On 10/25/2024 11:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:

> In article <r3RSO.201820$WtV9.120292@fx10.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/25/2024 9:58 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <eUPSO.730970$_o_3.409817@fx17.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/25/2024 6:11 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <9_ASO.54992$5Cq3.22997@fx06.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 1:12 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <FdxSO.247195$WXO8.135405@fx13.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 12:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <nyvSO.15934$Vuz4.12800@fx08.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 10:00 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <fFuSO.120726$6a33.19362@fx33.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/23/2024 8:09 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> July 26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instability.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The moment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for which you've been waiting").
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about Harris not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same office
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vance is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Huh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance]. This is only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming I did.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden will be on you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and stupidly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running for the same office.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and bad-faith
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which she won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered things she
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the subject" or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about "reading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands citations and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her intellectual
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's all a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines that she
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plays it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucking time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this time: she's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically announce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" *continues* to flee screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He sure has a leash on you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *She* sure is a cowardly little twat, just as you are.>
>>>>>>>>> He
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> She
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> has you chasing your tail.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No. I have her running away screaming in terror.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She. It's the opposite of "pothole," who claims to be female but who is actually
>>>>>> an effeminate male.
>>>>>
>>>>> She
>>>> Yes, Kremlin Girl is "she," and "pothole" is "he." It's obvious and it's settled.
>>>
>>> Nope and
>>
>> Yes. I'm right.
>
> No proof

Boxcars full of proof.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing