Message-ID:

Let me put it this way: today is going to be a learning experience.

alt / alt.atheism / Re: Mark Levin issues his own LEGAL ADVICE to Trumps attorneys

Subject: Re: Mark Levin issues his own LEGAL ADVICE to Trumps attorneys
From: Mike Colangelo
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 21:29 UTC
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.neodome.net!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx48.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Mark Levin issues his own LEGAL ADVICE to Trumps attorneys
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns
References: <20240529134405.0c160be3@mx> <v3a24l$1noj9$1@dont-email.me>
<20240530101323.5799dde4@mx> <v3a60d$1oc9c$1@dont-email.me>
<20240530111717.61f03cbf@mx> <kfqi5j134gftqs167jldroa98bpeua3ap2@4ax.com>
<v3chn7$27imi$1@dont-email.me> <v3cir8$284rf$2@dont-email.me>
<v3cm9v$27imi$2@dont-email.me> <1To6O.4076$qQk3.2864@fx18.iad>
<v3d6ng$2acqh$3@dont-email.me> <Nmp6O.18253$Dsz1.14041@fx14.iad>
<v3d9tb$2c46h$1@dont-email.me> <5vq6O.972$SHoa.4@fx04.iad>
<v3dcbg$2c46h$2@dont-email.me> <lzq6O.976$SHoa.787@fx04.iad>
<v3dd4f$2c46h$3@dont-email.me> <v3fv55$2usav$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: air@vatican_.con (Mike Colangelo)
In-Reply-To: <v3fv55$2usav$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <JoM6O.6069$kHEb.1507@fx48.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 14:29:12 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 3006

View all headers

On 6/1/2024 1:09 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
> On 5/31/2024 1:49 PM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and *admits* it — lied:

>
> {snip}
>
>> Common law writ. Unlike you, when Rosenbluth researches it, because he at
>> aleast has some intellectual honesty, which you have no trace of, he'll
>> reluctantly admit I am right, albeit with numerous 'yeah, but's' or other
>> provisos.
>
> I can't find anything about SCOTUS hearing a case from "common law writ."

Gak doesn't even know what it is. He's so stupid that he doesn't know he has
mangled the phrase, omitting a couple of important words.

>
> The Constitution sets forth what cases SCOTUS hears as an original matter (it's
> very few). The power of SCOTUS to hear appeals is determined by federal statues.
> Congress has limited the ability of SCOTUS to hear an appeal from a state court
> to after the highest court in the state has rendered its judgment.
>
> 28 U.S. Code § 1257:
>
> "Final judgments or decrees rendered by the highest court of a State in which a
> decision could be had, may be reviewed by the Supreme Court by writ of certiorari."

*That* completes the expression that Gak doesn't actually know. And it's very
clear from Gak's misuse of the expression that Gak thinks a "common law writ" is
something Trump can do.

>
> In contrast for cases in federal court, a party can ask SCOTUS to grant cert the
> instant it lands in one of the federal appellate courts.

Subject	Author
Re: Mark Levin issues his own LEGAL ADVICE to Trumps attorneys	Mike Colangelo