On 12/27/2024 4:04 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <4TibP.7079$q1_9.3403@fx03.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 12/26/2024 11:36 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>> content-free batch of lies:
>>
>>> In article <2whbP.11804$XfF8.5254@fx04.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the GOP:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the labor force."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /quote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His response will be deleted, unread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There will be and at higher wages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> competition would increase those jobs' wages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engaged in crime(s).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is at my house.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the night a couple of years ago?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You never did liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trespassing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trespassing is a crime.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
>>>>>>>>>>> There you have it folks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
>>>>>>>>>> settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trespassing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then why is it "unlawful"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
>>>>>> can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime ? it's a civil tort.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You really work at being stupid, don't you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
>>>>>> in the United States.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
>>>>>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unlawful presence:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trespassing
>>>>
>>>> Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a crime.
>>>
>>> Then it wouldn't be "unlawful".
>>
>> False. Civil violations are unlawful but not criminal.
>>
>> But mere unlawful presence in the country is not a crime. It is a violation
>> of federal immigration law to remain in the country without legal
>> authorization, but this violation is punishable by civil penalties, not
>> criminal. Chief among these civil penalties is deportation or removal, where
>> an unlawful resident may be detained and removed from the country.
>>
>>
>> https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/is-illegal-immigration-a-crime-improper-entry-v-unlawful-presence/
>>
>> Unlawful presence is not a crime. This is settled.
>
> It will be soon.

Nope. Congress is not going to pass a law that criminalizes unlawful presence.
This is settled.

>>
>> You lose. You always lose.

<crickets>

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing