On 9/5/2024 4:56 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <ckcCO.124001$FDd1.96811@fx18.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 9/4/2024 7:29 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <6F8CO.138778$8jx2.14996@fx17.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 9/4/2024 1:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <BQ0CO.37925$yWj9.32893@fx12.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/4/2024 9:19 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <IlrBO.43768$D_21.20219@fx14.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/2/2024 12:22 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <C_nBO.2$ORHe.0@fx07.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut
>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/2/2024 8:20 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <XnsB1E15D3C64CC1629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vb4f2q$2rtng$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-02, David Hartung <junk@nogood.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/31/24 12:50, Byker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/31/2024 7:17 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:00:54 -0700, Byker <byKKKer@do~rag.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2024 4:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:19:44 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 06:25:38 -0500, David Hartung
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <junk@nogood.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.reuters.com/technology/zuckerberg-says-biden-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> administration-pressured-meta-censor-covid-19-content-2024-08-2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7/ [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aug 27 (Reuters) - Meta Platforms (META.O)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , opens new tab CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the Biden
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> administration had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pressured the company to "censor" COVID-19 content during the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pandemic,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apparently referring to White House requests to take down
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misinformation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about the coronavirus and vaccines.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In a letter dated Aug. 26, Zuckerberg told the U.S. House of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Representatives Judiciary Committee that he regretted not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about this pressure earlier, as well as other decisions he had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp around removing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It looks as if the "nutcases" weren't so nuts after all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting how often this seems to occur.  Libs insist that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't happening then they run away when the proof that it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually did.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody is "running away", NoBody.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then why do you refuse to address the fact that Facebook admits
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to hiding important information from the public at the behest of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the government?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Facebook didn't do that. Taking down blatant lies is not "hiding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Translation:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. What I wrote is in plain English and requires no translation,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which was only a straw man anyway.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What Facebook took down was blatant lies. They had every right to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so, and the government had every right politely to request that they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More likely what they took down was opinions that made leftists
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uncomfortable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They banned the NY Post
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is "they"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so it was unable to post articles regarding
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the information they learned about the Hunter Biden laptop and that it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was NOT a Russian plant but real. something the FBI knew a week after
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they received it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They also censored
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is "they"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> / banned people who tried to post articles
>>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding the laptop being real. As post election polls determined
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this was more than enough by itself to swing the election towards a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden win.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The laptop is such a non-story
>>>>>>>>>>>> that even Trump didn't use it in his
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 campaign.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is known as election interference, a serious crime, which is why
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zuckerberg is covering his ass.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Zuckerberg is a billionaire,
>>>>>>>>>>>> who do you think he is supporting?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Who cares? How did the Obamas get 4 mansions?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They didn't. They have two very large houses. They got their money by writing
>>>>>>>>>> books that millions of people have bought and read. Barack Obama also earns
>>>>>>>>>> colossal paychecks giving speeches, as do all ex-presidents and some ex-vice
>>>>>>>>>> presidents. It's legal and it's honorable.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Too bad you only have a shitty broken down pre-fab for a house. Too bad you're a
>>>>>>>>>> housebound 100% disabled SSDI dole scrounger.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They have 4.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Two. It's settled.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4 and
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Two. It's settled.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why 2?
>>>>
>>>> I looked it up. They own two houses. Neither one is a broken-down decrepit
>>>> pre-fab like yours.
>>>
>>> Mansions and they have 3.
>>
>> They're rich, unlike you. They earned it honestly, unlike you.
>
> How? I see what they make.

You don't. You wouldn't even know where to look, because you're stupid.

> How is that possible?

They both have written best-selling books, including two by Barack Obama before
he became president. He earns $400,000 for a speech, and she earns $200,000 for
one. You couldn't get a nickel for speaking. In fact, if you tried, someone
would smash you in the mouth with a sand wedge.

You may not like that ex-presidents and their spouses command high speaking
fees, but they do, and it's honest, ethical and legal.
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing