>> >>Klaus Schadenfreude
>> >> >>> >><klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>[Default] Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> typed:
>> >> >>> >>>>In article
>> >> >>> >>>><66c2c220$0$2385540$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >> >>> >>>>brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >> >>> >>>>> On Aug 18, 2024 at 8:01:35 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >> >>> >>>>> <66c20cd1$0$3620708$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >> >>> >>>>> > In article <XnsB1D2514B7174E629555@185.151.15.160>,
>> >> >>> >>>>> > noemail@aol.com says...
>> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> According to the quote you deleted
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> the Trump government does.
>> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> Trump: Take the guns first, go through due process
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> second 02/28/18
>> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> President Trump on Wednesday voiced support for
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> to be dangerous, even if it violates due process
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> rights.
>> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> "I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> man's case that just took place in Florida ... to
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> go to court would have taken a long time," Trump
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> and gun violence.
>> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> "Take the guns first, go through due process second,"
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> Trump said.
>> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>> >>>>> >> http://tinyurl.com/y7ychvkv
>> >> >>> >>>>> >
>> >> >>> >>>>> > But that's not happening is it? Taking them from
>> >> >>> >>>>> > felons
>> and
>> >> >>> >>>>> > people who don't pass. So what?
>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>> When Trump says to take guns you are fine with it.
>> >> >>> >>>>> Interesting.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>>You are twisting words again.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>>Wrong. That's EXACTLY what Trump said.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>It is an interesting quirk that DJT says some correct
>> >> >>> >>things, accidentally, at times, that don't align with some
>> >> >>> >>right-wing mantra, e.g. him getting booed for talking about
>> >> >>> >>COVID.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >In this case he said an incorrect thing.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> So just let crazy people keep their guns, and shoot up schools
>> >> >>> and random people? I'm not even against gun rights as such,
>> >> >>> but it
>> sure
>> >> >>> is something how many gun owners are psychotic.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Who said let crazy people keep their guns? He wants to take them
>> from
>> >> >>the crazy people. You spin everything around.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Dude, come down off the weed for two seconds, I was replying to
>> Klaus,
>> >> > I was agreeing with Trump, when there's an emergency of a gun
>> >> > owner having violent tendencies, take their guns.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If government wants to raid your
>> >> home they need to get a warrant.
>> >
>> > Red flag law says they can get one.
>> >
>>
>>
>> Trump says they don't have to.
>
> So?
>

"We need guns to protect ourselves from
jack-booted feds trying to disarm us. Unless
they were sent by Trump"

Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:

> "We need guns to protect ourselves from
>jack-booted feds trying to disarm us. Unless
>they were sent by Trump"

Yeah, he's the pro-police, law-and-order candidate, who's also against
the "deep state", what a dumb bunch of bullshit. What kind of
imbecile beLIEves this clown? Give me a fuckin' break, the botnet is
pathetic, just suckers, accepting anything the guy says and does, no
matter how retarded.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Retardation.

That's a great new sig file for you, Joel!

In article <asbacj1ilumqbs7sr6sa9tnuqqdnickdhl@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> How does it make sense to you, to allow a crazy person to possess
> >> guns, while being assessed for their craziness? Is law enforcement
> >> that out of control, that you think they're going to pry into your
> >> life and take your guns for no reason? You're a fucking idiot, Trump
> >> was actually on the right track, for once.
> >
> >Who among us said a crazy person should have a gun?
>
>
> It's about ones who already *do* have gun(s), whether they should have
> "due process" while they shoot someone.

and?

Take them away.

In article <XnsB1D4CFA7F8BB8629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> news:66c4f98f$0$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
> > In article <XnsB1D4829D1845A629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66c4a9b3$1$1895497
> >> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
> >>
> >> > In article <XnsB1D450B0979C0629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
> >> > says...
> >> >>
> >> >> Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:7on7cj1begikjom3udvseondmllk0ge3qp@4ax.com:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>In article <09i7cj9k82uhh1g3d47i1l6bik3qdk3r6o@4ax.com>,
> >> >> >>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >> >> >>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.
> >> @gmail.com>
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
> >> >> >>> >>Klaus Schadenfreude
> >> >> >>> >><klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>[Default] Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> typed:
> >> >> >>> >>>>In article
> >> >> >>> >>>><66c2c220$0$2385540$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >> >> >>> >>>>brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >> >> >>> >>>>> On Aug 18, 2024 at 8:01:35 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> >> >>> >>>>> <66c20cd1$0$3620708$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > In article <XnsB1D2514B7174E629555@185.151.15.160>,
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > noemail@aol.com says...
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> According to the quote you deleted
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> the Trump government does.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> Trump: Take the guns first, go through due process
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> second 02/28/18
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> President Trump on Wednesday voiced support for
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> to be dangerous, even if it violates due process
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> rights.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> "I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> man's case that just took place in Florida ... to
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> go to court would have taken a long time," Trump
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> and gun violence.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> "Take the guns first, go through due process second,"
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> Trump said.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> http://tinyurl.com/y7ychvkv
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > But that's not happening is it? Taking them from
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > felons
> >> and
> >> >> >>> >>>>> > people who don't pass. So what?
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> When Trump says to take guns you are fine with it.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> Interesting.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>You are twisting words again.
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>Wrong. That's EXACTLY what Trump said.
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>It is an interesting quirk that DJT says some correct
> >> >> >>> >>things, accidentally, at times, that don't align with some
> >> >> >>> >>right-wing mantra, e.g. him getting booed for talking about
> >> >> >>> >>COVID.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >In this case he said an incorrect thing.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> So just let crazy people keep their guns, and shoot up schools
> >> >> >>> and random people? I'm not even against gun rights as such,
> >> >> >>> but it
> >> sure
> >> >> >>> is something how many gun owners are psychotic.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Who said let crazy people keep their guns? He wants to take them
> >> from
> >> >> >>the crazy people. You spin everything around.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Dude, come down off the weed for two seconds, I was replying to
> >> Klaus,
> >> >> > I was agreeing with Trump, when there's an emergency of a gun
> >> >> > owner having violent tendencies, take their guns.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> If government wants to raid your
> >> >> home they need to get a warrant.
> >> >
> >> > Red flag law says they can get one.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Trump says they don't have to.
> >
> > So?
> >
>
>
> "We need guns to protect ourselves from
> jack-booted feds trying to disarm us. Unless
> they were sent by Trump"

Who said that?

In article <r4hacjdm2hlru8udsmhcachttv8audkvfc@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > "We need guns to protect ourselves from
> >jack-booted feds trying to disarm us. Unless
> >they were sent by Trump"
>
>
> Yeah, he's the pro-police, law-and-order candidate, who's also against
> the "deep state", what a dumb bunch of bullshit. What kind of
> imbecile beLIEves this clown? Give me a fuckin' break, the botnet is
> pathetic, just suckers, accepting anything the guy says and does, no
> matter how retarded.

So you are against the police and law and order?

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>In article <r4hacjdm2hlru8udsmhcachttv8audkvfc@4ax.com>,
>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> > "We need guns to protect ourselves from
>> >jack-booted feds trying to disarm us. Unless
>> >they were sent by Trump"
>>
>> Yeah, he's the pro-police, law-and-order candidate, who's also against
>> the "deep state", what a dumb bunch of bullshit. What kind of
>> imbecile beLIEves this clown? Give me a fuckin' break, the botnet is
>> pathetic, just suckers, accepting anything the guy says and does, no
>> matter how retarded.
>
>So you are against the police and law and order?

No, and neither is Harris and Walz, Trump doesn't get to claim
ownership of that while *he* is the one having multiple felony cases
against him.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.