On 10/25/2024 2:01 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <2dSSO.437588$WOde.92033@fx09.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/25/2024 11:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>> content-free batch of lies:
>>
>>> In article <r3RSO.201820$WtV9.120292@fx10.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/25/2024 9:58 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <eUPSO.730970$_o_3.409817@fx17.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/25/2024 6:11 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <9_ASO.54992$5Cq3.22997@fx06.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 1:12 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <FdxSO.247195$WXO8.135405@fx13.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 12:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <nyvSO.15934$Vuz4.12800@fx08.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 10:00 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>>>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>>>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <fFuSO.120726$6a33.19362@fx33.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/23/2024 8:09 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> July 26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instability.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The moment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for which you've been waiting").
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about Harris not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same office
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vance is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Huh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance]. This is only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming I did.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden will be on you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and stupidly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running for the same office.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and bad-faith
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which she won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered things she
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the subject" or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about "reading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands citations and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her intellectual
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's all a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines that she
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plays it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucking time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this time: she's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically announce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" *continues* to flee screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> He sure has a leash on you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *She* sure is a cowardly little twat, just as you are.>
>>>>>>>>>>> He
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> She
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> has you chasing your tail.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No. I have her running away screaming in terror.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> She. It's the opposite of "pothole," who claims to be female but who is actually
>>>>>>>> an effeminate male.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She
>>>>>> Yes, Kremlin Girl is "she," and "pothole" is "he." It's obvious and it's settled.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope and
>>>>
>>>> Yes. I'm right.
>>>
>>> No proof
>>
>> Boxcars full of proof.
>
> None or you would have posted it.

I have posted it and you've seen it. This is settled.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing