On 10/22/2024 8:44 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <nJZRO.728287$_o_3.191211@fx17.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/22/2024 3:14 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <wPURO.54978$5Cq3.759@fx06.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/22/2024 12:36 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <0ESRO.423991$FzW1.84487@fx14.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 11:28 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <WCRRO.101986$S9Vb.13679@fx45.iad>, smythlejon2@hotmail.com
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 10:44 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Yak <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:N7PRO.110215$xO0f.28681@fx48.iad:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 4:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:49:08 -0600, Skeeter
>>>>>>>>>>> <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vf5uoq$vos8$4@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/21/2024 8:43 AM, Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 16:48:20 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:20:38 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:57:01 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jan. 6 case appendix to be released
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday after judge denies Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oct 18
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The judge in former President Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> federal Jan. 6 case on Thursday
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evening rejected his lawyers' request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to delay the court-ordered release of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a redacted appendix of new evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from special counsel Jack Smith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why it matters: Trump's lawyers said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delaying the case until after the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election would allow them to submit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a counter to the appendix that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> special counsel's office filed, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. District Court Judge Tanya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chutkan denied their request and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ordered Smith's dossier be unsealed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with redactions on Friday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.axios.com/2024/10/17/trump-jan-6-case-documents-r
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elease-jack-smith
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look at you approving at prosecutors and judges engaging in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election interference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Election interfernce - like the Jan 6 riots?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How did Jan 6 influence the election?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What were the "Hang Mike Pence" Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supporters trying to accomplish, if not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interfering with the election?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The voting process was complete but nice try with your spin.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changing the subject, I see.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ELECTION includes more than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just "the voting process" and you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know it. Even Trump acknowelged the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pence role in certifying the ELECTION
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which his rioters
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> His *insurrectionists*. It was far more, and far worse, than a mere
>>>>>>>>>>>>> riot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you support the riots across the country that burned, looted and
>>>>>>>>>>>> killed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's a lie.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> THEY were the insurrectionists.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's another. An insurrection is a violent attack on the government
>>>>>>>>>> with a well-defined political goal, e.g. keep the election loser in
>>>>>>>>>> office. The protests of 2020 were:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> * not an attack on government; and
>>>>>>>>>> * had no well-defined political goal
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The BLM protests were a call for the
>>>>>>>>> ENFORCEMENT of law (hold police accountable),
>>>>>>>>> not an attack on the law.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When some of them ? only a few, not the majority ? devolved into violent
>>>>>>>> rioting, they were no longer about upholding the law. But your basic point is
>>>>>>>> well taken.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Nobody" is just being an idiot trying
>>>>>>>>> to equate them with Jan 6.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Par for the course. I swear, it is as if she works at being stupid. She doesn't
>>>>>>>> really need to work at it, because it comes so naturally to her.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The protests of 2020 were not in any way an insurrection.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Exactly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In some cases police actually JOINED
>>>>>>>>> the protesters.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why some police officers stood with
>>>>>>>>> protesters outraged over George Floyd's
>>>>>>>>> death
>>>>>>>>> June 1, 2020
>>>>>>>>> https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-officers-stood-protesters-outraged-
>>>>>>>>> george-floyds-death/story?id=70984369
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump's
>>>>>>>>>> planned and calculated attack on the electoral count certification
>>>>>>>>>> process was an insurrection. This is not in rational dispute.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trump would happily have seen his
>>>>>>>>> supporters kill his vice president if it
>>>>>>>>> meant another Trump term.
>>>>>>>> Exactly right. He was cheering them on as they chanted "Hang Mike Pence."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, he certainly was.
>>>>>
>>>>> He wasn't.
>>>>
>>>> He was. It's settled and not in dispute.
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>
>> Yep. And I've proved it, too.
>
> You didn't.

I did. You're full of shit. I win.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing