On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
>>>>
>>>> On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
>>>>> In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>>>>>>>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the GOP:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the labor force."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /quote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His response will be deleted, unread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There will be and at higher wages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> competition would increase those jobs' wages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
>>>>>>>>>>>>> engaged in crime(s).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is at my house.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
>>>>>>>>>> the night a couple of years ago?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You never did liar.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trespassing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Trespassing is a crime.
>>>>>> Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
>>>>> There you have it folks.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
>>>> settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
>>>
>>> Trespassing.
>>
>> Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all.
>
> Then why is it "unlawful"

You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime — it's a civil tort.

You really work at being stupid, don't you?

As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.

United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182

Unlawful presence:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227

I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing