On 10/24/2024 1:12 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <FdxSO.247195$WXO8.135405@fx13.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/24/2024 12:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>> content-free batch of lies:
>>
>>> In article <nyvSO.15934$Vuz4.12800@fx08.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/24/2024 10:00 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <fFuSO.120726$6a33.19362@fx33.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/23/2024 8:09 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>>>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>>>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>>>>>>> July 26
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>>>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>>>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>>>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>>>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>>>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>>>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>>>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>>>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>>>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>>>>>>> instability.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>>>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>>>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>>>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>>>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>>>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>>>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>>>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>>>>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>>>>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>>>>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>> Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The moment
>>>>>>>> for which you've been waiting").
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>>>>>>     You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>     That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about Harris not
>>>>>>>>     debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same office
>>>>>>>> Vance is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>     Huh?
>>>>>>>>     Citation required.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>     No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance]. This is only
>>>>>>>>     your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>     Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming I did.
>>>>>>>>     To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden will be on you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and stupidly
>>>>>>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are not
>>>>>>>> running for the same office.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and bad-faith
>>>>>>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which she won't
>>>>>>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered things she
>>>>>>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the subject" or
>>>>>>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about "reading
>>>>>>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands citations and
>>>>>>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her intellectual
>>>>>>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's all a
>>>>>>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines that she
>>>>>>>> plays it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every
>>>>>>>> fucking time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this time: she's
>>>>>>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically announce
>>>>>>>> her kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course won't
>>>>>>>> work because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And "NoBody" *continues* to flee screaming in terror...
>>>>>
>>>>> He sure has a leash on you.
>>>>
>>>> *She* sure is a cowardly little twat, just as you are.>
>>> He
>>
>> She
>>
>>> has you chasing your tail.
>>
>> No. I have her running away screaming in terror.
>
> He

She. It's the opposite of "pothole," who claims to be female but who is actually
an effeminate male.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing