# (101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403 )

print( [ x+i for x in range(100,401,100) for i in range(1,4) ] )

is there another (simple) way to write this?

HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> writes:
> is there another (simple) way to write this?

Yes, but please consider doing these easy exercises yourself instead of
fobbing them onto other people.

Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
> HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> writes:
>> is there another (simple) way to write this?
>
> Yes, but please consider doing these easy exercises yourself instead of
> fobbing them onto other people.

Hen's probably just an experimental GPT. You, with your limited
resources, can never train it.

I'd say you can't beat the verbosity, or lack thereof of just plain zsh/bash:
$ echo {1,2,3,4}0{1,2,3}
101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403

Phil
--
We are no longer hunters and nomads. No longer awed and frightened, as we have
gained some understanding of the world in which we live. As such, we can cast
aside childish remnants from the dawn of our civilization.
-- NotSanguine on SoylentNews, after Eugen Weber in /The Western Tradition/

Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> wrote at 12:01 this Thursday (GMT):
> Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
>> HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> writes:
>>> is there another (simple) way to write this?
>>
>> Yes, but please consider doing these easy exercises yourself instead of
>> fobbing them onto other people.
>
> Hen's probably just an experimental GPT. You, with your limited
> resources, can never train it.
>
> I'd say you can't beat the verbosity, or lack thereof of just plain zsh/bash:
> $ echo {1,2,3,4}0{1,2,3}
> 101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403
>
> Phil

I /think/ you can replace it with {1...4} and {1...3}? I know there is
some syntax for "range of numbers" but I can't remember it exactly.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 06:10:06 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:

> I /think/ you can replace it with {1...4} and {1...3}?

Two dots, not three. Bash extension.

On 2024-06-14 06:10:06 -0000, candycanearter07 via Python-list wrote:
> Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> wrote at 12:01 this Thursday (GMT):
> > I'd say you can't beat the verbosity, or lack thereof of just plain zsh/bash:
> > $ echo {1,2,3,4}0{1,2,3}
> > 101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403
>
>
> I /think/ you can replace it with {1...4} and {1...3}? I know there is
> some syntax for "range of numbers" but I can't remember it exactly.

Only two dots, not three:

% echo {1..4}0{1..3}
101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403

hp

--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | hjp@hjp.at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"

candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
writes:

> Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> wrote at 12:01 this Thursday (GMT):
>> Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
>>> HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> writes:
>>>> is there another (simple) way to write this?
>>>
>>> Yes, but please consider doing these easy exercises yourself
>>> instead of
>>> fobbing them onto other people.
>>
>> Hen's probably just an experimental GPT. You, with your limited
>> resources, can never train it.
>>
>> I'd say you can't beat the verbosity, or lack thereof of just plain
>> zsh/bash:
>> $ echo {1,2,3,4}0{1,2,3}
>> 101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403
>
> I /think/ you can replace it with {1...4} and {1...3}? I know there is
> some syntax for "range of numbers" but I can't remember it exactly.

You're right, but it's even shorter -
$ echo {1..4}0{1..3}
101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403

Good golfing!

Phil
--
We are no longer hunters and nomads. No longer awed and frightened, as we have
gained some understanding of the world in which we live. As such, we can cast
aside childish remnants from the dawn of our civilization.
-- NotSanguine on SoylentNews, after Eugen Weber in /The Western Tradition/

Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> wrote at 14:20 this Thursday (GMT):
> candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
> writes:
>
>> Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> wrote at 12:01 this Thursday (GMT):
>>> Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
>>>> HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> writes:
>>>>> is there another (simple) way to write this?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but please consider doing these easy exercises yourself
>>>> instead of
>>>> fobbing them onto other people.
>>>
>>> Hen's probably just an experimental GPT. You, with your limited
>>> resources, can never train it.
>>>
>>> I'd say you can't beat the verbosity, or lack thereof of just plain
>>> zsh/bash:
>>> $ echo {1,2,3,4}0{1,2,3}
>>> 101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403
>>
>> I /think/ you can replace it with {1...4} and {1...3}? I know there is
>> some syntax for "range of numbers" but I can't remember it exactly.
>
> You're right, but it's even shorter -
> $ echo {1..4}0{1..3}
> 101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403
>
> Good golfing!
>
> Phil

Thanks :D
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom