67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
politically motivated.
59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
government is a very big issue

https://x.com/MAGAIncWarRoom/status/1796301911618150406

Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

Andrew W wrote:

> 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
> politically motivated.
> 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
> government is a very big issue

Because Trump said so?

If he were truthful, he wouldn't be a convicted felon.

On Fri, 31 May 2024 22:50:30 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
wrote:

>
>67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
>politically motivated.

https://tinyurl.com/ydh3nfku

77% of American adults view Putin unfavorably.

72% believe that "Russia’s actions are an unjustified attempt to
overthrow the Ukrainian government"

54% believe that only Russia, and not Ukraine, has committed war
crimes during the war.

>59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...

100% of the jury believed that Trump is guilty as fuc... charged. And
that is the only thing that counts.

> ...the weaponization of
>government is a very big issue

I suggest you familiarize yourself with "Project 2025". But then
again, you'll probably love it. It'd make Trump a very, very powerful
man, who can rule as he pleases.

>
>https://x.com/MAGAIncWarRoom/status/1796301911618150406
>
>
>
>Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
>the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.
>
>http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=241147
***
(VIDEO 23.39) Is the Sun a Simulation? Kerry K
***

How open minded are you?

--
Malte Runz

On Fri, 31 May 2024 08:17:52 -0700, El Kabong <twang@the.noodle>
wrote:

>Andrew W wrote:
>
>> 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
>> politically motivated.
>> 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
>> government is a very big issue
>
>Because Trump said so?

I've tried to find the source of the data behind the claims. No luck
so far. Maybe I should google "J. Hogan Gidley's ass".
>
>If he were truthful, he wouldn't be a convicted felon.

But, he is. He is!

--
Malte Runz

"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
news:v3ch2p$27t4s$1@dont-email.me:

>
> 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
> politically motivated.
> 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization
> of government is a very big issue
>
> https://x.com/MAGAIncWarRoom/status/1796301911618150406
>
>

Nixon supporters felt the same way.

>
> Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information
> from the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.
>
> http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site
>

On Fri, 31 May 2024 08:17:52 -0700, El Kabong
<twang@the.noodle> in alt.atheism with message-id
<9bqj5jtsk24dt1cq6qlisdgeon18aesfn1@4ax.com> wrote:

>Andrew W wrote:
>
>> 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
>> politically motivated.
>> 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
>> government is a very big issue
>
>Because Trump said so?
>
>If he were truthful, he wouldn't be a convicted felon.

The DA ran on a platform of "Get Trump"
The judge is a Dim contributor.
the judge's daughter makes big money by being a dim
supporter and activist.
The jury instructions and many of the "legal" points used
had never been used this way before.
The jury pool was over 90% dims.
The jury was allowed to go home overnight and over the
Memorial Day weekend. Naturally their largely Dim family
and friends knew they were on the jury and they would have
to answer to them if the result has not been guilty.

Was any other result expected?

It isn't over until the appeals courts sing.

--

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting
and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Whatever it takes - Stop the Democrats. Or the Dims
as I prefer to call them

The most dangerous enemies the United States has:

Biden the Senile Bastard and his Bitch and
supported by the Sluts and Pimps including
Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,
Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Jamaal Bowman,
Cori Bush, Adam Schiff, Maxine Waters, Jerry Nadler,
Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and Cory Booker. They
have stepped over the line and are working against
the country and what it stands for.

Do not work with them but oppose everything they attempt.

Stop the Green Raw Deal! I dare call it treason.
Go WOKE. Go broke.
CRT - Criminals Recruiting Thugs
DEI - Dumbass Egotistical Idiocy
End all social engineering programs.

I don't know how Comical Karine can still hold a straight
face with what she has to say.

Did the last sane person leaving California remember to
turn off the lights? Did he do the same for the Rotten
Apple?

Abortion should be like any other medical procedure
and be the decision of the patient and the doctor.
It is the business of no one else.

There is only one reason for a woman to get an abortion.
She want's it. All else is irrelevant

I support a Pro-Choice Constitutional Amendment.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com

Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:

> On Fri, 31 May 2024 08:17:52 -0700, El Kabong
> <twang@the.noodle> in alt.atheism with message-id
> <9bqj5jtsk24dt1cq6qlisdgeon18aesfn1@4ax.com> wrote:
>
> >Andrew W wrote:
> >
> >> 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
> >> politically motivated.
> >> 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
> >> government is a very big issue
> >
> >Because Trump said so?
> >
> >If he were truthful, he wouldn't be a convicted felon.
>
> The DA ran on a platform of "Get Trump"
> The judge is a Dim contributor.
> the judge's daughter makes big money by being a dim
> supporter and activist.
> The jury instructions and many of the "legal" points used
> had never been used this way before.
> The jury pool was over 90% dims.
> The jury was allowed to go home overnight and over the
> Memorial Day weekend. Naturally their largely Dim family
> and friends knew they were on the jury and they would have
> to answer to them if the result has not been guilty.
>
> Was any other result expected?

Is there secret evidence that Trump didn't do the crime,
that the judge wouldn't let him use? Why should the jury
have found differently?

Who told you a DA is supposed to be unbiased? If I lived
in NY, i would have voted for Bragg just so he could "get
Trump".

Maybe they should just issue every Republican in NYC a
license to kill, since they can't get fair trials?

> It isn't over until the appeals courts sing.

And after that, more crying about judges from the Magans.

On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:42:49 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now>
wrote:

>On Fri, 31 May 2024 08:17:52 -0700, El Kabong
><twang@the.noodle> in alt.atheism with message-id
><9bqj5jtsk24dt1cq6qlisdgeon18aesfn1@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>Andrew W wrote:
>>
>>> 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
>>> politically motivated.
>>> 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
>>> government is a very big issue
>>
>>Because Trump said so?
>>
>>If he were truthful, he wouldn't be a convicted felon.
>
>The DA ran on a platform of "Get Trump"

Did he really?
https://tinyurl.com/yckae9ha
"Bragg launched his campaign for the Manhattan DA position in June
2019, two months before outgoing DA Cyrus Vance Jr issued a subpoena
for the Trump Organization in order to acquire Trump's tax returns.
Proceedings against Trump by Vance began in August 2019, [...]
During the first half of Bragg's campaign, it was not clear that
proceedings against Trump would be able to take place, as Trump had
appealed to the Supreme Court for immunity from the subpoena. The
Court ruled 7-2 that he was not immune in the Trump v. Vance case in
July 2020.
[...]
While campaigning, Bragg said: "I have investigated Trump and his
children and held them accountable for their misconduct with the Trump
Foundation. [...]
He also said that he would continue with Vance's investigation and
hold Trump "accountable by following the facts where they go.""

"Would continue" an ongoing investigation.

>The judge is a Dim contributor.

He donated $35 to Democrats in 2020. $15 went to Joe Biden.
U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon, the judge in the documents case
in Florida, owes her life long position to Donald Trump, and she has
his dick up her arse in the most disgusting way. Spending weeks and
months on every single issue, that a regular judge could decide from
the bench in minutes. Deliberately delaying the case until after the
election.

>the judge's daughter makes big money by being a dim
>supporter and activist.

She raises money for Democrats. She gets paid for her work, of course,
but she gaines nothing personally directly from this case. You may
have sources telling a different story. Sources with evidence, of
course. Not just another FOX blow horn spreading lies. Real, hard,
solid evidence!

>The jury instructions and many of the "legal" points used
>had never been used this way before.

What points have never been used before? Again, I don't need to hear
Jesse Watters or Laura Ingraham repeating the accusations. What
specific 'legal point', name one of the many, has never been used that
way before.

>The jury pool was over 90% dims.

But even the 10% Republican found him guilty. The defense was
satisfied with the jury. Blame them. The jury in Florida will be 90%
Republican.

>The jury was allowed to go home overnight and over the
>Memorial Day weekend. Naturally their largely Dim family ...

Objection! Speculation.

>> ... and friends knew they were on the jury and they would have
>to answer to them if the result has not been guilty.

A really shitty argument. In case of a hung jury they could simply lie
about what their verdict were, if they were worried about their
family's reaction. 'I voted guilty, but that one idiot refused to go
along. Don't blame me!!!'
>
>Was any other result expected?

Did you read some of the transcripts or looked at the evidence
yourself? The documents, the tapes, the notes, the receipts, the
witness testimony? You would have needed a 12 hard core MAGA cultists
jury to have Trump acquitted.
>
>It isn't over until the appeals courts sing.

Of course not. Do you take any bets on a reversal of the decision?

--
Malte Runz

On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 14:54:57 -0700, El Kabong
<twang@the.noodle> in alt.atheism with message-id
<9bes5jpvtq36nt0fm7dge416ag7rk2o3k0@4ax.com> wrote:

>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 31 May 2024 08:17:52 -0700, El Kabong
>> <twang@the.noodle> in alt.atheism with message-id
>> <9bqj5jtsk24dt1cq6qlisdgeon18aesfn1@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Andrew W wrote:
>> >
>> >> 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
>> >> politically motivated.
>> >> 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
>> >> government is a very big issue
>> >
>> >Because Trump said so?
>> >
>> >If he were truthful, he wouldn't be a convicted felon.
>>
>> The DA ran on a platform of "Get Trump"
>> The judge is a Dim contributor.
>> the judge's daughter makes big money by being a dim
>> supporter and activist.
>> The jury instructions and many of the "legal" points used
>> had never been used this way before.
>> The jury pool was over 90% dims.
>> The jury was allowed to go home overnight and over the
>> Memorial Day weekend. Naturally their largely Dim family
>> and friends knew they were on the jury and they would have
>> to answer to them if the result has not been guilty.
>>
>> Was any other result expected?
>
>Is there secret evidence that Trump didn't do the crime,
>that the judge wouldn't let him use? Why should the jury
>have found differently?
>
>Who told you a DA is supposed to be unbiased? If I lived
>in NY, i would have voted for Bragg just so he could "get
>Trump".
>
>Maybe they should just issue every Republican in NYC a
>license to kill, since they can't get fair trials?
>
>> It isn't over until the appeals courts sing.
>
>And after that, more crying about judges from the Magans.

The appeals process should result in a more accurate result.

--

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting
and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Whatever it takes - Stop the Democrats. Or the Dims
as I prefer to call them

The most dangerous enemies the United States has:

Biden the Senile Bastard and his Bitch and
supported by the Sluts and Pimps including
Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,
Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Jamaal Bowman,
Cori Bush, Adam Schiff, Maxine Waters, Jerry Nadler,
Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and Cory Booker. They
have stepped over the line and are working against
the country and what it stands for.

Do not work with them but oppose everything they attempt.

Stop the Green Raw Deal! I dare call it treason.
Go WOKE. Go broke.
CRT - Criminals Recruiting Thugs
DEI - Dumbass Egotistical Idiocy
End all social engineering programs.

I don't know how Comical Karine can still hold a straight
face with what she has to say.

Did the last sane person leaving California remember to
turn off the lights? Did he do the same for the Rotten
Apple?

Abortion should be like any other medical procedure
and be the decision of the patient and the doctor.
It is the business of no one else.

There is only one reason for a woman to get an abortion.
She want's it. All else is irrelevant

I support a Pro-Choice Constitutional Amendment.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com

"Malte Runz" wrote in message
news:v8is5jdcqj2o70p182bfa17q62rbg8ncnk@4ax.com...
>
>On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:42:49 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 31 May 2024 08:17:52 -0700, El Kabong
>><twang@the.noodle> in alt.atheism with message-id
>><9bqj5jtsk24dt1cq6qlisdgeon18aesfn1@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Andrew W wrote:
>>>
>>>> 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
>>>> politically motivated.
>>>> 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
>>>> government is a very big issue
>>>
>>>Because Trump said so?
>>>
>>>If he were truthful, he wouldn't be a convicted felon.
>>
>>The DA ran on a platform of "Get Trump"
>
>Did he really?
>https://tinyurl.com/yckae9ha
>"Bragg launched his campaign for the Manhattan DA position in June
>2019, two months before outgoing DA Cyrus Vance Jr issued a subpoena
>for the Trump Organization in order to acquire Trump's tax returns.
>Proceedings against Trump by Vance began in August 2019, [...]
>During the first half of Bragg's campaign, it was not clear that
>proceedings against Trump would be able to take place, as Trump had
>appealed to the Supreme Court for immunity from the subpoena. The
>Court ruled 7-2 that he was not immune in the Trump v. Vance case in
>July 2020.
>[...]
>While campaigning, Bragg said: "I have investigated Trump and his
>children and held them accountable for their misconduct with the Trump
>Foundation. [...]
>He also said that he would continue with Vance's investigation and
>hold Trump "accountable by following the facts where they go.""
>
>"Would continue" an ongoing investigation.
>
>>The judge is a Dim contributor.
>
>He donated $35 to Democrats in 2020. $15 went to Joe Biden.
>U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon, the judge in the documents case
>in Florida, owes her life long position to Donald Trump, and she has
>his dick up her arse in the most disgusting way. Spending weeks and
>months on every single issue, that a regular judge could decide from
>the bench in minutes. Deliberately delaying the case until after the
>election.
>
>
>>the judge's daughter makes big money by being a dim
>>supporter and activist.
>
>She raises money for Democrats. She gets paid for her work, of course,
>but she gaines nothing personally directly from this case. You may
>have sources telling a different story. Sources with evidence, of
>course. Not just another FOX blow horn spreading lies. Real, hard,
>solid evidence!
>
>>The jury instructions and many of the "legal" points used
>>had never been used this way before.
>
>What points have never been used before? Again, I don't need to hear
>Jesse Watters or Laura Ingraham repeating the accusations. What
>specific 'legal point', name one of the many, has never been used that
>way before.
>
>
>>The jury pool was over 90% dims.
>
>But even the 10% Republican found him guilty. The defense was
>satisfied with the jury. Blame them. The jury in Florida will be 90%
>Republican.
>

10% or more of Republicans are also corrupt/bribed. You really don't
understand systemic corruption. The cabals always covers all bases.

The Dem voting judges always reject the defence's evidence and won't even
let them talk. They also yell at them. They are biased and partisan.

You are completely blind to corruption and clueless on how the world works.
It's about money and power. The cabals have trillions to do all of this.
You're just a clown.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

>
>>The jury was allowed to go home overnight and over the
>>Memorial Day weekend. Naturally their largely Dim family ...
>
>Objection! Speculation.
>
>>> ... and friends knew they were on the jury and they would have
>>to answer to them if the result has not been guilty.
>
>A really shitty argument. In case of a hung jury they could simply lie
>about what their verdict were, if they were worried about their
>family's reaction. 'I voted guilty, but that one idiot refused to go
>along. Don't blame me!!!'
>>
>>Was any other result expected?
>
>Did you read some of the transcripts or looked at the evidence
>yourself? The documents, the tapes, the notes, the receipts, the
>witness testimony? You would have needed a 12 hard core MAGA cultists
>jury to have Trump acquitted.
>>
>>It isn't over until the appeals courts sing.
>
>Of course not. Do you take any bets on a reversal of the decision?
>

On Tue, 04 Jun 2024 01:34:16 +0200, Malte Runz
<nobodys@busine.ss> in alt.atheism with message-id
<v8is5jdcqj2o70p182bfa17q62rbg8ncnk@4ax.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:42:49 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 31 May 2024 08:17:52 -0700, El Kabong
>><twang@the.noodle> in alt.atheism with message-id
>><9bqj5jtsk24dt1cq6qlisdgeon18aesfn1@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Andrew W wrote:
>>>
>>>> 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
>>>> politically motivated.
>>>> 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
>>>> government is a very big issue
>>>
>>>Because Trump said so?
>>>
>>>If he were truthful, he wouldn't be a convicted felon.
>>
>>The DA ran on a platform of "Get Trump"
>
>Did he really?
>https://tinyurl.com/yckae9ha
>"Bragg launched his campaign for the Manhattan DA position in June
>2019, two months before outgoing DA Cyrus Vance Jr issued a subpoena
>for the Trump Organization in order to acquire Trump's tax returns.
>Proceedings against Trump by Vance began in August 2019, [...]
>During the first half of Bragg's campaign, it was not clear that
>proceedings against Trump would be able to take place, as Trump had
>appealed to the Supreme Court for immunity from the subpoena. The
>Court ruled 7-2 that he was not immune in the Trump v. Vance case in
>July 2020.
>[...]
>While campaigning, Bragg said: "I have investigated Trump and his
>children and held them accountable for their misconduct with the Trump
>Foundation. [...]
>He also said that he would continue with Vance's investigation and
>hold Trump "accountable by following the facts where they go.""
>
>"Would continue" an ongoing investigation.
>
>>The judge is a Dim contributor.
>
>He donated $35 to Democrats in 2020. $15 went to Joe Biden.
>U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon, the judge in the documents case
>in Florida, owes her life long position to Donald Trump, and she has
>his dick up her arse in the most disgusting way. Spending weeks and
>months on every single issue, that a regular judge could decide from
>the bench in minutes. Deliberately delaying the case until after the
>election.
>
>
>>the judge's daughter makes big money by being a dim
>>supporter and activist.
>
>She raises money for Democrats. She gets paid for her work, of course,
>but she gaines nothing personally directly from this case. You may
>have sources telling a different story. Sources with evidence, of
>course. Not just another FOX blow horn spreading lies. Real, hard,
>solid evidence!
>
>>The jury instructions and many of the "legal" points used
>>had never been used this way before.
>
>What points have never been used before? Again, I don't need to hear
>Jesse Watters or Laura Ingraham repeating the accusations. What
>specific 'legal point', name one of the many, has never been used that
>way before.
>
>
>>The jury pool was over 90% dims.
>
>But even the 10% Republican found him guilty. The defense was
>satisfied with the jury. Blame them. The jury in Florida will be 90%
>Republican.
>
>>The jury was allowed to go home overnight and over the
>>Memorial Day weekend. Naturally their largely Dim family ...
>
>Objection! Speculation.
>
>>> ... and friends knew they were on the jury and they would have
>>to answer to them if the result has not been guilty.
>
>A really shitty argument. In case of a hung jury they could simply lie
>about what their verdict were, if they were worried about their
>family's reaction. 'I voted guilty, but that one idiot refused to go
>along. Don't blame me!!!'
>>
>>Was any other result expected?
>
>Did you read some of the transcripts or looked at the evidence
>yourself? The documents, the tapes, the notes, the receipts, the
>witness testimony? You would have needed a 12 hard core MAGA cultists
>jury to have Trump acquitted.
>>
>>It isn't over until the appeals courts sing.
>
>Of course not. Do you take any bets on a reversal of the decision?

I don't bet, especially when there is no way to collect.

--

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting
and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Whatever it takes - Stop the Democrats. Or the Dims
as I prefer to call them

The most dangerous enemies the United States has:

Biden the Senile Bastard and his Bitch and
supported by the Sluts and Pimps including
Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,
Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Jamaal Bowman,
Cori Bush, Adam Schiff, Maxine Waters, Jerry Nadler,
Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and Cory Booker. They
have stepped over the line and are working against
the country and what it stands for.

Do not work with them but oppose everything they attempt.

Stop the Green Raw Deal! I dare call it treason.
Go WOKE. Go broke.
CRT - Criminals Recruiting Thugs
DEI - Dumbass Egotistical Idiocy
End all social engineering programs.

I don't know how Comical Karine can still hold a straight
face with what she has to say.

Did the last sane person leaving California remember to
turn off the lights? Did he do the same for the Rotten
Apple?

Abortion should be like any other medical procedure
and be the decision of the patient and the doctor.
It is the business of no one else.

There is only one reason for a woman to get an abortion.
She want's it. All else is irrelevant

I support a Pro-Choice Constitutional Amendment.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com

On Fri, 31 May 2024 18:53:18 +0200, Malte Runz
<nobodys@busine.ss> in alt.atheism with message-id
<3guj5jpoibt0h9n0d06ih4uv8ov51sicpu@4ax.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 31 May 2024 22:50:30 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
>>politically motivated.
>
>https://tinyurl.com/ydh3nfku
>
>77% of American adults view Putin unfavorably.
>
>72% believe that "Russia’s actions are an unjustified attempt to
>overthrow the Ukrainian government"
>
>54% believe that only Russia, and not Ukraine, has committed war
>crimes during the war.
>
>>59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...
>
>100% of the jury believed that Trump is guilty as fuc... charged. And
>that is the only thing that counts.

So did the OJ jury.

>
>
>> ...the weaponization of
>>government is a very big issue
>
>I suggest you familiarize yourself with "Project 2025". But then
>again, you'll probably love it. It'd make Trump a very, very powerful
>man, who can rule as he pleases.

He had four years. Did he try to rule or to govern?

>
>>
>>https://x.com/MAGAIncWarRoom/status/1796301911618150406
>>
>>
>>
>>Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
>>the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.
>>
>>http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site
>
>https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=241147
>***
>(VIDEO 23.39) Is the Sun a Simulation? Kerry K
>***
>
>How open minded are you?

Enough to know what a disaster Biden is.

--

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting
and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Whatever it takes - Stop the Democrats. Or the Dims
as I prefer to call them

The most dangerous enemies the United States has:

Biden the Senile Bastard and his Bitch and
supported by the Sluts and Pimps including
Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,
Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Jamaal Bowman,
Cori Bush, Adam Schiff, Maxine Waters, Jerry Nadler,
Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and Cory Booker. They
have stepped over the line and are working against
the country and what it stands for.

Do not work with them but oppose everything they attempt.

Stop the Green Raw Deal! I dare call it treason.
Go WOKE. Go broke.
CRT - Criminals Recruiting Thugs
DEI - Dumbass Egotistical Idiocy
End all social engineering programs.

I don't know how Comical Karine can still hold a straight
face with what she has to say.

Did the last sane person leaving California remember to
turn off the lights? Did he do the same for the Rotten
Apple?

Abortion should be like any other medical procedure
and be the decision of the patient and the doctor.
It is the business of no one else.

There is only one reason for a woman to get an abortion.
She want's it. All else is irrelevant

I support a Pro-Choice Constitutional Amendment.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com

Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 14:54:57 -0700, El Kabong
> >Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 31 May 2024 08:17:52 -0700, El Kabong
> >> >Andrew W wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
> >> >> politically motivated.
> >> >> 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
> >> >> government is a very big issue
> >> >
> >> >Because Trump said so?
> >> >
> >> >If he were truthful, he wouldn't be a convicted felon.
> >>
> >> The DA ran on a platform of "Get Trump"
> >> The judge is a Dim contributor.
> >> the judge's daughter makes big money by being a dim
> >> supporter and activist.
> >> The jury instructions and many of the "legal" points used
> >> had never been used this way before.
> >> The jury pool was over 90% dims.
> >> The jury was allowed to go home overnight and over the
> >> Memorial Day weekend. Naturally their largely Dim family
> >> and friends knew they were on the jury and they would have
> >> to answer to them if the result has not been guilty.
> >>
> >> Was any other result expected?
> >
> >Is there secret evidence that Trump didn't do the crime,
> >that the judge wouldn't let him use? Why should the jury
> >have found differently?
> >
> >Who told you a DA is supposed to be unbiased? If I lived
> >in NY, i would have voted for Bragg just so he could "get
> >Trump".
> >
> >Maybe they should just issue every Republican in NYC a
> >license to kill, since they can't get fair trials?
> >
> >> It isn't over until the appeals courts sing.
> >
> >And after that, more crying about judges from the Magans.
>
> The appeals process should result in a more accurate result.

So you're saying you will accept the appeals court's
ruling, even if it upholds the convictions.

On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 18:29:00 -0700, El Kabong
<twang@the.noodle> in alt.atheism with message-id
<nbrs5jlfuc6v1mdh2pl8f0roi0ia491kff@4ax.com> wrote:

>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>> On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 14:54:57 -0700, El Kabong
>> >Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 31 May 2024 08:17:52 -0700, El Kabong
>> >> >Andrew W wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
>> >> >> politically motivated.
>> >> >> 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
>> >> >> government is a very big issue
>> >> >
>> >> >Because Trump said so?
>> >> >
>> >> >If he were truthful, he wouldn't be a convicted felon.
>> >>
>> >> The DA ran on a platform of "Get Trump"
>> >> The judge is a Dim contributor.
>> >> the judge's daughter makes big money by being a dim
>> >> supporter and activist.
>> >> The jury instructions and many of the "legal" points used
>> >> had never been used this way before.
>> >> The jury pool was over 90% dims.
>> >> The jury was allowed to go home overnight and over the
>> >> Memorial Day weekend. Naturally their largely Dim family
>> >> and friends knew they were on the jury and they would have
>> >> to answer to them if the result has not been guilty.
>> >>
>> >> Was any other result expected?
>> >
>> >Is there secret evidence that Trump didn't do the crime,
>> >that the judge wouldn't let him use? Why should the jury
>> >have found differently?
>> >
>> >Who told you a DA is supposed to be unbiased? If I lived
>> >in NY, i would have voted for Bragg just so he could "get
>> >Trump".
>> >
>> >Maybe they should just issue every Republican in NYC a
>> >license to kill, since they can't get fair trials?
>> >
>> >> It isn't over until the appeals courts sing.
>> >
>> >And after that, more crying about judges from the Magans.
>>
>> The appeals process should result in a more accurate result.
>
>
>So you're saying you will accept the appeals court's
>ruling, even if it upholds the convictions.

Of course. That does not require agreement.

--

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting
and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Whatever it takes - Stop the Democrats. Or the Dims
as I prefer to call them

The most dangerous enemies the United States has:

Biden the Senile Bastard and his Bitch and
supported by the Sluts and Pimps including
Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,
Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Jamaal Bowman,
Cori Bush, Adam Schiff, Maxine Waters, Jerry Nadler,
Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and Cory Booker. They
have stepped over the line and are working against
the country and what it stands for.

Do not work with them but oppose everything they attempt.

Stop the Green Raw Deal! I dare call it treason.
Go WOKE. Go broke.
CRT - Criminals Recruiting Thugs
DEI - Dumbass Egotistical Idiocy
End all social engineering programs.

I don't know how Comical Karine can still hold a straight
face with what she has to say.

Did the last sane person leaving California remember to
turn off the lights? Did he do the same for the Rotten
Apple?

Abortion should be like any other medical procedure
and be the decision of the patient and the doctor.
It is the business of no one else.

There is only one reason for a woman to get an abortion.
She want's it. All else is irrelevant

I support a Pro-Choice Constitutional Amendment.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com

On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:58:28 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
wrote:

>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>news:v8is5jdcqj2o70p182bfa17q62rbg8ncnk@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:42:49 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 31 May 2024 08:17:52 -0700, El Kabong
>>><twang@the.noodle> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>><9bqj5jtsk24dt1cq6qlisdgeon18aesfn1@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Andrew W wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
>>>>> politically motivated.
>>>>> 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
>>>>> government is a very big issue
>>>>
>>>>Because Trump said so?
>>>>
>>>>If he were truthful, he wouldn't be a convicted felon.
>>>
>>>The DA ran on a platform of "Get Trump"
>>
>>Did he really?
>>https://tinyurl.com/yckae9ha
>>"Bragg launched his campaign for the Manhattan DA position in June
>>2019, two months before outgoing DA Cyrus Vance Jr issued a subpoena
>>for the Trump Organization in order to acquire Trump's tax returns.
>>Proceedings against Trump by Vance began in August 2019, [...]
>>During the first half of Bragg's campaign, it was not clear that
>>proceedings against Trump would be able to take place, as Trump had
>>appealed to the Supreme Court for immunity from the subpoena. The
>>Court ruled 7-2 that he was not immune in the Trump v. Vance case in
>>July 2020.
>>[...]
>>While campaigning, Bragg said: "I have investigated Trump and his
>>children and held them accountable for their misconduct with the Trump
>>Foundation. [...]
>>He also said that he would continue with Vance's investigation and
>>hold Trump "accountable by following the facts where they go.""
>>
>>"Would continue" an ongoing investigation.
>>
>>>The judge is a Dim contributor.
>>
>>He donated $35 to Democrats in 2020. $15 went to Joe Biden.
>>U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon, the judge in the documents case
>>in Florida, owes her life long position to Donald Trump, and she has
>>his dick up her arse in the most disgusting way. Spending weeks and
>>months on every single issue, that a regular judge could decide from
>>the bench in minutes. Deliberately delaying the case until after the
>>election.
>>
>>
>>>the judge's daughter makes big money by being a dim
>>>supporter and activist.
>>
>>She raises money for Democrats. She gets paid for her work, of course,
>>but she gaines nothing personally directly from this case. You may
>>have sources telling a different story. Sources with evidence, of
>>course. Not just another FOX blow horn spreading lies. Real, hard,
>>solid evidence!
>>
>>>The jury instructions and many of the "legal" points used
>>>had never been used this way before.
>>
>>What points have never been used before? Again, I don't need to hear
>>Jesse Watters or Laura Ingraham repeating the accusations. What
>>specific 'legal point', name one of the many, has never been used that
>>way before.
>>
>>
>>>The jury pool was over 90% dims.
>>
>>But even the 10% Republican found him guilty. The defense was
>>satisfied with the jury. Blame them. The jury in Florida will be 90%
>>Republican.
>>
>
>10% or more of Republicans are also corrupt/bribed. ...

Just like all the judges who threw out 60+ cases of alleged voter
fraud in 2016. Just like every single person of power and influence
who goes against the cult leader. They're all corrupt!

> ... You really don't
>understand systemic corruption. ...

I understand that you also didn't have any counterpoints to my
objections to the list of sorry excuses.

> ... The cabals always covers all bases.

Yes, they are a formidable foe indeed. But you and your buddies are
beating them regardless. Praise the Lord!

>The Dem voting judges always reject the defence's evidence and won't even
>let them talk. ...

Bullshit. Prove me wrong.

> ... They also yell at them. ...

Who yelled at whom? When and where?
I know you won't give an example, but rather call me ignorant because
I 'don't know anything about the real world'. But you know that we
have long ago realized that that's how you play the game. You run,
tail between your legs.

> ... They are biased and partisan.

Unlike Aileen Cannon, who is totally fair and objective and in no way
shows any kind of sympathy for one or the other side. You're a
hypocrite to the core.
>
>You are completely blind to corruption and clueless on how the world works.

Will you look at that! I always comment 'live', i.e. I don't read your
posts in their entirety before commenting. And once again I had your
evasion down, almost ad verbatim.

>It's about money and power. The cabals have trillions to do all of this.

But Andrew from Down Under is successfully exposing their evil deeds
and slowly winning the battle. Halle fucking lujah!

>You're just a clown.

My pronoun is 'It'.

--
Malte Runz

"Malte Runz" wrote in message
news:4r0v5j5mp3pv3k5ej6rrluusmiffh7kbtf@4ax.com...
>
>On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:58:28 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>wrote:
>
>>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>>news:v8is5jdcqj2o70p182bfa17q62rbg8ncnk@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:42:49 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The jury pool was over 90% dims.
>>>
>>>But even the 10% Republican found him guilty. The defense was
>>>satisfied with the jury. Blame them. The jury in Florida will be 90%
>>>Republican.
>>>
>>
>>10% or more of Republicans are also corrupt/bribed. ...
>
>Just like all the judges who threw out 60+ cases of alleged voter
>fraud in 2016. Just like every single person of power and influence
>who goes against the cult leader. They're all corrupt!
>

No, mostly the ones you follow.

>
>> ... You really don't
>>understand systemic corruption. ...
>
>I understand that you also didn't have any counterpoints to my
>objections to the list of sorry excuses.
>

That would be a waste of time with a leftist.

>
>> ... The cabals always cover all bases.
>
>Yes, they are a formidable foe indeed. But you and your buddies are
>beating them regardless. Praise the Lord!
>

We have help. Your side is going away. The game is changing.

>
>>The Dem voting judges always reject the defence's evidence and won't even
>>let them talk. ...
>
>Bullshit. Prove me wrong.
>

Your type don't look at proof.

>
>> ... They also yell at them. ...
>
>Who yelled at whom? When and where?
>I know you won't give an example, but rather call me ignorant because
>I 'don't know anything about the real world'. But you know that we
>have long ago realized that that's how you play the game. You run,
>tail between your legs.
>

Says the clown who plays games every day in newsgroups for fun.

Judge Merchan LOSES IT & SHOUTS at Trump Defense Witness in Trial
https://youtu.be/BaUoygptyxM?t=16

>
>> ... They are biased and partisan.
>
>Unlike Aileen Cannon, who is totally fair and objective and in no way
>shows any kind of sympathy for one or the other side. You're a
>hypocrite to the core.
>>

If a woke leftist loony calls me a hypocrite then I know I'm doing good.
Keep it up.

>
>>You are completely blind to corruption and clueless on how the world
>>works.
>
>Will you look at that! I always comment 'live', i.e. I don't read your
>posts in their entirety before commenting. And once again I had your
>evasion down, almost ad verbatim.
>

It's just a fact.

>
>>It's about money and power. The cabals have trillions to do all of this.
>
>But Andrew from Down Under is successfully exposing their evil deeds
>and slowly winning the battle. Halle fucking lujah!
>

I'm doing my bit. You support the enemies of humanity.

>
>>You're just a clown.
>
>My pronoun is 'It'.
>

What's that supposed to mean?

Maybe this?
Clown from the movie It
https://tinyurl.com/4m9wy8cw
Yep that's you.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

On 5/31/24 08:50, Andrew W wrote:
>
> 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
> politically motivated.
> 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
> government is a very big issue
>
> https://x.com/MAGAIncWarRoom/status/1796301911618150406

Thus spake Hogan Gidley. Where did Gidley get his information from?

--
David Canzi

"In Dr. Johnson's famous dictionary patriotism is defined as the
last resort of a scoundrel. With all due respect to an enlightened
but inferior lexicographer I beg to submit it is the first."
Ambrose Bierce, _The Devil's Dictionary_

DT 34xG

On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 09:39:03 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
wrote:

>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>news:4r0v5j5mp3pv3k5ej6rrluusmiffh7kbtf@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:58:28 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>>>news:v8is5jdcqj2o70p182bfa17q62rbg8ncnk@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:42:49 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>The jury pool was over 90% dims.
>>>>
>>>>But even the 10% Republican found him guilty. The defense was
>>>>satisfied with the jury. Blame them. The jury in Florida will be 90%
>>>>Republican.
>>>>
>>>
>>>10% or more of Republicans are also corrupt/bribed. ...
>>
>>Just like all the judges who threw out 60+ cases of alleged voter
>>fraud in 2016. Just like every single person of power and influence
>>who goes against the cult leader. They're all corrupt!
>>
>
>No, mostly the ones you follow.

I don't follow any judges.
>
>
>>
>>> ... You really don't
>>>understand systemic corruption. ...
>>
>>I understand that you also didn't have any counterpoints to my
>>objections to the list of sorry excuses.
>>
>
>That would be a waste of time with a leftist.

I have two words for you: Sour grapes.
>
>
>>
>>> ... The cabals always cover all bases.
>>
>>Yes, they are a formidable foe indeed. But you and your buddies are
>>beating them regardless. Praise the Lord!
>>
>
>We have help. Your side is going away. The game is changing.

I know. I see you finally managed to force evil Klaus Schwab to step
down as chairman of the World Economic Forum. Your relentless exposure
of his dealings with the cabals, the deep state, and probably space
aliens is coming to fruition. Who's next?
>
>
>>
>>>The Dem voting judges always reject the defence's evidence and won't even
>>>let them talk. ...
>>
>>Bullshit. Prove me wrong.
>>
>
>Your type don't look at proof.

Your type never provides any.
>
>
>>
>>> ... They also yell at them. ...
>>
>>Who yelled at whom? When and where?
>>I know you won't give an example, but rather call me ignorant because
>>I 'don't know anything about the real world'. But you know that we
>>have long ago realized that that's how you play the game. You run,
>>tail between your legs.
>>
>
>Says the clown who plays games every day in newsgroups for fun.
>
>Judge Merchan LOSES IT & SHOUTS at Trump Defense Witness in Trial
>https://youtu.be/BaUoygptyxM?t=16

I also need to raise my voice every now and again when the kids at
work try to test my patience and authority once too often.
>
>
>>
>>> ... They are biased and partisan.
>>
>>Unlike Aileen Cannon, who is totally fair and objective and in no way
>>shows any kind of sympathy for one or the other side. You're a
>>hypocrite to the core.
>>>
>
>If a woke leftist loony calls me a hypocrite then I know I'm doing good.
>Keep it up.

I will. Don't worry about that.

>
>
>>
>>>You are completely blind to corruption and clueless on how the world
>>>works.
>>
>>Will you look at that! I always comment 'live', i.e. I don't read your
>>posts in their entirety before commenting. And once again I had your
>>evasion down, almost ad verbatim.
>>
>
>It's just a fact.

Yup. I am that good.
>
>
>>
>>>It's about money and power. The cabals have trillions to do all of this.
>>
>>But Andrew from Down Under is successfully exposing their evil deeds
>>and slowly winning the battle. Halle fucking lujah!
>>
>
>I'm doing my bit. You support the enemies of humanity.

You could win an Olympic gold medal, if self-importance were a
discipline. Your 'work' here has zero impact... except for the
laughter you generate among your readers.
>
>
>>
>>>You're just a clown.
>>
>>My pronoun is 'It'.
>>
>
>What's that supposed to mean?
>
>Maybe this?
>Clown from the movie It
>https://tinyurl.com/4m9wy8cw
>Yep that's you.

You're so smart!

--
Malte Runz

David Canzi wrote:
> On 5/31/24 08:50, Andrew W wrote:
> >
> > 67% of Americans already believe these attacks on Donald Trump are
> > politically motivated.
> > 59% of Americans believe Joe Biden is part of it...the weaponization of
> > government is a very big issue
> >
> > https://x.com/MAGAIncWarRoom/status/1796301911618150406
>
> Thus spake Hogan Gidley. Where did Gidley get his information from?

Gidley read it in some usenet kook's post.