The statute of limitations on Trump' felony did *not* run out before his
indictment. There is a five year statute of limitations (or "limitions," as
Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness puts it) for misdemeanor falsification of
business records in the second degree, § 175.05, but Trump was *never* charged
with or indicted on that. He was indicted on § 175.10, falsification of business
records in the *first* degree, which is a felony and has an extended limitation
due to the pandemic:

The crimes Trump was convicted of date back more than five years, but they
withstood an initial court challenge because of a pandemic-era extension.

Trump was indicted on March 30, 2023, more than six years after the earliest
charge in the indictment, which dates to Feb. 14, 2017. That's beyond the
five years typically allowed by the statute of limitations, but there's a
catch: Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo extended the time limit to file
charges in all criminal cases when courts were disrupted by the COVID-19
pandemic in 2020.

Trump's lawyers moved to dismiss the case in its early stages based on the
statute of limitations, but Merchan rejected the argument. In a pretrial
decision, the judge said the pandemic extension stretched out the deadline
for the prosecution by one year and 47 days.

"In other words, this felony prosecution had to be commenced within six years
and 47 days from when the crimes were allegedly committed," Merchan wrote.

Trump was charged within days of the potential deadline. The extension
"brought the conduct described in the indictment within the prescribed five-
year time limit," Merchan wrote.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/06/05/trump-case-statute-of-limitations-explained/73983592007/

So stop lying about "statute of limitations" (or "limitions") — the case was
started on time.

And stop lying about it being a misdemeanor. Trump was never charged with a
misdemeanor. He *only* was charged with a felony from the outset. It is *not*
the case that a misdemeanor was "upgraded" to a felony. It was a felony charge
from the beginning.

In article <xIG8O.4$46t.2@fx46.iad>, chris.the.guy@usatoday.com says...
>
> The statute of limitations on Trump' felony did *not* run out before his
> indictment. There is a five year statute of limitations (or "limitions," as
> Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness puts it) for misdemeanor falsification of
> business records in the second degree, § 175.05, but Trump was *never* charged
> with or indicted on that. He was indicted on § 175.10, falsification of business
> records in the *first* degree, which is a felony and has an extended limitation
> due to the pandemic:
>
> The crimes Trump was convicted of date back more than five years, but they
> withstood an initial court challenge because of a pandemic-era extension.
>
> Trump was indicted on March 30, 2023, more than six years after the earliest
> charge in the indictment, which dates to Feb. 14, 2017. That's beyond the
> five years typically allowed by the statute of limitations, but there's a
> catch: Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo extended the time limit to file
> charges in all criminal cases when courts were disrupted by the COVID-19
> pandemic in 2020.
>
> Trump's lawyers moved to dismiss the case in its early stages based on the
> statute of limitations, but Merchan rejected the argument. In a pretrial
> decision, the judge said the pandemic extension stretched out the deadline
> for the prosecution by one year and 47 days.
>
> "In other words, this felony prosecution had to be commenced within six years
> and 47 days from when the crimes were allegedly committed," Merchan wrote.
>
> Trump was charged within days of the potential deadline. The extension
> "brought the conduct described in the indictment within the prescribed five-
> year time limit," Merchan wrote.
>
> https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/06/05/trump-case-statute-of-limitations-explained/73983592007/
>
> So stop lying about "statute of limitations" (or "limitions") ? the case was
> started on time.
>
> And stop lying about it being a misdemeanor. Trump was never charged with a
> misdemeanor. He *only* was charged with a felony from the outset. It is *not*
> the case that a misdemeanor was "upgraded" to a felony. It was a felony charge
> from the beginning.

TDS much?

On 6/7/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester, trailer-trash fuckdrip and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <xIG8O.4$46t.2@fx46.iad>, chris.the.guy@usatoday.com says...
>>
>> The statute of limitations on Trump' felony did *not* run out before his
>> indictment. There is a five year statute of limitations (or "limitions," as
>> Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness puts it) for misdemeanor falsification of
>> business records in the second degree, § 175.05, but Trump was *never* charged
>> with or indicted on that. He was indicted on § 175.10, falsification of business
>> records in the *first* degree, which is a felony and has an extended limitation
>> due to the pandemic:
>>
>> The crimes Trump was convicted of date back more than five years, but they
>> withstood an initial court challenge because of a pandemic-era extension.
>>
>> Trump was indicted on March 30, 2023, more than six years after the earliest
>> charge in the indictment, which dates to Feb. 14, 2017. That's beyond the
>> five years typically allowed by the statute of limitations, but there's a
>> catch: Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo extended the time limit to file
>> charges in all criminal cases when courts were disrupted by the COVID-19
>> pandemic in 2020.
>>
>> Trump's lawyers moved to dismiss the case in its early stages based on the
>> statute of limitations, but Merchan rejected the argument. In a pretrial
>> decision, the judge said the pandemic extension stretched out the deadline
>> for the prosecution by one year and 47 days.
>>
>> "In other words, this felony prosecution had to be commenced within six years
>> and 47 days from when the crimes were allegedly committed," Merchan wrote.
>>
>> Trump was charged within days of the potential deadline. The extension
>> "brought the conduct described in the indictment within the prescribed five-
>> year time limit," Merchan wrote.
>>
>> https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/06/05/trump-case-statute-of-limitations-explained/73983592007/
>>
>> So stop lying about "statute of limitations" (or "limitions") ? the case was
>> started on time.
>>
>> And stop lying about it being a misdemeanor. Trump was never charged with a
>> misdemeanor. He *only* was charged with a felony from the outset. It is *not*
>> the case that a misdemeanor was "upgraded" to a felony. It was a felony charge
>> from the beginning.
>
> BDS much?

Yes, you suffer from an extreme and probably terminal case of it, you
trailer-trash fuckdrip.

In news:xIG8O.4$46t.2@fx46.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<chris.the.guy@usatoday.com> typed:

> And stop lying about it being a misdemeanor. Trump was never charged
> with a misdemeanor. He *only* was charged with a felony from the
> outset. It is *not* the case that a misdemeanor was "upgraded" to a
> felony. It was a felony charge from the beginning.

How Liberals Pay Off Their Bimbos

Ann Coulter

I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm Eisen that
Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly serious" crimes. But one point
I'm still not clear on is how Trump was supposed to describe his payments to
Stormy Daniels.

That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies by recording
the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer Michael Cohen -- as a "legal
expense," thus creating a "false business record."

How was he supposed to describe it?

-- "Nuisance fee"?

-- "Extortion payment"?

-- "Cost of doing business for a celebrity"?

-- "Legal settlement that's a lot cheaper than having my lawyers run up gigantic
bills suing Daniels for defamation"?

NO! The only answer liberals will accept is this:

"Hush money payment to a porn star who was threatening to claim we had sex -- a
claim as false as the Trump Tower doorman's allegation I had an illegitimate
child with an employee, which is so false that even the media admit it's
false -- for the exclusive purpose of hiding the porn star's (false) claim from
the electorate, so that they would vote for me, even though they did vote for
me, despite seeing a video one month before the election of me bragging about
grabbing women 'by the p*ssy.' The Daniels allegation, however, I believe would
have pushed them over the edge, so I used my own money to pay Daniels not to lie
about me, much like the $30,000 that was paid to the lying doorman."

If he'd said that, District Attorney Alvin Bragg would have been forced to say,
BINGO! That's exactly what I and The New York Times wanted you to write in your
internal business records. Free to go, Mr. Trump.

How could Trump not have known this?! Duh. Just look at the precedents.

When Bill Clinton ran for president in 1992, his campaign hired a sleazy private
detective, Jack Palladino, to threaten journalists and private individuals in
order to prevent voters from finding out about the horny hick's legion of sexual
conquests and sexual assaults -- or "bimbo eruptions," as campaign aide Betsey
Wright charmingly put it.

The smear merchant was first hired after singer Gennifer Flowers told a tabloid
she'd had a lengthy affair with Clinton. Palladino wrote a memo to the campaign,
promising to impugn her "character and veracity until she is destroyed beyond
all recognition."

Clinton campaign: SOLD! (By the by, Clinton would eventually admit to having sex
with Flowers.)

Then in 2008, presidential candidate John Edwards hit up a couple of well-heeled
donors for more than a million dollars to hide his yearlong affair with Rielle
Hunter and their resulting "love child."

To keep Hunter happy (and hidden) throughout his run, the campaign gave her
"cash, luxury hotels, private jets rides and a $20,000-a-month rental mansion in
Santa Barbara, California" -- as summarized by The Guardian. (Even lefty
publications in the U.K. are more honest than the American media.)

All these goodies were paid for by heiress Rachel "Bunny" Mellon, who gave the
Edwards campaign $725,000 -- laundered through a North Carolina interior
decorator -- and Texas lawyer Fred Baron, who gave the campaign $400,000.

As any of you campaign finance buffs know, $725,000 and $400,000 exceed the
federal limit for campaign donations by about a half-million dollars apiece.
(The limit was $2,300 in 2008.)

With Hunter squirreled away, Edwards orchestrated a massive cover-up, repeatedly
denying the affair, only "confessing" after he was caught red-handed -- but
still insisting that it was "not possible" that he was the father of Hunter's
child. He even asked his campaign aide, Andrew Young, to cop to being the
child's true father, although he was married, too. (And you thought Michael
Cohen was loyal!)

In July 2008, the National Enquirer caught Edwards sneaking into the Beverly
Hilton to see his mistress and love child -- complete with photos of him holding
his daughter. After spending about six hours alone with them, he tried to sneak
out through the basement at 2:40 a.m., whereupon he encountered Enquirer
reporters. He ran back and forth but was continuously confronted by reporters,
so he ducked into a hotel restroom and remained there for 15 minutes, until
hotel security rescued him.

Maybe I don't have a nose for news, but that sounds like a pretty good story to
me. There was even a sex tape. Top that, Stormy! The Times did not breathe a
word of it to readers.

But that's not my point.

Suppose you were Donald Trump trying to decide how to record a nuisance payment
that you were making with your own money (not Bunny Mellon's) for entry into
your own books?

You'd look at precedent, right? How did Clinton report the campaign cash he was
spending on a lowlife to smear his sexual conquests? How did Edwards report the
million-plus dollars in campaign donations he received from Fred and Bunny to
cover up an ongoing affair?

Clinton laundered the campaign's payments to Palladino through a law firm and
listed them on Federal Election Commission forms as "legal expenses." Unlike
Trump's personal business records, these entries were being submitted to the
FEC. Those entries had to be perfect!

So that's how it's done.

But wait a second! How come when Trump lists his payment to squelch a single
"bimbo eruption" as a "legal expense," he's committed "profoundly serious"
crimes?

According to the legal eagles in the D.A.'s office, Cohen's payment of $130,000
to Daniels -- reimbursed by Trump -- was actually a "loan" to the Trump campaign
that should have been listed on his federal campaign finance report.

How did Edwards explain the million bucks he got from campaign donors -- gratis,
no reimbursement expected or paid? His elegantly simple solution was not to
report those contributions to the FEC. His reports included not the briefest
mention of these gargantuan sums that were used to conceal a mistress and love
child from the voters. (And he was definitely using the money to hide the affair
from voters, not his wife: Elizabeth Edwards knew about the affair since at
least March 2007.)

In Edwards' case, Obama's Justice Department did bring a prosecution for
campaign finance violations, but it ended with one acquittal and a hung jury on
all other counts. The DOJ declined to retry the case.

The Times -- finally deigning to speak of Edwards' love child hush money --
reported on the failed prosecution, noting that the case "had no precedent" and
would not "help politicians better interpret the labyrinth of campaign finance
law."

But now, an even more "unprecedented" legal case, based on the "labyrinth of
campaign finance law," is a hanging offense.

Liberals aren't off their rockers, at all.

https://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2024/06/05/how-liberals-pay-off-their-bimbos-n2640042

max headroom wrote:
> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm Eisen that
> Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly serious" crimes. But one point
> I'm still not clear on is how Trump was supposed to describe his payments to
> Stormy Daniels.
>
> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies by recording
> the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer Michael Cohen -- as a "legal
> expense," thus creating a "false business record."
>
> How was he supposed to describe it?

Not lie about it. The payment wasn't illegal. In New York the
lying was. Make the payment and whatever campaign finance
disclosures that would require.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

In article <v3vnph$2788n$1@dont-email.me>, chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com
says...
>
> max headroom wrote:
> > I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm Eisen that
> > Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly serious" crimes. But one point
> > I'm still not clear on is how Trump was supposed to describe his payments to
> > Stormy Daniels.
> >
> > That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies by recording
> > the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer Michael Cohen -- as a "legal
> > expense," thus creating a "false business record."
> >
> > How was he supposed to describe it?
>
> Not lie about it. The payment wasn't illegal. In New York the
> lying was. Make the payment and whatever campaign finance
> disclosures that would require.

He lied? Oh my God!...no one in NY lies.

On 6/7/2024 10:47 AM, On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth
waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and
*failed* — to bullshit:

> In news:xIG8O.4$46t.2@fx46.iad, Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, *wrote* (not "typed" — only stupid cuntflaps configure custom attributions):

>
>> And stop lying about it being a misdemeanor. Trump was never charged
>> with a misdemeanor. He *only* was charged with a felony from the
>> outset. It is *not* the case that a misdemeanor was "upgraded" to a
>> felony. It was a felony charge from the beginning.
>
>
> How Liberals Pay Off Their Bimbos

No.

> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm Eisen that
> Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly serious" crimes. But one point
> I'm still not clear on is how Trump was supposed to describe his payments to
> Stormy Daniels.
>
> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies by recording
> the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer Michael Cohen -- as a "legal
> expense," thus creating a "false business record."
>
> How was he supposed to describe it?

If he had just paid it from his personal bank account, o oozing scarlet red
maxipad, he wouldn't have had to describe or classify it at all. But nooooo! The
lifelong tax cheat wanted to try to disguise it as a business expense so his
company could deduct it from income. Trump *always* is looking for some angle to
chisel and cheat. This time, it bit him right in his little mushroom-shaped (and
size) dick.

I bet you with you had a dick, o oozing scarlet red maxipad.

In news:v3vpli$27gph$1@dont-email.me, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<chris.the.guy@usatoday.com> typed:

> On 6/7/2024 10:47 AM, Max the Magnanimous typed:
>> In news:xIG8O.4$46t.2@fx46.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:

>>> And stop lying about it being a misdemeanor. Trump was never charged
>>> with a misdemeanor. He *only* was charged with a felony from the
>>> outset. It is *not* the case that a misdemeanor was "upgraded" to a
>>> felony. It was a felony charge from the beginning.

>> How Liberals Pay Off Their Bimbos

> No.

>> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm Eisen
>> that Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly serious" crimes. But
>> one point I'm still not clear on is how Trump was supposed to describe his
>> payments to Stormy Daniels.

>> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies by
>> recording the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer Michael Cohen --
>> as a "legal expense," thus creating a "false business record."

>> How was he supposed to describe it?

> If he had just paid it from his personal bank account, Your Grace, he wouldn't
> have had to describe or classify it at all. ...

"Cohen would be paid in a series of monthly payments of $35,000 over the course
of 2017. The first check was for $70,000, covering two months. Cohen sent an
invoice to the Trump Organization for each check, portraying the payment as his
'retainer.' Every time he was paid, a bookkeeper generated a record for the
company's files, known as a voucher, with the description 'legal expense.' The
first three payments were made from Trump's trust, while the remaining nine came
from his personal account.

"Each of the 34 charges against Trump corresponded to a check, invoice and
voucher generated to reimburse Cohen...."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-charges-conviction-guilty-verdict/

BTW, Trump was charged and convicted of receiving vouchers written and sent by
Cohen.

In news:v3vnph$2788n$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
typed:

> max headroom wrote:

>> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm
>> Eisen that Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly
>> serious" crimes. But one point I'm still not clear on is how Trump
>> was supposed to describe his payments to Stormy Daniels.

>> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies
>> by recording the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer
>> Michael Cohen -- as a "legal expense," thus creating a "false
>> business record."

>> How was he supposed to describe it?

> Not lie about it. The payment wasn't illegal. In New York the
> lying was. Make the payment and whatever campaign finance
> disclosures that would require.

No FEC reports were required-- Trump's payments were in 2017.

>> Clinton laundered the campaign's payments to Palladino through a law firm and
>> listed them on Federal Election Commission forms as "legal expenses." Unlike
>> Trump's personal business records, these entries were being submitted to the
>> FEC. Those entries had to be perfect!

On 6/7/2024 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza new sock Chris Mueller wrote:
> The statute of limitations on Trump' felony did *not* run out before his
> indictment.

If New York state had not extended the statue of limitations prior to
that it would have.

What's really interesting is how a New York jury found someone guilty of
sexual assault when there is zero evidence to support any of the claims.

That's Democrats though. They can always find a stupid bitch to take
one up the ass for the team.

On 6/7/2024 10:03 AM, another Rudy sock Michael A Terrell wrote:
> On 6/7/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
> child molester, trailer-trash fuckdrip and another fucking do-nothing,
> lied:
>
>>
>> BDS much?
>
> Yes, I suffer from an extreme and probably terminal case of it, you
> know I'm trailer-trash fuckdrip.

Did you see Joe shit his pants on TV again?

On 6/7/2024 1:41 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> The payment wasn't illegal. In New York the lying was.

5 year staute of limitations = expired.

Next.

On 6/7/2024 11:47 AM, max headroom wrote:
> Liberals aren't off their rockers, at all.

You suffer from little man syndrome.

In news:v403oh$28c79$48@dont-email.me, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> typed:

> On 6/7/2024 11:47 AM, max headroom wrote:

>> Liberals aren't off their rockers, at all.

> You suffer from little man syndrome.

Get back to us after you've had a couple of "English Comprehension" semesters at
your local JC.

On 6/7/2024 3:45 PM, CaLaVeRa wrote:
> On 6/7/2024 1:41 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>> The payment wasn't illegal. In New York the lying was.
>
> 5 year staute of limitations = expired.

It was extended, spammy.

On 6/7/2024 3:35 PM, Lexor wrote:
> On 6/7/2024 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza new sock Chris Mueller wrote:
>> The statute of limitations on Trump' felony did *not* run out before his
>> indictment.
>
> If New York state had not extended the statue of limitations prior to that it
> would have.

But it *was* extended.

> What's really interesting is how a New York jury found someone guilty of sexual
> assault when there is zero evidence to support any of the claims.

No one was found "guilty" of sexual assault. Trump was found liable for it, and
there was evidence.

On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of
his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
> In news:v3vpli$27gph$1@dont-email.me, Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red macipad, the cuntflaps, *wrote* (not "typed" — only stupid cuntflaps configure custom attributions):
>
>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
>>> In news:xIG8O.4$46t.2@fx46.iad, Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red macipad, the cuntflaps, *wrote* (not "typed" — only stupid cuntflaps configure custom attributions):
>
>>>> And stop lying about it being a misdemeanor. Trump was never charged
>>>> with a misdemeanor. He *only* was charged with a felony from the
>>>> outset. It is *not* the case that a misdemeanor was "upgraded" to a
>>>> felony. It was a felony charge from the beginning.
>
>
>>> How Liberals Pay Off Their Bimbos
>
>> No.
>
>>> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm Eisen
>>> that Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly serious" crimes. But
>>> one point I'm still not clear on is how Trump was supposed to describe his
>>> payments to Stormy Daniels.
>
>>> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies by
>>> recording the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer Michael Cohen --
>>> as a "legal expense," thus creating a "false business record."
>
>>> How was he supposed to describe it?
>
>> If he had just paid it from his personal bank account, o oozing scarlet red maxipad, he wouldn't
>> have had to describe or classify it at all.
>
> "Cohen would be

No, o oozing scarlet red maxipad. Trump committed crimes, fucked up, and got
caught. He fucked up because he can never *not* be a cheat and a chiseler.

On 6/7/2024 3:13 PM, On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth
waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and
*failed* — to bullshit:

> In news:v3vnph$2788n$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
> typed:
>
>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
>
>>> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm
>>> Eisen that Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly
>>> serious" crimes. But one point I'm still not clear on is how Trump
>>> was supposed to describe his payments to Stormy Daniels.
>
>>> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies
>>> by recording the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer
>>> Michael Cohen -- as a "legal expense," thus creating a "false
>>> business record."
>
>>> How was he supposed to describe it?
>
>> Not lie about it. The payment wasn't illegal. In New York the
>> lying was. Make the payment and whatever campaign finance
>> disclosures that would require.
>
> No FEC reports were required-- Trump's payments were in 2017.

They were reimbursement for illegal campaign contributions Cohen made to Trump's
campaign, o oozing scarlet red maxipad. That made them Trump's illegal campaign
contributions.

In article <v408nh$29pra$1@dont-email.me>, chris.the.guy@usatoday.com
says...
>
> On 6/7/2024 3:45 PM, CaLaVeRa wrote:
> > On 6/7/2024 1:41 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> >> The payment wasn't illegal. In New York the lying was.
> >
> > 5 year staute of limitations = expired.
>
> It was extended, spammy.

To favor the corrupt prosecution?

In article <v408pp$29pra$2@dont-email.me>, chris.the.guy@usatoday.com
says...
>
> On 6/7/2024 3:35 PM, Lexor wrote:
> > On 6/7/2024 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza new sock Chris Mueller wrote:
> >> The statute of limitations on Trump' felony did *not* run out before his
> >> indictment.
> >
> > If New York state had not extended the statue of limitations prior to that it
> > would have.
>
> But it *was* extended.
>
> > What's really interesting is how a New York jury found someone guilty of sexual
> > assault when there is zero evidence to support any of the claims.
>
> No one was found "guilty" of sexual assault. Trump was found liable for it, and
> there was evidence.

He was railroaded and you know it.

In article <v40992$29rni$1@dont-email.me>, chris.the.guy@usatoday.com
says...
>
> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of
> his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
> > In news:v3vpli$27gph$1@dont-email.me, Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red macipad, the cuntflaps, *wrote* (not "typed" ? only stupid cuntflaps configure custom attributions):
> >
> >> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
> >>> In news:xIG8O.4$46t.2@fx46.iad, Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red macipad, the cuntflaps, *wrote* (not "typed" ? only stupid cuntflaps configure custom attributions):
> >
> >>>> And stop lying about it being a misdemeanor. Trump was never charged
> >>>> with a misdemeanor. He *only* was charged with a felony from the
> >>>> outset. It is *not* the case that a misdemeanor was "upgraded" to a
> >>>> felony. It was a felony charge from the beginning.
> >
> >
> >>> How Liberals Pay Off Their Bimbos
> >
> >> No.
> >
> >>> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm Eisen
> >>> that Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly serious" crimes. But
> >>> one point I'm still not clear on is how Trump was supposed to describe his
> >>> payments to Stormy Daniels.
> >
> >>> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies by
> >>> recording the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer Michael Cohen --
> >>> as a "legal expense," thus creating a "false business record."
> >
> >>> How was he supposed to describe it?
> >
> >> If he had just paid it from his personal bank account, o oozing scarlet red maxipad, he wouldn't
> >> have had to describe or classify it at all.
> >
> > "Cohen would be
>
> No, o oozing scarlet red maxipad. Trump committed crimes, fucked up, and got
> caught. He fucked up because he can never *not* be a cheat and a chiseler.

Joes border order is failing. Another fail from the senile puppet.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/migrants-around-world-traverse-
california-desert-reach-us-2024-06-06/

https://www.voanews.com/a/the-latest-hot-spot-for-illegal-border-
crossings-is-san-diego-but-routes-change-quickly-/7617274.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ggRUIVUAUc

In article <v409dr$29rni$2@dont-email.me>, chris.the.guy@usatoday.com
says...
>
> On 6/7/2024 3:13 PM, On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth
> waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and
> *failed* ? to bullshit:
>
> > In news:v3vnph$2788n$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
> > typed:
> >
> >> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
> >
> >>> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm
> >>> Eisen that Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly
> >>> serious" crimes. But one point I'm still not clear on is how Trump
> >>> was supposed to describe his payments to Stormy Daniels.
> >
> >>> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies
> >>> by recording the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer
> >>> Michael Cohen -- as a "legal expense," thus creating a "false
> >>> business record."
> >
> >>> How was he supposed to describe it?
> >
> >> Not lie about it. The payment wasn't illegal. In New York the
> >> lying was. Make the payment and whatever campaign finance
> >> disclosures that would require.
> >
> > No FEC reports were required-- Trump's payments were in 2017.
>
> They were reimbursement for illegal campaign contributions Cohen made to Trump's
> campaign, o oozing scarlet red maxipad. That made them Trump's illegal campaign
> contributions.

No illegal contributions were made.

"Lexor" wrote in message news:v40241$h4e$3@toxic.dizum.net...
>
>On 6/7/2024 10:03 AM, another Rudy sock Michael A Terrell wrote:
>> On 6/7/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester, trailer-trash fuckdrip and another fucking do-nothing,
>> lied:
>>
>>>
>>> BDS much?
>>
>> Yes, I suffer from an extreme and probably terminal case of it, you know
>> I'm trailer-trash fuckdrip.
>
>Did you see Joe shit his pants on TV again?
>

No, Rudy Canoza with his 10 fake pseudonyms didn't see it. All woke leftists
are blind and psychotic.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

On 2024-06-08, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <v408pp$29pra$2@dont-email.me>, chris.the.guy@usatoday.com
> says...
>>
>> On 6/7/2024 3:35 PM, Lexor wrote:
>> > On 6/7/2024 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza new sock Chris Mueller wrote:
>> >> The statute of limitations on Trump' felony did *not* run out before his
>> >> indictment.
>> >
>> > If New York state had not extended the statue of limitations prior to that it
>> > would have.
>>
>> But it *was* extended.
>>
>> > What's really interesting is how a New York jury found someone guilty of sexual
>> > assault when there is zero evidence to support any of the claims.
>>
>> No one was found "guilty" of sexual assault. Trump was found liable for it, and
>> there was evidence.
>
> He was railroaded and you know it.

Like thee other attacks on Trump, this too will be overturned.
The more Jean Carroll talks, the less her chances of collecting the money are.
She is a complete wack-a-doodle and some may not know but this is not her first time accusing a man
of rape.

Do a little research.

--
pothead
Joe Biden is the absolute WORST President Of the U.S. ever.
Nobody else is even close. Including Jimmy Carter.
Vote for ANYBODY but Joe Biden in 2024.

On 2024-06-08, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <v40992$29rni$1@dont-email.me>, chris.the.guy@usatoday.com
> says...
>>
>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of
>> his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
>> > In news:v3vpli$27gph$1@dont-email.me, Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red macipad, the cuntflaps, *wrote* (not "typed" ? only stupid cuntflaps configure custom attributions):
>> >
>> >> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
>> >>> In news:xIG8O.4$46t.2@fx46.iad, Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red macipad, the cuntflaps, *wrote* (not "typed" ? only stupid cuntflaps configure custom attributions):
>> >
>> >>>> And stop lying about it being a misdemeanor. Trump was never charged
>> >>>> with a misdemeanor. He *only* was charged with a felony from the
>> >>>> outset. It is *not* the case that a misdemeanor was "upgraded" to a
>> >>>> felony. It was a felony charge from the beginning.
>> >
>> >
>> >>> How Liberals Pay Off Their Bimbos
>> >
>> >> No.
>> >
>> >>> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm Eisen
>> >>> that Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly serious" crimes. But
>> >>> one point I'm still not clear on is how Trump was supposed to describe his
>> >>> payments to Stormy Daniels.
>> >
>> >>> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies by
>> >>> recording the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer Michael Cohen --
>> >>> as a "legal expense," thus creating a "false business record."
>> >
>> >>> How was he supposed to describe it?
>> >
>> >> If he had just paid it from his personal bank account, o oozing scarlet red maxipad, he wouldn't
>> >> have had to describe or classify it at all.
>> >
>> > "Cohen would be
>>
>> No, o oozing scarlet red maxipad. Trump committed crimes, fucked up, and got
>> caught. He fucked up because he can never *not* be a cheat and a chiseler.
>
> Joes border order is failing. Another fail from the senile puppet.
>
> https://www.reuters.com/world/us/migrants-around-world-traverse-
> california-desert-reach-us-2024-06-06/
>
> https://www.voanews.com/a/the-latest-hot-spot-for-illegal-border-
> crossings-is-san-diego-but-routes-change-quickly-/7617274.html
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ggRUIVUAUc

I believe it took one day for yet another one of Joe Biden's policies to fail.
Joe Biden is accumulating quite the track record for failure.
indeed he is.

--
pothead
Joe Biden is the absolute WORST President Of the U.S. ever.
Nobody else is even close. Including Jimmy Carter.
Vote for ANYBODY but Joe Biden in 2024.