Rocksolid Light

News from da outaworlds

mail  files  register  groups  login

Message-ID:  

BOFH excuse #119: evil hackers from Serbia.


comp / comp.mail.uucp / Re: Has anyone else used UUCP on the go?

SubjectAuthor
* Has anyone else used UUCP on the go?Molly A. McCollum
`* Re: Has anyone else used UUCP on the go?Grant Taylor
 `- Re: Has anyone else used UUCP on the go?lkh

1
Subject: Has anyone else used UUCP on the go?
From: Molly A. McCollum
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 09:17 UTC
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mam@sdf.org (Molly A. McCollum)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Has anyone else used UUCP on the go?
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 05:17:59 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <9564b471-4f44-b70f-ef54-52236bf435db@sdf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 11:18:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7c5d5f7a99031cbd94d6efc279ed4642";
logging-data="3547328"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19YJcNJ1yOlr5Gn8zbHV0SFGGOd5Cn1u5M="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pwUg8T60JRtk7NJxTQ7vRAJvmWE=
View all headers

Hey all, I wanted to know if anyone else has this use case that I used
UUCP for.

For a while I had a WWAN card in one of my ThinkPads, and so I was able to
have internet on the go (but not all the time due to poor service). On
said ThinkPad, I had installed Postfix and UUCP to run a local mail
server, which would then go out to a cheap $5 Contabo VPS I rented, which
would DKIM sign the email and then send it out (also worked inbound too of
course).

I'm curious as to if anyone else used UUCP for this purpose. I like the
delay-tolerant networking and the polling style, because it means that not
everyone has to have a well-known address or always-online machine, only
the gateway does.

Basically: It was perfect for my setup.

I haven't touched the laptop that it was set up on in a while. (I only had
a few trivial things connected to the emails under its domain.)
That's why I used past tense.

Anyways, I'm curious to see what uses anyone else has used for UUCP on
their own machines.

--
Molly A. McCollum
mam@SDF.org

Subject: Re: Has anyone else used UUCP on the go?
From: Grant Taylor
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Organization: TNet Consulting
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:10 UTC
References: 1
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net!.POSTED.198.18.1.11!not-for-mail
From: gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Has anyone else used UUCP on the go?
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 12:10:35 -0500
Organization: TNet Consulting
Message-ID: <v44nmb$4pb$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
References: <9564b471-4f44-b70f-ef54-52236bf435db@sdf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:10:35 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net; posting-host="198.18.1.11";
logging-data="4907"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@tnetconsulting.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <9564b471-4f44-b70f-ef54-52236bf435db@sdf.org>
Lines: 34
View all headers

On 6/9/24 04:17, Molly A. McCollum wrote:
> Hey all, I wanted to know if anyone else has this use case that I used
> UUCP for.

I have done this in the past.

> I'm curious as to if anyone else used UUCP for this purpose. I like the
> delay-tolerant networking and the polling style, because it means that
> not everyone has to have a well-known address or always-online machine,
> only the gateway does.

What you call "delay tolerant networking" I refer to as "hop-by-hop"
networking. It is very nice to have, particularly when end-to-end
networking can't be established, much less maintained.

> Anyways, I'm curious to see what uses anyone else has used for UUCP on
> their own machines.

My biggest use case was -- what you called -- delay tolerant networking
to send files between systems I used at home, work, and elsewhere. It
worked particularly well when I was on the road and didn't have IP
connectivity (via port forwards from an unknown location) to systems
inside my home / office network. I could send files via the VPS which
has a connection to my home and office and would relay files through
just fine.

Once tuned, it worked better for large files that took a while to send.
Queue them with uucp, they would go to the Internet gateway quickly
across the LAN and then slowly go out the slow Internet connection while
I was off doing other things having shut the source notebook down.

--
Grant. . . .

Subject: Re: Has anyone else used UUCP on the go?
From: lkh
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 06:00 UTC
References: 1 2
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: lkh@dwalin.uucp (lkh)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Has anyone else used UUCP on the go?
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 06:00:12 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 47
Sender: <lkh@dwalin.fritz.box>
Message-ID: <v464pc$702g$2@dont-email.me>
References: <9564b471-4f44-b70f-ef54-52236bf435db@sdf.org> <v44nmb$4pb$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:00:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="12c07dc1facfd4033637b5dc60756f8f";
logging-data="229456"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+JSd+M7xrNFOPtEv7E6nNl"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.9.3-arch1-1 (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wculpvZv2FvB1yg5Rrm9jjf8G0w=
View all headers

Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
> On 6/9/24 04:17, Molly A. McCollum wrote:
>> Hey all, I wanted to know if anyone else has this use case that I used
>> UUCP for.
>
> I have done this in the past.
>

yep, and this is exactly the use case I'm setting up on my laptop
right now.

>> I'm curious as to if anyone else used UUCP for this purpose. I like the
>> delay-tolerant networking and the polling style, because it means that
>> not everyone has to have a well-known address or always-online machine,
>> only the gateway does.
>
> What you call "delay tolerant networking" I refer to as "hop-by-hop"
> networking. It is very nice to have, particularly when end-to-end
> networking can't be established, much less maintained.

you could even establish a whole subdomain behind the uucp link
with FQDN's for each machine as far as email is concerned.

UUCP clearly still has it's advantages.

>> Anyways, I'm curious to see what uses anyone else has used for UUCP on
>> their own machines.

we're even setting up a small netnews exchange right now :D

> My biggest use case was -- what you called -- delay tolerant networking
> to send files between systems I used at home, work, and elsewhere. It
> worked particularly well when I was on the road and didn't have IP
> connectivity (via port forwards from an unknown location) to systems
> inside my home / office network. I could send files via the VPS which
> has a connection to my home and office and would relay files through
> just fine.

That's interesting. I don't have a uucp capable machine in the office,
but it's intriguing.

Cheers,

lkh

--
Laurens Kils-Hütten * lkh@sdf-eu.org * @lkh@social.sdfeu.org

1

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor