On 10/17/2024 7:42 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <%%iQO.266436$v8v2.152889@fx18.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/17/2024 4:33 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <67119b50$4$1895505$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 4:09:13 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <671198e6$4$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <67119743$4$2758$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:58:28 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <6711967e$5$3826$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <67118ce8$1$2873018$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:00:38 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>> <671188f1$0$3829$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <671180d7$0$1895500$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 2:14:18 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <verun9$2tegq$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <671175b5$2$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 1:36:21 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <versg5$2stfd$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-voting-kamala-harris/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that not one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala Harris.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots early at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on ?Jose-Diaz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Balart Reports.? Not a single voter lining up at the polling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for Harris,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NBC correspondent added.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line, and we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly would tell us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,? Hillyard said. ?These were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-important Mohave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> County.?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WATCH:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim Coddington
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said that voters are making a ?special effort? to vote this year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley Schwarz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first time ever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?He keeps saying it, and I?ve been thinking about it, and so here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am,? Schwarz said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in 2024
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he is ?horrified by the state of the country,? Hillyard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to Arizona from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blue states to support Trump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to The New
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in 2020 by less
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president won the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5% to 45.4%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest and shocked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sleeves this time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where do you get these wild stories?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Stay blind.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And stupid as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Just a few anomalies regarding the 2020 election.*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Six states changed their election laws two months before the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>> election by executive fiat, instead of going through the proper channels
>>>>>>>>>>> in the legislature. That is a violation of their state constitutions and
>>>>>>>>>>> that in and of itself is enough to invalidate the results of the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>> election.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Mark Zuckerberg, hard left, spent $450 million dollars of private
>>>>>>>>>>> money on our elections. After the 2020 election analysis revealed that
>>>>>>>>>>> most of that money went to benefit Democrats.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. 6 swing states stopped counting the votes on election night for the
>>>>>>>>>>> first time in American history. At the time that they stopped counting
>>>>>>>>>>> the votes, Donald Trump was ahead of Biden in each of them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. The unelected tech oligarchs in conjunction with the FBI in this
>>>>>>>>>>> country censored a very important story about Hunter Biden?s laptop and
>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Biden?s corruption. People who worked in the intelligence community,
>>>>>>>>>>> came out and said it was Russian disinformation only to have that laptop
>>>>>>>>>>> be admitted into evidence as part of an FBI investigation and criminal
>>>>>>>>>>> prosecution of Hunter Biden. Polling after the election showed that if
>>>>>>>>>>> people knew about the Hunter Biden laptop story it would?ve changed 17%
>>>>>>>>>>> of the vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 5. 2,036,041 ballots were touched by anomalies.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6. 923 American citizens filled out affidavits alleging voter fraud, and
>>>>>>>>>>> signed them under penalties of perjury.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 7. 50 plus courts blocked evidentiary hearings into the alleged fraud
>>>>>>>>>>> found in 2020.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 8. Prior to 2020 there were four other contested elections, one in
>>>>>>>>>>> Florida, one in the 78th district of Missouri, one in the ninth district
>>>>>>>>>>> of North Carolina, and one in the 22nd district of New York. In every
>>>>>>>>>>> single one of those four instances, there was an evidentiary hearing. In
>>>>>>>>>>> the 2020 election, there was no evidentiary hearing. For the first time
>>>>>>>>>>> in American history.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 9. No election contest in American history has had 923 fact witnesses
>>>>>>>>>>> sign under penalties of perjury and stake their personal freedom in
>>>>>>>>>>> testimony to attest to the irregularities and legal issues found in
>>>>>>>>>>> various states.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 10. 37 states in the United States of America altered their absentee or
>>>>>>>>>>> mail in ballots ballot integrity procedures before the 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 11. If those 37 states used the same ballot integrity procedures that
>>>>>>>>>>> they used in 2018, swing states would?ve found an upwards of 30,000 more
>>>>>>>>>>> ineligible ballots.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 12. In Pennsylvania, counties allowed new ballots to be filled out after
>>>>>>>>>>> the election.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 13. Any one of those is enough to say that there was enough fraud in the
>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election to doubt the outcome. Can I prove Donald Trump would?ve
>>>>>>>>>>> won the election if the Democrats hadn?t cheated? No I can?t prove a
>>>>>>>>>>> counter-narrative, but I can tell you that this amount of fraud leads
>>>>>>>>>>> any reasonable person to the conclusion that Joe Biden didn?t win.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The insurrection therefore was on 11/3/2020.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1/6 was a lawful protest with permits that got out of hand. Unlike
>>>>>>>>>>> Democrats who spent 10 months burning down this country to the tune of
>>>>>>>>>>> $2 billion dollars, and injuring 740 police officers nationwide, the
>>>>>>>>>>> capital riot had a couple million dollars in damages, 140 police
>>>>>>>>>>> officers that were injured and zero deaths. Except the 3 Trump
>>>>>>>>>>> supporters who were unarmed and killed without any investigation by the
>>>>>>>>>>> corrupt government.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anybody who is clutching their pearls about January 6 without mentioning
>>>>>>>>>>> the fact that there was a large federal presence and many anomalies that
>>>>>>>>>>> have yet to be answered is a liar and a partisan hack.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You sound like an uninformed stage 10 TDS patient who needs to detox
>>>>>>>>>>> from CNN and MSNBC.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You can endorse the cackling communist from California, but..don?t you
>>>>>>>>>>> dare pretend like the reason why you?re doing it is because Donald Trump
>>>>>>>>>>> did something wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Let?s break down and address these claims one by one:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 1: States changing election laws by executive fiat
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It?s true that some states changed voting procedures before the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>> due to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly to expand access to mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>>>> However, these changes were largely made through emergency powers or by state
>>>>>>>>>> election boards and officials, often with judicial review. In most cases, the
>>>>>>>>>> courts ruled these changes were legal under state constitutions. Even in
>>>>>>>>>> states where the legality was questioned, no court invalidated the election
>>>>>>>>>> results based solely on these procedural changes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 2: Mark Zuckerberg spent $450 million to benefit Democrats
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mark Zuckerberg and his wife donated to a non-partisan group, the Center for
>>>>>>>>>> Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which provided funds to help local election
>>>>>>>>>> offices run elections during the pandemic. While some of the funds went to
>>>>>>>>>> areas that leaned Democrat (which are often more populous), Republican-leaning
>>>>>>>>>> areas also received funds. There?s no evidence that this funding was used to
>>>>>>>>>> favor one party over another.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 3: 6 swing states stopped counting votes on election night
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In 2020, due to the unprecedented number of mail-in ballots, some states did
>>>>>>>>>> stop counting votes temporarily on election night. This wasn?t a unique event
>>>>>>>>>> in history?vote counting has often extended beyond election night in previous
>>>>>>>>>> elections, especially in states with close races. Mail-in ballots take longer
>>>>>>>>>> to process, and the delays were expected and announced beforehand. Trump?s
>>>>>>>>>> early lead in some states was due to the ?red mirage? phenomenon, where
>>>>>>>>>> same-day in-person votes (which leaned Republican) were counted first,
>>>>>>>>>> followed by mail-in ballots (which leaned Democrat).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 4: Hunter Biden laptop story and censorship
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The Hunter Biden laptop story was published just weeks before the 2020
>>>>>>>>>> election. Some media outlets and social media platforms took steps to limit
>>>>>>>>>> its distribution, citing concerns about the authenticity of the information
>>>>>>>>>> and potential foreign interference. While subsequent investigations confirmed
>>>>>>>>>> that the laptop was part of a legitimate investigation into Hunter Biden,
>>>>>>>>>> there is no evidence that the suppression of this story changed the election
>>>>>>>>>> outcome. Polls suggesting otherwise are speculative.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 5: 2 million ballots touched by anomalies
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This claim is vague and lacks concrete evidence. Many claims about voting
>>>>>>>>>> anomalies have been thoroughly investigated, and none have shown widespread
>>>>>>>>>> fraud that would alter the outcome of the election. Anomalies are common in
>>>>>>>>>> every election, but they are generally clerical or minor errors that do not
>>>>>>>>>> affect the overall result.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 6: 923 affidavits alleging voter fraud
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> While it?s true that some people signed affidavits, affidavits are not proof
>>>>>>>>>> of fraud?they are simply statements by individuals. Many of these affidavits
>>>>>>>>>> were dismissed by courts due to lack of evidence or because they described
>>>>>>>>>> misunderstandings of normal election processes. Simply filing an affidavit
>>>>>>>>>> does not prove fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 7: 50+ courts blocked evidentiary hearings
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Many courts rejected election fraud claims because the evidence presented was
>>>>>>>>>> insufficient or non-existent. Courts didn?t block hearings out of bias but
>>>>>>>>>> rather followed legal standards that require concrete evidence before
>>>>>>>>>> proceeding. Most cases were dismissed because they didn?t meet the burden of
>>>>>>>>>> proof.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 8: No evidentiary hearing for the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There were numerous hearings and legal challenges related to the 2020
>>>>>>>>>> election, including in key states like Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania. In
>>>>>>>>>> most cases, judges found no credible evidence of widespread fraud. The idea
>>>>>>>>>> that there was ?no evidentiary hearing? is false.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 9: 923 fact witnesses signed under perjury
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> While hundreds of people may have signed affidavits, it?s important to note
>>>>>>>>>> that many of these affidavits were dismissed by courts due to a lack of
>>>>>>>>>> supporting evidence. An affidavit alone does not constitute proof, and many
>>>>>>>>>> were based on misunderstandings or hearsay rather than direct knowledge of
>>>>>>>>>> fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 10: 37 states altered absentee or mail-in ballot procedures
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, many states made adjustments to their mail-in voting procedures in
>>>>>>>>>> response to the pandemic, which is entirely legal if done in accordance with
>>>>>>>>>> state laws. These changes were made to ensure voter safety and accessibility.
>>>>>>>>>> Courts generally upheld these changes as legal, with some minor exceptions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 11: 30,000 more ineligible ballots in swing states
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence to support the claim that 30,000 ineligible ballots were
>>>>>>>>>> cast in swing states. Audits and recounts in key states, including Georgia and
>>>>>>>>>> Arizona, have consistently shown that the number of ineligible ballots was
>>>>>>>>>> extremely low and nowhere near enough to affect the outcome of the election.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 12: Pennsylvania allowed new ballots after the election
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This claim is false. Pennsylvania followed court-approved deadlines for
>>>>>>>>>> accepting mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day and received
>>>>>>>>>> within a certain window after the election, which is a standard practice.
>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence that ballots were illegally counted after the election.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 13: Any one of these is enough to invalidate the election
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Each of these claims has been investigated and largely debunked. While there
>>>>>>>>>> were some procedural changes due to the pandemic, none of the claims provide
>>>>>>>>>> credible evidence of widespread fraud that would invalidate the results of the
>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> January 6 vs. Summer 2020 Protests
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The January 6 attack was not a lawful protest. It was a violent breach of the
>>>>>>>>>> U.S. Capitol aimed at overturning the results of a democratic election. There
>>>>>>>>>> were investigations into the conduct of Capitol Police, but there is no
>>>>>>>>>> evidence of a government cover-up of the deaths of protesters. In contrast,
>>>>>>>>>> while the summer 2020 protests did lead to property damage and injuries, they
>>>>>>>>>> were largely protests against police brutality, and widespread condemnation
>>>>>>>>>> occurred when violence took place.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In summary, the 2020 election was one of the most scrutinized elections in
>>>>>>>>>> U.S. history, with no credible evidence found to support claims of widespread
>>>>>>>>>> fraud that would have changed the outcome. The claims made here have been
>>>>>>>>>> widely investigated, with no proof supporting the narrative that the election
>>>>>>>>>> was stolen.
>>>>
>>>> A shame you have no reasoned response not this content. That is OK, though,
>>>> just means we have reached agreement -- the election was fair or at the very
>>>> least there is no good evidence or reason to think it was not. Thank you.
>>>
>>> It was a
>>
>> It was a free, fair and clean election, and everyone knows it, including Trump ?
>> *especially* Trump.
>
> Nope.

Yep. You know it was. There is *zero* evidence of any "massive,"
election-changing fraud. There are only insurrectionist Trump's lies about it.

Free, fair and clean election — settled.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing