On 12/27/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <7JAbP.9860$YXj.5424@fx34.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut
> says...
>>
>> On 12/27/2024 7:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <ChzbP.73241$DYF8.4993@fx14.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 12/27/2024 4:04 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <4TibP.7079$q1_9.3403@fx03.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/26/2024 11:36 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <2whbP.11804$XfF8.5254@fx04.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the GOP:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the labor force."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /quote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His response will be deleted, unread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There will be and at higher wages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> competition would increase those jobs' wages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engaged in crime(s).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is at my house.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the night a couple of years ago?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You never did liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trespassing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trespassing is a crime.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There you have it folks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trespassing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Then why is it "unlawful"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
>>>>>>>>>> can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime ? it's a civil tort.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You really work at being stupid, don't you?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
>>>>>>>>>> in the United States.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Unlawful presence:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trespassing
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a crime.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then it wouldn't be "unlawful".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> False. Civil violations are unlawful but not criminal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But mere unlawful presence in the country is not a crime. It is a violation
>>>>>> of federal immigration law to remain in the country without legal
>>>>>> authorization, but this violation is punishable by civil penalties, not
>>>>>> criminal. Chief among these civil penalties is deportation or removal, where
>>>>>> an unlawful resident may be detained and removed from the country.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/is-illegal-immigration-a-crime-improper-entry-v-unlawful-presence/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unlawful presence is not a crime. This is settled.
>>>>>
>>>>> It will be soon.
>>>>
>>>> Nope. Congress is not going to pass a law that criminalizes unlawful presence.
>>>> This is settled.
>>>
>>> If they cross anywhere other than
>>
>> It has nothing to do with "crossing," you fucking idiot. It has to do only with
>> being present in the country without authorization. As I have instructed you (an
>> idiot) many times, the large majority of people who are unlawfully present are
>> "visa overstays." They are people who *entered* the country legally, but then
>> remained in the U.S> beyond the expiration date of their visa. They have
>> committed *no* crime relating to immigration.
>>
>> People who enter the country other than at a port of entry have committed the
>> crime of improper entry (8 U.S.C. § 1325). Those people comprise fewer than half
>> of all those who are unlawfully present. People who entered the country legally
>> but then did not depart on or before the expiration of their visa have committed
>> no immigration crime at all. Unlawful presence is *not* a crime.
>>
>> You really are a fucking idiot. You know you are.
>
> What about the millions here now that didn't cross legally?
Nothing about them.

Trump is not going to deport the vast majority of them.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing