On 8/16/2024 11:34 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <HZLvO.432900$ZhK.169719@fx14.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 8/16/2024 8:30 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>
>>> In article <dSJvO.90003$UNJ9.19488@fx40.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/16/2024 7:56 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <HHJvO.453977$qO%5.32201@fx16.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/16/2024 6:12 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <CyvvO.54199$jpKa.38872@fx41.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/15/2024 3:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <67tsbjlfmqh5i8m1amlst3muc13a1evgvt@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 09:05:27 -0500, "X, formerly known as \"!Jones\"" <x@y.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/trump-has-become-what-he-campaigned-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> against/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump Has Become What He Campaigned Against
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> By Dan McLaughlin
>>>>>>>>>>>>> August 13, 2024 3:46 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Observers of Donald Trump?s rallies over the past month ? such as the NR
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Editors panel on Friday ? have noticed two related problems with Trump?s
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rhetorical approach to taking on Kamala Harris (even aside from his ill-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> considered attacks, as happened when he went after Brian Kemp in Georgia).
>>>>>>>>>>>>> One is that Trump often goes into spin-the-oldies mode, describing his
>>>>>>>>>>>>> various favorite themes and grievances in a shorthand that will be familiar
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to his fans but is nearly incomprehensible to undecided voters who aren?t
>>>>>>>>>>>>> consumers of MAGA media. The other is that Trump is offering generalized
>>>>>>>>>>>>> swipes at Harris and Tim Walz for their records and positions but not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> boring into the specific things they?ve done and said that show them to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Back during the primaries, I warned that the flexibility and freshness that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> characterized Trump?s campaign in 2016 was eroding because, by now, he has
>>>>>>>>>>>>> been in a lot of political fights and has a record, so his style sounds
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stale, his jabs are predictable, and he is loath to change course in ways
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would amount to admissions of mistakes or failure in the past. What
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we?re seeing now is another side of that, and an ironic one: Trump turning
>>>>>>>>>>>>> into what he campaigned against in Republican politics.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What, after all, characterized the conservative and right-wing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> commentariat?s two big frustrations with John McCain in 2008 and Mitt
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romney in 2012 and, more broadly, with establishment Republican politicians
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Trump was supposed to cure? Some of the frustration was ideological
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g., McCain?s views on immigration), and some was broken promises, but in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of communications, there were two persistent grievances. One was that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> McCain and Romney were unwilling or unable to deliver the best attacks that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people on their side thought they should make. Trump, by contrast, would go
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there. He?d never leave a weapon unused. He was attack politics
>>>>>>>>>>>>> personified. But now the pundit and talker class is back to fuming that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump isn?t using the best stuff because he?s so vague and blathery that he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn?t communicating the attacks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump Will Get His Clock Cleaned by Kamala Harris in the Debate If He
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn?t Improve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The other thing Trump was supposed to represent was a fresh voice in how to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deliver Republican arguments to voters who were not already committed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Goldwaterite conservatives. Romney, in particular, always seemed to believe
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that he had to go around telling rather than showing people that he was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?severely conservative? and Reaganite and stood for all the stuff you?d
>>>>>>>>>>>>> find in a Heritage Foundation white paper or a back issue of National
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Review. Some of Trump?s 2016 rivals did a bit too much of the same. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrasted with Reagan himself, who had folksy ways of delivering arguments
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that were conservative in substance but he would present simply as common
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump never did communicate like Reagan, but knowing nothing of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> language of Republican discourse, he threw out the playbook and found his
>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ways to say things that reached some new people. We can argue about the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pros and cons of this, but the point is that it was new and distinct and it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn?t take for granted that his audience already knew and agreed with all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the conservative arguments.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump?s not doing that anymore. The old shibboleths are dead; long live the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> new shibboleths. Everything is now in Trump shorthand instead of movement-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conservative shorthand. But it?s indecipherable to anybody who doesn?t know
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the lyrics by heart.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of this, of course, is why it?s a bad idea to run a 78-year-old third-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time candidate instead of somebody fresher.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Well written article!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I left the GOP in '08 after voting Republican for nearly 50 years...
>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, *mostly* voted Republican. I was a right-leaning moderate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The worst part of the GOP's platform is Trump. I don't know why his
>>>>>>>>>>>> campaign didn't see the switcheroo; I had been expecting it for a
>>>>>>>>>>>> couple of years... and the Donald is still whining about a big nothing
>>>>>>>>>>>> burger that caught him flat-footed. The GOP campaign managers need to
>>>>>>>>>>>> jerk his leash sharply and bring him on topic!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *I* will vote for Kamala this round; however, our country needs at
>>>>>>>>>>>> least two healthy parties... and the GOP's health is failing with the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A split is a possibility. The hard right, the racists and fascists, having flexed some
>>>>>>>>>>> power, will try again under their own banner.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The Libs and Cons will unite to shut them out.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is why Kamala's gonna make Trump defeated again, we just can't
>>>>>>>>>> have four more years of DJT (or a dictatorship, beyond four years).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Explain this dictatorship. I bet you can't. When you can get arrested
>>>>>>>>> for not using the proper "pronoun" is not freedom.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You cannot be arrested anywhere for not using "proper pronouns," you fucking liar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Being misgendered (i.e., being referred to with [snip remainder of plagiarized bullshit]
>>>>>> You cannot be arrested anywhere for not using "proper pronouns," you fucking liar.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can.
>>>>
>>>> You can't.
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>
>> Yes, you can't. There is no jurisdiction in the country in which you can be
>> arrested for using the "wrong" pronouns. This has been proved and is not in dispute.
>
> Yes you can.

No, you cannot. This has been proved and is not in rational dispute.