On 10/25/2024 9:58 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <eUPSO.730970$_o_3.409817@fx17.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/25/2024 6:11 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <9_ASO.54992$5Cq3.22997@fx06.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/24/2024 1:12 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <FdxSO.247195$WXO8.135405@fx13.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 12:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <nyvSO.15934$Vuz4.12800@fx08.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 10:00 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <fFuSO.120726$6a33.19362@fx33.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/23/2024 8:09 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> July 26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instability.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>>>>>>>>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>>>>>>>>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The moment
>>>>>>>>>>>> for which you've been waiting").
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>>>>>>>>>>     You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about Harris not
>>>>>>>>>>>>     debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same office
>>>>>>>>>>>> Vance is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Huh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance]. This is only
>>>>>>>>>>>>     your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming I did.
>>>>>>>>>>>>     To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden will be on you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and stupidly
>>>>>>>>>>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are not
>>>>>>>>>>>> running for the same office.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and bad-faith
>>>>>>>>>>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which she won't
>>>>>>>>>>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered things she
>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the subject" or
>>>>>>>>>>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about "reading
>>>>>>>>>>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands citations and
>>>>>>>>>>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her intellectual
>>>>>>>>>>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's all a
>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines that she
>>>>>>>>>>>> plays it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every
>>>>>>>>>>>> fucking time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this time: she's
>>>>>>>>>>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically announce
>>>>>>>>>>>> her kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course won't
>>>>>>>>>>>> work because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" *continues* to flee screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He sure has a leash on you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *She* sure is a cowardly little twat, just as you are.>
>>>>>>> He
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> has you chasing your tail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. I have her running away screaming in terror.
>>>>>
>>>>> He
>>>>
>>>> She. It's the opposite of "pothole," who claims to be female but who is actually
>>>> an effeminate male.
>>>
>>> She
>> Yes, Kremlin Girl is "she," and "pothole" is "he." It's obvious and it's settled.
>
> Nope and

Yes. I'm right.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing