On 10/18/2024 8:20 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <nXuQO.382676$FzW1.325758@fx14.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/17/2024 7:42 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <%%iQO.266436$v8v2.152889@fx18.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/17/2024 4:33 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <67119b50$4$1895505$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 4:09:13 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <671198e6$4$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <67119743$4$2758$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:58:28 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>> <6711967e$5$3826$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <67118ce8$1$2873018$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:00:38 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <671188f1$0$3829$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <671180d7$0$1895500$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 2:14:18 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> <verun9$2tegq$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <671175b5$2$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 1:36:21 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <versg5$2stfd$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-voting-kamala-harris/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that not one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala Harris.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots early at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on ?Jose-Diaz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Balart Reports.? Not a single voter lining up at the polling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for Harris,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NBC correspondent added.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line, and we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly would tell us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,? Hillyard said. ?These were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-important Mohave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> County.?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WATCH:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim Coddington
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said that voters are making a ?special effort? to vote this year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley Schwarz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first time ever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?He keeps saying it, and I?ve been thinking about it, and so here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am,? Schwarz said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in 2024
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he is ?horrified by the state of the country,? Hillyard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to Arizona from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blue states to support Trump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to The New
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in 2020 by less
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president won the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5% to 45.4%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest and shocked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sleeves this time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where do you get these wild stories?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stay blind.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And stupid as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Just a few anomalies regarding the 2020 election.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Six states changed their election laws two months before the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>> election by executive fiat, instead of going through the proper channels
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the legislature. That is a violation of their state constitutions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that in and of itself is enough to invalidate the results of the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>> election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Mark Zuckerberg, hard left, spent $450 million dollars of private
>>>>>>>>>>>>> money on our elections. After the 2020 election analysis revealed that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of that money went to benefit Democrats.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. 6 swing states stopped counting the votes on election night for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> first time in American history. At the time that they stopped counting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the votes, Donald Trump was ahead of Biden in each of them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. The unelected tech oligarchs in conjunction with the FBI in this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> country censored a very important story about Hunter Biden?s laptop and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Biden?s corruption. People who worked in the intelligence community,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> came out and said it was Russian disinformation only to have that laptop
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be admitted into evidence as part of an FBI investigation and criminal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prosecution of Hunter Biden. Polling after the election showed that if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people knew about the Hunter Biden laptop story it would?ve changed 17%
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. 2,036,041 ballots were touched by anomalies.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. 923 American citizens filled out affidavits alleging voter fraud, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> signed them under penalties of perjury.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7. 50 plus courts blocked evidentiary hearings into the alleged fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>> found in 2020.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8. Prior to 2020 there were four other contested elections, one in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Florida, one in the 78th district of Missouri, one in the ninth district
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of North Carolina, and one in the 22nd district of New York. In every
>>>>>>>>>>>>> single one of those four instances, there was an evidentiary hearing. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 2020 election, there was no evidentiary hearing. For the first time
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in American history.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9. No election contest in American history has had 923 fact witnesses
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sign under penalties of perjury and stake their personal freedom in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> testimony to attest to the irregularities and legal issues found in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> various states.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10. 37 states in the United States of America altered their absentee or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mail in ballots ballot integrity procedures before the 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11. If those 37 states used the same ballot integrity procedures that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they used in 2018, swing states would?ve found an upwards of 30,000 more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ineligible ballots.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12. In Pennsylvania, counties allowed new ballots to be filled out after
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13. Any one of those is enough to say that there was enough fraud in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election to doubt the outcome. Can I prove Donald Trump would?ve
>>>>>>>>>>>>> won the election if the Democrats hadn?t cheated? No I can?t prove a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> counter-narrative, but I can tell you that this amount of fraud leads
>>>>>>>>>>>>> any reasonable person to the conclusion that Joe Biden didn?t win.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The insurrection therefore was on 11/3/2020.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/6 was a lawful protest with permits that got out of hand. Unlike
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrats who spent 10 months burning down this country to the tune of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $2 billion dollars, and injuring 740 police officers nationwide, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> capital riot had a couple million dollars in damages, 140 police
>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers that were injured and zero deaths. Except the 3 Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>> supporters who were unarmed and killed without any investigation by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupt government.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anybody who is clutching their pearls about January 6 without mentioning
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the fact that there was a large federal presence and many anomalies that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have yet to be answered is a liar and a partisan hack.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound like an uninformed stage 10 TDS patient who needs to detox
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from CNN and MSNBC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can endorse the cackling communist from California, but..don?t you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dare pretend like the reason why you?re doing it is because Donald Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>> did something wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let?s break down and address these claims one by one:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 1: States changing election laws by executive fiat
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It?s true that some states changed voting procedures before the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>>>> due to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly to expand access to mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>> However, these changes were largely made through emergency powers or by state
>>>>>>>>>>>> election boards and officials, often with judicial review. In most cases, the
>>>>>>>>>>>> courts ruled these changes were legal under state constitutions. Even in
>>>>>>>>>>>> states where the legality was questioned, no court invalidated the election
>>>>>>>>>>>> results based solely on these procedural changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 2: Mark Zuckerberg spent $450 million to benefit Democrats
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Zuckerberg and his wife donated to a non-partisan group, the Center for
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which provided funds to help local election
>>>>>>>>>>>> offices run elections during the pandemic. While some of the funds went to
>>>>>>>>>>>> areas that leaned Democrat (which are often more populous), Republican-leaning
>>>>>>>>>>>> areas also received funds. There?s no evidence that this funding was used to
>>>>>>>>>>>> favor one party over another.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 3: 6 swing states stopped counting votes on election night
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In 2020, due to the unprecedented number of mail-in ballots, some states did
>>>>>>>>>>>> stop counting votes temporarily on election night. This wasn?t a unique event
>>>>>>>>>>>> in history?vote counting has often extended beyond election night in previous
>>>>>>>>>>>> elections, especially in states with close races. Mail-in ballots take longer
>>>>>>>>>>>> to process, and the delays were expected and announced beforehand. Trump?s
>>>>>>>>>>>> early lead in some states was due to the ?red mirage? phenomenon, where
>>>>>>>>>>>> same-day in-person votes (which leaned Republican) were counted first,
>>>>>>>>>>>> followed by mail-in ballots (which leaned Democrat).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 4: Hunter Biden laptop story and censorship
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Hunter Biden laptop story was published just weeks before the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>> election. Some media outlets and social media platforms took steps to limit
>>>>>>>>>>>> its distribution, citing concerns about the authenticity of the information
>>>>>>>>>>>> and potential foreign interference. While subsequent investigations confirmed
>>>>>>>>>>>> that the laptop was part of a legitimate investigation into Hunter Biden,
>>>>>>>>>>>> there is no evidence that the suppression of this story changed the election
>>>>>>>>>>>> outcome. Polls suggesting otherwise are speculative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 5: 2 million ballots touched by anomalies
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This claim is vague and lacks concrete evidence. Many claims about voting
>>>>>>>>>>>> anomalies have been thoroughly investigated, and none have shown widespread
>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud that would alter the outcome of the election. Anomalies are common in
>>>>>>>>>>>> every election, but they are generally clerical or minor errors that do not
>>>>>>>>>>>> affect the overall result.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 6: 923 affidavits alleging voter fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> While it?s true that some people signed affidavits, affidavits are not proof
>>>>>>>>>>>> of fraud?they are simply statements by individuals. Many of these affidavits
>>>>>>>>>>>> were dismissed by courts due to lack of evidence or because they described
>>>>>>>>>>>> misunderstandings of normal election processes. Simply filing an affidavit
>>>>>>>>>>>> does not prove fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 7: 50+ courts blocked evidentiary hearings
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Many courts rejected election fraud claims because the evidence presented was
>>>>>>>>>>>> insufficient or non-existent. Courts didn?t block hearings out of bias but
>>>>>>>>>>>> rather followed legal standards that require concrete evidence before
>>>>>>>>>>>> proceeding. Most cases were dismissed because they didn?t meet the burden of
>>>>>>>>>>>> proof.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 8: No evidentiary hearing for the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There were numerous hearings and legal challenges related to the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>> election, including in key states like Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania. In
>>>>>>>>>>>> most cases, judges found no credible evidence of widespread fraud. The idea
>>>>>>>>>>>> that there was ?no evidentiary hearing? is false.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 9: 923 fact witnesses signed under perjury
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> While hundreds of people may have signed affidavits, it?s important to note
>>>>>>>>>>>> that many of these affidavits were dismissed by courts due to a lack of
>>>>>>>>>>>> supporting evidence. An affidavit alone does not constitute proof, and many
>>>>>>>>>>>> were based on misunderstandings or hearsay rather than direct knowledge of
>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 10: 37 states altered absentee or mail-in ballot procedures
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, many states made adjustments to their mail-in voting procedures in
>>>>>>>>>>>> response to the pandemic, which is entirely legal if done in accordance with
>>>>>>>>>>>> state laws. These changes were made to ensure voter safety and accessibility.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Courts generally upheld these changes as legal, with some minor exceptions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 11: 30,000 more ineligible ballots in swing states
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence to support the claim that 30,000 ineligible ballots were
>>>>>>>>>>>> cast in swing states. Audits and recounts in key states, including Georgia and
>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona, have consistently shown that the number of ineligible ballots was
>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely low and nowhere near enough to affect the outcome of the election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 12: Pennsylvania allowed new ballots after the election
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This claim is false. Pennsylvania followed court-approved deadlines for
>>>>>>>>>>>> accepting mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day and received
>>>>>>>>>>>> within a certain window after the election, which is a standard practice.
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence that ballots were illegally counted after the election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 13: Any one of these is enough to invalidate the election
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Each of these claims has been investigated and largely debunked. While there
>>>>>>>>>>>> were some procedural changes due to the pandemic, none of the claims provide
>>>>>>>>>>>> credible evidence of widespread fraud that would invalidate the results of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> January 6 vs. Summer 2020 Protests
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The January 6 attack was not a lawful protest. It was a violent breach of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. Capitol aimed at overturning the results of a democratic election. There
>>>>>>>>>>>> were investigations into the conduct of Capitol Police, but there is no
>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence of a government cover-up of the deaths of protesters. In contrast,
>>>>>>>>>>>> while the summer 2020 protests did lead to property damage and injuries, they
>>>>>>>>>>>> were largely protests against police brutality, and widespread condemnation
>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred when violence took place.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In summary, the 2020 election was one of the most scrutinized elections in
>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. history, with no credible evidence found to support claims of widespread
>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud that would have changed the outcome. The claims made here have been
>>>>>>>>>>>> widely investigated, with no proof supporting the narrative that the election
>>>>>>>>>>>> was stolen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A shame you have no reasoned response not this content. That is OK, though,
>>>>>> just means we have reached agreement -- the election was fair or at the very
>>>>>> least there is no good evidence or reason to think it was not. Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was a
>>>>
>>>> It was a free, fair and clean election, and everyone knows it, including Trump ?
>>>> *especially* Trump.
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>
>> Yep. You know it was. There is *zero* evidence of any "massive,"
>> election-changing fraud. There are only insurrectionist Trump's lies about it.
>>
>> Free, fair and clean election — settled.
>
> You believe the lies of the left.

No, I believe the rock-solid unquestioned facts. No "massive" election-changing
fraud. This is settled. And you and Trump know it.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing