On 10/28/2024 12:21 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:

> In article <EYPTO.249495$WXO8.74608@fx13.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On 10/28/2024 10:01 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>
>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:wzOTO.89026$7OO5.77312@fx43.iad...
>>>> On 10/28/2024 8:26 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:FtPSO.26517$9Rk4.10335@fx37.iad...
>>>>>> On 10/25/2024 7:19 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:vfes9n$2s3np$4@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <rxSRO.54739$KDwf.3770@fx01.iad>, rudy@phil.hendrie.con
>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell
>>>>>>>>>> back
>>>>>>>>>> when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having posted as
>>>>>>>>>> "Lamey," but
>>>>>>>>>> he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a fucking loser.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is absolutely true.  Research shows that the more new prisons
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and longer the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sentences.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions.  The more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisons and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> More support:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-criminal-justice-
>>>>>>>>>>>> reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another gimmick to
>>>>>>>>>>>> fill up the
>>>>>>>>>>>> prisons.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply wrong.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then dont do it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A tiny number of people do, though, and will continue to do so.  Point is
>>>>>>>> that people can and do change while in prison.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Somehow, I bet it wasn't just the $5,000 that was taken.. I'm pretty sure
>>>>>>> one or more people died due to a direct result of that crime. It is those
>>>>>>> deaths that put you in prison without parole.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No one was killed in the bank robbery, scooter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bank robbery?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, bank robbery, scooter. That's all that Richardson was charged with.
>>>
>>> And how did we go from the general cases above to this SPECIFIC case?
>>
>> See above, scooter: "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer" You took the
>> bait, scooter.
>>
>> We were talking in general about grotesquely unjust sentences out of proportion
>> to the crime committed, scooter. *Now*, scooter, we're talking about that
>> specific case. You swallowed the bait, scooter.
>>
>>>>> When did that specific become part of the topic and which specific bank
>>>>> robbery are you claiming was part of the discussion?
>>>>
>>>> It always was part of the topic, scooter.
>>>
>>> No, it's not.
>>
>> Yes, scooter, it was. It is a specific and on-point instance of what the general
>> topic *formerly* was, scooter.
>>
>>>
>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer" is about a bank robber who was
>>>> given a 60 year no-parole no-probation sentence for robbing a bank of $5,000.
>>>> Why don't you try paying attention, scooter?
>>>
>>> Well, has he committed another violent crime since he's been in jail?
>>
>> That's not the goal of incarceration, scooter.
>>
>> The sentence is manifestly unjust, scooter.
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Shots were fired, but no one was hit.
>>>>>
>>>>> So?
>>>>
>>>> So, the conviction was only for bank robbery, scooter.
>>>
>>> You have proof of that? Somehow I doubt it.
>>
>> https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/la-court-of-appeal/1100023.html
>>
>> You shoot yourself in your crotch every time, scooter...not that there's much to
>> hit there.
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Illegal possession of a firearm
>>>>> Illegal discharge of a Firearm
>>>>> Reckless endangerment
>>>>> Attempted homicide
>>>>
>>>> None of those were part of the charges, scooter.
>>>
>>> Prove it.
>>
>> See above, scooter, you dumb fascist KKK fat fuck.
>>
>>>
>>>>>> The sentence imposed was *solely* for the robbery, scooter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, but
>>>>
>>>> No "but," scooter.
>>>
>>> Then prove your claim that it was *solely* for the robbery.
>>
>> See above, scooter, you dumb fascist KKK fat fuck.
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you think there was some other element to the sentencing, scooter, trot
>>>>>> out your evidence. But you don't have any and you never will.
>>>>>
>>>>> How about the law?
>>>>
>>>> Nothing about the law, scooter.
>>>
>>> Somehow I don't see your suggestion that we ignore the law
>>
>> Straw man, scooter. I never suggested we ignore the law, scooter.
>>
>>>> The man was duly and justly convicted, but the sentence is manifestly unjust.
>>>
>>> I don't see it.
>>
>> Of course you don't, scooter, you dumb fascist KKK fat fuck. Fascists KKK fat
>> fucks never do.
>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>  Does it make sense to imprison someone for having robbed a bank for 5K
>>>>>>>> some 5 years ago?  10? 50?  A year ago?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well.. we could always just execute them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's not going to happen, scooter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then count your blessings he's only getting life.
>>>>
>>>> We don't execute people for the theft of $5,000, scooter, and we never will.
>>>> You are not going to get the North Korean "justice" that you wish to see.
>>>
>>> Rudy.. when will you learn not to make such stupid claims because you know I
>>> will prove you wrong.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Ketchum
>>
>> No, scooter. That was in 1901. We don't do things today as we did in 1901,
>> scooter. And we're not going back to that, scooter. Move to North Korea if
>> that's the kind of "justice" system you wish to live under, scooter.
>>
>>>>>> You are not going to get the despotic state that you want.
>>>>>
>>>>> An [sic] I know you want the despotic state you want.
>>>>
>>>> I don't want a despotic state, scooter. You do.
>>
>> <crickets>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> You can move to North Korea if you want to live in a state that summarily
>>>>>> executes people for jaywalking, scooter.
>>>>>
>>>>> I should I move?
>>>>
>>>> Because you're the one who wishes to live in a despotic state, scooter.
>>
>> <crickets>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, show me a case were someone was given like [life] just for robbing
>>>>>>> a bank of 5K... can't be for any other crime just the robbery of the money.
>>>>>
>>>>> Except when you rob a bank... it's not just about the robbery of the money.
>>>>
>>>> If that's all that happened, scooter, then it *is* only about the robbery of
>>>> the money.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> *This* case, scooter ? the case of Robert Richardson detailed in the New
>>>>>> York Times (Gold Standard) story above.
>>>>>
>>>>> and yet,
>>>>
>>>> No, scooter. Fuck off with your scooterisms.
>>>>
>>>> "Actually..." [empty padding]
>>>> "Further..." [empty padding]
>>>> "Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
>>>> "And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
>>>> before fleeing]
>>>> "On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
>>>> "And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
>>>> "Heck..." [empty padding]
>>>> "Well..." [empty padding]
>>>> "After all..." [empty padding]
>>>> "In fact..." [empty padding]
>>>> "Indeed..." [empty padding]
>>>> "I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
>>>> acknowledgment]
>>>> "So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
>>>> *never* said, i.e. a straw man]
>>>> "TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." ? a straw man]
>>>> "Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and
>>>> "TRANSLATION:.." ? a straw man]
>>>> "Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in
>>>> the Constitution anyway]
>>>> "it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
>>>> "its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
>>>> "where" [he means "were"]
>>>> "were" [he means "where"]
>>>> "creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Also according to police reports he fired said gun at a police officer.
>>>>
>>>> That's a lie, scooter. You didn't *read* any police reports.
>> <crickets>
>
> Your desperation is showing
Same old stale 35-year-old Usenet trope as before.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing