On 6/1/2024 2:49 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
> On 6/1/2024 2:42 PM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and
> *admits* it — lied:
>
>> On 6/1/2024 5:25 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>> On 5/31/2024 1:49 PM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times —
>>> and *admits* it — lied:
>>>
>>>> On 5/31/2024 4:38 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>>> On 5/31/2024 1:36 PM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times —
>>>>> and *admits* it — lied:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/31/2024 4:34 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/31/2024 12:54 PM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of
>>>>>>> times — and *admits* it — lied:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/31/2024 3:16 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 5/31/2024 12:00 PM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of
>>>>>>>>> times — and *admits* it — lied:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/31/2024 2:43 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/31/2024 7:19 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of
>>>>>>>>>>> times — and *admits* it — lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/31/2024 9:20 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/31/2024 6:01 AM, Yak wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/31/2024 2:12 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 11:17:17 -0500, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 08:29:16 -0700
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/2024 8:13 AM, Johnny wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 07:23:12 -0700
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Johnny wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Manhattan trial court has done worse. It has taken up a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in which there is exclusive FEDERAL JURISDICTION (involving the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is so stupid.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, there is not only a federal constitutional equal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection violation, in that this state trial court has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> purposefully interposed itself into the federal presidential
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election without authority or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No such thing as a federal presidential election. What there are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are state run elections for state presidential electors run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state laws. Congress can make its own laws for federal courts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them face constitutional challenge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If Trump is convicted there will be an appeal.  Then we will see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who is stupid, you or Mark Levin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump isn't being charged with violating federal law. Levin's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> argument is very weak.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is his argument:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> May. 29, 2024
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MY LEGAL ADVICE TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S ATTORNEYS: NEXT STEP U.S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SUPREME
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> COURT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Levin's not a lawyer.  If he was, he might note the appellate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> courts will have something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to say about that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Levin is a lawyer; and there is a direct path the SCOTUS on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeal. Whether it hears it or not is another matter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Levin is a lawyer. But giving him credit for being intelligent, he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> knows he is spouting shit just to drum up ratings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no direct appeal to SCOTUS
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Common law writ. Rarely used, and even more rarely granted, but it
>>>>>>>>>>>> is a direct path.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck off, you law-ignorant priest-fucked cocksucker. There is no
>>>>>>>>>>> direct appeal of a state trial court verdict to the U.S. Supreme Court,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Common law writ,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No. You don't know what the fuck you're bullshitting about, you
>>>>>>> priest-fucked cocksucker.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, I do.
>>>>>
>>>>> You don't. You're not a lawyer and you're not even an educated layman like
>>>>> Rosenbluth.
>>>>
>>>> Common law writ.
>>>
>>> You don't know what that even is or who issues it. If you had one fucking
>>> clue, which being a priest-fucked little cocksucker you don't, you'd know
>>> that you have to specify "writ of __________________", where
>>> "__________________" is replaced by some other word or term. But you don't
>>> know that. You're just repeating something you heard some other
>>> knuckle-dragging right-wingnut fuckwit blabber.
>>>
>>> I said, "There is no direct appeal to SCOTUS
>>
>> There is,
>
> There is not, you priest-fucked little cocksucker.
>
>> Ball
>
> No such poster here, as you well know.
>
>> common law writ.
>
> You don't even know what that is or who does it. If you knew what it was, and
> clearly you don't, you little priest-fucked cocksucker, you'd know that you
> wrote an incomplete phrase. There is no such thing as simply "common law writ."
> It's a writ *of* something, and you don't know what that something is.
>
> As Rosenbluth already informed you, and you stupidly ignored (being a
> priest-fucked little cocksucker), the Supreme Court cannot take an appeal
> directly from a state trial court.

And Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and *admits* it — runs
away...