John Hill wrote on Fri, 1 Nov 2024 07:56:58 -0000 (UTC) :

>> Who cares about the truth?
>
> "The Earth is flat".
> "No, it not for the following reasons�K".
> "It's obviously flat, because�K".

Uneducated people readily & strongly believe that gravity is a force.
Right?

But wait... Einstein hypothesized that it's not a force.
And even Newton thought that the action at a distance was preposterous.

> Doesn't make any difference to its sphericity.

I live in mountainous boonies above the Silicon Valley & Monterey Bay
where, since I'm an octogenarian, I seem to fall down a lot lately.

So I studied why gravity is so immensely powerful given Einstein said it
wasn't a force at all but the earth expanding outward at 9.8m/s/s and
curving spacetime rushing inward at 11km/s - perfectly balancing out such
that the earth *becomes* a sphere (almost symmetric in sphericity).

My point is that the Apple trolls like Jolly Roger, nospam, Lewis, Alan
Baker, Alan Browne, Joerg Lorenz, Chris, Hemidactylus, et al., are Apple
trolls *because* they don't have the intelligence or education to know the
difference between what Apple marketing (cleverly) feeds them - and truth.

They just don't have the intelligence but that alone isn't what makes these
Apple trolls the deniers of facts that they are (as they probably all think
gravity is a force for example - simply because they are ignorant people).

Just as Alan Baker claims to know bimmers but he doesn't know the basics,
and just as he claims to teach racing but he knows nothing about curves,
these uneducated low-IQ Apple trolls all are to the left of the 1st DK
quartile.

In common vernacular, these Apple trolls are all to the left of Mount
Stupid because not only do they know nothing, but they think they're
geniuses (which is witnessed by them exclaiming they "found me!!!!" after I
posted scores of messages with the same photos I've been using for decades,
and all I did was add "s" to the moniker (which threw them off for weeks!).

You see, John Hill, I've established these Apple trolls all share common
traits, one of which is they're incredibly uneducated and of very low IQ.

But being stupid alone isn't what makes them an Apple troll, right?

What's different about these strange Apple trolls like nospam was, is they
defend everything Apple to the death - no matter what it is they defend.

If Apple doesn't have automatic call recording, they come up with inane
excuses for apologizing for why Apple doesn't have that feature.

Their lack of education and low IQ shows up in those absurd excuses, from
it being illegal to nobody needs it and nobody wants it, etc.

Notice these traits ALWAYS show up with the Apple trolls who are zealots:
1. They're incredibly *uneducated* because all own abnormally low IQs
2. Yet, they *believe* in everything Apple marketing feeds them to believe
3. So they *defend to the death* everything Apple - no matter the truth

There's only one more major trait of these Apple trolls that an intelligent
well educated person would instantly notice - which makes them *different*
from normal people who speak about the other common operating systems.

A. Windows users don't defend Microsoft to the death - they know the truth.
(And they *accept* that truth - without becoming a religious zealot.)
B. Android users don't defend Google to the death - they know the truth.'
(They also *accept* that truth - without becoming a religious zealot.)
C. Apple trolls defend everything Apple - to the death - no matter what.
(Why?)

After studying why these strange Apple trolls are so *different* from
normal people - and putting together how incredibly ignorant and uneducated
all of them are - I've realized they have been told their entire lives how
stupid they are. How worthless they are. How they can't fathom truth.

Yet Apple marketing *loves* these Apple trolls!

Apple marketing tells these Apple trolls everything that these Apple trolls
want to hear - about how great they are for choosing the Apple ecosystem.

Notice all the Apple trolls get their ego fed to them by Apple marketing.
Notice I don't feed their ego - so they hate me - with a passion.

But they *love* Apple Marketing because Apple tells them how great their
choice of ecosystem is. They *identify* with the clever Apple marketing.

This *identity* ego comes out in everything Alan Browne posts for example.
Just watch.

On 2024-11-01 09:26, Andrews wrote:
> John Hill wrote on Fri, 1 Nov 2024 07:56:58 -0000 (UTC) :
>
>>> Who cares about the truth?
>>
>> "The Earth is flat".
>> "No, it not for the following reasons�K".
>> "It's obviously flat, because�K".
>
> Uneducated people readily & strongly believe that gravity is a force.
> Right?
>
> But wait... Einstein hypothesized that it's not a force.
> And even Newton thought that the action at a distance was preposterous.
>
>> Doesn't make any difference to its sphericity.
>
> I live in mountainous boonies above the Silicon Valley & Monterey Bay
> where, since I'm an octogenarian, I seem to fall down a lot lately.
>
> So I studied why gravity is so immensely powerful given Einstein said it
> wasn't a force at all but the earth expanding outward at 9.8m/s/s and
> curving spacetime rushing inward at 11km/s - perfectly balancing out such
> that the earth *becomes* a sphere (almost symmetric in sphericity).

Einstein never said that what we experience as gravity was caused by the
Earth expanding outward.

>
> My point is that the Apple trolls like Jolly Roger, nospam, Lewis, Alan
> Baker, Alan Browne, Joerg Lorenz, Chris, Hemidactylus, et al., are Apple
> trolls *because* they don't have the intelligence or education to know the
> difference between what Apple marketing (cleverly) feeds them - and truth.
>
> They just don't have the intelligence but that alone isn't what makes these
> Apple trolls the deniers of facts that they are (as they probably all think
> gravity is a force for example - simply because they are ignorant people).
>
> Just as Alan Baker claims to know bimmers but he doesn't know the basics,
> and just as he claims to teach racing but he knows nothing about curves,
> these uneducated low-IQ Apple trolls all are to the left of the 1st DK
> quartile.
I claim to teach road racing... ...because I do, in fact, teach road racing.

I started road racing in 2013 and was invited to join the Race Drivers
Committee of the Sports Car Club of BC after the 2016 season, and I've
been teaching every year since.

<https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2024-SCCBC-Driver-Training-June-9-2024/i-Fkd9344/buy>

That's me on the left with my fellow instructor, Paul Bunbury.

Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
> John Hill wrote on Fri, 1 Nov 2024 07:56:58 -0000 (UTC) :
>
>>> Who cares about the truth?
>>
>> "The Earth is flat".
>> "No, it not for the following reasons”K".
>> "It's obviously flat, because”K".
>
> Uneducated people readily & strongly believe that gravity is a force.
> Right?
>
> But wait... Einstein hypothesized that it's not a force.
> And even Newton thought that the action at a distance was preposterous.
>
>> Doesn't make any difference to its sphericity.
>
> I live in mountainous boonies above the Silicon Valley & Monterey Bay
> where, since I'm an octogenarian, I seem to fall down a lot lately.
>
> So I studied why gravity is so immensely powerful given Einstein said it
> wasn't a force at all but the earth expanding outward at 9.8m/s/s and
> curving spacetime rushing inward at 11km/s - perfectly balancing out such
> that the earth *becomes* a sphere (almost symmetric in sphericity).
>

As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
But I’m in awe of your inventive abilities.

But as a nonagenarian I do understand about falling down! So far I have
been lucky and bounced. Walk carefully and avoid turning round on the spot.

Old John.

--
The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :

> As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.

I have a college degree. You do not.

Most uneducated people actually believe gravity is a force, so I know that
you're like all the Apple trolls - you have no college education at all.

Certainly not in physics.

It's interesting you lied because no physicist is unaware of Einstein's
equivalency principle which hypothesizes about the earth's acceleration.

And every real physicist is well aware of electromagnetic repulsion.
Except you.

Since you lied about being a physicist, please click on this link:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=why+gravity+is+not+a+force>

Pick *any* reference that shows that the earth is actually moving up.
*Why General Relativity (and Newton's Laws) tell us The Sky is Falling Up*
<https://youtu.be/GuLL_upE4zk>

> But as a nonagenarian I do understand about falling down! So far I have
> been lucky and bounced. Walk carefully and avoid turning round on the spot.

Watch this video since you're NOT a physicist - this guy *is* a physicist:
*The TRUE Cause of Gravity in General Relativity*
<https://youtu.be/PjT85AxTmI0>
It covers the earth moving up.

Then watch this from the same physicist. It covers spacetime moving down.
*The River Model of General Relativity*
<https://youtu.be/hFlzQvAyH7g>

You can pick *any* reference you want but those with physics degrees know
what Einstein's equivalency principle means.

Essentially the earth is round (and all planets are round) simply because
the electrostatic outward repulsion exactly equals the inward rushing 4D
spacetime attraction to massenergy - which is what determines sphericity.

Hint: I'm not stupid. Most people are stupid. You are not a physicist.

On 2024-11-04 08:41, Andrews wrote:
> John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :
>
>> As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
>> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
>> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.
>
> I have a college degree. You do not.
>
> Most uneducated people actually believe gravity is a force, so I know that
> you're like all the Apple trolls - you have no college education at all.
>
> Certainly not in physics.
>
> It's interesting you lied because no physicist is unaware of Einstein's
> equivalency principle which hypothesizes about the earth's acceleration.
>
> And every real physicist is well aware of electromagnetic repulsion.
> Except you.
>
> Since you lied about being a physicist, please click on this link:
> <https://www.google.com/search?q=why+gravity+is+not+a+force>
>
> Pick *any* reference that shows that the earth is actually moving up.
> *Why General Relativity (and Newton's Laws) tell us The Sky is Falling Up*
> <https://youtu.be/GuLL_upE4zk>
>
>> But as a nonagenarian I do understand about falling down! So far I have
>> been lucky and bounced. Walk carefully and avoid turning round on the spot.
>
> Watch this video since you're NOT a physicist - this guy *is* a physicist:
> *The TRUE Cause of Gravity in General Relativity*
> <https://youtu.be/PjT85AxTmI0>
> It covers the earth moving up.
>
> Then watch this from the same physicist. It covers spacetime moving down.
> *The River Model of General Relativity*
> <https://youtu.be/hFlzQvAyH7g>
>
> You can pick *any* reference you want but those with physics degrees know
> what Einstein's equivalency principle means.
>
> Essentially the earth is round (and all planets are round) simply because
> the electrostatic outward repulsion exactly equals the inward rushing 4D
> spacetime attraction to massenergy - which is what determines sphericity.
>
> Hint: I'm not stupid. Most people are stupid. You are not a physicist.

Hint: You're showing yourself more and more to be a certifiable wackdoodle.

On 2024-11-04 08:41, Andrews wrote:
> John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :
>
>> As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
>> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
>> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.
>
> I have a college degree. You do not.

He just said he's a research physicist, Arlen.

Why shouldn't we believe him?

>
> Most uneducated people actually believe gravity is a force, so I know that
> you're like all the Apple trolls - you have no college education at all.
>
> Certainly not in physics.
>
> It's interesting you lied because no physicist is unaware of Einstein's
> equivalency principle which hypothesizes about the earth's acceleration.

He's not unaware of it.

He's just aware that it doesn't mean that the earth is accelerating
outward at constant 9.8m/s^2.

Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
> John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :
>
>> As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
>> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
>> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.
>
> I have a college degree. You do not.

Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.

In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the
Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

And I can prove it, naturally. But it would be better, since you are who
you are, for you to look it up for yourself.

But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?

Old John.

--
The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

On 11/5/2024 1:56 PM, John Hill wrote:
> Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
>> John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :
>>
>>> As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
>>> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
>>> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.
>>
>> I have a college degree. You do not.
>
> Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.
>
> In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the
> Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).
>
> And I can prove it, naturally. But it would be better, since you are who
> you are, for you to look it up for yourself.
>
> But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?
>
> Old John.
>

Crap, I was hoping you would encourage him to prove gravity is not a
force by walking off a cliff.

--
I Stand With Israel!

On 2024-11-05 11:56, John Hill wrote:
> Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
>> John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :
>>
>>> As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
>>> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
>>> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.
>>
>> I have a college degree. You do not.
>
> Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.
>
> In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the
> Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).
>
> And I can prove it, naturally. But it would be better, since you are who
> you are, for you to look it up for yourself.
>
> But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?
>
> Old John.
>

Hey...

He refuses to believe I'm an amateur road racer and credentialed road
racing driving instructor, so...

:-)

On 2024-11-05 11:56, John Hill wrote:
> Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
>> John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :
>>
>>> As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
>>> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
>>> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.
>>
>> I have a college degree. You do not.
>
> Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.
>
> In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the
> Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).
>
> And I can prove it, naturally. But it would be better, since you are who
> you are, for you to look it up for yourself.
>
> But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?
>
> Old John.
>

Oh, and be prepared for Andrew/Arlen/(however many other nyms) to post
pictures of textbooks as proof of his education.

:-)

On 2024-11-05, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> On 2024-11-05 11:56, John Hill wrote:
>> Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
>>> John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :
>>>
>>>> As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I
>>>> needed to read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard
>>>> anything you write. But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.
>>>
>>> I have a college degree. You do not.
>>
>> Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total
>> ignorance.
>>
>> In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That
>> is the Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).
>>
>> And I can prove it, naturally. But it would be better, since you are
>> who you are, for you to look it up for yourself.
>>
>> But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?
>>
>> Old John.
>
> Hey...
>
> He refuses to believe I'm an amateur road racer and credentialed road
> racing driving instructor, so...
>
>:-)

Get used to it. Little Andrews can't help himself. His unchecked
narcissism is so strong that he regularly gets into these ridiculous
pissing contests making weak attacks like this about anyone who dares to
stand up to his bullshit.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

John Hill <yclept@outlook.com> wrote:
> Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
>> John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :
>>
>>> As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
>>> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
>>> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.
>>
>> I have a college degree. You do not.
>
> Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.
>
> In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the
> Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

He won't believe you in the same way he didn't believe me.

> And I can prove it, naturally.

I offered to do a show-and-tell with him with my PhD certificate if he was
willing to show his college "degrees". He chickened out.

> But it would be better, since you are who
> you are, for you to look it up for yourself.
>
> But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?

Depends which one(s) you were in ;-)

> Old John.
>

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> On 2024-11-05 11:56, John Hill wrote:
>> Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
>>> John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :
>>>
>>>> As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
>>>> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
>>>> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.
>>>
>>> I have a college degree. You do not.
>>
>> Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.
>>
>> In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the
>> Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).
>>
>> And I can prove it, naturally. But it would be better, since you are who
>> you are, for you to look it up for yourself.
>>
>> But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?
>>
>> Old John.
>>
>
> Oh, and be prepared for Andrew/Arlen/(however many other nyms) to post
> pictures of textbooks as proof of his education.
>
> :-)
>

That’s OK. You will notice that I did NOT challenge that. He may be a
professor for all I know or care.

Old John.

--
The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
> John Hill <yclept@outlook.com> wrote:
>> Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
>>> John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :
>>>
>>>> As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
>>>> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
>>>> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.
>>>
>>> I have a college degree. You do not.
>>
>> Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.
>>
>> In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the
>> Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).
>
> He won't believe you in the same way he didn't believe me.
>
>> And I can prove it, naturally.
>
> I offered to do a show-and-tell with him with my PhD certificate if he was
> willing to show his college "degrees". He chickened out.
>
>> But it would be better, since you are who
>> you are, for you to look it up for yourself.
>>
>> But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?
>
> Depends which one(s) you were in ;-)

Keble. But that is really only significant as an undergraduate, and then
only from a tutorial point of view. Lectures, practical work were
university matters. Post graduate work was pretty much independent of
college, far more on your supervisor.

Old John.

--
The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

John Hill <yclept@outlook.com> wrote:
> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>> John Hill <yclept@outlook.com> wrote:
>>> Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
>>>> John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :
>>>>
>>>>> As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
>>>>> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
>>>>> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.
>>>>
>>>> I have a college degree. You do not.
>>>
>>> Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.
>>>
>>> In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the
>>> Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).
>>
>> He won't believe you in the same way he didn't believe me.
>>
>>> And I can prove it, naturally.
>>
>> I offered to do a show-and-tell with him with my PhD certificate if he was
>> willing to show his college "degrees". He chickened out.
>>
>>> But it would be better, since you are who
>>> you are, for you to look it up for yourself.
>>>
>>> But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?
>>
>> Depends which one(s) you were in ;-)
>
> Keble. But that is really only significant as an undergraduate, and then
> only from a tutorial point of view. Lectures, practical work were
> university matters. Post graduate work was pretty much independent of
> college, far more on your supervisor.

I know. Was gently teasing.

> Old John.
>

John Hill wrote on Tue, 5 Nov 2024 19:56:47 -0000 (UTC) :

> In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the
> Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

OK. Then let's take that as prima facie evidence that you claim to have a
doctorate in Physics, which means you're familiar with Newton, right?

Even Newton said a priori that its action at a distance was preposterous,
but it was the best he could propose until Einstein enlightened all of us.

What did Einstein postulate is the true source of what we call gravity?

HINT: Veritasium explains it reasonably well for the hoi polloi.
*How Gravity Actually Works*
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRr1kaXKBsU>

*Why Gravity is NOT a Force*
<https://www.facebook.com/veritasium/videos/why-gravity-is-not-a-force/1041664880521597/>

sticks wrote on Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:35:42 -0600 :

> Crap, I was hoping you would encourage him to prove gravity is not a
> force by walking off a cliff.

What is hilarious about that statement is it shows how ignorant these low
IQ uneducated Apple religious zealot trolls are, because.... because...

Because...
...
...

That was *exactly* what Einstein said was the happiest moment of his life!

....
...
...

Since you ignorant uneducated low-IQ Apple trolls have no idea what I'm
talking about, Einstein's revelation that there was no gravity when a
window washer fell off a roof (substitute cliff) was the happiest moment in
his entire life of discovery of the true nature of gravity.

....
...
...

I doubt any of you low IQ uneducated ignorant Apple zealots can comprehend
a word I'm explaining to you - but the fact that gravity hence disappeared
faster than the speed of light was a key revelation for Einstein's theory!

*Albert Einstein's most happy thought*
<https://www.sciencemusings.com/albert-einsteins-most-happy-thought/>

"The young physicist was sitting at his desk in the patent office at
Bern when this thought occurred to him: If a person fell freely from
the roof of his house, he would not feel his own weight. While he
was falling it would be (at least in his immediate surroundings)
as if there were no gravity."

Jolly Roger wrote on 5 Nov 2024 22:12:28 GMT :

> Get used to it. Little Andrews can't help himself. His unchecked
> narcissism is so strong that he regularly gets into these ridiculous
> pissing contests making weak attacks like this about anyone who dares to
> stand up to his bullshit.

I've studied you Apple trolls; but I study you the most, Jolly Roger.
*I learn a lot about you from what you write*, Jolly Roger.

From what you and the other Apple trolls write, I've concluded that nary a
single one of you Apple trolls owns a college degree - which is important.

The fact you can't even earn your GED, Jolly Roger, shows that none of you
Apple trolls owns the mental capabilities to comprehend complex situations.

Hence, you fall for every trick in the book Apple feeds you to believe.

Your whole life you've been told you are stupid - but not by Apple.
Apple tells you that your decision to wait outside in long lines is smart.

You *love* Apple for that reason.

Why do you think Alan Browne loves those Apple white papers so much, JR?
Because they affirm that he chose the "superior product".

Why do all of you Apple trolls hate people who tell the truth about Apple?
HINT: Same reason all religious zealots hate someone stating the truth.

Part of the reason you're an Apple troll, Jolly Roger, is that you don't
own the mental abilities to comprehend Apple manipulates you perfectly.

John Hill wrote on Wed, 6 Nov 2024 19:40:18 -0000 (UTC) :

> That's OK. You will notice that I did NOT challenge that. He may be a
> professor for all I know or care.

I accepted, a priori, that you own the cognitive skills to earn a
doctorate, Mr. John Hill - which means therefore you're on my level.

If you do own the mental acuity to comprehend complex facts, then you will
be able to understand what Einstein said about the equivalence principle.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_principle>

While *you* (and I) may own a receptive IQ, the sad fact is that the Apple
trolls do not - as none of them owns the mental capacity that you claim.

So let's forget about those uneducated ignorant low-IQ Apple trolls.
Let's ask *you* if you understand why gravity is not a force, shall we?

Given the proletariat are whom we are addressing here, let's look at how
well-known well-educated science educators explain the source of gravity.

*Why is gravity not a real force?*
<https://www.wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/2022/08/05/why-is-gravity-not-a-real-force/>

*Gravity is not a force. But what does that mean?*
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3LjJeeae68>

*Discovery That Changed Physics! Gravity is NOT a Force!*
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pZNzF6LBII>

Since those cites are meant for the unwashed masses, (and yet you and I
rise above them by virtue of being born with at least normal IQs), how
would *YOU* now describe the true source of gravity having now seen them?

HINT: Your response will tell me more about your "education" than you may
realize.

Chris wrote on Wed, 6 Nov 2024 18:08:19 -0000 (UTC) :

>> In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the
>> Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).
>
> He won't believe you in the same way he didn't believe me.

Your response tells me more about your "education" than you may
realize, Chris. Remember - I have a good memory of your actions.

Remember you ridiculed the use of "vehicle" in immunological reference?
And yet, it's an extremely common word every biologist is well aware of.

Because a biologist has taken a few basic classes in immunology, Chris.
But not you.

Why have you never taken even a single class in fundamental immunology?
And yet, you claim to own a doctorate in the medical sciences, Chris.

How is that even possible?

Remember you also ridiculed the commonly known assessment that 30,000
subunits as being large for a non-living SARS-COV-2 viral particle?

Given you claimed a doctorate in the medical sciences, you could never have
earned that degree without at least one course in genetics, and yet, your
response tells me instantly that you know nothing about genetics, Chris.

Why haven't you taken even a single basic course in genetics, Chris?
I know the answer - but I want *YOU* to answer that question for us, Chris.

It's what you write, Chris - that informs me most about your "education".

On 11/7/2024 9:25 AM, Andrews wrote:
> sticks wrote on Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:35:42 -0600 :
>
>> Crap, I was hoping you would encourage him to prove gravity is not a
>> force by walking off a cliff.
>
> What is hilarious about that statement is it shows

No, what is hilarious is your inability to see that no one cares about
what YOU think they should consider an issue, and therefore can't see
the humor in the joke. Of course, that was predictable.

--
I Stand With Israel!

On 2024-11-07, Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
> Jolly Roger wrote on 5 Nov 2024 22:12:28 GMT :
>
>> Get used to it. Little Andrews can't help himself. His unchecked
>> narcissism is so strong that he regularly gets into these ridiculous
>> pissing contests making weak attacks like this about anyone who dares
>> to stand up to his bullshit.
>
> I've studied you Apple trolls; but I study you the most, Jolly Roger.
> *I learn a lot about you from what you write*, Jolly Roger.
>
> From what you and the other Apple trolls write, I've concluded that
> nary a single one of you Apple trolls owns a college degree - which is
> important.
>
> The fact you can't even earn your GED, Jolly Roger, shows that none of
> you Apple trolls owns the mental capabilities to comprehend complex
> situations.
>
> Hence, you fall for every trick in the book Apple feeds you to
> believe.
>
> Your whole life you've been told you are stupid - but not by Apple.
> Apple tells you that your decision to wait outside in long lines is
> smart.
>
> You *love* Apple for that reason.
>
> Why do you think Alan Browne loves those Apple white papers so much,
> JR? Because they affirm that he chose the "superior product".
>
> Why do all of you Apple trolls hate people who tell the truth about
> Apple? HINT: Same reason all religious zealots hate someone stating
> the truth.
>
> Part of the reason you're an Apple troll, Jolly Roger, is that you
> don't own the mental abilities to comprehend Apple manipulates you
> perfectly.

To wit. 😉

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

sticks wrote on Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:12:06 -0600 :

>> What is hilarious about that statement is it shows
>
> No, what is hilarious is your inability to see that no one cares about
> what YOU think they should consider an issue, and therefore can't see
> the humor in the joke. Of course, that was predictable.

Just like what matters to the USA election is to *understand* why people
voted the way they did, what matters for this Apple newsgroup is why the
rather strange Apple trolls do what it is that they do.

Why do the Trumpian Apple trolls such as Lewis, nospam, Jolly Roger, Alan
Baker, Alan Browne, Haemactylus, Chris, Joerg Lorenz, et.al) incessantly
troll Apple ng's by denying all facts about Apple they simply don't like?

It turns out that their *ego* is tied up in their perception of Apple
products, where they "feel" emotionally they belong to an elite clique.

A clique who stands outside Apple stores waiting for products to buy.

On 11/7/2024 11:43 AM, Andrews wrote:
> sticks wrote on Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:12:06 -0600 :
>
>>> What is hilarious about that statement is it shows
>>
>> No, what is hilarious is your inability to see that no one cares about
>> what YOU think they should consider an issue, and therefore can't see
>> the humor in the joke. Of course, that was predictable.
>
> Just like what matters to the USA election is to *understand* why people
> voted the way they did, what matters for this Apple newsgroup is why the
> rather strange Apple trolls do what it is that they do.
>
> Why do the Trumpian Apple trolls such as Lewis, nospam, Jolly Roger, Alan
> Baker, Alan Browne, Haemactylus, Chris, Joerg Lorenz, et.al) incessantly
> troll Apple ng's by denying all facts about Apple they simply don't like?
>
> It turns out that their *ego* is tied up in their perception of Apple
> products, where they "feel" emotionally they belong to an elite clique.
>
> A clique who stands outside Apple stores waiting for products to buy.

Most of the people here could actually write your posts for you.....

--
I Stand With Israel!

sticks wrote on Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:07:33 -0600 :

>> A clique who stands outside Apple stores waiting for products to buy.
>
> Most of the people here could actually write your posts for you.....

Only one of the Apple trolls knew anything about Apple products, and nospam
isn't posting anymore. David Empson knew a lot but he doesn't post either.

All the Apple trolls (such as Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne,
Haemactylus, Chris, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) parrot Apple marketing.

That's why they hate anyone who posts the truth about Apple products here.