rotten news relay - comp.lang.lisp - Re: Why not a setf-able NIL ?

Subject: Re: Why not a setf-able NIL ?
From: B. Pym
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:29 UTC

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Nobody447095@here-nor-there.org (B. Pym)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: Why not a setf-able NIL ?
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:29:49 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <v740rp$rp3d$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:29:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="165432e49622fe863a1ad5c6c218598d";
logging-data="910445"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18YSLOPGnDAoH9TYjDSm654"
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.18.1.6
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NRumX9sMSjaERdLOn/f4axqoNO0=

View all headers

Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:

> You must be very very sad. I know of no programming language
> allowing you to redefined/reassing 42. I suppose you would like to do
> (let ((42 101010)) (* 42 2)) too...

Ignorance.

Forth:

: 42 233 ; ok
42 2 * . 466 ok

Understand?

Subject	Author
Re: Why not a setf-able NIL ?	B. Pym

Q: Are we not men? A: We are Vaxen.

comp / comp.lang.lisp / Re: Why not a setf-able NIL ?