On 10/22/2024 12:36 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:

> In article <0ESRO.423991$FzW1.84487@fx14.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/22/2024 11:28 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>> content-free batch of lies:
>>
>>> In article <WCRRO.101986$S9Vb.13679@fx45.iad>, smythlejon2@hotmail.com
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/22/2024 10:44 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> Yak <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:N7PRO.110215$xO0f.28681@fx48.iad:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 4:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:49:08 -0600, Skeeter
>>>>>>> <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <vf5uoq$vos8$4@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/21/2024 8:43 AM, Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 16:48:20 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:20:38 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:57:01 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jan. 6 case appendix to be released
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday after judge denies Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oct 18
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The judge in former President Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> federal Jan. 6 case on Thursday
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evening rejected his lawyers' request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to delay the court-ordered release of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a redacted appendix of new evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from special counsel Jack Smith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why it matters: Trump's lawyers said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delaying the case until after the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election would allow them to submit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a counter to the appendix that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> special counsel's office filed, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. District Court Judge Tanya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chutkan denied their request and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ordered Smith's dossier be unsealed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with redactions on Friday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.axios.com/2024/10/17/trump-jan-6-case-documents-r
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elease-jack-smith
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look at you approving at prosecutors and judges engaging in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election interference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Election interfernce - like the Jan 6 riots?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How did Jan 6 influence the election?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What were the "Hang Mike Pence" Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>> supporters trying to accomplish, if not
>>>>>>>>>>>> interfering with the election?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The voting process was complete but nice try with your spin.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Changing the subject, I see.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The ELECTION includes more than
>>>>>>>>>> just "the voting process" and you
>>>>>>>>>> know it. Even Trump acknowelged the
>>>>>>>>>> Pence role in certifying the ELECTION
>>>>>>>>>> which his rioters
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> His *insurrectionists*. It was far more, and far worse, than a mere
>>>>>>>>> riot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yet you support the riots across the country that burned, looted and
>>>>>>>> killed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a lie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> THEY were the insurrectionists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's another. An insurrection is a violent attack on the government
>>>>>> with a well-defined political goal, e.g. keep the election loser in
>>>>>> office. The protests of 2020 were:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * not an attack on government; and
>>>>>> * had no well-defined political goal
>>>>>
>>>>> The BLM protests were a call for the
>>>>> ENFORCEMENT of law (hold police accountable),
>>>>> not an attack on the law.
>>>>
>>>> When some of them ? only a few, not the majority ? devolved into violent
>>>> rioting, they were no longer about upholding the law. But your basic point is
>>>> well taken.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Nobody" is just being an idiot trying
>>>>> to equate them with Jan 6.
>>>>
>>>> Par for the course. I swear, it is as if she works at being stupid. She doesn't
>>>> really need to work at it, because it comes so naturally to her.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The protests of 2020 were not in any way an insurrection.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly.
>>>>>
>>>>> In some cases police actually JOINED
>>>>> the protesters.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why some police officers stood with
>>>>> protesters outraged over George Floyd's
>>>>> death
>>>>> June 1, 2020
>>>>> https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-officers-stood-protesters-outraged-
>>>>> george-floyds-death/story?id=70984369
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump's
>>>>>> planned and calculated attack on the electoral count certification
>>>>>> process was an insurrection. This is not in rational dispute.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump would happily have seen his
>>>>> supporters kill his vice president if it
>>>>> meant another Trump term.
>>>> Exactly right. He was cheering them on as they chanted "Hang Mike Pence."
>>>
>>> Nope,
>>
>> Yes, he certainly was.
>
> He wasn't.

He was. It's settled and not in dispute.
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing