In comp.mobile.android, on Fri, 3 Jan 2025 11:22:06 -0800, Alan
<nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>On 2025-01-03 11:03, Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>> Will these regulations apply in the UK?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As you have had explained to you at least twice before, they will
>>>>>> become
>>>>>> a de facto standard, because it won't be worth the cost to the
>>>>>> manufacturers to produce a substantially different model for every
>>>>>> different market; on the contrary they will try and keep as much as
>>>>>> possible of every product the same world-wide.
>>>>>
>>>>> Evidently it is not quite as simple as that. In another thread it is
>>>>> explained that Apple have withdrawn phones with lightning connectors
>>>>> from the EU market and continue to sell them in the UK.
>>>>
>>>> I haven't seen that other thread, but they may well be offloading old
>>>> stock pending newer models.  Eventually market forces can be expected
>>>> to prevail.
>>>
>>> Apple have removed the iphone 14 and SE from sale in the EU and Northern
>>> Ireland due to the regulations coming into effect on 30th December.
>>> Both models are still available in the rest of the UK.
>
>Let's play, "Count the unsupported assertions"!
>
>>
>> While Android phones typically *double* the EU minimum standards...
>
>Unsupported assertion!
>
>> Bear in mind that Apple is cognizant that their use of cheap batteries in
>> the iPhone means they'll have to label those same phones as very clearly
>> NOT meeting the upcoming 2025 EU battery charge-cycle lifetime standards.
>
>Unsupported assertion!
>
>>
>> Apple has always cheaped out on batteries and hardware (such as RAM).
>
>Two unsupported assertions!
>
>> Now Apple's addiction to cheap components returns to bite them back.
>>
>> Not only has Apple always been cheap on batteries, but on RAM also.
>> Which means only the latest iPhones can run the memory intensive AI apps.
>
>Another unsupported assertion!
>
>>
>> In other words, even the very few iPhones that "can" be sold in the EU
>> after June of this year still *barely* squeak by due to cheap components.
>
>Another!
>
>>
>> It's just more evidence of the obvious maxim: *Apple hates you*
>
>Unsupported assertion and obvious bullshit on top of it!

It's easy to make things up. While less notable when it attacks a
corporation or its product, it's more noticeable and more important when
it attacks a person, a race, a religion, a national group, a political
grou, and liars do that all the time to promote their own interests.

On 2025-01-03 06:09, Isaac Montara wrote:
> Anyone know how existing & new Google, Samsung & Apple phones are faring?
> https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/smartphones-
> and-tablets_en

I still can not figure out what the Subject of this thread means:

Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025

??

--
Cheers, Carlos.

On 2025-01-08 12:02, Carlos E.R. wrote:
> On 2025-01-03 06:09, Isaac Montara wrote:
>> Anyone know how existing & new Google, Samsung & Apple phones are faring?
>> https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/
>> smartphones- and-tablets_en
>
> I still can not figure out what the Subject of this thread means:
>
> Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025
>
> ??
>
Bad typing. The OP's right hand was one key to the right of the correct
key for a few letters.

"Re: EI mew ;abeling ..."
"Re: EU new labeling ..."

"I" is one to the right of "U", etc.

Carlos E.R. wrote:

> I still can not figure out what the Subject of this thread means:

When I saw "Isaac Montara" the needle on my
new-arlen-nym-o-meter started wobbling

> Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025

I read it as "EU new labelling regulations"

On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 20:37:36 +0000, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
wrote:

>Carlos E.R. wrote:
>
>> I still can not figure out what the Subject of this thread means:
>
>When I saw "Isaac Montara" the needle on my
>new-arlen-nym-o-meter started wobbling
>
>> Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025
>
>I read it as "EU new labelling regulations"

It did not take me long to work this out either.

On 2025-01-08 21:20, Alan wrote:
> On 2025-01-08 12:02, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>> On 2025-01-03 06:09, Isaac Montara wrote:
>>> Anyone know how existing & new Google, Samsung & Apple phones are
>>> faring?
>>> https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/
>>> smartphones- and-tablets_en
>>
>> I still can not figure out what the Subject of this thread means:
>>
>> Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025
>>
>> ??
>>
> Bad typing. The OP's right hand was one key to the right of the correct
> key for a few letters.
>
> "Re: EI mew ;abeling ..."
> "Re: EU new labeling ..."
>
> "I" is one to the right of "U", etc.

Ah, ok. My keyboard is different, the ";" is to the right of the "m".

--
Cheers, Carlos.

On 2025-01-08 21:44, Scott wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 20:37:36 +0000, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>
>>> I still can not figure out what the Subject of this thread means:
>>
>> When I saw "Isaac Montara" the needle on my
>> new-arlen-nym-o-meter started wobbling
>>
>>> Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025
>>
>> I read it as "EU new labelling regulations"
>
> It did not take me long to work this out either.

I also have this suspicion, but I need more posts to make sure. Wait,
there are more posts, going back to July. [...] Yeah, score increased.

--
Cheers, Carlos.

Hi Andy,

Happy New Year!
Just respond to the value of the body of the message - not the headers.

I read everything on this newsgroup, Andy, that you write. Everything.

Also everything from Arno. Frank. Gelato. Bev. Steve. Jeff. Zaidy. etc. on
the Android newsgroup, but far fewer on the Apple newsgroups, although I
read everything from badgolferman & Steve, who had been posted to Usenet
for decades just as I have been. I even read what Jolly Roger posts,
believe it or not, as he's the quintessential Apple poster of all time.

Probably 80% of the Android posters (like micky) know nothing and worse,
can't learn anything, while it's far worse than that for the Apple trolls.

But I have each poster well under control with a system that scores them.

I long ago added that scoring system which marks morons as already read.
But it continually adds points to your posts & to those of others above.

Not so much the rest.
It ignores posts from Alan & Joerg but also subtracts points from others.

It's constantly keeping track of the intelligence level of each poster.
You're intelligent but most people on this newsgroup are low-IQ morons.

For example, when you posted that Marcel wrote NetGuard, I hit the macro to
bump your score, just as it did when you kept abreast of Marcel's
successful OAUTH2 additions to FairEmail; but it bumps you down every time
you call me a spammer (which you sometimes do, much to your discredit).

While you provide valuable insight, I've likely provided many times more
than all the rest of you combined, Andy, to this newsgroup, in the form of
knowledge about how Android actually works & in the form of tutorials.

But I still learn a lot of from the likes of those few listed above, Andy.
So there's value for me in this newsgroup, even as I deplore the morons.

Around every new year the script triggers, Andy, for privacy reasons, where
I may know privacy probably better than all the rest of you do, combined.

Periodically, the nyms change, as do the time zones, the posting hosts, the
nntp servers, the newsreader, etc., all of which is done for privacy Andy.

You are smart enough to know that keeping the same headers for two decades
or more isn't the best thing if you want to retain some privacy on the net.

Most people are completely clueless about the basics of privacy, Andy.

Maybe not you. But almost everyone else on this newsgroup has sacrificed
their privacy (which is fine) but then they denigrate others that don't.

I don't hide who I am in the gift of the value of the body of the article.
It's only in the meaningless wrapping paper surrounding that body, Andy.

With that in mind, if it takes anyone more than a few seconds to figure out
that it's the same detailed annotated images, the same phone even, the same
location, the same exacting super-detailed always precise information,
etc., they that just means they are low-IQ utter morons, as I never change.

I'm not hiding from you. I don't even try.
I'm hiding the headers from robotic data-collection engines.

It's all done with a process that uses telnet and scripts written years
ago, thanks mostly to Marek (and a few others), mostly on the Linux ngs.

It randomizes the nntp news server (although I can keep it if I like); and
it randomizes the VPN IP address, time posted & other meaningless headers.

The hardest part was the algorithm for the randomized dictionary swaps.

Even Vanguard & Frank helped write the scripts, although neither of them
knew that's what they were doing, I'm sure, as the scripts are complex.

Then it was ported to Windows and that's where the automation proceeds.
Telnet does most of the work. The headers are dictionary lookups.

It used to be that the headers randomly copied other nyms from other
newsgroups and other headers from different posts, so as to mix things up,
but then it accidentally picked up people here so I cut that part out.

Now it just picks everything from a set of a half-dozen dictionaries.

I don't even know what nym is being used as it doesn't matter the nym.
Often I don't even know what person I'm responding to as what matters is
not their pedigree but what they said in the post that contained value.

My editor is "Gvim" and the user agent is telnet if that matters to you.
Only fools care more about the wrapping paper than the gift being provided.

In short...

Anyone who says "I figured you out" is proclaiming that they're a moron,
especially if it takes more than one post for them to figure that out.

Let me know what the nym is for this post as I don't even see it, so I
won't know what it is until *after* this post is reflected in my feed.

On 2025-01-09 17:22, Marion wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Happy New Year!
> Just respond to the value of the body of the message - not the headers.
>
> I read everything on this newsgroup, Andy, that you write. Everything.

1

>
> Also everything from Arno. Frank. Gelato. Bev. Steve. Jeff. Zaidy. etc. on
> the Android newsgroup, but far fewer on the Apple newsgroups, although I
> read everything from badgolferman & Steve, who had been posted to Usenet
> for decades just as I have been. I even read what Jolly Roger posts,
> believe it or not, as he's the quintessential Apple poster of all time.
>
> Probably 80% of the Android posters (like micky) know nothing and worse,
> can't learn anything, while it's far worse than that for the Apple trolls.
>
> But I have each poster well under control with a system that scores them.

2

And you are a new poster, new name.

>
> I long ago added that scoring system which marks morons as already read.
> But it continually adds points to your posts & to those of others above.
>
> Not so much the rest.
> It ignores posts from Alan & Joerg but also subtracts points from others.
>
> It's constantly keeping track of the intelligence level of each poster.
> You're intelligent but most people on this newsgroup are low-IQ morons.
>
> For example, when you posted that Marcel wrote NetGuard, I hit the macro to
> bump your score, just as it did when you kept abreast of Marcel's
> successful OAUTH2 additions to FairEmail; but it bumps you down every time
> you call me a spammer (which you sometimes do, much to your discredit).

"you call me" — how, if you are a new poster? I feel a smell...

3

> While you provide valuable insight, I've likely provided many times more

What, a first time poster

4

> than all the rest of you combined, Andy, to this newsgroup, in the form of
> knowledge about how Android actually works & in the form of tutorials.
>
> But I still learn a lot of from the likes of those few listed above, Andy.
> So there's value for me in this newsgroup, even as I deplore the morons.
>
> Around every new year the script triggers, Andy, for privacy reasons, where
> I may know privacy probably better than all the rest of you do, combined.
>
> Periodically, the nyms change, as do the time zones, the posting hosts, the
> nntp servers, the newsreader, etc., all of which is done for privacy Andy.

& 5! Hi, Arlen!

>
> You are smart enough to know that keeping the same headers for two decades
> or more isn't the best thing if you want to retain some privacy on the net.

Bullshit.

>
> Most people are completely clueless about the basics of privacy, Andy.
>
> Maybe not you. But almost everyone else on this newsgroup has sacrificed
> their privacy (which is fine) but then they denigrate others that don't.
>
> I don't hide who I am in the gift of the value of the body of the article.
> It's only in the meaningless wrapping paper surrounding that body, Andy.
>
> With that in mind, if it takes anyone more than a few seconds to figure out
> that it's the same detailed annotated images, the same phone even, the same
> location, the same exacting super-detailed always precise information,
> etc., they that just means they are low-IQ utter morons, as I never change.
>
> I'm not hiding from you. I don't even try.
> I'm hiding the headers from robotic data-collection engines.
>
> It's all done with a process that uses telnet and scripts written years
> ago, thanks mostly to Marek (and a few others), mostly on the Linux ngs.
>
> It randomizes the nntp news server (although I can keep it if I like); and
> it randomizes the VPN IP address, time posted & other meaningless headers.
>
> The hardest part was the algorithm for the randomized dictionary swaps.
>
> Even Vanguard & Frank helped write the scripts, although neither of them
> knew that's what they were doing, I'm sure, as the scripts are complex.
>
> Then it was ported to Windows and that's where the automation proceeds.
> Telnet does most of the work. The headers are dictionary lookups.
>
> It used to be that the headers randomly copied other nyms from other
> newsgroups and other headers from different posts, so as to mix things up,
> but then it accidentally picked up people here so I cut that part out.
>
> Now it just picks everything from a set of a half-dozen dictionaries.
>
> I don't even know what nym is being used as it doesn't matter the nym.
> Often I don't even know what person I'm responding to as what matters is
> not their pedigree but what they said in the post that contained value.
>
> My editor is "Gvim" and the user agent is telnet if that matters to you.
> Only fools care more about the wrapping paper than the gift being provided.
>
> In short...
> Anyone who says "I figured you out" is proclaiming that they're a moron,
> especially if it takes more than one post for them to figure that out.
>
> Let me know what the nym is for this post as I don't even see it, so I
> won't know what it is until *after* this post is reflected in my feed.

--
Cheers, Carlos.

Carlos E.R. wrote on Thu, 9 Jan 2025 20:46:35 +0100 :

> & 5! Hi, Arlen!

I repeat, verbatim...

"Anyone who says 'I figured you out' is proclaiming that they're a moron"

It's no wonder your IQ score is highly negative, Carlos.
Just above that of Chris s|b but below that of Stan, Frank & Vanguard.

BTW, I don't even know what nym is being used as it doesn't matter the nym.
What matters is the invaluable detailed knowledge imparted in the body.

However, since I flip the switch routinely around the turn of the year,
apparently this new 2025 nym is "Marion" (which you knew before I did).

Here's an image, just like all the other images for the past decade.
<https://i.postimg.cc/x1BL0M8G/shortcut-location-accuracy04.jpg>

You can cross-check with any reverse image search to find that it's mine.
I've been posting the same style of images, Carlos, for over a decade.

If people can't figure out who I am from that, then they're utter morons.
That's how easy it is to figure out my posts, Carlos, which I don't hide.

And yet, like the handicapped child who screams out in joy "I found it"
when he picks up the huge Easter egg on the table completely unhidden,
the lower the IQ the more people like you, Carlos, scream out in joy...

"I found you!"

Note that you guys consistently finger people who are NOT me, all the time,
as me, where I chuckle in mirth (especially those like Frank Slootweg who
think they're utter geniuses but who are so wrong that it's amusing to me).

I didn't even know who I was just now until I read my own post, Carlos.
Who I am does NOT show up in my GVim editing (which doesn't show headers).

So the only way I even know whom I'm responding to is from the attribution
line, which is also randomized (as is everything but the valuable body).

Every time someone screams out "I found you!", it's always low-IQ morons.

On 2025-01-09 21:49, Marion wrote:
> Carlos E.R. wrote on Thu, 9 Jan 2025 20:46:35 +0100 :
>
>> & 5!  Hi, Arlen!
>
> I repeat, verbatim...
> "Anyone who says 'I figured you out' is proclaiming that they're a moron"
>
> It's no wonder your IQ score is highly negative, Carlos.

Insults again. Not reading the rest.

--
Cheers, Carlos.

on Thu, 9 Jan 2025 22:01:32 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :

> Not reading the rest.

Then you should be able to figure my posts out just from the response
showing what I think of the lack of value you impart in every reply.

Anyone who claims "I found you" is no different than the mentally
handicapped person who says the same when finding the not hidden egg.

That you think I'm "hiding" from you shows how low your IQ really is
when I change nothing but the meaningless wrapping paper even after being
on this newsgroup almost since its inception.

I periodically change the header wrapping paper for the aggregators.
Not for you - although you're so stupid - maybe it does hide from you.

What I find funny is when you low-IQ morons claim you "finally" found what
was never hidden in the first place - as it shows how DK you really are.

On 2025-01-09 16:36, Marion wrote:
> on Thu, 9 Jan 2025 22:01:32 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :
>
>
>> Not reading the rest.
>
> Then you should be able to figure my posts out just from the response
> showing what I think of the lack of value you impart in every reply.
>
> Anyone who claims "I found you" is no different than the mentally
> handicapped person who says the same when finding the not hidden egg.
>
> That you think I'm "hiding" from you shows how low your IQ really is
> when I change nothing but the meaningless wrapping paper even after being
> on this newsgroup almost since its inception.
>
> I periodically change the header wrapping paper for the aggregators.
> Not for you - although you're so stupid - maybe it does hide from you.
>
> What I find funny is when you low-IQ morons claim you "finally" found what
> was never hidden in the first place - as it shows how DK you really are.

You should be punched right in the face.

On 2025-01-10 01:36, Marion wrote:
> on Thu, 9 Jan 2025 22:01:32 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :
>
>
>> Not reading the rest.
>
> Then you should be able to figure my posts out just from the response
> showing what I think of the lack of value you impart in every reply.

Insulting again. Not reading, troll.

--
Cheers, Carlos.

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 04:17:07 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :

> Not reading

The point is you deserved what you got for your moronically triumphant
claiming of "*I found it!*" (as if it was hidden) just like the handicapped
children always do when they "find" the NOT-hidden Easter egg, Carlos.

On 2025-01-09 22:43, Marion wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 04:17:07 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :
>
>
>> Not reading
>
> The point is you deserved what you got for your moronically triumphant
> claiming of "*I found it!*" (as if it was hidden) just like the handicapped
> children always do when they "find" the NOT-hidden Easter egg, Carlos.

Did I say "punched"?

I meant "bitch-slapped".

Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
> On 2025-01-09 21:49, Marion wrote:
> > Carlos E.R. wrote on Thu, 9 Jan 2025 20:46:35 +0100 :
> >
> >> & 5!  Hi, Arlen!
> >
> > I repeat, verbatim...
> > "Anyone who says 'I figured you out' is proclaiming that they're a moron"
> >
> > It's no wonder your IQ score is highly negative, Carlos.
>
> Insults again. Not reading the rest.

Don't worry about it.

In this short subthread he both praised and insulted me, while I have
not responded to him, not now and not in a long time. Normally he has
some bogus 'explanation' for this inconsistent behaviour of his, but
even that can not apply in this case.

So if *someone* shouldn't be saying anything about IQs, ...

[From this subthread:]

"I read everything on this newsgroup, Andy, that you write. Everything.

Also everything from Arno. Frank. Gelato. Bev. Steve. Jeff. Zaidy. etc. on
the Android newsgroup
...
Even Vanguard & Frank helped write the scripts, although neither of them
knew that's what they were doing, I'm sure, as the scripts are
complex."

But then:

"Note that you guys consistently finger people who are NOT me, all the time,
as me, where I chuckle in mirth (especially those like Frank Slootweg who
think they're utter geniuses but who are so wrong that it's amusing to me)."

BTW, he never mentioned any specifics on this and I didn't get any
complaints from these - allegedly - 'wrong' people.

On 2025-01-10 16:47, Frank Slootweg wrote:
> Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2025-01-09 21:49, Marion wrote:
>>> Carlos E.R. wrote on Thu, 9 Jan 2025 20:46:35 +0100 :
>>>
>>>> & 5!  Hi, Arlen!
>>>
>>> I repeat, verbatim...
>>> "Anyone who says 'I figured you out' is proclaiming that they're a moron"
>>>
>>> It's no wonder your IQ score is highly negative, Carlos.
>>
>> Insults again. Not reading the rest.
>
> Don't worry about it.
>
> In this short subthread he both praised and insulted me, while I have
> not responded to him, not now and not in a long time. Normally he has
> some bogus 'explanation' for this inconsistent behaviour of his, but
> even that can not apply in this case.
>
> So if *someone* shouldn't be saying anything about IQs, ...
>
> [From this subthread:]
>
> "I read everything on this newsgroup, Andy, that you write. Everything.
>
> Also everything from Arno. Frank. Gelato. Bev. Steve. Jeff. Zaidy. etc. on
> the Android newsgroup
> ...
> Even Vanguard & Frank helped write the scripts, although neither of them
> knew that's what they were doing, I'm sure, as the scripts are
> complex."
>
> But then:
>
> "Note that you guys consistently finger people who are NOT me, all the time,
> as me, where I chuckle in mirth (especially those like Frank Slootweg who
> think they're utter geniuses but who are so wrong that it's amusing to me)."

But then that other people could complain that they are not Arlen, and
those I noticed that I remember did not complain.

> BTW, he never mentioned any specifics on this and I didn't get any
> complaints from these - allegedly - 'wrong' people.

Right.

This is the behaviour of a troll, not of a kind person as he recently
says. Certainly not justified with "privacy".

--
Cheers, Carlos.

On 10 Jan 2025 15:47:27 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :

> In this short subthread he both praised and insulted me,

Frank,

When you teach a class of students, you praise individuals when they say
useful things, and you gently chastise them when they say absurd things.

a. What you term an "insult" simply means you say absurd things.
b. What you term "praise" simply means you sometimes don't.

How I react to you depends on what YOU say, Frank.
I'm extremely consistent.

> while I have
> not responded to him, not now and not in a long time. Normally he has
> some bogus 'explanation' for this inconsistent behaviour of his, but
> even that can not apply in this case.

It's extremely consistent Frank.
a. When YOU say absurd things - I disagree with you.
b. When YOU say correct things - I concur.

The only person "inconsistent" here.... is YOU.
Not me.

I've been the same for decades - and that's all the more reason that people
like Carlos who scream out "I found you" are simply proving they're morons.

If it takes you more than one or two posts to figure out mine, then there
is something drastically wrong with you since even my images are the same
over the years - and they're all unique - as nobody posts what I post.
<https://i.postimg.cc/x1BL0M8G/shortcut-location-accuracy04.jpg>

After seeing just one of those, anyone who claims "I'm hiding" from them is
simply stating that they're like the mentally handicapped who claim "I
found it" when they see the Easter egg on the table which is not hidden.

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 20:29:20 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :

> Certainly not justified with "privacy".

Carlos,

You're a moron if you can't distinguish between a header & a body.

If it takes you more than 1 or 2 posts to figure out the body, then there
is something drastically wrong with you since even my images are the same
over the years - and they're all unique - as nobody posts what I post.
<https://i.postimg.cc/x1BL0M8G/shortcut-location-accuracy04.jpg>

After seeing just one of those, anyone who claims "I'm hiding" from them is
simply stating that they're like the mentally handicapped who claim "I
found it" when they see the Easter egg on the table which is not hidden.

You deserve my mocking, Carlos, because you publicly invited me to do so.

To wit:
If you had not screamed out like a handicapped child that you found
the Easter egg which was never hidden in the first place, then I would
not have mocked you for acting exactly like those handicapped kids do.

You caused this mockery of you by your own public absurdities Carlos.
Not me.

On 2025-01-10 22:20, Marion wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 20:29:20 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :
>
>
>> Certainly not justified with "privacy".
>
> Carlos,
>
> You're a moron if you can't distinguish between a header & a body.
>

Not reading, insulting again.

--
Cheers, Carlos.

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 22:42:04 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :

> Not reading

Good.

Maybe you've finally learned your lesson that to scream out "*I found it!*"
when it was never hidden in the first place, is the height of absurdity.

Who is *that* stupid to proclaim they finally found what was never hidden.
Answer: You.

On 1/10/2025 3:15 PM, Marion wrote:
> I'm extremely consistent.

nope, you nym shyft often.

--
I Stand With Israel!

On 2025-01-11 00:13, Marion wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 22:42:04 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :
>
>
>> Not reading
>
> Good.
>
> Maybe you've finally learned your lesson that to scream out "*I found it!*"
> when it was never hidden in the first place, is the height of absurdity.
>
> Who is *that* stupid to proclaim they finally found what was never hidden.
> Answer: You.

Maybe you will learn that you are stupid insulting people one day if
people stop reading you you.

Oh wait... you are a troll.

--
Cheers, Carlos.

On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 03:18:04 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :

> Maybe you will learn that you are stupid insulting people

OK. Let's run a simple empirical experiment, shall we?

a. You stop wrongfully accusing me of hiding in the message body
b. And I'll stop proving that you're a moron by pointing to what you do

How's that for a good experiment, Carlos?
A. You immediately stop insulting me (which is what started this tangent).
B. Then I'll stop responding to your insults (because they won't be there).

Deal?
That way we can get back to kind-hearted purposefully helpful posts.