On 9/5/2024 4:51 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <XmqCO.75298$QhM1.13678@fx09.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 9/5/2024 2:01 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <JQnCO.188478$D_21.178833@fx14.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 9/5/2024 12:06 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <W8lCO.73096$if3c.52828@fx13.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/5/2024 8:45 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <NEjCO.21033$Jh%5.13238@fx45.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/5/2024 4:56 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <ckcCO.124001$FDd1.96811@fx18.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/4/2024 7:29 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6F8CO.138778$8jx2.14996@fx17.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/4/2024 1:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <BQ0CO.37925$yWj9.32893@fx12.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/4/2024 9:19 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <IlrBO.43768$D_21.20219@fx14.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/2/2024 12:22 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <C_nBO.2$ORHe.0@fx07.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/2/2024 8:20 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <XnsB1E15D3C64CC1629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vb4f2q$2rtng$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-02, David Hartung <junk@nogood.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/31/24 12:50, Byker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/31/2024 7:17 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:00:54 -0700, Byker <byKKKer@do~rag.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2024 4:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:19:44 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 06:25:38 -0500, David Hartung
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <junk@nogood.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.reuters.com/technology/zuckerberg-says-biden-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> administration-pressured-meta-censor-covid-19-content-2024-08-2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7/ [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aug 27 (Reuters) - Meta Platforms (META.O)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , opens new tab CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the Biden
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> administration had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pressured the company to "censor" COVID-19 content during the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pandemic,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apparently referring to White House requests to take down
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misinformation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about the coronavirus and vaccines.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In a letter dated Aug. 26, Zuckerberg told the U.S. House of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Representatives Judiciary Committee that he regretted not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about this pressure earlier, as well as other decisions he had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp around removing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It looks as if the "nutcases" weren't so nuts after all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting how often this seems to occur.  Libs insist that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't happening then they run away when the proof that it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually did.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody is "running away", NoBody.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then why do you refuse to address the fact that Facebook admits
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to hiding important information from the public at the behest of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the government?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Facebook didn't do that. Taking down blatant lies is not "hiding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Translation:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. What I wrote is in plain English and requires no translation,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which was only a straw man anyway.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What Facebook took down was blatant lies. They had every right to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so, and the government had every right politely to request that they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More likely what they took down was opinions that made leftists
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uncomfortable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They banned the NY Post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is "they"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so it was unable to post articles regarding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the information they learned about the Hunter Biden laptop and that it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was NOT a Russian plant but real. something the FBI knew a week after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they received it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They also censored
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is "they"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> / banned people who tried to post articles
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding the laptop being real. As post election polls determined
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this was more than enough by itself to swing the election towards a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden win.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The laptop is such a non-story
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that even Trump didn't use it in his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 campaign.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is known as election interference, a serious crime, which is why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zuckerberg is covering his ass.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zuckerberg is a billionaire,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who do you think he is supporting?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who cares? How did the Obamas get 4 mansions?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They didn't. They have two very large houses. They got their money by writing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> books that millions of people have bought and read. Barack Obama also earns
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> colossal paychecks giving speeches, as do all ex-presidents and some ex-vice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presidents. It's legal and it's honorable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Too bad you only have a shitty broken down pre-fab for a house. Too bad you're a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> housebound 100% disabled SSDI dole scrounger.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They have 4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Two. It's settled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Two. It's settled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why 2?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked it up. They own two houses. Neither one is a broken-down decrepit
>>>>>>>>>>>> pre-fab like yours.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Mansions and they have 3.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They're rich, unlike you. They earned it honestly, unlike you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How? I see what they make.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You don't. You wouldn't even know where to look, because you're stupid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aw I have you upset now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How is that possible?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They both have written best-selling books, including two by Barack Obama before
>>>>>>>> he became president. He earns $400,000 for a speech, and she earns $200,000 for
>>>>>>>> one. You couldn't get a nickel for speaking. In fact, if you tried, someone
>>>>>>>> would smash you in the mouth with a sand wedge.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bring it bitch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's phony tuff-boi talk. You're not tough. You've admitted it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then bring it bitch.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing but phony tuff-boi talk. You're not tough. You're a pussy.
>>>
>>> It has you scared.
>>
>> No. Phony tuff-boi talk scares no one.
>>
>> You're not tough. You never were, but especially you're not at age 75+
>
> I'm not that old.

Yes, you are.

>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You may not like that ex-presidents and their spouses command high speaking
>>>>>>>> fees, but they do, and it's honest, ethical and legal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it is. They legally and ethically earned their money ? something you were
>>>>>> never able to do.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope.
>>>>
>>>> Yep. Proved beyond dispute.
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>
>> Yep. Not in dispute.
>
> No proof.

Proof — lots of it.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing