Trump never lies because his followers believe everything he says.

Then there's that 'exit poll' from some secret election that says NY blacks
love him because all blacks identify with breaking the law, being caught and
convicted.

Paul Szypula wrote:
> Trump never lies because

https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-makes-show-trial-conviction-ripe-for-reversal-legal-experts-say/

Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky says the conviction isn’t
likely to stick, for an array of reasons. Chief among them: Merchan’s
convoluted jury instructions, in which the Biden campaign-donor judge
framed the jury’s deliberations in a way that, according to legal expert
Jonathan Turley, “seemed less like a jury deliberation than a canned
hunt.” Merchan told the jurors they didn’t have to agree on the three
possible “unlawful means” prosecutors vaguely alleged Trump had employed
to “influence” the 2016 election.

“The jurors were told that they could split on what occurred, with four
jurors accepting each of the three possible crimes in a 4-4-4 split. The
court would still consider that a unanimous verdict so long as they
agree that it was in furtherance of some crime,” Turley wrote in the
Hill before the verdict was handed down.

Von Spakovsky said Merchan’s instructions point to reversible error —
“an error in trial proceedings that affects a party’s rights so
significantly that it is grounds for reversal if the affected party
properly objected at trial,” according to the Legal Information Institute.

“This is such a mistake. … If I were the court of appeals, the moment
this case came in, I would overturn the conviction,” the former Federal
Election Commission member and Heritage Foundation fellow told me before
the verdict this week on the Simon Conway Show. “That is one of the
craziest things I have ever heard and it is a complete violation of
President Trump’s substantive due process rights.”

Von Spakovsky said the standard in like cases is that jurors come to a
unanimous agreement on each of the charges they are deliberating. He
said Merchan added an absurd twist to the proceedings after handicapping
Trump’s defense throughout the trial.

Defense attorney Randy Zelin told CNN that Merchan’s jury instructions
contained a “key flaw.”

“Whether you are driving in a Ford or a Ferrari, if someone gives you
bad directions, you’re going to end up lost. And those jury instructions
were just a complete, just take the Constitution, throw it out a window,
burn it, shoot it and hang it,” the attorney said on “CNN Special Report.”

If this is a medical emergency, stop reading, log off, and dial 911!

> "Trump Has No Evidence ... [of something]"

This surprises you, why? (Does he usually?)

If this is a medical emergency, stop reading, log off, and dial 911!

>Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky says the conviction isn’t
>likely to stick, for an array of reasons.

I can predict the likely-hood of a conviction being overturned by
simply looking at the appellate's bank account(s).

I see two that I'd hit first:

The N.Y. law whereby two misdemeanors (rubbed together just right)
make a felony... would be my first target.

The jury instructions wherein the jury didn't have to specify *which*
secondary law was the target of the first violation *might* be
grounds; however, if the first fails, it's likely that the second
will, also.

Were *I* in the Donald's shoes, I'd be weighing the cost. I'm willing
to bet that it CAN be overturned, but it would significantly stress
even his resources... and for what? If a person is willing to spend
50 million dollars, he or she can get out of *anything*; however, in
this case where any significant prison time is highly unlikely, *I*
would just keep the money and say: "I'm a felon... so what? I have 50
million dollars."

X, formerly known as "!Jones" wrote:
> This surprises you, why?

https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-makes-show-trial-conviction-ripe-for-reversal-legal-experts-say/

‘One of the Craziest Things’
Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky says the conviction isn’t
likely to stick, for an array of reasons. Chief among them: Merchan’s
convoluted jury instructions, in which the Biden campaign-donor judge
framed the jury’s deliberations in a way that, according to legal expert
Jonathan Turley, “seemed less like a jury deliberation than a canned
hunt.” Merchan told the jurors they didn’t have to agree on the three
possible “unlawful means” prosecutors vaguely alleged Trump had employed
to “influence” the 2016 election.

“The jurors were told that they could split on what occurred, with four
jurors accepting each of the three possible crimes in a 4-4-4 split. The
court would still consider that a unanimous verdict so long as they
agree that it was in furtherance of some crime,” Turley wrote in the
Hill before the verdict was handed down.

Accomplice media outlets running interference for Biden and his minions
— and attempting to influence the 2024 election — collectively wailed
that conservative news outlets have been misrepresenting Merchan’s jury
instructions. But there’s no denying the unusual nature of the judge’s
explanations at the end of a deeply legally flawed trial.

Von Spakovsky said Merchan’s instructions point to reversible error —
“an error in trial proceedings that affects a party’s rights so
significantly that it is grounds for reversal if the affected party
properly objected at trial,” according to the Legal Information Institute.

“This is such a mistake. … If I were the court of appeals, the moment
this case came in, I would overturn the conviction,” the former Federal
Election Commission member and Heritage Foundation fellow told me before
the verdict this week on the Simon Conway Show. “That is one of the
craziest things I have ever heard and it is a complete violation of
President Trump’s substantive due process rights.”

Von Spakovsky said the standard in like cases is that jurors come to a
unanimous agreement on each of the charges they are deliberating. He
said Merchan added an absurd twist to the proceedings after handicapping
Trump’s defense throughout the trial.

Threw the Constitution ‘Out the Window’
Defense attorney Randy Zelin told CNN that Merchan’s jury instructions
contained a “key flaw.”

“Whether you are driving in a Ford or a Ferrari, if someone gives you
bad directions, you’re going to end up lost. And those jury instructions
were just a complete, just take the Constitution, throw it out a window,
burn it, shoot it and hang it,” the attorney said on “CNN Special Report.”

Turley told Fox News that the “trial is a target rich environment for
appeal,” although he said the appeal will likely “stretch beyond the
election.”

Speaker Mike Johnson has called on the U.S. Supreme Court to quickly
take up the case because of its unprecedented constitutional
implications. The state appeals courts in line to preside over the Trump
case are lined with Democrat-appointed judges.

Von Spakovsky said the courts should act as expeditiously as the Supreme
Court did in the Colorado ballot access case in which it unanimously
overturned the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling kicking Trump off the
state presidential primary ballot.

As for Merchan, von Spakovsky said the judge is either one of the most
incompetent judges he has ever seen or his curious instructions to the
jury was “a sign of intentional misfeasance.”

“In fact, I think it’s the latter because throughout this entire case he
has acted as if he is an alternate member of the prosecution team,” the
legal expert said.

Loran wrote :
> Paul Szypula wrote:
>> Trump never lies because
>
>
>
> https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-makes-show-trial-conviction-ripe-for-reversal-legal-experts-say/
>
> Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky says the conviction isn’t likely
> to stick, for an array of reasons. Chief among them: Merchan’s convoluted
> jury instructions, in which the Biden campaign-donor judge framed the jury’s
> deliberations in a way that, according to legal expert Jonathan Turley,
> “seemed less like a jury deliberation than a canned hunt.” Merchan told the
> jurors they didn’t have to agree on the three possible “unlawful means”
> prosecutors vaguely alleged Trump had employed to “influence” the 2016
> election.
>
> “The jurors were told that they could split on what occurred, with four
> jurors accepting each of the three possible crimes in a 4-4-4 split. The
> court would still consider that a unanimous verdict so long as they agree
> that it was in furtherance of some crime,” Turley wrote in the Hill before
> the verdict was handed down.
>
> Von Spakovsky said Merchan’s instructions point to reversible error — “an
> error in trial proceedings that affects a party’s rights so significantly
> that it is grounds for reversal if the affected party properly objected at
> trial,” according to the Legal Information Institute.
>
> “This is such a mistake. … If I were the court of appeals, the moment this
> case came in, I would overturn the conviction,” the former Federal Election
> Commission member and Heritage Foundation fellow told me before the verdict
> this week on the Simon Conway Show. “That is one of the craziest things I
> have ever heard and it is a complete violation of President Trump’s
> substantive due process rights.”
>
> Von Spakovsky said the standard in like cases is that jurors come to a
> unanimous agreement on each of the charges they are deliberating. He said
> Merchan added an absurd twist to the proceedings after handicapping Trump’s
> defense throughout the trial.
>
>
>
> Defense attorney Randy Zelin told CNN that Merchan’s jury instructions
> contained a “key flaw.”
>
> “Whether you are driving in a Ford or a Ferrari, if someone gives you bad
> directions, you’re going to end up lost. And those jury instructions were
> just a complete, just take the Constitution, throw it out a window, burn it,
> shoot it and hang it,” the attorney said on “CNN Special Report.”

Shut up Vladimir! :-?

X, formerly known as "!Jones" wrote:
> I can predict the likely-hood of a conviction being overturned by

https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-makes-show-trial-conviction-ripe-for-reversal-legal-experts-say/

‘One of the Craziest Things’
Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky says the conviction isn’t
likely to stick, for an array of reasons. Chief among them: Merchan’s
convoluted jury instructions, in which the Biden campaign-donor judge
framed the jury’s deliberations in a way that, according to legal expert
Jonathan Turley, “seemed less like a jury deliberation than a canned
hunt.” Merchan told the jurors they didn’t have to agree on the three
possible “unlawful means” prosecutors vaguely alleged Trump had employed
to “influence” the 2016 election.

“The jurors were told that they could split on what occurred, with four
jurors accepting each of the three possible crimes in a 4-4-4 split. The
court would still consider that a unanimous verdict so long as they
agree that it was in furtherance of some crime,” Turley wrote in the
Hill before the verdict was handed down.

Accomplice media outlets running interference for Biden and his minions
— and attempting to influence the 2024 election — collectively wailed
that conservative news outlets have been misrepresenting Merchan’s jury
instructions. But there’s no denying the unusual nature of the judge’s
explanations at the end of a deeply legally flawed trial.

Von Spakovsky said Merchan’s instructions point to reversible error —
“an error in trial proceedings that affects a party’s rights so
significantly that it is grounds for reversal if the affected party
properly objected at trial,” according to the Legal Information Institute.

“This is such a mistake. … If I were the court of appeals, the moment
this case came in, I would overturn the conviction,” the former Federal
Election Commission member and Heritage Foundation fellow told me before
the verdict this week on the Simon Conway Show. “That is one of the
craziest things I have ever heard and it is a complete violation of
President Trump’s substantive due process rights.”

Von Spakovsky said the standard in like cases is that jurors come to a
unanimous agreement on each of the charges they are deliberating. He
said Merchan added an absurd twist to the proceedings after handicapping
Trump’s defense throughout the trial.

Threw the Constitution ‘Out the Window’
Defense attorney Randy Zelin told CNN that Merchan’s jury instructions
contained a “key flaw.”

“Whether you are driving in a Ford or a Ferrari, if someone gives you
bad directions, you’re going to end up lost. And those jury instructions
were just a complete, just take the Constitution, throw it out a window,
burn it, shoot it and hang it,” the attorney said on “CNN Special Report.”

Turley told Fox News that the “trial is a target rich environment for
appeal,” although he said the appeal will likely “stretch beyond the
election.”

Speaker Mike Johnson has called on the U.S. Supreme Court to quickly
take up the case because of its unprecedented constitutional
implications. The state appeals courts in line to preside over the Trump
case are lined with Democrat-appointed judges.

Von Spakovsky said the courts should act as expeditiously as the Supreme
Court did in the Colorado ballot access case in which it unanimously
overturned the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling kicking Trump off the
state presidential primary ballot.

As for Merchan, von Spakovsky said the judge is either one of the most
incompetent judges he has ever seen or his curious instructions to the
jury was “a sign of intentional misfeasance.”

“In fact, I think it’s the latter because throughout this entire case he
has acted as if he is an alternate member of the prosecution team,” the
legal expert said.

Capricorne wrote:
> Shut up Vladimir!

https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-makes-show-trial-conviction-ripe-for-reversal-legal-experts-say/

On 6/1/2024 9:05 AM, Loran aka "MassPeekWa" aka spammy, fucking lying
cocksucking HIV-oozing pseudonymous liar-who-has-not-been-defamed, lied:

> X, formerly known as "!Jones" wrote:
>> This surprises you, why?
>
> https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-

"Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky says" — ha ha ha! *HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA*!

Spongebob is as much of a constitutional law expert as Spastic-Kovsky.

Mike Colangelo wrote:
> On 6/1/2024 9:05 AM, Loran aka "MassPeekWa" aka spammy, fucking lying
> cocksucking HIV-oozing pseudonymous liar-who-has-not-been-defamed, lied:
>
>
>> X, formerly known as "!Jones" wrote:
>>> This surprises you, why?
>>
>> https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-
>
> "Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky says" — ha ha ha! *HA HA
> HA HA HA HA HA*!

https://www.heritage.org/staff/hans-von-spakovsky

Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on a wide range of issues—including
civil rights, civil justice, the First Amendment, immigration, the rule
of law, and government reform—as a Senior Legal Fellow in The Heritage
Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.

As manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative, von
Spakovsky also studies and writes about campaign finance restrictions,
voter fraud and voter ID, enforcement of federal voting rights laws,
administration of elections and voting equipment standards.

Heritage’s election reform project examines not only how to protect the
integrity of campaigns and elections but to achieve greater fairness and
security. “In an era of razor-thin election margins, these issues are
vital to the preservation of our republican form of government and the
rule of law,” von Spakovsky says.

Previously, as manager of the think tank’s Civil Justice Reform
Initiative, von Spakovsky studied how plaintiffs’ attorneys and
activists attempt to manipulate the courts for their own ends—at the
expense of the public.

He is the co-author with John Fund of the book Who’s Counting?: How
Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk (Encounter Books,
2012); Obama’s Enforcer: Eric Holder’s Justice Department
(HarperCollins/Broadside June 2014); and Our Broken Elections: How the
Left Changed the Way You Vote (Encounter Books, Nov. 2021).

President Donald Trump appointed von Spakovsky to the Presidential
Advisory Commission on Election Integrity in 2017.

Before joining Heritage in 2008, von Spakovsky served two years as a
member of the Federal Election Commission, the authority charged with
enforcing campaign finance laws for congressional and presidential
elections, including public funding.

Previously, von Spakovsky worked at the Justice Department as Counsel to
the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, providing expertise in
enforcing the Voting Rights Act and the Help America Vote Act of 2002.

A former litigator, in-house counsel and senior corporate officer in the
insurance industry, von Spakovsky worked on tort reform and civil
justice issues there for more than a decade.

He has served on the Board of Advisors of the U.S. Election Assistance
Commission and on the Fulton County (Georgia) Board of Registrations and
Elections. He is a former Vice Chairman of the Fairfax County (Virginia)
Electoral Board and a former member of the Virginia Advisory Board to
the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. He currently serves on the Board of
the Public Interest Legal Foundation.

His analysis and commentary have appeared in The Wall Street Journal,
The Washington Times, The Hill and USA Today, as well as such outlets as
National Review Online and Fox News. His series for PJ Media, Every
Single One, was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. He appears regularly on
Fox News Channel and on other national and regional TV and radio news
outlets.

He has testified before state and Congressional committees and made
presentations to, among other organizations, the National Association of
Secretaries of State, the Federalist Society, the National Conference of
State Legislatures and the American Legislative Exchange Council. He
also has taught as an adjunct professor at the George Mason University
School of Law.

A 1984 graduate of Vanderbilt University School of Law, von Spakovsky
received a bachelor's degree in 1981 from the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology. He currently resides in Vienna, Virginia.

In article <74gm5jhl7pjn1kh705vqv4m893i4ikbecs@4ax.com>, x@y.com says...
>
> If this is a medical emergency, stop reading, log off, and dial 911!
>
> >Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky says the conviction isn?t
> >likely to stick, for an array of reasons.
>
> I can predict the likely-hood of a conviction being overturned by
> simply looking at the appellate's bank account(s).
>
> I see two that I'd hit first:
>
> The N.Y. law whereby two misdemeanors (rubbed together just right)
> make a felony... would be my first target.
>
> The jury instructions wherein the jury didn't have to specify *which*
> secondary law was the target of the first violation *might* be
> grounds; however, if the first fails, it's likely that the second
> will, also.
>
> Were *I* in the Donald's shoes, I'd be weighing the cost. I'm willing
> to bet that it CAN be overturned, but it would significantly stress
> even his resources... and for what? If a person is willing to spend
> 50 million dollars, he or she can get out of *anything*; however, in
> this case where any significant prison time is highly unlikely, *I*
> would just keep the money and say: "I'm a felon... so what? I have 50
> million dollars."

He got that in 10 hours after the verdict.

In article <70I6O.1215$RsQ5.599@fx42.iad>, air@vatican_.con says...
>
> On 6/1/2024 9:05 AM, Loran aka "MassPeekWa" aka spammy, fucking lying
> cocksucking HIV-oozing pseudonymous liar-who-has-not-been-defamed, lied:
>
>
> > X, formerly known as "!Jones" wrote:
> >> This surprises you, why?
> >
> > https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-
>
> "Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky says" ? ha ha ha! *HA HA HA HA HA
> HA HA*!
>
> Spongebob is as much of a constitutional law expert as Spastic-Kovsky.

and you're none at all.

On 6/1/2024 10:51 AM, Loran aka "MassPeekWa" aka spammy, fucking lying
cocksucking HIV-oozing pseudonymous liar-who-has-not-been-defamed, lied:

> Mike Colangelo wrote:
>> On 6/1/2024 9:05 AM, Loran aka "MassPeekWa" aka spammy, fucking lying
>> cocksucking HIV-oozing pseudonymous liar-who-has-not-been-defamed, lied:
>>
>>
>>> X, formerly known as "!Jones" wrote:
>>>> This surprises you, why?
>>>
>>> https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-
>>
>> "Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky says" — ha ha ha! *HA HA HA HA
>> HA HA HA*!
>
> https://www.heritage.org/staff/hans-von-spakovsky
>
> Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on

nothing.

On 6/1/2024 6:12 AM, Paul Szypula wrote:
> Trump never lies

There you go.

On 6/1/2024 9:29 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
> On 6/1/2024 9:05 AM, Loran aka "MassPeekWa" aka spammy, fucking lying
> cocksucking HIV-oozing pseudonymous liar-who-has-not-been-defamed, lied:
>
>
>> X, formerly known as "!Jones" wrote:
>>> This surprises you, why?
>>
>> https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-
>
> "Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky

Constipational shit-stirrer Mike Colangelo aka Rudy Canoza, Michael
Terrell and others.

greg hall wrote:
> On 6/1/2024 9:29 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
>> On 6/1/2024 9:05 AM, Loran aka "MassPeekWa" aka spammy, fucking lying
>> cocksucking HIV-oozing pseudonymous liar-who-has-not-been-defamed, lied:
>>
>>
>>> X, formerly known as "!Jones" wrote:
>>>> This surprises you, why?
>>>
>>> https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-
>>
>> "Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky
>
> Constipational shit-stirrer Mike Colangelo aka Rudy Canoza, Michael
> Terrell and others.
>
>
I have a solution to that:

https://www.easynews.com/agreement/

SPAM. Easynews enforces a zero-tolerance spam policy regarding our users
posts to usenet through our network. It is the sole discretion of
Easynews to determine if a user's posts are considered spam. If Easynews
has determined that a user has posted 1 or more articles of spam, that
user will be charged a $500 per hour clean-up fee and the user's account
will be canceled immediately and all reasonable efforts will be made by
Easynews to prevent the user from using our network anytime thereafter.

Transmitting or receiving, uploading, using or reusing material which is
abusive, indecent, defamatory, obscene or menacing, or a breach of
confidence, privacy or similar third party rights;

Easynews Abuse handles all correspondences and inquiries via email. You
can contact Easynews Abuse via email at abuse@easynews.com.

If you are reporting a Usenet or Easynews violation (flooding/spamming,
Child Pornography, copyright/DMCA, etc.), please e-mail the complaint to
the appropriate address:

For general abuse issues: abuse@easynews.com

Please include the message header or sample of the message headers for
the post(s) in question.

Subject: Re: FEC Expert Witness Whose Testimony Merchan Denied Discloses
What
He Would Have Said in Trump Trial
Newsgroups:
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,or.politics,can.politics
References: <20240601105108.7fa30ee5@mx> <v3fgek$2rl70$2@dont-email.me>
<20240601111523.2d83ca9d@mx> <v3fjlq$2s7gf$2@dont-email.me>
<20240601120030.466a4439@mx> <v3fk9o$2s7gf$3@dont-email.me>
<20240601132318.2373d174@mx> <v3fvqh$2uv60$1@dont-email.me>
<20240601153048.359e984c@mx> <v3g2if$2ve94$1@dont-email.me>
<v3g3nr$2vk7k$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Mike Colangelo <air@vatican_.con>
In-Reply-To: <v3g3nr$2vk7k$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <xBM6O.6079$kHEb.1243@fx48.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 14:42:52 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2397
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3014975
alt.politics.trump:242418 or.politics:497236 can.politics:697905

greg hall wrote:
> On 6/1/2024 9:29 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
>> On 6/1/2024 9:05 AM, Loran aka "MassPeekWa" aka spammy, fucking lying
>> cocksucking HIV-oozing pseudonymous liar-who-has-not-been-defamed, lied:
>>
>>
>>> X, formerly known as "!Jones" wrote:
>>>> This surprises you, why?
>>>
>>> https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-
>>
>> "Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky
>
> Constipational shit-stirrer Mike Colangelo aka Rudy Canoza, Michael
> Terrell and others.
>
>

abuse@easynews.com

https://www.easynews.com/agreement/
SPAM. Easynews enforces a zero-tolerance spam policy regarding our users
posts to usenet through our network. It is the sole discretion of
Easynews to determine if a user's posts are considered spam. If Easynews
has determined that a user has posted 1 or more articles of spam, that
user will be charged a $500 per hour clean-up fee and the user's account
will be canceled immediately and all reasonable efforts will be made by
Easynews to prevent the user from using our network anytime thereafter.

ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY. You may not use our Services or our System to
post or transmit any illegal material, including without limitation any
transmissions that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise to
civil liability, or otherwise violate any local, state, national or
international law or regulation. In particular, the following is a
representative, non-exhaustive list of acts that are prohibited:

Falsifying header information or user identification information.

Transmitting or receiving, uploading, using or reusing material which is
abusive, indecent, defamatory, obscene or menacing, or a breach of
confidence, privacy or similar third party rights;

PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE THE MESSAGE-ID IN YOUR SUBMISSION

The Message-ID is necessary for us to identify the material to NCMEC.
You can find the Message-ID in the header of the post. There is a header
for every Usenet post. It includes information such as the poster's
email address, date, subject line, etc.

TERMINATION. Easynews reserves the right, without notice and in our sole
discretion, to terminate your right to access or use our Services or to
discontinue all or part of the Services. We are not responsible for any
loss or harm related to your inability to access or use our Services.

How do I contact Easynews Abuse?

Easynews Abuse handles all correspondences and inquiries via email. You
can contact Easynews Abuse via email at abuse@easynews.com.

If you are reporting a Usenet or Easynews violation (flooding/spamming,
Child Pornography, copyright/DMCA, etc.), please e-mail the complaint to
the appropriate address:

For general abuse issues: abuse@easynews.com
For Child Pornography issues: cp@easynews.com
For copyright/DMCA issues: dmca@easynews.com

Please include the message header or sample of the message headers for
the post(s) in question.

Loran wrote:
> greg hall wrote:
>> On 6/1/2024 9:29 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
>>> On 6/1/2024 9:05 AM, Loran aka "MassPeekWa" aka spammy, fucking lying
>>> cocksucking HIV-oozing pseudonymous liar-who-has-not-been-defamed, lied:
>>>
>>>
>>>> X, formerly known as "!Jones" wrote:
>>>>> This surprises you, why?
>>>>
>>>> https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-
>>>
>>> "Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky
>>
>> Constipational shit-stirrer Mike Colangelo aka Rudy Canoza, Michael
>> Terrell and others.
>>
>>
>
> abuse@easynews.com
>
> https://www.easynews.com/agreement/
> SPAM. Easynews enforces a zero-tolerance spam policy regarding our users
> posts to usenet through our network. It is the sole discretion of
> Easynews to determine if a user's posts are considered spam. If Easynews
> has determined that a user has posted 1 or more articles of spam, that
> user will be charged a $500 per hour clean-up fee and the user's account
> will be canceled immediately and all reasonable efforts will be made by
> Easynews to prevent the user from using our network anytime thereafter.
>
> ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY. You may not use our Services or our System to
> post or transmit any illegal material, including without limitation any
> transmissions that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise to
> civil liability, or otherwise violate any local, state, national or
> international law or regulation. In particular, the following is a
> representative, non-exhaustive list of acts that are prohibited:
>
> Falsifying header information or user identification information.
>
> Transmitting or receiving, uploading, using or reusing material which is
> abusive, indecent, defamatory, obscene or menacing, or a breach of
> confidence, privacy or similar third party rights;
>
> PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE THE MESSAGE-ID IN YOUR SUBMISSION
>
> The Message-ID is necessary for us to identify the material to NCMEC.
> You can find the Message-ID in the header of the post. There is a header
> for every Usenet post. It includes information such as the poster's
> email address, date, subject line, etc.
>
> TERMINATION. Easynews reserves the right, without notice and in our sole
> discretion, to terminate your right to access or use our Services or to
> discontinue all or part of the Services. We are not responsible for any
> loss or harm related to your inability to access or use our Services.
>
> How do I contact Easynews Abuse?
>
> Easynews Abuse handles all correspondences and inquiries via email. You
> can contact Easynews Abuse via email at abuse@easynews.com.
>
> If you are reporting a Usenet or Easynews violation (flooding/spamming,
> Child Pornography, copyright/DMCA, etc.), please e-mail the complaint to
> the appropriate address:
>
> For general abuse issues: abuse@easynews.com
> For Child Pornography issues: cp@easynews.com
> For copyright/DMCA issues: dmca@easynews.com
>
> Please include the message header or sample of the message headers for
> the post(s) in question.
>
net narc heeeeeeeeeeeem

% wrote:
> Loran wrote:
>> greg hall wrote:
>>> On 6/1/2024 9:29 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
>>>> On 6/1/2024 9:05 AM, Loran aka "MassPeekWa" aka spammy, fucking
>>>> lying cocksucking HIV-oozing pseudonymous
>>>> liar-who-has-not-been-defamed, lied:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> X, formerly known as "!Jones" wrote:
>>>>>> This surprises you, why?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-
>>>>
>>>> "Constitutional law expert Hans von Spakovsky
>>>
>>> Constipational shit-stirrer Mike Colangelo aka Rudy Canoza, Michael
>>> Terrell and others.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> abuse@easynews.com
>>
>> https://www.easynews.com/agreement/
>> SPAM. Easynews enforces a zero-tolerance spam policy regarding our
>> users posts to usenet through our network. It is the sole discretion
>> of Easynews to determine if a user's posts are considered spam. If
>> Easynews has determined that a user has posted 1 or more articles of
>> spam, that user will be charged a $500 per hour clean-up fee and the
>> user's account will be canceled immediately and all reasonable efforts
>> will be made by Easynews to prevent the user from using our network
>> anytime thereafter.
>>
>> ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY. You may not use our Services or our System to
>> post or transmit any illegal material, including without limitation
>> any transmissions that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise
>> to civil liability, or otherwise violate any local, state, national or
>> international law or regulation. In particular, the following is a
>> representative, non-exhaustive list of acts that are prohibited:
>>
>> Falsifying header information or user identification information.
>>
>> Transmitting or receiving, uploading, using or reusing material which
>> is abusive, indecent, defamatory, obscene or menacing, or a breach of
>> confidence, privacy or similar third party rights;
>>
>> PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE THE MESSAGE-ID IN YOUR SUBMISSION
>>
>> The Message-ID is necessary for us to identify the material to NCMEC.
>> You can find the Message-ID in the header of the post. There is a
>> header for every Usenet post. It includes information such as the
>> poster's email address, date, subject line, etc.
>>
>> TERMINATION. Easynews reserves the right, without notice and in our
>> sole discretion, to terminate your right to access or use our Services
>> or to discontinue all or part of the Services. We are not responsible
>> for any loss or harm related to your inability to access or use our
>> Services.
>>
>> How do I contact Easynews Abuse?
>>
>> Easynews Abuse handles all correspondences and inquiries via email.
>> You can contact Easynews Abuse via email at abuse@easynews.com.
>>
>> If you are reporting a Usenet or Easynews violation
>> (flooding/spamming, Child Pornography, copyright/DMCA, etc.), please
>> e-mail the complaint to the appropriate address:
>>
>> For general abuse issues: abuse@easynews.com
>> For Child Pornography issues: cp@easynews.com
>> For copyright/DMCA issues: dmca@easynews.com
>>
>> Please include the message header or sample of the message headers for
>> the post(s) in question.
> >
> net narc heeeeeeeeeeeem

Oh heck yes!!!