On 5/15/2024 1:49 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <5MW0O.121793$lwqa.103700@fx18.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 5/14/2024 5:47 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <bDS0O.9896$mH39.4013@fx04.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 5/14/2024 2:25 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <CmQ0O.4823$ba_5.4462@fx46.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/14/2024 1:22 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <dnO0O.70442$iMKd.33605@fx12.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/14/2024 11:02 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <YDM0O.35574$iFZ2.26318@fx36.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/14/2024 9:48 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <QtM0O.90445$Fmd1.1062@fx13.iad>, max.boot@lathymes.com
>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> David French, a Times columnist, hosted a written online conversation with
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rebecca Roiphe, a former assistant district attorney in the Manhattan district
>>>>>>>>>>>> attorney?s office, and Ken White, a former federal prosecutor, to discuss Donald
>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump?s Manhattan trial and Michael Cohen?s testimony.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> David French: Let?s start with a big-picture question. I have less trial
>>>>>>>>>>>> experience than either of you, but this deep into a trial, I always had a sense
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the momentum of the case, of who is winning and who is losing. Who is more
>>>>>>>>>>>> pleased with the course of the trial so far ? the prosecution or the defense?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rebecca Roiphe: In my view, the prosecution is happier about how things are
>>>>>>>>>>>> going than the defense. They have established the backbone of the case, which is
>>>>>>>>>>>> the false records, and they have provided a great deal of circumstantial
>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence tying Donald Trump to those records and establishing his intent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken White: When you ask who is more pleased with the course of the trial,
>>>>>>>>>>>> remember that Trump is usually pursuing a public relations and political
>>>>>>>>>>>> strategy at the expense of good courtroom strategy. In that sense, I suspect
>>>>>>>>>>>> Team Trump is happy that he?s getting lots of airtime to push his narrative that
>>>>>>>>>>>> he?s a victim of the elites and that the trial doesn?t seem to have had much of
>>>>>>>>>>>> an impact on his polling numbers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you ask me as a trial lawyer, I agree with Rebecca that the D.A. is doing a
>>>>>>>>>>>> solid job proving the elements of its case and telling the story in a way likely
>>>>>>>>>>>> to grab the jury. So far, they are hitting all the necessary points.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> French: Stormy Daniels?s testimony was far more riveting and disturbing than I
>>>>>>>>>>>> anticipated. She described a sexual encounter that was fundamentally exploitive
>>>>>>>>>>>> and potentially even predatory. In the aftermath, Trump?s lawyer moved for a
>>>>>>>>>>>> mistrial, claiming that the details of that testimony could prejudice the jury.
>>>>>>>>>>>> What was your assessment of her testimony? Did the prosecution make a mistake in
>>>>>>>>>>>> asking her to describe the details of the encounter?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> White: This is all on Trump. He?s the one who decided, for ego reasons, to make
>>>>>>>>>>>> repeated claims that the sexual encounter never happened. He could have rendered
>>>>>>>>>>>> the details irrelevant by keeping his mouth shut, but he had to call her a liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>> That makes it relevant. Yes, her description was skin-crawling. She wasn?t a
>>>>>>>>>>>> great witness ? she was argumentative and had trouble answering questions
>>>>>>>>>>>> directly ? but she did what the prosecution needed her to do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Roiphe: The prosecution was in a difficult position. It needed to establish that
>>>>>>>>>>>> this story would have been disturbing, so much so that Trump would find it
>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary to suppress it. But the judge had admonished them not to bring out too
>>>>>>>>>>>> many details. The media got caught up in the sex scene at the expense of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> real point of the testimony, and it?s possible that the jury did as well. But I
>>>>>>>>>>>> don?t think it will ultimately undermine the case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/14/opinion/trump-trial-michael-cohen.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Heh heh heh...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A whore
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> She's a porn star whore.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> She's a porn starlet, but not a whore.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and a convicted liar
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> who lied on Trump's behalf.My reader is top line. Yours is trash.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Doesn't matter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It matters.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He's looking *great* in court today.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope and
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, and you know it. Trump's shitty lawyers haven't laid a finger on him.
>>>>>
>>>>> He looked almost as bad as
>>>>
>>>> He looked terrific, and Trump looked scared shitless, as he should be.
>>>
>>> You didn't see any pics or videos.
>>
>> I did. I also read reporting of reliable news. Trump was scared shitless. He
>> knows he's losing. It's great!
>
> The polls say otherwise. I saw and heard and you are wrong. I see I ran
> you off of the other posts about this.
>>
>>> Neither did I.
>>
>> We know.
>
> Edit...you lose
>>
>> Cohen kicked the asses of Trump's ham-hock lawyers.
>
> He lied. There is nothing that shows Trump guilty of any crime.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why can't you get a decent newsreader, you cunt? "Re: ?They Have Established
>>>>>>>>>> the Backbone of the Case?: Three Writers Dissect the Trump Trial" ? your fucked
>>>>>>>>>> up homo newsreader fucks up the subject line. Those question marks were single
>>>>>>>>>> quotes, you cocksucker.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yet you change the groups and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Get a proper newsreader, cocksucker, so it doesn't fuck up the subject line.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm a fucking coward.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We already know that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, you do.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, we do. YTIW
>>>
>>> NW
>>
>> YTIW
>
> Nope.

Yep.

>>>>>>
>>>>>> With a fucked-up newsreader. Get a proper one, shitbag.
>>>>>
>>>>> You kicked my ass hours ago.
>>>>
>>>> *Months*, you stupid cocksucker.
>>
>> <crickets>
>
> What is there to respond to?

My humiliation of you, of course.