On 5/16/2024 12:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <m4p1O.680$29Ia.142@fx13.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut
> says...
>>
>> On 5/15/2024 1:49 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <5MW0O.121793$lwqa.103700@fx18.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 5/14/2024 5:47 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <bDS0O.9896$mH39.4013@fx04.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/14/2024 2:25 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <CmQ0O.4823$ba_5.4462@fx46.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/14/2024 1:22 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <dnO0O.70442$iMKd.33605@fx12.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/14/2024 11:02 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <YDM0O.35574$iFZ2.26318@fx36.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/14/2024 9:48 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <QtM0O.90445$Fmd1.1062@fx13.iad>, max.boot@lathymes.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David French, a Times columnist, hosted a written online conversation with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rebecca Roiphe, a former assistant district attorney in the Manhattan district
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attorney?s office, and Ken White, a former federal prosecutor, to discuss Donald
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump?s Manhattan trial and Michael Cohen?s testimony.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David French: Let?s start with a big-picture question. I have less trial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experience than either of you, but this deep into a trial, I always had a sense
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the momentum of the case, of who is winning and who is losing. Who is more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pleased with the course of the trial so far ? the prosecution or the defense?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rebecca Roiphe: In my view, the prosecution is happier about how things are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going than the defense. They have established the backbone of the case, which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the false records, and they have provided a great deal of circumstantial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence tying Donald Trump to those records and establishing his intent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken White: When you ask who is more pleased with the course of the trial,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember that Trump is usually pursuing a public relations and political
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strategy at the expense of good courtroom strategy. In that sense, I suspect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Team Trump is happy that he?s getting lots of airtime to push his narrative that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he?s a victim of the elites and that the trial doesn?t seem to have had much of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an impact on his polling numbers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ask me as a trial lawyer, I agree with Rebecca that the D.A. is doing a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solid job proving the elements of its case and telling the story in a way likely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to grab the jury. So far, they are hitting all the necessary points.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> French: Stormy Daniels?s testimony was far more riveting and disturbing than I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anticipated. She described a sexual encounter that was fundamentally exploitive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and potentially even predatory. In the aftermath, Trump?s lawyer moved for a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mistrial, claiming that the details of that testimony could prejudice the jury.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What was your assessment of her testimony? Did the prosecution make a mistake in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking her to describe the details of the encounter?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> White: This is all on Trump. He?s the one who decided, for ego reasons, to make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeated claims that the sexual encounter never happened. He could have rendered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the details irrelevant by keeping his mouth shut, but he had to call her a liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That makes it relevant. Yes, her description was skin-crawling. She wasn?t a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> great witness ? she was argumentative and had trouble answering questions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directly ? but she did what the prosecution needed her to do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roiphe: The prosecution was in a difficult position. It needed to establish that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this story would have been disturbing, so much so that Trump would find it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary to suppress it. But the judge had admonished them not to bring out too
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many details. The media got caught up in the sex scene at the expense of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> real point of the testimony, and it?s possible that the jury did as well. But I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don?t think it will ultimately undermine the case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/14/opinion/trump-trial-michael-cohen.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Heh heh heh...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A whore
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> She's a porn star whore.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> She's a porn starlet, but not a whore.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a convicted liar
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> who lied on Trump's behalf.My reader is top line. Yours is trash.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't matter.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It matters.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He's looking *great* in court today.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nope and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, and you know it. Trump's shitty lawyers haven't laid a finger on him.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He looked almost as bad as
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He looked terrific, and Trump looked scared shitless, as he should be.
>>>>>
>>>>> You didn't see any pics or videos.
>>>>
>>>> I did. I also read reporting of reliable news. Trump was scared shitless. He
>>>> knows he's losing. It's great!
>>>
>>> The polls say otherwise. I saw and heard and you are wrong. I see I ran
>>> you off of the other posts about this.
>>>>
>>>>> Neither did I.
>>>>
>>>> We know.
>>>
>>> Edit...you lose
>>>>
>>>> Cohen kicked the asses of Trump's ham-hock lawyers.
>>>
>>> He lied. There is nothing that shows Trump guilty of any crime.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why can't you get a decent newsreader, you cunt? "Re: ?They Have Established
>>>>>>>>>>>> the Backbone of the Case?: Three Writers Dissect the Trump Trial" ? your fucked
>>>>>>>>>>>> up homo newsreader fucks up the subject line. Those question marks were single
>>>>>>>>>>>> quotes, you cocksucker.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you change the groups and
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Get a proper newsreader, cocksucker, so it doesn't fuck up the subject line.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm a fucking coward.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We already know that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, you do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, we do. YTIW
>>>>>
>>>>> NW
>>>>
>>>> YTIW
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>
>> Yep.

<crickets>

>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With a fucked-up newsreader. Get a proper one, shitbag.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You kicked my ass hours ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Months*, you stupid cocksucker.
>>>>
>>>> <crickets>
>>>
>>> What is there to respond to?
>>
>> My humiliation of you, of course.
>
> Why did you run away from the other threads?

I didn't.