On 10/18/2024 8:52 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <IlvQO.34574$MoU3.23874@fx36.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>> On 10/18/2024 8:20 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <nXuQO.382676$FzW1.325758@fx14.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/17/2024 7:42 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <%%iQO.266436$v8v2.152889@fx18.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/17/2024 4:33 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>> convicted
>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free
>>>>>> batch
>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <67119b50$4$1895505$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 4:09:13 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>> <671198e6$4$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <67119743$4$2758$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:58:28 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <6711967e$5$3826$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <67118ce8$1$2873018$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:00:38 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> <671188f1$0$3829$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <671180d7$0$1895500$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 2:14:18 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <verun9$2tegq$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <671175b5$2$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 1:36:21 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <versg5$2stfd$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Struggles To
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting-kamala-harris/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harris.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose-Diaz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Balart Reports.? Not a single voter lining up at the polling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harris,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NBC correspondent added.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would tell us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,? Hillyard said. ?These were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important Mohave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> County.?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WATCH:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coddington
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said that voters are making a ?special effort? to vote this year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Schwarz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time ever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?He keeps saying it, and I?ve been thinking about it, and so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am,? Schwarz said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2024
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he is ?horrified by the state of the country,? Hillyard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blue states to support Trump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The New
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 by less
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 45.4%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and shocked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sleeves this time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where do you get these wild stories?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stay blind.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And stupid as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Just a few anomalies regarding the 2020 election.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Six states changed their election laws two months before the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election by executive fiat, instead of going through the proper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> channels
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the legislature. That is a violation of their state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that in and of itself is enough to invalidate the results of the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Mark Zuckerberg, hard left, spent $450 million dollars of private
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> money on our elections. After the 2020 election analysis revealed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of that money went to benefit Democrats.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. 6 swing states stopped counting the votes on election night for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first time in American history. At the time that they stopped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> counting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the votes, Donald Trump was ahead of Biden in each of them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. The unelected tech oligarchs in conjunction with the FBI in this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> country censored a very important story about Hunter Biden?s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laptop and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Biden?s corruption. People who worked in the intelligence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> came out and said it was Russian disinformation only to have that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laptop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be admitted into evidence as part of an FBI investigation and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prosecution of Hunter Biden. Polling after the election showed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people knew about the Hunter Biden laptop story it would?ve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed 17%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. 2,036,041 ballots were touched by anomalies.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. 923 American citizens filled out affidavits alleging voter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signed them under penalties of perjury.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7. 50 plus courts blocked evidentiary hearings into the alleged fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found in 2020.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8. Prior to 2020 there were four other contested elections, one in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Florida, one in the 78th district of Missouri, one in the ninth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> district
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of North Carolina, and one in the 22nd district of New York. In every
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> single one of those four instances, there was an evidentiary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hearing. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 2020 election, there was no evidentiary hearing. For the first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in American history.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9. No election contest in American history has had 923 fact witnesses
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sign under penalties of perjury and stake their personal freedom in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testimony to attest to the irregularities and legal issues found in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> various states.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10. 37 states in the United States of America altered their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> absentee or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mail in ballots ballot integrity procedures before the 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11. If those 37 states used the same ballot integrity procedures that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they used in 2018, swing states would?ve found an upwards of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 30,000 more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ineligible ballots.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12. In Pennsylvania, counties allowed new ballots to be filled out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13. Any one of those is enough to say that there was enough fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election to doubt the outcome. Can I prove Donald Trump would?ve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won the election if the Democrats hadn?t cheated? No I can?t prove a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> counter-narrative, but I can tell you that this amount of fraud leads
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any reasonable person to the conclusion that Joe Biden didn?t win.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The insurrection therefore was on 11/3/2020.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/6 was a lawful protest with permits that got out of hand. Unlike
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrats who spent 10 months burning down this country to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tune of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $2 billion dollars, and injuring 740 police officers nationwide, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capital riot had a couple million dollars in damages, 140 police
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers that were injured and zero deaths. Except the 3 Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supporters who were unarmed and killed without any investigation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupt government.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anybody who is clutching their pearls about January 6 without
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioning
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the fact that there was a large federal presence and many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anomalies that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have yet to be answered is a liar and a partisan hack.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound like an uninformed stage 10 TDS patient who needs to detox
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from CNN and MSNBC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can endorse the cackling communist from California, but..don?t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dare pretend like the reason why you?re doing it is because Donald
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did something wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let?s break down and address these claims one by one:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 1: States changing election laws by executive fiat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It?s true that some states changed voting procedures before the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> due to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly to expand access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, these changes were largely made through emergency powers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or by state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election boards and officials, often with judicial review. In most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> courts ruled these changes were legal under state constitutions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states where the legality was questioned, no court invalidated the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results based solely on these procedural changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 2: Mark Zuckerberg spent $450 million to benefit Democrats
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Zuckerberg and his wife donated to a non-partisan group, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Center for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which provided funds to help local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> offices run elections during the pandemic. While some of the funds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> areas that leaned Democrat (which are often more populous),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republican-leaning
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> areas also received funds. There?s no evidence that this funding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was used to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> favor one party over another.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 3: 6 swing states stopped counting votes on election night
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In 2020, due to the unprecedented number of mail-in ballots, some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stop counting votes temporarily on election night. This wasn?t a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unique event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in history?vote counting has often extended beyond election night
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in previous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elections, especially in states with close races. Mail-in ballots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take longer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to process, and the delays were expected and announced beforehand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump?s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early lead in some states was due to the ?red mirage? phenomenon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same-day in-person votes (which leaned Republican) were counted first,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> followed by mail-in ballots (which leaned Democrat).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 4: Hunter Biden laptop story and censorship
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Hunter Biden laptop story was published just weeks before the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election. Some media outlets and social media platforms took steps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to limit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its distribution, citing concerns about the authenticity of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and potential foreign interference. While subsequent investigations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the laptop was part of a legitimate investigation into Hunter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is no evidence that the suppression of this story changed the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outcome. Polls suggesting otherwise are speculative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 5: 2 million ballots touched by anomalies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This claim is vague and lacks concrete evidence. Many claims about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anomalies have been thoroughly investigated, and none have shown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> widespread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud that would alter the outcome of the election. Anomalies are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> common in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every election, but they are generally clerical or minor errors
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that do not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affect the overall result.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 6: 923 affidavits alleging voter fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While it?s true that some people signed affidavits, affidavits are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not proof
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of fraud?they are simply statements by individuals. Many of these
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affidavits
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were dismissed by courts due to lack of evidence or because they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> described
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misunderstandings of normal election processes. Simply filing an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affidavit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not prove fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 7: 50+ courts blocked evidentiary hearings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Many courts rejected election fraud claims because the evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presented was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insufficient or non-existent. Courts didn?t block hearings out of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bias but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rather followed legal standards that require concrete evidence before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proceeding. Most cases were dismissed because they didn?t meet the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> burden of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proof.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 8: No evidentiary hearing for the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were numerous hearings and legal challenges related to the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election, including in key states like Georgia, Arizona, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pennsylvania. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most cases, judges found no credible evidence of widespread fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that there was ?no evidentiary hearing? is false.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 9: 923 fact witnesses signed under perjury
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While hundreds of people may have signed affidavits, it?s important
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to note
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that many of these affidavits were dismissed by courts due to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lack of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supporting evidence. An affidavit alone does not constitute proof,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were based on misunderstandings or hearsay rather than direct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 10: 37 states altered absentee or mail-in ballot procedures
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, many states made adjustments to their mail-in voting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> procedures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response to the pandemic, which is entirely legal if done in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accordance with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state laws. These changes were made to ensure voter safety and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accessibility.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Courts generally upheld these changes as legal, with some minor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exceptions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 11: 30,000 more ineligible ballots in swing states
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence to support the claim that 30,000 ineligible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ballots were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cast in swing states. Audits and recounts in key states, including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Georgia and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona, have consistently shown that the number of ineligible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ballots was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely low and nowhere near enough to affect the outcome of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 12: Pennsylvania allowed new ballots after the election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This claim is false. Pennsylvania followed court-approved deadlines
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accepting mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within a certain window after the election, which is a standard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> practice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence that ballots were illegally counted after the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 13: Any one of these is enough to invalidate the election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Each of these claims has been investigated and largely debunked.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were some procedural changes due to the pandemic, none of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claims provide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> credible evidence of widespread fraud that would invalidate the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> January 6 vs. Summer 2020 Protests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The January 6 attack was not a lawful protest. It was a violent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breach of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. Capitol aimed at overturning the results of a democratic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election. There
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were investigations into the conduct of Capitol Police, but there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence of a government cover-up of the deaths of protesters. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrast,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> while the summer 2020 protests did lead to property damage and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> injuries, they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were largely protests against police brutality, and widespread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condemnation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred when violence took place.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In summary, the 2020 election was one of the most scrutinized
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elections in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. history, with no credible evidence found to support claims of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> widespread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud that would have changed the outcome. The claims made here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> widely investigated, with no proof supporting the narrative that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was stolen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A shame you have no reasoned response not this content. That is OK, though,
>>>>>>>> just means we have reached agreement -- the election was fair or at the very
>>>>>>>> least there is no good evidence or reason to think it was not. Thank you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It was a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was a free, fair and clean election, and everyone knows it, including
>>>>>> Trump ?
>>>>>> *especially* Trump.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope.
>>>>
>>>> Yep. You know it was. There is *zero* evidence of any "massive,"
>>>> election-changing fraud. There are only insurrectionist Trump's lies about it.
>>>>
>>>> Free, fair and clean election — settled.
>>>
>>> You believe the lies of the left.
>>
>> No, I believe the rock-solid unquestioned facts. No "massive" election-changing
>> fraud. This is settled. And you and Trump know it.
>
> I don't believe the lies your side tells.
*All* you believe are Trump lies. You're a gullible, unthinking fuckwit with an
empty bullshit life. All you do all fucking day long is post meaningless
content-free bullshit to Usenet.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing