In article <m4p1O.680$29Ia.142@fx13.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut
says...
>
> On 5/15/2024 1:49 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
> molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>
> > In article <5MW0O.121793$lwqa.103700@fx18.iad>,
> > mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
> >>
> >> On 5/14/2024 5:47 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
> >>
> >>> In article <bDS0O.9896$mH39.4013@fx04.iad>,
> >>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/14/2024 2:25 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <CmQ0O.4823$ba_5.4462@fx46.iad>,
> >>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 5/14/2024 1:22 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <dnO0O.70442$iMKd.33605@fx12.iad>,
> >>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 5/14/2024 11:02 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In article <YDM0O.35574$iFZ2.26318@fx36.iad>,
> >>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/14/2024 9:48 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <QtM0O.90445$Fmd1.1062@fx13.iad>, max.boot@lathymes.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> David French, a Times columnist, hosted a written online conversation with
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rebecca Roiphe, a former assistant district attorney in the Manhattan district
> >>>>>>>>>>>> attorney?s office, and Ken White, a former federal prosecutor, to discuss Donald
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Trump?s Manhattan trial and Michael Cohen?s testimony.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> David French: Let?s start with a big-picture question. I have less trial
> >>>>>>>>>>>> experience than either of you, but this deep into a trial, I always had a sense
> >>>>>>>>>>>> of the momentum of the case, of who is winning and who is losing. Who is more
> >>>>>>>>>>>> pleased with the course of the trial so far ? the prosecution or the defense?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rebecca Roiphe: In my view, the prosecution is happier about how things are
> >>>>>>>>>>>> going than the defense. They have established the backbone of the case, which is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the false records, and they have provided a great deal of circumstantial
> >>>>>>>>>>>> evidence tying Donald Trump to those records and establishing his intent.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ken White: When you ask who is more pleased with the course of the trial,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> remember that Trump is usually pursuing a public relations and political
> >>>>>>>>>>>> strategy at the expense of good courtroom strategy. In that sense, I suspect
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Team Trump is happy that he?s getting lots of airtime to push his narrative that
> >>>>>>>>>>>> he?s a victim of the elites and that the trial doesn?t seem to have had much of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> an impact on his polling numbers.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you ask me as a trial lawyer, I agree with Rebecca that the D.A. is doing a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> solid job proving the elements of its case and telling the story in a way likely
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to grab the jury. So far, they are hitting all the necessary points.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> French: Stormy Daniels?s testimony was far more riveting and disturbing than I
> >>>>>>>>>>>> anticipated. She described a sexual encounter that was fundamentally exploitive
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and potentially even predatory. In the aftermath, Trump?s lawyer moved for a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> mistrial, claiming that the details of that testimony could prejudice the jury.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> What was your assessment of her testimony? Did the prosecution make a mistake in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> asking her to describe the details of the encounter?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> White: This is all on Trump. He?s the one who decided, for ego reasons, to make
> >>>>>>>>>>>> repeated claims that the sexual encounter never happened. He could have rendered
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the details irrelevant by keeping his mouth shut, but he had to call her a liar.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> That makes it relevant. Yes, her description was skin-crawling. She wasn?t a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> great witness ? she was argumentative and had trouble answering questions
> >>>>>>>>>>>> directly ? but she did what the prosecution needed her to do.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Roiphe: The prosecution was in a difficult position. It needed to establish that
> >>>>>>>>>>>> this story would have been disturbing, so much so that Trump would find it
> >>>>>>>>>>>> necessary to suppress it. But the judge had admonished them not to bring out too
> >>>>>>>>>>>> many details. The media got caught up in the sex scene at the expense of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> real point of the testimony, and it?s possible that the jury did as well. But I
> >>>>>>>>>>>> don?t think it will ultimately undermine the case.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/14/opinion/trump-trial-michael-cohen.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Heh heh heh...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> A whore
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> No.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> She's a porn star whore.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> She's a porn starlet, but not a whore.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> and a convicted liar
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> who lied on Trump's behalf.My reader is top line. Yours is trash.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Doesn't matter.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It matters.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> He's looking *great* in court today.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Nope and
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes, and you know it. Trump's shitty lawyers haven't laid a finger on him.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> He looked almost as bad as
> >>>>
> >>>> He looked terrific, and Trump looked scared shitless, as he should be.
> >>>
> >>> You didn't see any pics or videos.
> >>
> >> I did. I also read reporting of reliable news. Trump was scared shitless. He
> >> knows he's losing. It's great!
> >
> > The polls say otherwise. I saw and heard and you are wrong. I see I ran
> > you off of the other posts about this.
> >>
> >>> Neither did I.
> >>
> >> We know.
> >
> > Edit...you lose
> >>
> >> Cohen kicked the asses of Trump's ham-hock lawyers.
> >
> > He lied. There is nothing that shows Trump guilty of any crime.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Why can't you get a decent newsreader, you cunt? "Re: ?They Have Established
> >>>>>>>>>> the Backbone of the Case?: Three Writers Dissect the Trump Trial" ? your fucked
> >>>>>>>>>> up homo newsreader fucks up the subject line. Those question marks were single
> >>>>>>>>>> quotes, you cocksucker.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Yet you change the groups and
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Get a proper newsreader, cocksucker, so it doesn't fuck up the subject line.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm a fucking coward.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We already know that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, you do.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, we do. YTIW
> >>>
> >>> NW
> >>
> >> YTIW
> >
> > Nope.
>
> Yep.
>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> With a fucked-up newsreader. Get a proper one, shitbag.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You kicked my ass hours ago.
> >>>>
> >>>> *Months*, you stupid cocksucker.
> >>
> >> <crickets>
> >
> > What is there to respond to?
>
> My humiliation of you, of course.

Why did you run away from the other threads? Coward.