On 7/22/2024 5:20 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <aIBnO.76279$oGQf.56543@fx10.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 7/22/2024 4:06 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <VqBnO.65868$BFg.10169@fx13.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 7/22/2024 2:40 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <C_znO.157679$ySE.146051@fx11.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/22/2024 2:11 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <vCznO.155988$SLqf.13413@fx15.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/22/2024 1:05 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <V6xnO.60234$BYv6.1767@fx09.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/22/2024 8:23 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <_zunO.5$601.3@fx38.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut
>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/22/2024 7:28 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <yQtnO.21108$hDqe.20147@fx44.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/22/2024 7:09 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <ZytnO.141665$xL%b.132827@fx17.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/22/2024 6:38 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <v7kr7c$h1sk$1@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/21/2024 8:45 PM, Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Michael A Terrell"  wrote in message news:E1VmO.140475$sE%9.9431@fx14.iad...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2024 1:18 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <v7h2as$3lp2j$5@dont-email.me>, X@Y.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Moral Collapse of J. D. Vance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead of a truth-teller in his own community, Vance as a candidate has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become a contemptible and cringe-inducing clown.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do we call a man who turns on everything he once claimed to believe?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For a practitioner of petty and self-serving duplicity, we use ?sellout? or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?backstabber.? (Sometimes we impugn the animal kingdom and call him a rat,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a skunk, or a weasel.) For grand betrayals of weightier loyalties?country
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and faith?we invoke the more solemn terms of ?traitor? or ?apostate.?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But what should we call J. D. Vance, the self-described hillbilly turned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marine turned Ivy League law-school graduate turned venture capitalist
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turned Senate candidate? Words fail. His perfidy to his own people in Ohio
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is too big to allow him to escape with the label of ?opportunist,? and yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the shabbiness and absurdity of his Senate campaign is too small to brand
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him a defector or a heretic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My friend Preet Bharara, the former U.S. attorney for the Southern District
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of New York, tried to describe Vance recently and came up with ?pathetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loser poser fake jerk,? but that is a lot of words. To distill the essence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Vance as a public figure, the word that enters my mind is an anatomical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference beginning with the letter a.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead of a candidate who?s willing to speak hard truths to his people,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ohioans now have a native son who has returned to weaponize their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resentment and cultural dysfunctions. His ambition is fueled by the money
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of others who would never deign to live in the Midwest. And like other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> populist charlatans, he has convinced himself that he should be anointed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lead the rubes out of their misery.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He admitted he was wrong and manly [sic] admitted to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He admitted nothing. "Manly" is not an adverb, ever. It is only an adjective.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only correcting grammar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't only correct *wrong* English, you cunt. I proved tu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unmanly Vance admitting to an error. He didn't admit to his egregious error.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You didn't prove anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I proved that you lied.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You proved nothing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I proved that you lied.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No you didn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I did.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Then let's see it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You already have.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw what I saw and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You didn't see what you claimed to have seen. You're always making shit up about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seeing stuff that you had no possibility of seeing, because you weren't there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it wasn't televised.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RNC wasn't televised?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You didn't watch it gavel to gavel, and Vance didn't admit any error at it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I did watch it and
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You didn't watch the entire thing, you fucking cocksucking liar.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I did watch it and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You did not watch the entire convention, and you did not see or hear Vance admit
>>>>>>>> any mistake...because he didn't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How do you know what I watched?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know you did not watch *all* of the convention. No one did. Stop >
>>>>> lying about that.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is Rudy cherry picking
>>>>
>>>> No. You said you watched every minute of the convention. That's a lie.
>>>
>>> Cherry picking again?
>>
>> Not once.

<crickets>

>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> he did say it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He didn't. At no time did he admit any error ? *lying* ? about his claim to be
>>>>>>>>>> of hillbilly origins.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He admitted he was wrong about Trump.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He didn't. And he was *not* wrong about Trump. Trump *is* America's Hitler, or
>>>>>>>> at least America's Hitler-wannabe.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He never said anything about Hitler.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a lie. He said in 2016 that he thought Trump might be "America's Hitler."
>>>>>> Those are Vance's words. Stop lying.
>>>>>
>>>>> No he didn't.
>>>>
>>>> Yes he did. This is proved beyond all dispute.

<crickets>

>>>>
>>>>>> Vance might be saying now that he has changed his thinking on Trump, but he has
>>>>>> *no* coherent explanation for it. Trump proved to be *worse* as president than
>>>>>> Vance thought he would be.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope.
>>>>
>>>> Yep.
>>>>
>>>> Vance lied. You lied.
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>
>> Yep. You both lied.
>
> I posted

lies. Yes, and I demolished them.

I win. You lose. Again.