'DNC’s Opening Night — A Pathetically Sad Display For A Party Quickly
Headed For Oblivion

<https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/08/ingrassia-dncs-opening-night-pathetically-sad-display-party/

'The specter of 82-year-old Biden opening a half-empty Democratic
National Convention alongside 76-year-old Hillary Clinton, whose obvious
envy of the prospect that not she but another woman would be coronated
Democratic nominee was a pathetic, borderline tragic, display of the
party that once produced such giants like Woodrow Wilson, Franklin
Roosevelt, and John F. Kennedy.

Now, after having been browbeaten into submission, Joe Biden has
formally passed the baton – though against his will – to a woman who has
never been democratically elected to any significant post in her
political career.

For her part, Clinton, looking quite haggard herself, also cut the image
of someone resigned to her fate in Democratic circles trying to pretend
she will not go down as the greatest loser in history.

Clinton was supposed to have broken the glass ceiling. Biden was
supposed to have saved democracy. Instead, these two geriatrics are the
barely walking embodiments of a woefully failed system.'

'They capture everything wrong with this dismal era in America’s
political history. Should this nation survive, and somehow navigate
itself out of this dark age, the likes of Biden and Clinton – alongside
Pelosi, et al. – will be accorded the blame by future historians for
nearly sinking the republic. Should it fall, they will be indicted as
its executioners.

The half empty arena was a perfect metaphor for the fractured psychology
of the modern Democratic Party. Outside, teems of Hamas-sympathetic
protestors clashed with local police and pro-Israeli demonstrators.

Inside, Democrats – wrestling among themselves in a bitter power play
between progressives and establishmentarians – struggled mightily to
present a convincing unified front, one that more or less shared a
general sense of identity and purpose.

In the past, they would call these natural clashes a family feud. Today,
while too sloppy to be deemed a civil war, the Democratic Party – much
like the governance of the country overall – appears dysfunctional
beyond repair: a sinking ship.'

'So, what is the Democratic Party in 2024? Well, the most cynical –
though, likely accurate – reading is a front for the administrative
state, the shadowy cabal of behind-the-scenes operators who possesses
the real political power, where the traditional institutions of
government – notably, the presidency and Congress, but also the courts
to a lesser degree – serve the interests of the bureaucracy, contra the
Constitution’s original design.'

'For its part, the bureaucracy, which includes the intelligence agencies
and increasingly weaponized Department of Justice, is replete with
unelected operators – more like operatives – who may be far less
competent than their forebears, even though their power is arguably at
its greatest to date.

As an illustration: when Harry Truman first signed into law the National
Security Act of 1947, the ceremonial start of the Global American
Empire, marking the death of the old constitutional republic, the
intelligence agencies of the time (this, after all, was the era of
Hoover and Dulles) were far more sophisticated than they are,
functionally speaking, today.

Though indeed military technology was more rudimentary, the minds behind
these agencies were far and away more competent than the DEI-hires of
2024. They reflected a regime that, by the midpoint of the previous
century, covered half the earth – offering a bulwark, both
institutionally and ideologically – against the communist menace, vested
in the former Soviet Union.'

'Superficially, this planetary divide was a clash between freedom and
democracy on the one hand, and tyranny and communism on the other.

As the decades rolled on, the bureaucracy gained more and more power —
at the expense of the constitutional and democratically accountable
institutions of government.

JFK’s assassination, and the near-certain prospect of intel collusion,
and Richard Nixon’s unceremonious ouster, are but two of the most famous
expressions of the past six decades of the bureaucracy’s rise — and
indeed, wholesale replacement — of the Executive Branch and the
Congress’ political power.'

'But even in those examples, the fact that bureaucratic agents had to
resort to actual violence demonstrated the tug of war of power that
still existed between the old and new regimes.

Today, the bureaucracy can oust a sitting president, reduced to a
near-comatose figurehead, from his post in a slipshod coup d’état that
all but the most brainwashed devotees of the regnant order can see.

And the remarkable thing about it is that it no longer has to rely on
brute force, as in the cases of Kennedy and Nixon, but can get the
President to capitulate on a whim.'

'And yet, a paradox: though it can oust a president in a bloodless coup,
it is utterly incapable of winning a war overseas, or for that matter,
even withdrawing from a lost one, as evident in the Afghanistan troop
debacle, with efficiency.

The latter is blistering testimony of a regime – and the greater
bureaucracy of which Biden and Harris are its figureheads – that is
utterly spent.

Its diminishing political capital, to the extent it has any, solely
rides on the glories of its increasingly distant past. The party on
display in Chicago has reverted, much like all once great empires in
rapid decline, to an increasingly barbaric and pre-civilized state.

Its politicians literally embody the most primitive societies, where
tribal leaders cannibalize other tribes – and where no other tribes
exist, inevitably turn on their own. Joe Biden, like Clinton before
him, is being cannibalized by his tribe in real time.

He may not realize or fully understand what is happening, given his
cognitive decline, but on some level he must intuit what is happening
and resent it.

After all, Biden spent a half century in politics – to ascend to the
highest level of power (albeit illegitimately), and then, once he served
his role, the regime that carried him to such highs, immediately turned
on him — the greatest indignity possible.

At this moment, Biden must realize that he only ever was a pawn for a
callous regime that was bound to eat its own, sooner or later. He never
accomplished anything of note; he merely served as a convenient tool for
that one and only purpose. And he did that for fifty whole years.

Biden’s Faustian pact was to sell his soul and be reduced to a pathetic
shell of a man, one who is literally decaying for the entire world to
observe, so that he might enjoy his fleeting moment of fame.

But his fate is tied with the fate of the country, which will wither as
rapidly as he is in real time, if the policies and ideology that he
represents is not handed a decisive defeat. So, to the extent he has
victory at all, it will be a wholly Pyrrhic one, inextricably bound to a
regime hellbent on its own managed destruction.

Kamala Harris, the next iteration of those failed policies, represents
the next in line in the series of figureheads for the deep state — as
well as the subversive interest groups, both foreign and domestic, that
prop it up.

Only this time, the power grab is even more brazen than it was four
years ago when they stole an election. Now, they don’t even see fit to
go through the motions of a democratic primary, instead forcing their
chosen candidate upon an unwilling populace, and using their
apparatchiks in the media to, with painstaking incredulity, legitimate
her in the eyes of the people.

This is not the sign of a party full of fresh life and new ideas, but
one quickly headed for oblivion. Let us pray the rest of the country is
spared from that same fate.'