Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Kennemur
>>>
>>> Glen D. Yeadon "silverback"
>>>
>>> Benjamin Cramer
>>>
>>> Boedicia
>>>
>>> Bolt Upright
>>>
>>> Jason P.
>>>
>>> Jewdas
>>>
>>> JeSSe
>>>
>>> plainolantijewishantiamericantraitor
>>>
>>> Topaz
>>>
>>> Kevin Alfred Strom
>>>
>>> Larry L. Jansen
>>>
>>> Mark C. Craig
>>>
>>> Jerry L. White
>>>
>>> Ian McKinney
>>>
>>> Doc Tavish
>>>
>>> ALL GONE!!!
>>
>> "It is Mine to avenge; I will repay. In due time their foot will slip;
>> their day of disaster is near and their doom rushes upon them (who are
>> terribly hungry misbehaving terribly)." (Deuteronomy 32:35 w/
>> parenthetical clarification)
>>
>> Source:
>> https://biblehub.com/deuteronomy/32-35.htm
>>
>> Suggest further reading:
>> https://bit.ly/h_angry
>>
>> In the interim, the only healthy way (John 14:6) to stop (John 5:14)
>> being terribly hungry (aka hangry) is as shown at
>> http://WonderfullyHungry.org
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
>> hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
>> appetite for food right now too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Source:
https://narkive.com/uRyaax88.9

Positive control on USENET:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

Suggested further reading:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ

Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

....because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/01/ethics-and-constitutional-dunces-the-320-house-members-mostly-republicans-who-voted-for-the-antisemitism-awareness-act/
>>>
>>>
>>> Ethics and Constitutional Dunces: The 320 House Members (Mostly
>>> Republicans) Who Voted for the “Antisemitism Awareness Act”
>>> MAY 1, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>>
>>>
>>> You know, or should, that your conduct is unethical and outrageous when
>>> it makes Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fl.) look good by comparison Gaetz voted
>>> against HR 690, as every member of the House should have since it is
>>> throbbingly unconstitutional on its face, no question, no argument, a
>>> flat out First Amendment violation. Gaetz told his followers on
>>> Twitter/X that he voted against the proposed legislation because it is a
>>> “ridiculous hate speech bill.”
>>>
>>> “Antisemitism is wrong, but this legislation is written without regard
>>> for the Constitution, common sense, or even the common understanding of
>>> the meaning of words,” he wrote. Bingo. The bill, in weasel words
>>> remarkable even by recent Congressional standards, declares that
>>> “anti-Semitism” is a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
>>> 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and embraces an expansive definition of
>>> the term “adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United
>>> States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department
>>> of State; and… includes the “[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism”
>>> identified in the IHRA definition.”
>>>
>>> The IHRA definition includes examples of pure speech, and I would expect
>>> any junior in high school to know that these cannot be criminalized:
>>>
>>>
>>> Working definition of antisemitism :
>>>
>>> “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as
>>> hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of
>>> antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or
>>> their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious
>>> facilities.”
>>>
>>> To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as
>>> illustrations:
>>>
>>> Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel,
>>> conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar
>>> to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as
>>> antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to
>>> harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go
>>> wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and
>>> employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
>>>
>>> Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media,
>>> schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into
>>> account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
>>>
>>> Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the
>>> name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
>>> Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical
>>> allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such
>>> as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish
>>> conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or
>>> other societal institutions.
>>> Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined
>>> wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for
>>> acts committed by non-Jews.
>>> Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or
>>> intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of
>>> National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during
>>> World War II (the Holocaust)
>>> Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or
>>> exaggerating the Holocaust.
>>> Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the
>>> alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own
>>> nations.
>>> Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by
>>> claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
>>> Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or
>>> demanded of any other democratic nation.
>>> Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g.,
>>> claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or
>>> Israelis.
>>> Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
>>> Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
>>> Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for
>>> example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic
>>> materials in some countries).
>>>
>>> I bolded the most obviously unconstitutional “examples” above that are
>>> made illegal by the “Antisemitism Awareness Act.” That’s right: it’s
>>> every one of them.
>>>
>>> The GOP majority is using the legislative process for virtue-signalling
>>> and grandstanding while showing disregard for individual rights and
>>> Constitutional protections. It’s an abuse of power and process, and
>>> anyone who voted for this monstrosity who doesn’t realize it defies the
>>> Bill of Rights is too ignorant to be in Congress.
>>>
>>> I was amused to see that Rep. Jackson Lee, among the most prominent
>>> Dunning-Kruger sufferers in the House, was one of the Democrats
>>> sponsoring the bill, along with Rep. Stefanik, who knows better and
>>> should be ashamed of herself.
>>>
>>> All 320 House members who voted “yes” should. They disgrace the
>>> Legislative Branch.
>>
>> The absolutely only godly way (John 14:6) to stop the terrible
>> misbehavior toward Jews is as shown at http://WonderfullyHungry.org
>
> You got that right!
>
> Baruch HaShem.
>
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
>> hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
>> appetite for food right now too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Source:
https://narkive.com/GHNKXeiE.5

Positive control on USENET:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

Suggested further reading:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ

Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

....because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/04/28/time-for-some-ethical-clarity-regarding-the-hamas-israel-war/
>>>
>>> Time for Some Ethical Clarity Regarding the Hamas-Israel War…
>>> APRIL 28, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. Advocating for Gaza or Gazans is advocating for Palestinians and Hamas.
>>>
>>> 2. Advocating for Palestinians and Hamas is advocating anti-Semitism and
>>> genocide—of Jews.
>>>
>>> 3. Advocating for Palestinians and Hamas is also advocating for,
>>> rationalizing , enabling and encouraging terrorism.
>>>
>>> 4. Any public statements from President Biden or his administration
>>> critical of Israel’s handling of the war helps achieve Hamas’s
>>> objectives. Helping to achieve Hamas’s objectives as a consequence of
>>> its terrorist attack validates the use of terrorism as a means of
>>> achieving Palestinian ends.
>>>
>>>
>>> 5. It is basic radical revolutionary strategy to manipulate a foe into
>>> harming “innocents,” bystanders, and non-combatants. When such
>>> revolutionaries deliberately place such bystanders, and non-combatants
>>> in harm’s way, it is the revolutionaries who are accountable and
>>> responsible. Except for the children, whom their parents and other
>>> adults have endangered, there are no “innocents” in a population that
>>> knowingly hands its leadership over to violent and extremist leaders.
>>> The German people were not “innocent” in World War II; Japanese
>>> civilians were not innocent either. Rhetoric describing the Gazan
>>> civilians as “innocent” is capitulating to the strategy of terrorists.
>>>
>>> 6. The campus demonstrations against Israel assist and enable terrorist
>>> propaganda and encourage future terrorist attacks. Unsettling U.S.
>>> society is one of Hamas’s objectives (and Iran’s, and Hezbollah’s). That
>>> alone is justification for shutting down the pro-Hamas demonstrations on
>>> campus. In addition to interfering with Jewish students’ education (and
>>> non-Jewish students too: the campus protests when I was a college
>>> freshman, frequently stopped me from attending class.), these tell Hamas
>>> and other that terror attacks on Israel will have beneficial results to
>>> their cause. In short, these demonstrations will get people killed.
>>>
>>> 7. Biden’s two-faced, cynical waffling on the war…“We support Israel!”
>>> “We support Palestinian civilians!” “We support Israel!” “We support
>>> Palestinian civilians!”….
>>>
>>>
>>> …validates Hamas tactics and undermines Israel. The tactic is cowardly,
>>> unethical, immoral, and, as usual for Biden, stupid, irresponsible and
>>> incompetent.
>>>
>>> 8. Last week there was report that Biden was looking for ways to
>>> recognize a Palestinian state. Allowing Palestinians to get what they
>>> crave as a direct (or indirect) result of the October 7 terror attack
>>> justifies terrorism in their self- warped culture’s poisoned mind.
>>>
>>> 9. In the same vein, Biden, Harris and Sec. of State Blinken suggesting
>>> in public statements that Israel prosecuting the war vigorously to its
>>> conclusion—the end of Hamas—isolates the country or, as V.P. Harris said
>>> regarding the looming invasion of Hamas’s stronghold in Rafah, would be
>>> a “huge mistake” simply bolsters the terrorist’s cause. Sen. John
>>> Fetterman’s reaction was logically, ethically, and morally spot-on:
>>
>> The only godly way to win the war on terrorism is as shown at
>> http://WonderfullyHungry.org
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
>> hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
>> appetite for food right now too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Source:
https://narkive.com/vJNe4CWg.9

Positive control on USENET:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

Suggested further reading:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ

Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

....because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1abt1p0/uk_covid19_inquiry_humza_yousaf_admits_winging_it/
>>>
>>> UK COVID-19 Inquiry: Humza Yousaf admits 'winging it' as Scotland's
>>> health secretary during pandemic
>>> On the same day of the exchange, the Scottish government issued a 'state
>>> of the pandemic' document reporting a 35% rise in COVID cases around
>>> that time.
>>> By Connor Gillies, Scotland correspondent @ConnorGillies
>>>
>>> Friday 26 January 2024 17:31, UK
>>>
>>> First Minister Humza Yousaf during a visit to Built Environment -
>>> Smarter Transformation (BE-ST) at Hamilton International Technology Park
>>> in Blantyre, Glasgow, to open the new National Retrofit Centre for
>>> Scotland and announce new funding for innovation centres. Picture date:
>>> Wednesday January 17, 2024.
>>> Image:
>>> Pic: PA
>>> Messages have emerged of Scotland's First Minister Humza Yousaf
>>> admitting to "winging it" during his role as health secretary at the
>>> height of the COVID pandemic.
>>>
>>> The UK COVID Inquiry has released WhatsApp exchanges between Mr Yousaf
>>> and Scotland's national clinical director Professor Jason Leitch from
>>> June 2021.
>>>
>>> The discussion happened shortly after Mr Yousaf was appointed health
>>> secretary and saw him joke that he was "winging it! And will get found
>>> out sooner rather than later", followed by a laughing emoji.
>>>
>>> WhatsApp exchanges between Mr Yousaf and Scotland&#39;s national
>>> clinical director Professor Jason Leitch from June 2021
>>> Image:
>>> WhatsApp exchanges between Mr Yousaf and Scotland's national clinical
>>> director Professor Jason Leitch from June 2021
>>> On the same day of the exchange, the Scottish government issued a "state
>>> of the pandemic" document reporting a 35% rise in COVID cases around
>>> that time.
>>>
>>> The Scottish government told Sky News it would be "inappropriate" to
>>> respond to questions about the messages during the inquiry.
>>>
>>> The UK COVID-19 Inquiry has already heard from Mr Yousaf as it takes
>>> evidence during a series of sessions in Edinburgh.
>>>
>>> Appearing on Thursday, the now first minister offered an "unreserved"
>>> apology for the Scottish government's "frankly poor" handling of
>>> requests from the inquiry for WhatsApp messages to be handed over.
>>>
>>> Former first minister Nicola Sturgeon has wiped her messages and Mr
>>> Yousaf's exchanges had to be recovered after also becoming lost. The
>>> pair say they were following Scottish government policy on informal
>>> messages.
>>>
>>> Mr Yousaf said he accepted this would have caused "serious grief and
>>> retrauma" for those who lost loved ones and announced an external review
>>> into his administration's use of mobile messaging.
>>>
>>> Advertisement
>>>
>>> Read more:
>>> COVID adviser Professor Jason Leitch denies daily purge of WhatsApps
>>> Scotland's chief medical officer told colleagues to delete WhatsApps 'at
>>> end of every day'
>>>
>>>
>>> Sturgeon brands Johnson 'clown' in texts
>>> 'We should have done better'
>>>
>>> Asked about WhatsApp messages from the time of the pandemic, which the
>>> inquiry requested from the Scottish government, Mr Yousaf said: "Let me
>>> unreservedly apologise to this inquiry, but also to those who are
>>> mourning the loss of a loved one, who were bereaved by COVID, for the
>>> government's frankly poor handling of the various Rule 9 requests in
>>> relation to informal messages.
>>>
>>> "There is no excuse for it, we should have done better and it is why I
>>> reiterate that apology today."
>>>
>>> This is a limited version of the story so unfortunately this content is
>>> not available.
>>> Open the full version
>>> Mr Yousaf conceded there was "clearly a gap" in the mobile message
>>> policy in relation to how material in informal messages should be retained.
>>>
>>> Ms Sturgeon will appear at the inquiry on Wednesday.
>>
>> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
>> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
>> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
>> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
>> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>>
>> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
>> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
>> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
>> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
>> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
>> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
>> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
>> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
>> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
>> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
>> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
>> longer effective.
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Source:
https://narkive.com/U35Bb5Zy.8

Positive control on USENET:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Suggested further reading:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ

Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

....because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1adv5ts/nicola_sturgeons_advisor_says_i_was_wrong_to_push/
>>>
>>> Nicola Sturgeon's adviser says 'I was wrong to push for zero Covid'
>>> Prof Sridhar was an advocate of 'zero Covid' but now admits she was wrong
>>> By ETHAN ENNALS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The influential public health scientist who advised former Scottish
>>> First Minister Nicola Sturgeon that it was possible to eliminate Covid
>>> now admits that she made 'a mistake'.
>>>
>>> Professor Devi Sridhar was a vocal advocate of 'zero Covid', the
>>> controversial view that it was possible to eradicate the virus by
>>> adopting draconian measures such as quarantining people when crossing
>>> the Scottish border.
>>>
>>> The Covid Inquiry heard last week that Prof Sridhar regularly sent the
>>> then First Minister messages on Twitter where she appeared to push for
>>> the strategy to be adopted. In one, sent in June 2020, she told Sturgeon
>>> that she had been working on a 'feasible plan for elimination [of the
>>> virus]'.
>>>
>>> Sturgeon would later describe elimination as the 'only sensible
>>> strategy' to tackle the virus.
>>>
>>> The revelation will likely cause further controversy after the inquiry
>>> heard last week that Sturgeon also told Prof Sridhar not to 'worry about
>>> protocol'.
>>>
>>> The influential public health scientist who advised former Scottish
>>> First Minister Nicola Sturgeon that it was possible to eliminate Covid
>>> now admits that she made 'a mistake'
>>> +4
>>> View gallery
>>> The influential public health scientist who advised former Scottish
>>> First Minister Nicola Sturgeon that it was possible to eliminate Covid
>>> now admits that she made 'a mistake'
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Prof Sridhar now claims she regrets using the phrase 'zero Covid' and
>>> that her aim was to limit the number of infections in Scotland until the
>>> vaccine rollout.
>>>
>>> 'This was a mistake I made using the word 'elimination',' she told the
>>> Covid Inquiry, adding that 'maximum suppression' would have been a more
>>> appropriate phrase.
>>>
>>> Other experts who spoke at the inquiry said that the Scottish
>>> Government's refusal to accept that Covid was 'here to stay' led to a
>>> much slower release of social restrictions than was necessary.
>>> Throughout the pandemic, Scotland eased restrictions several weeks after
>>> England.
>>>
>>> Professor Mark Woolhouse, an epidemiologist at the University of
>>> Edinburgh and a UK scientific adviser during the pandemic, said Scottish
>>> Ministers were preoccupied with appearing more cautious than their
>>> English counterparts. He added: 'This segued into this idea that... we
>>> could somehow end up in zero Covid. To me... this was not consistent
>>> with the evidence.'
>>>
>>> In June 2020, when Scotland was recording fewer than five Covid cases
>>> every day, Prof Sridhar, originally from the US, published an article in
>>> The Guardian calling for a 'zero-coronavirus Britain'. That same month,
>>> she told New Scientist magazine that 'Scotland could eliminate
>>> coronavirus if it were not for England', arguing that Westminster was
>>> not doing enough to stop the spread of the virus.
>>>
>>> However, in January 2022 – 17 months later – Scotland was recording
>>> roughly 8,000 daily cases and Nicola Sturgeon announced the nation would
>>> remove the majority of its Covid restrictions in an effort to live with
>>> the virus.
>>>
>>> No country has been able to eliminate the virus.
>>>
>>> Prof Sridhar now claims she regrets using the phrase 'zero Covid' and
>>> that her aim was to limit the number of infections in Scotland until the
>>> vaccine rollout
>>> +4
>>> View gallery
>>> Prof Sridhar now claims she regrets using the phrase 'zero Covid' and
>>> that her aim was to limit the number of infections in Scotland until the
>>> vaccine rollout
>>>
>>> Speaking on Tuesday, Prof Sridhar claimed she never believed that zero
>>> Covid could be achieved and instead likened it to aspirational public
>>> health campaigns that sought to end malaria or tuberculosis. 'We use
>>> these campaigns to say we don't accept the spread of these diseases,'
>>> she said. '[In summer 2020] we had a chance to hold and wait for a
>>> vaccine in an optimal position.'
>>>
>>> However, experts accused her of 'rewriting history'.
>>>
>>> 'Prof Sridhar now claims she never believed in zero Covid, but all you
>>> have to do is go back and read her articles to see that's not the case,'
>>> says Professor Robert Dingwall, sociologist at Nottingham Trent
>>> University and former Government scientific adviser.
>>>
>>> 'Then she argued that Covid could be eliminated if not for the wicked
>>> English. Every scientist who knew what they were talking about said zero
>>> Covid wasn't achievable.'
>>>
>>> Prof Sridhar declined to comment last night.
>>
>> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
>> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
>> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
>> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
>> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>>
>> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
>> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
>> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
>> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
>> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
>> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
>> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
>> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
>> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
>> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
>> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
>> longer effective.
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Source:
https://narkive.com/wCZxWsUL.6

Positive control on USENET:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1aecbhn/sturgeon_jumped_the_gun_in_banning_mass/
>>>
>>>
>>> Sturgeon ‘jumped the gun’ in banning mass gatherings early, Gove tells
>>> Covid inquiry
>>> UK cabinet minister during pandemic adds that he was not inclined to
>>> believe Scottish first minister was acting maliciously
>>>
>>> UK politics live – latest updates
>>> Severin Carrell Scotland editor
>>> @severincarrell
>>> Mon 29 Jan 2024 12.36 EST
>>> Nicola Sturgeon broke confidentiality and “jumped the gun” when she
>>> announced a ban on mass gatherings in Scotland before other parts of the
>>> UK agreed to the move during the pandemic, the UK Covid inquiry has heard.
>>>
>>> The then first minister announced on 12 March 2020 that the Scottish
>>> government would ban any gatherings of 500 people or more the following
>>> week, before that decision had been agreed at a Cobra meeting called
>>> later that day to discuss the crisis.
>>>
>>> Michael Gove, the then UK cabinet minister, said that caused
>>> “discomfort” and “disquiet” in Whitehall. It led Boris Johnson, then
>>> prime minister, other cabinet ministers and senior civil servants to
>>> question whether Sturgeon could be trusted.
>>>
>>> Gove, who was the minister responsible for coordinating the UK’s
>>> devolved administrations, said that while Sturgeon had “jumped the gun”,
>>> he was not inclined to believe that she was acting maliciously or for
>>> political gain.
>>>
>>> Police officers outside the main entrance to the UK Covid-19 inquiry
>>> hearing at the Edinburgh International Conference Centre
>>> UK Covid inquiry to investigate evidence Scottish ministers failed to
>>> protect vulnerable people
>>> Read more
>>> While Sturgeon had not told the UK government she planned to announce it
>>> that day, she had indicated that she wanted to shut down large gatherings.
>>>
>>> “My approach generally was not to allow moments of irritation, or
>>> disappointment, to curdle,” Gove told Jamie Dawson KC, the inquiry’s
>>> counsel. He wanted to prioritise “effective working in future”, he said.
>>>
>>> Heather Hallett, the inquiry’s chair, intervened and said to Gove: “Some
>>> might think that’s being rather generous.
>>>
>>> “It wasn’t just that the then first minister announced a decision about
>>> mass gatherings in Scotland, it was a breach of confidentiality. You as
>>> a longstanding, very experienced government minister, know the
>>> importance of confidentiality to government decision-making.”
>>>
>>> The inquiry on Monday examined extracts from a confidential Cabinet
>>> Office memo prepared for that Cobra meeting, which took place two weeks
>>> before the UK went into lockdown. It said a final decision on banning
>>> mass gatherings would be taken across the UK only after the UK’s four
>>> chief medical officers had given their advice.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hallett added later that Sturgeon was not bound by the ministerial code
>>> for UK ministers attending Cobra meetings. Gove said that even so,
>>> devolved government ministers should still “at the very least” wait
>>> until the decision had been agreed by everyone.
>>>
>>> Sturgeon is due to give evidence to the inquiry later this week and is
>>> expected to be asked about the incident, which fuelled long-running
>>> tensions between the two governments throughout the crisis.
>>>
>>> The inquiry heard that earlier that day, the prime minister’s then
>>> adviser, Dominic Cummings, had told Johnson by text not to have
>>> “meetings with the [devolved administrations] on the fucking phone all
>>> the time either so people can’t tell you the truth”.
>>>
>>> Cummings urged Johnson to have his daily briefings in the cabinet room
>>> at No 10, which were private, rather than at much larger Cobra meetings,
>>> which included all the devolved administrations and officials and
>>> ministers from across Whitehall.
>>>
>>> skip past newsletter promotion
>>> Sign up to First Edition
>>>
>>> Free daily newsletter
>>> Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you
>>> what’s happening and why it matters
>>>
>>> Enter your email address
>>> Enter your email address
>>> Sign up
>>> Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online
>>> ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our
>>> Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the
>>> Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
>>> after newsletter promotion
>>> Gove told the inquiry this was because cabinet room meetings were
>>> confidential, which allowed Johnson to test ideas with his advisers
>>> privately.
>>>
>>> Last Thursday, the inquiry looked at an exchange between Sturgeon and
>>> her then chief of staff, Liz Lloyd, in which the first minister
>>> described Johnson as a “fucking clown”. Sturgeon added: “His utter
>>> incompetence in every sense is now offending me on behalf of politicians
>>> everywhere.”
>>>
>>> Dawson said Scottish ministers were angry about a proposal in May 2020
>>>from Johnson to dilute the stay-at-home lockdown policy. Sturgeon felt
>>> she was being coerced into that move, with which she disagreed. Lloyd
>>> described a Cobra meeting at which that was discussed as “a shambles”.
>>>
>>> Gove said he believed Sturgeon and her ministers acted professionally
>>> and in the public interest for the vast majority of the time during the
>>> pandemic. Even so, it would be “naive” to believe she did not exploit
>>> occasional opportunities to promote Scottish independence.
>>>
>>> Giving evidence later to the inquiry, Jeane Freeman, Scotland’s health
>>> secretary in 2020, admitted that the government’s understanding of the
>>> level of readiness of Scotland’s care homes for the pandemic was “not
>>> adequate from the outset”.
>>>
>>> She said she regretted that. Around half of all Scotland’s Covid deaths
>>> during the first wave took place in care homes; in the early part of the
>>> crisis, ministers failed to order hospitals to test elderly patients for
>>> Covid before being discharged.
>>>
>>> “I regret very much and will do for the rest of my life any deaths that
>>> occurred [in the care sector] because of action that the Scottish
>>> government didn’t take, or did take but could have done better,” she
>>> told the hearing.
>>
>> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
>> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
>> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
>> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
>> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>>
>> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
>> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
>> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
>> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
>> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
>> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
>> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
>> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
>> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
>> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
>> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
>> longer effective.
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>
>>>> You (greeting your neighbor): "I am wonderfully hungry and hope you,
>>>> neighbor, also have a healthy appetite too. So how are you ?"
>>>>
>>>> Neighbor: "Good."
>>>>
>>>> You: "I hope your 'good' means you, neighbor, have a healthy appetite.
>>>> So you do have the ability to eat a piece of healthy fruit at the
>>>> moment, don’t you ?"
>>>>
>>>> Neighbor: "Actually, lately I haven’t been able to eat fruit because I
>>>> don’t really taste anything anymore."
>>>>
>>>> You: "That’s terrible."
>>>>
>>>> Neighbor: "How so ?"
>>>>
>>>> You: "Losing the ability to taste and smell food is a specific symptom
>>>> of being infected with the COVID-19 coronavirus."
>>>>
>>>> Neighbor: "How did you know that I don’t smell anything anymore?"
>>>>
>>>> You: "It’s called anosmia. Google anosmia and COVID-19 together and
>>>> see why you need to self-quarantine and call your doctor about your
>>>> having anosmia and your consequently needing to be tested to confirm
>>>> that you are contagious."
>>>>
>>>> Bottom line: When we are saying we’re wonderfully hungry (Philippians
>>>> 4:12), we are able (Philippians 4:13) to receive GOD’s help to
>>>> possibly (Matthew 19:26) save (Ephesians 2:10) many lives during this
>>>> COVID-19 pandemic.
>>>>
>>>> Neighbor: "Are there others like you ?"
>>>>
>>>> You: "Yes, we are members of the ‘My heart & all of me belongs to
>>>> Jesus ...’ Facebook group, which you are also welcome to join."
>>>>
>>>> Link to original post in sci.med.cardiology:
>>>>
>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>>>
>>> Thank you for sharing.
>>
>> I am simply wonderfully hungry and hope you, Michael, and others
>> reading this, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Source:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/1P8_-_lXegk/m/ot_rr3pCAAAJ

Positive control on USENET:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

Suggested further reading:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ

Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

....because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> I am simply wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
>> hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite for food right now
>> too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Source:
https://narkive.com/Hxyy9wBm.5

Positive control on USENET:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

Suggested further reading:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ

Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

....because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1atvvvl/apoorva_mandavilli_keeps_making_mistakes_at_the/
>>>
>>> Apoorva Mandavilli keeps making mistakes at the New York Times to
>>> exaggerate the risk of COVID to keep Americans scared
>>> This is not journalism but activism
>>>
>>> VINAY PRASAD
>>> FEB 18, 2024
>>> Apoorva Mandavilli is hell bent on keeping Americans scared of COVID
>>> even if that means publishing falsehoods. Here is the latest.
>>>
>>>
>>> She can’t even report the number of Americans who died WITH covid per
>>> week accurately. In a prior essay, I detail her COVID errors and show
>>> that these are one-sided. She tends to fear-monger about the virus. See
>>> those e.g. here.
>>>
>>> Apoorva Mandavilli is a terrible science reporter working at the New
>>> York Times
>>> VINAY PRASAD
>>> ·
>>> SEPTEMBER 28, 2023
>>> Apoorva Mandavilli is a terrible science reporter working at the New
>>> York Times
>>> Recently, I read an article by Apoorva Mandavilli— the New York Times
>>> science reporter. I will come to that example at the end of this piece,
>>> but it just reminded me that she is incompetent as a science journalist.
>>> She has her own views on covid policy. She is pro mask, pro boosting
>>> kids, and pro school shutdown. She seems as if she favors partisan D…
>>>
>>> Read full story
>>> It isn’t just factual errors. Even the framing of her recent article is
>>> biased.
>>>
>>> This week the CDC considered removing the 5 day requirement for
>>> isolation post COVID. A curious reporter might ask, “Hmmm, among all
>>> people who had covid this last month, what % tested for COVID, and what
>>> % of those isolated for 5 days?”
>>>
>>> Were people even following the CDCs policy?
>>>
>>> If the answer is no one is testing and no one is isolating, then the
>>> policy change is negligible— as no one was doing it anyway. That’s not
>>> what we got.
>>>
>>>
>>> Instead the New York Times, Apoorva Mandavilli believes COVID remains a
>>> big threat, and her article is entirely critical of the proposed rule
>>> change. She laments the proposed policy change and cites a willing band
>>> of selective quotes, but she doesn’t actually provide data.
>>>
>>> She can’t even ask the first question: was anyone following the policy
>>> to begin with.
>>>
>>> When she does provide statistics, she gets is horrifically wrong. How is
>>> this acceptable? Let’s not forget her other comments. She refused to
>>> take lab leak seriously, and condemned it as racist.
>>>
>>> Image
>>> She was wrong about hospitalizations
>>>
>>>
>>> She was wrong about diagnosis vs deaths
>>>
>>>
>>> And of course, she is so biased she got school closure wrong and her
>>> reporting contributed to massive harm to generation of kids.
>>>
>>> Image
>>> A decent NY Times would relieve her of duty.
>>
>> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
>> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
>> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
>> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
>> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>>
>> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
>> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the US & elsewhere is by
>> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
>> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
>> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
>> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
>> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
>> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
>> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
>> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
>> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
>> longer effective.
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Source:
https://narkive.com/UnqJPju9.3

Positive control on USENET:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

Suggested further reading:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ

Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

....because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/1b1r5p5/medicines_regulator_failed_to_flag_covid_vaccine/
>>>
>>>
>>> Medicines regulator failed to flag Covid vaccine side effects and must
>>> be investigated, say MPs
>>> All-party group believe MHRA were aware of heart and clotting issues in
>>> February 2021 but did not highlight the problems for several months
>>>
>>> Sarah Knapton,
>>> SCIENCE EDITOR
>>> 27 February 2024 • 6:24pm
>>> Related Topics
>>> Vaccines, Medicines, Pharmaceutical industry, Steve Brine, AstraZeneca
>>>
>>> 987
>>> All-party parliamentary group on pandemic response and recovery say MHRA
>>> failed to raise the alarm on vaccine side effects
>>> All-party parliamentary group on pandemic response and recovery say MHRA
>>> failed to raise the alarm on vaccine side effects CREDIT: iSTOCKPHOTO
>>> The medical regulator failed to sound the alarm over Covid vaccine side
>>> effects and should be investigated, MPs have said.
>>>
>>> The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is
>>> responsible for approving drugs and devices and monitors side effects
>>> caused by treatments.
>>>
>>> But the all-party parliamentary group (APPG) on pandemic response and
>>> recovery, an influential group of MPs, has raised “serious patient
>>> safety concerns”. It has claimed that “far from protecting patients” the
>>> regulator operates in a way that “puts them at serious risk”.
>>>
>>> Some 25 MPs across four parties have written to the health select
>>> committee asking for an urgent investigation. In reply, Steve Brine, the
>>> health committee chairman, has said an inquiry into patient safety is
>>> “very likely”.
>>>
>>> In a letter to Mr Brine, the APPG said that there was reason to believe
>>> that the MHRA had been aware of post-vaccination heart and clotting
>>> issues as early as February 2021, but did not highlight the problems for
>>> several months.
>>>
>>> Denmark and several other European countries suspended the AstraZeneca
>>> vaccine over clotting fears in March 2021, but the MHRA only published
>>> safety advice on April 7, by which time 24 million people had been
>>> vaccinated.
>>>
>>>
>>> The watchdog also saw a “signal” for the heart problems myocarditis and
>>> pericarditis in February 2021, but did not include the conditions in
>>> safety updates until June 2021, MPs said.
>>>
>>> “In effect, the MHRA licences medical products as safe knowing it lacks
>>> the processes to properly monitor adverse events,” the APPG wrote.
>>>
>>> “In the case of Covid-19 vaccines, given the comparatively novel
>>> technology and record manufacturing speed, could the MHRA have even
>>> properly scrutinised the licensing data or known the short term safety?
>>>
>>> “Historically trust and confidence in vaccines and vaccine safety has
>>> been high in the UK, but it seems that the experience of the Covid-19
>>> vaccines has undermined this and by association trust in the regulator
>>> and the pharmaceutical industry.
>>>
>>> “Now more than ever a wide-reaching and in-depth review is needed.”
>>>
>>> Underestimates complexities
>>> The group also warned that the MHRA Yellow Card reporting system – which
>>> encourages patients and doctors to flag-up medicine side effects –
>>> “grossly” underestimates complexities, and in some instances picks up
>>> just one in 180 cases of harm.
>>>
>>> An analysis by Stockport NHS Foundation Trust found that in the North
>>> West of England, 1,058 people had been admitted to hospital with stomach
>>> bleeds caused by anticoagulant medication over five years, yet just six
>>> Yellow Card reports were made during the period.
>>>
>>> Side effects from drugs account for one in every 16 hospital admissions
>>> in Britain, and cost the NHS more than £2 billion each year.
>>>
>>> But trials are often too small to pick up adverse reactions,
>>> particularly when they are driven by rare genetic mutations, meaning it
>>> is vital to continue monitoring drugs in the community.
>>>
>>> The MHRA recently said it would investigate why blood thinners were
>>> causing dangerous side effects in between two and five per cent of patients.
>>>
>>> The APPG said it was also concerned that MHRA regulation of medicine was
>>> funded by the pharmaceutical industry and said the body had shifted from
>>> focusing on scrutiny to trying to help drugs get approved.
>>>
>>> ‘Watchdog to the enabler’
>>> Dame June Raine, the chief executive of the MHRA, who announced she
>>> would be stepping down last week, has previously said the agency was
>>> transitioning from “watchdog to the enabler,” a phrase which MPs said
>>> warranted its own investigation.
>>>
>>> Graham Stringer MP, co-chair of the APPG on pandemic response and
>>> recovery, said:
>>>
>>> “The MHRA oversees a failing system that is slow to act, causing harm to
>>> patients and beset with conflicts of interest.
>>>
>>> “We cannot allow it to continue. That’s why we have written to the
>>> health select committee calling for an urgent investigation into the MHRA.”
>>>
>>> The APPG said that concerns raised directly with the MHRA had been met
>>> with “an habitually dismissive and evasive response”.
>>>
>>> Dame June said: “We have made significant steps to put patients at the
>>> heart of all our work.
>>>
>>> “These include incorporating patient views and lived experience into our
>>> safety reviews; involving patients in the early stages of planning
>>> medicines development and building a new responsive reporting system for
>>> patients to tell us about any adverse incidents. We have also led on
>>> legislative changes to strengthen surveillance for medical devices and
>>> medicines, meaning patient safety is embedded firmly into law.
>>>
>>> “Our progress so far in making changes based on meaningful patient
>>> involvement gives us a solid base to build upon as we continue on this
>>> important journey.”
>>>
>>> “We are committed to enabling innovation that brings transformative
>>> medical products safely to patients.’’
>>
>> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
>> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
>> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
>> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
>> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>>
>> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
>> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
>> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
>> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
>> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
>> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
>> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
>> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
>> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
>> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
>> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
>> longer effective.
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1b4rx90/now_they_are_targeting_the_amish/
>>>
>>>
>>> Now They Are Targeting the Amish
>>> Friends Read Free
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Commentary
>>> In January of this year, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, in
>>> cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, raided the Amos
>>> Miller Organic Farm, a longtime members-only organic farm in Lancaster
>>> County. Government agents took possession of many tens of thousands of
>>> dollars worth of food that had been produced on the farm for family and
>>> friends, people who rely on this farm for high-quality products that
>>> avoid factory methods, chemicals, and industrial processes.
>>> This is the kind of food that many people around the country would love
>>> to buy but cannot because of the industrial cartels that control
>>> production and distribution in this country. Residents of Amish country
>>> are wildly fortunate to have such options, particularly as it pertains
>>> to raw milk products, which are widely considered to be more nutritious
>>> and delicious than processed milk. However, that truth is censored very
>>> heavily by YouTube, as part of the general censorship regime in
>>> operation now.
>>> Story continues below advertisement
>>>
>>> Food safety regulations seem like they are an attempt to protect the
>>> consumer. The darker truth behind the entire history of this regulation
>>> is that it is designed to prop up certain industries at the expense of
>>> others. In particular, traditional farms have long been a target of such
>>> regulation, and often make the mainline food supply less healthy and
>>> even dangerous.
>>> For many decades, regulators have carved out a special exemption for the
>>> Amish, who have been allowed to go about their business provided they do
>>> not reach a critical mass of consumers. But that is starting to change.
>>> As ever more people have grown gravely suspicious of what the regulators
>>> are pushing, more people are trading with traditional farms that sell
>>> organic produce and also fresh eggs and milk.
>>> One might suppose that in a country that presumably values free
>>> enterprise, this would not be a problem. Truth is that the regulators
>>> have been lying in wait for an opportunity to crack down. And that time
>>> seems finally to have arrived. The Amos Miller farm has been disabled,
>>> even though its methods of producing food are no different from that
>>> used for thousands of years and in fact built this country when it was
>>> largely agricultural.
>>> RELATED STORIES
>>> The Disaster of American Healthcare
>>> 2/28/2024
>>> The Disaster of American Healthcare
>>> How Deep Is the Rabbit Hole?
>>> 2/28/2024
>>> How Deep Is the Rabbit Hole?
>>> This problem affects the whole of the food supply. The state departments
>>> of agriculture are mere foot soldiers for the USDA, which has been
>>> vexing the Miller farm since 2016, along with every other independent
>>> farmer in the country.
>>> As Thomas Massie has long pointed out and attempted to fix, you simply
>>> cannot get your product to market without using USDA processors, which
>>> are expensive, few and far between, and less capable than independent
>>> sources. Again, it really is an outrage that this is happening in a
>>> country built by yeoman farmers providing for their communities.
>>> Story continues below advertisement
>>> Let’s just take a step back and look at the big picture here. I feel a
>>> certain passion for this subject because, quite frankly, I have long
>>> been wrong about this. I used to laugh derisively at the crunchy
>>> liberals who insisted on natural this and natural that, believing it to
>>> be nothing but an affectation of the rich who did not understand the
>>> vast food needs of a giant population. I fully believed that mass
>>> industrialized and regulated (and probably subsidized) production was
>>> just what was required for the modern age. I suspect that many people
>>> bought into the propaganda, just like I did.
>>> I had placed the defense of independent farming and organic methods
>>> solidly on the left. So it is hilarious and ridiculous to me that it is
>>> now considered a pet issue of the “far right.” It’s utterly absurd: to
>>> defend the right to raise and sell food is not an issue of the left or
>>> right. It is a matter of human rights.
>>> Aside from that, I actually did some reading on food production, only to
>>> discover that industrial methods and mass subsidies contribute to
>>> population ill-health. This revelation was slow to dawn but it only
>>> takes a bit of looking to discover that vast amounts of retail food is
>>> all about getting rid of the excesses of the industrial system. That’s
>>> why everything contains corn syrup, why the cows are fed corn, and why
>>> grains are stuffed into every product possible, while healthy food is
>>> rare and expensive.
>>> It doesn’t have to be this way, I came to realize. Regular traditional
>>> farming not only provides for population needs, as it always has, but
>>> has the benefit of being vastly healthier. It has been put at a huge
>>> disadvantage thanks to government regulations. Independent farms barely
>>> survived, and now with their growing popularity, government is
>>> determined to shut them down.
>>> Story continues below advertisement
>>> What finally flipped me on the question was the government’s response to
>>> COVID. Everything they asked us to do was the opposite of what we should
>>> have done. They kept the liquor and weed stores open while shutting down
>>> AA meetings, gyms, and independent groceries. They moved sick patients
>>> into nursing homes. They forced ventilators and pharma products on
>>> people who simply needed sunshine and traditional therapeutics. They
>>> made it impossible to get proven drugs while forcing everyone to take
>>> the experimental misnamed vaccine.
>>> For that matter, they forced the whole population into masks that
>>> reduced the ability to breath and get oxygen, and thereby made people
>>> vastly sicker. When it turned out that the shot came with terrible side
>>> effects and death, they did nothing. In fact, government agencies hid
>>> the evidence of harm from the public.
>>> So you have to ask yourself a fundamental question. Do we want these
>>> same people in charge of farming, ranching, food quality, and food
>>> distribution? The answer is no. In fact, there is a very long history of
>>> food regulation being used to ruin the food supply. Every bit of
>>> government involvement that overrides the decisions of producers and
>>> consumers has contributed more to population ill-health.
>>> When I was growing up, I was subjected to the government’s evil food
>>> pyramid that privileged grains and demonized meat and eggs. It took
>>> decades for genuine scientists and nutritionists to debunk that
>>> nonsense. The war on eggs, for example, was completely misguided.
>>> Presumably everyone knows that now. But even today, the United States is
>>> one of the few countries in the world that requires retail sales of eggs
>>> to include washing off the membrane outside the eggs. That’s why this
>>> country is one of the few in the world in which eggs have to be
>>> refrigerated!
>>> Story continues below advertisement
>>> Look, this huge problem dates far back in history. Back in 1906, the
>>> federal government first got involved in regulating meat quality, and
>>> the problems began immediately. Inspectors used a “poke and sniff”
>>> method of checking for rancid meat that was proven to spread disease.
>>> This idiotic method persisted for many decades after it had been
>>> affirmed to be unsafe.
>>> It also turned out that the main lobbying forces for meat inspections
>>> were the dominant suppliers in the industry. They were attempting to
>>> drive up the cost of compliance as a method of competing and cartel
>>> creation.
>>> An Amish farmer uses a horse drawn harrow in a field on his farm near
>>> Wilson, Wisc., in a file photo. (Karen Bleier/AFP via Getty Images)
>>> An Amish farmer uses a horse drawn harrow in a field on his farm near
>>> Wilson, Wisc., in a file photo. (Karen Bleier/AFP via Getty Images)
>>> What will save the food supply in this country is less government
>>> oversight and bullying and more of the free market that the Amish
>>> practice. It is highly dangerous for government powers to be deployed in
>>> harassing these people and thus further poisoning the food supply. I’m
>>> happy to admit that I was wrong on this subject for most of my writing
>>> career. But the COVID response taught me a thing or two. I learned that
>>> we cannot trust government oversight in any aspect of human health,
>>> particularly not that which affects our food.
>>> Story continues below advertisement
>>> And it’s not only about food. It’s also about religious freedom. Groups
>>> like the Amish and so many others have thrived in the United States
>>> thanks to religious freedom. Their lifestyle and food choices are part
>>> of that. Take that away and you remove the whole guts of the whole basis
>>> of the American experience. It’s that serious.
>>> Meanwhile, as government goes after raw milk, vast numbers suffer real
>>> injury from mRNA shots the government forced on millions of people.
>>> Pharma’s stocks continue to trade at high levels while true
>>> investigations get little attention by the captured corporate media outlets.
>>> The Amos Miller Organic Farm deserves every passionate defense from
>>> anyone who values health and freedom. Make no mistake. The war on the
>>> organic farm is a war on all of us and only to the industrial benefit of
>>> large producers tightly connected to the cartel that runs agriculture in
>>> this country. The entire regulatory empire needs to be completely
>>> deregulated in the interest of the health and well-being of everyone.
>>> Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not
>>> necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
>>
>> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
>> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
>> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
>> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
>> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>>
>> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
>> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the US & elsewhere is by
>> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
>> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
>> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
>> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
>> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
>> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
>> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
>> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
>> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
>> longer effective.
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1b5w1bi/telegraph_ministers_failed_to_consider_longterm/
>>>
>>>
>>> Ministers failed to consider long-term pain of lockdown, say scientists
>>> Poll of leading thinkers contrasts sharply with public perception at
>>> height of pandemic that there was consensus
>>> Sarah Knapton,
>>> SCIENCE EDITOR and
>>> Joe Pinkstone
>>> 2 March 2024 • 6:00pm
>>>
>>> 667
>>> poll result
>>> The Government did not pay sufficient attention to the long-term
>>> collateral damage of lockdowns, a majority of British scientists
>>> surveyed believe.
>>> A wide-ranging survey conducted by The Telegraph and Censuswide shows
>>> that nearly seven in ten (68 per cent) academics believe more
>>> consideration should have been given to the fallout caused by shutting
>>> down the country.
>>> The views are in stark contrast to the public discourse at the height of
>>> the pandemic, when only a few dissenting scientific voices spoke out to
>>> highlight the health and economic risks from lockdowns.
>>> While just over half (51 per cent) of scientists thought lockdowns were
>>> always proportionate and always justified, one third disagreed.
>>> The survey also reveals that while 44 per cent of scientists believed
>>> pandemic modelling was “excellent” or “good”, some 37 per cent thought
>>> it was “average”, “poor”, or “very poor”.
>>> Experts said the results show there was far less scientific consensus
>>> than the public was led to believe, and warned that many academics had
>>> felt unable to speak their mind at the time.
>>> Scientists feared loss of patronage
>>> Prof Robert Dingwall, a former government Covid adviser, from Nottingham
>>> Trent University, said: “It was always clear to those of us who were
>>> able to make evidence-based criticisms of ‘official science’ and
>>> government actions, that we enjoyed considerable tacit support in the
>>> scientific community.
>>> “This was, however, muted by concerns about loss of patronage, access to
>>> research grants and difficulty in publication as the cost of speaking out.
>>> “Others certainly paid a price for trying to voice loyal opposition. I
>>> don’t blame anyone for keeping their head down if they had a career to
>>> build, a family to support or a preference for a quiet life.”
>>> Bob Seeley, a Tory MP who during the pandemic spoke up against
>>> lockdowns, said: “At the time we were, understandably, focused on
>>> immediate risk.
>>> “However, it was also clear that there was precious little thought as to
>>> the long-term damage to a society, especially in the development of
>>> young people. Schools should never have been shut. We are seeing a
>>> generation of young people damaged.
>>> “There was too much politics from some scientists who were pushing a
>>> politicised agenda.”
>>> He added: “The lack of interest in the origins of the virus seems bizarre.
>>> “My fear is that at very least, lockdown will be seen to have been an
>>> ineffective way of dealing with the crisis. The lack of an open and
>>> science-led conversation during the crisis was, I felt, disturbing.”
>>> A generation scarred
>>> Last month, the World Bank warned that lockdown disruption to education
>>> would scar multiple generations of children who suffered serious
>>> developmental and learning delays.
>>> NHS waiting lists soared to a record 7.8 million last September and
>>> there have been tens of thousands of extra non-Covid deaths since the
>>> pandemic, particularly among heart and cancer patients.
>>> A study from University College London in February estimated that 12,000
>>> years of life had been lost in Britain because of delays in diagnosing
>>> skin cancer during Covid lockdowns.
>>> Gordon Wishart, chief medical officer at Check4Cancer, and visiting
>>> professor of cancer surgery at Anglia Ruskin University, repeatedly
>>> warned in 2020 and 2021 that delaying cancer diagnosis and treatment
>>> would lead to deaths, but said his fears were ignored.
>>> “I did feel like my concerns were falling on deaf ears as far as the
>>> Government is concerned,” he said.
>>> “I have real concerns that we would not do anything different if we have
>>> another pandemic, as the Covid Inquiry did not seem that interested in
>>> identifying what went wrong with our approach, and how we would change
>>> it next time.”
>>> The Telegraph survey, taken between December and February by 198
>>> scientists from universities across Britain, also showed that 70 per
>>> cent believed government decisions were not transparent or well
>>> communicated.
>>>
>>>
>>> During the pandemic, what did you think of the Government’s communication?
>>> 17%
>>> Transparent and well communicated
>>> 70%
>>> Not transparent and not well communicated
>>> 13%
>>> No views on this/prefer not to say
>>> During the pandemic, do you think of the Government paid sufficient
>>> attention to the long-term damage of lockdowns?
>>> 19%
>>> Government paid sufficient attention
>>> Government did not pay sufficient attention
>>> 68%
>>> 14%
>>> No views on this/prefer not to say
>>> SOURCE: CENSUSWIDE SURVEY WITH 198 UK SCIENTISTS (2023/ 2024)
>>> Just three per cent thought all scientific views had been considered by
>>> the Government, while a third believed officials had focused on only a
>>> minority of opinions.
>>>
>>>
>>> During Covid in the UK, how would you rate the effectiveness of the
>>> modelling that was used?
>>> During the Covid pandemic in the UK, how many, if any, scientific views
>>> were considered?
>>> 3%
>>> 19%
>>> All of
>>> them
>>> Excellent
>>> 51%
>>> Majority
>>> of them
>>> 31%
>>> Good
>>> 20%
>>> Average
>>> 33%
>>> Minority
>>> of them
>>> 13%
>>> Poor
>>> 4%
>>> 1%
>>> Extremely poor
>>> None of them
>>> 19%
>>> 14%
>>> No views/prefer
>>> not to say
>>> No views/prefer
>>> not to say
>>> During the pandemic, what did you think of the Government's decisions?
>>> Transparent and well-communicated
>>> 51%
>>> Not transparent and not well-communicated
>>> 33%
>>> No views on this/prefer not to say
>>> 16%
>>> SOURCE: CENSUSWIDE SURVEY WITH 198 UK SCIENTISTS (2023/ 2024)
>>> Sunetra Gupta, professor of theoretical epidemiology at the University
>>> of Oxford, said it was important to prevent the “abuse and persecution”
>>> of scientists who were prepared to challenge the consensus.
>>> “There are clearly systemic problems in academia that need to be
>>> addressed in order to permit a fuller debate of these critical issues,”
>>> she said.
>>> “In future, I hope universities and institutions like the Royal Society,
>>> as well as the government and the media, will see fit to put on more
>>> debates and allow dissenting voices to be heard.”
>>> The survey also showed that scientists are split over whether Covid-19
>>> leaked from a laboratory, with the majority thinking that China has not
>>> been open and transparent about the origins of the disease.
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you think Covid-19 is of zoonotic/natural origin?
>>> Definitely
>>> Most likely
>>> Most likely not
>>> Definitely not
>>> No views on this/
>>> prefer not to say
>>> 0%
>>> 10
>>> 20
>>> 30
>>> 40
>>> 50
>>> 60
>>> Do you think China have been open and transparent about the origins of
>>> Covid-19?
>>> 61%
>>> 6%
>>> 34%
>>> No
>>> Yes
>>> No views on this/
>>> prefer not to say
>>> Do you think Covid-19 leaked from a lab in China?
>>> Yes
>>> No
>>> No views on this/
>>> prefer not to say
>>> 0%
>>> 10
>>> 20
>>> 30
>>> 40
>>> SOURCE: CENSUSWIDE SURVEY WITH 198 UK SCIENTISTS (2023/ 2024)
>>> Around one third believe that gain-of-function experiments – which
>>> increase the potency of viruses and bacteria – could spark a pandemic,
>>> while the same number think the work could help prevent future outbreaks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you think gain-of-function experiments experiments are needed to
>>> prevent future pandemics?
>>> 34%
>>> 52%
>>> No views on this/prefer not to say
>>> Yes
>>> 14%
>>> No
>>> Do you think gain-of-function experiments experiments risk sparking
>>> future pandemics?
>>> 34%
>>> 47%
>>> No views on this/prefer not to say
>>> Yes
>>> 19%
>>> No
>>> SOURCE: CENSUSWIDE SURVEY WITH 198 UK SCIENTISTS (2023/ 2024)
>>> Ravi Gupta, professor of clinical microbiology at the University of
>>> Cambridge, said: “I think the survey shows that people believe in the
>>> ability of science to answer questions but some of those experiments
>>> carry a risk and they need to be regulated.
>>> “Now the dust is settling, hopefully people are allowed to have a
>>> balanced discussion.”
>>> The survey, which dealt with current contentious issues within science,
>>> also found that around six in 10 scientists think that sex is binary,
>>> while a similar number agree gender is fluid.
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you think sex is binary?
>>> 58%
>>> 29%
>>> 13%
>>> Yes*
>>> No
>>> No views on this
>>> /prefer not to say
>>> *except in rare cases such as intersex individuals
>>> Do you think gender is binary?
>>> 22%
>>> 64%
>>> 14%
>>> Yes
>>> No
>>> No views on this
>>> /prefer not to say
>>> SOURCE: CENSUSWIDE SURVEY WITH 198 UK SCIENTISTS (2023/ 2024)
>>> Responding to the survey, a Department of Health and Social Care
>>> spokesman said: “Throughout the pandemic, the Government acted to save
>>> lives and livelihoods, preventing the NHS being overwhelmed, and
>>> delivered a world-leading vaccine rollout which protected millions.
>>> “We have always said there are lessons to be learnt from the pandemic
>>> and are committed to learning from the Covid-19 Inquiry’s findings,
>>> which will play a key role in informing the Government’s planning and
>>> preparations for the future.”
>>
>> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
>> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
>> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
>> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
>> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>>
>> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
>> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
>> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
>> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
>> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
>> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
>> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
>> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
>> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
>> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
>> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
>> longer effective.
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1b6ntt8/locking_down_small_areas_during_the_autumn_of/
>>>
>>>
>>> Covid inquiry: Local lockdowns failed, said Drakeford
>>> 21 hours ago
>>> By David Deans, Rowenna Hoskin & Jack Grey,
>>> BBC News
>>>
>>> Share
>>> Getty Images A Covid-19 poster in the foreground with Caerphilly Castle
>>> in the backgroundGetty Images
>>> Caerphilly county borough was the first area to lockdown in September 2020
>>> Mark Drakeford said locking down small areas during the autumn of 2020
>>> was a "failed experiment", the Covid inquiry has been told.
>>>
>>> Some council areas and towns like Llanelli and Bangor were subject to
>>> restrictions as officials struggled to cope with rising case numbers.
>>>
>>> A senior Welsh advisor said that in hindsight "perhaps they weren't the
>>> best idea".
>>>
>>> Rob Orford told the inquiry that lockdowns made it more "complicated".
>>>
>>> The chief scientific advisor for Wales was among the senior officials
>>> giving evidence at Monday's hearing, sitting in Cardiff.
>>>
>>> It was told that Sir Frank Atherton, chief medical officer for Wales,
>>> called the lack of information surrounding different UK restrictions an
>>> "omnishambles".
>>>
>>> The word, voted 2012's word of the year by the Oxford English
>>> Dictionary, means a situation which is shambolic from every possible angle.
>>>
>>> Sir Frank told the hearing that Wales should have followed England when
>>> it made masks law in shops.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile a senior civil servant, Dame Shan Morgan, admitted to deleting
>>> messages early in the pandemic.
>>>
>>> Welsh government Wales' chief medical officer Sir Frank AthertonWelsh
>>> government
>>> Wales' chief medical officer Sir Frank Atherton
>>> Tom Poole, counsel to the inquiry, told the hearing that the first
>>> minister had described in written evidence local lockdowns as a "failed
>>> experiment".
>>>
>>> Caerphilly county was the first council area to go into a local lockdown
>>> in September 2020, after a significant rise in cases there. A number of
>>> other places followed soon after.
>>>
>>> It generally meant people could not leave the areas without a reasonable
>>> excuse. Case rates fell initially in Caerphilly, before rising again
>>> before the firebreak lockdown of late October.
>>>
>>> Dr Orford said in "hindsight perhaps they weren't the best idea".
>>>
>>> "I felt it made things more complicated that you had to have more
>>> legislation, more policies in place across different local authorities,"
>>> he said.
>>>
>>> Caerphilly case rate
>>> Figures from the time showed case rates fell in Caerphilly before rising
>>> later
>>> The hearing heard an account of the first Welsh government cabinet
>>> meeting where Covid was discussed in 24 February 2020 - a month after
>>> Sir Frank warned Mr Drakeford of a "significant risk" of Covid coming to
>>> Wales.
>>>
>>> Minutes claimed that Vaughan Gething, who was health minister at the
>>> time, said there had been no imported cases in the UK at that point -
>>> there were nine positive cases by 18 February.
>>>
>>> The minutes have been disputed by a Welsh government source, who told
>>> BBC Wales the document was incorrect in its account of Mr Gething's remarks.
>>>
>>> Local lockdowns a failed experiment, says first minister
>>> The timeline of the Covid-19 pandemic in Wales
>>> Welsh government 'caught with trousers down' on Covid
>>> Gething deleted messages, Covid inquiry hears
>>> Russell George MS, Welsh Conservative shadow health minister, called the
>>> alleged mistake "astounding".
>>>
>>> "The fact that he wasn't aware of Covid's arrival into the UK when
>>> others were preparing is very telling."
>>>
>>> By the end of January, Sir Frank said it was "increasingly apparent that
>>> optimistic scenario of it fizzling out in China was not going to happen".
>>>
>>> He added that the delay did not particularly surprise him, because of
>>> "everything that was happening in Wales, including the management of the
>>> flooding".
>>>
>>> Sir Frank said no matter what the Welsh or UK governments had done, he
>>> believed a nationwide lockdown was unavoidable.
>>>
>>> Face masks
>>> During his evidence Sir Frank said Wales should have copied England when
>>> it made face coverings mandatory in public places.
>>>
>>> Wales made masks compulsory on public transport in July 2020 but not in
>>> shops until September, whereas England made them mandatory in shops in July.
>>>
>>> Sir Frank originally advised against it amid concerns over PPE, face
>>> coverings encouraging risky behaviour and coverings not being up to
>>> World Health Organization standards.
>>>
>>> "I think from all the time and energy spent on face coverings it would
>>> have been better to align," he added.
>>>
>>> The inquiry was shown a page from Sir Frank's notebook with the word
>>> omnishambles scrawled across it, which appears to be from the summer of
>>> 2020.
>>>
>>> Covid Inquiry A spider diagram Atherton scrawled in his notebook, which
>>> appears to be from the summer of 2020, with omnishambles written at the
>>> centre of the pageCovid Inquiry
>>> Sir Frank had written omnishambles in his notebook about the difference
>>> in UK restrictions
>>> "This represents a degree of frustration I think I had which is that
>>> information came from UK level into Wales very late and left us on the
>>> back foot on some issues," said Sir Frank.
>>>
>>> He said it "seemed odd" that some restrictions were being lifted when
>>> the virus was low, but other restrictions - including rules on wearing
>>> masks - were being introduced.
>>>
>>> He concluded his evidence by saying there was "no safer alternative" to
>>> discharging hospital patients with symptoms of Covid into care homes
>>> without a test being required.
>>>
>>> "The common view was that care homes ought to be able to manage cases of
>>> infectious disease by isolating people within there," he said.
>>>
>>> Though "not an easy decision" he said it was made "in the context of
>>> hospitals absolutely risking being overloaded".
>>>
>>> He said elderly patients could have been asymptomatic in hospital but
>>> potentially "staying in hospital and becoming infected".
>>>
>>> The Welsh government's chief scientific adviser for health, Rob Orford,
>>> was concerned early in the pandemic that the disease would overwhelm the
>>> NHS.
>>>
>>> Rob Orford
>>> Rob Orford, chief scientific adviser for health wrote emails in February
>>> explaining the NHS would be overwhelmed
>>> The Inquiry heard he wrote two emails in February warning the NHS
>>> capacity would be outstripped based on the demand.
>>>
>>> Public Health Wales advised against the Wales v Scotland Six Nations
>>> match of March 2020 taking place, despite the Welsh government not
>>> forcing its postponement.
>>>
>>> By the time organisers called off the match, one day before kick-off,
>>> 20,000 Scottish rugby fans had already travelled to Cardiff.
>>>
>>> Tom Poole said Public Health Wales had advised the match "should be
>>> postponed or cancelled".
>>>
>>> Mr Orford said he was not aware that advice had been given but agreed
>>> that, with "the benefit of hindsight", it would have made sense to call
>>> the match off.
>>>
>>> Dame Shan Morgan, who was permanent secretary to the Welsh government
>>> for the bulk of the pandemic - the most senior civil servant in Wales,
>>> also gave evidence on Monday.
>>>
>>> She admitted having deleted "some" early WhatsApp messages about Covid.
>>>
>>> "I didn't turn on disappearing messages... To be honest I wouldn't know
>>> how to but I know I deleted a few early messages," she said. "I have no
>>> recollection of why beyond I suppose just an attempt at housekeeping."
>>>
>>> Counsel to the Inquiry Tom Poole told the hearing that Jane Runeckles,
>>> the first minister's special adviser, switched on the WhatsApp deletion
>>> function in November 2021.
>>>
>>> It comes after the Inquiry heard last week that Mr Gething used the same
>>> setting during the pandemic.
>>>
>>> The Inquiry will continue on Tuesday when Wales' top civil servant
>>> Andrew Goodall and Public Health Wales boss Tracey Cooper will give
>>> evidence.
>>
>> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
>> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
>> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
>> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
>> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>>
>> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
>> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
>> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
>> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
>> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
>> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
>> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
>> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
>> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
>> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
>> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
>> longer effective.
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/03/14/ethics-alarms-points-out-how-terrible-rfk-jr-s-vp-short-list-is-kamala-harris-says-hold-my-beer/
>>>
>>>
>>> Ethics Alarms Points Out How Terrible RFK Jr.’s VP “Short List” is;
>>> Kamala Harris says “Hold My Beer!”
>>> MARCH 14, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>>
>>>
>>> What a shameless demagogue.
>>>
>>> I am immediately torn, because every Kamala Harris head-exploding
>>> utterance raises a Julie Principle issue: OK, an elected official who
>>> has conclusively proven herself to be dumb, irresponsible and ethically
>>> inert says something that is dumb, irresponsible and ethically alert.
>>> Why is that worth complaining about or criticizing? Nevertheless, some
>>> of Harris’s outbursts are just too despicable to be ignored. Like this
>>> one, today, as she visited abortion providers and staff members at a
>>> clinic in St. Paul, Minnesota to cheer on women putting the unborn to
>>> death for the crime of complicating their mothers’ lives:
>>>
>>> “These attacks against an individual’s right to make decisions about
>>> their own body are outrageous and, in many instances, just plain old
>>> immoral,” she thundered. “How dare these elected leaders believe they
>>> are in a better position to tell women what they need, to tell women
>>> what is in their best interest. We have to be a nation that trusts women.”
>>>
>>> Nice. Kamala had previously used the “How dare they!” stunt to condemn
>>> the U.S. Supreme Court for daring to do their jobs, which includes
>>> striking down bad decisions that made up constitutional rights that
>>> didn’t exist. The abortion-fanatic’s dishonest defense has always relied
>>> on pretending that only one life is involved in an abortion, though the
>>> state has a valid interest in protecting all lives, including unborn
>>> humans who their mothers want to kill. When does an abortion in Harris’s
>>> world suddenly involve more than just the woman’s body? Six weeks? 15
>>> weeks? 9 months? Never, if her words mean what they appear to mean.
>>> “Plain old immoral” has always included “Thou shalt not kill”: what
>>> weird definition of “immoral” is Harris alluding to? It must be really
>>> old; Sumarian, maybe? Ancient Aztec?
>>>
>>>
>>> And what is the right to do whatever you want with your own body? Does
>>> it have any limits? Could Kamala please state this right simply and
>>> concisely? The concept would seem to be an endorsement of anarchy, and
>>> an assertion that the rule of law is itself “immoral,” which is ironic,
>>> since legal codes are moral codes. Government and law necessarily
>>> dictate what a citizen can or cannot to “with their own body,” and
>>> Harris’s party has grand designs on that area even beyond its harsh
>>> measures to force Americans to get mysterious chemicals injected into
>>> their bodies as well as their children. It also wants to find ways to
>>> stop citizens from saying, writing and hearing words, ideas and opinions
>>> that progressives find “hateful” or “misinformation.”
>>>
>>> Doesn’t using our mouths and brains to do what we want them to do bodily
>>> autonomy too?
>>>
>>> The claim that abortion is opposed because elected officials feel it
>>> isn’t in a woman’s best interests is a flat-out lie. Abortion’s ethical
>>> conflict is that it pits a woman’s best interests against another human
>>> being’s right to exist. Fine: making the nascent life you carry
>>> disappear may be in your best interests, just as murdering your cheating
>>> spouse or stealing your sister jewels might be in your best interests.
>>> But the rule of law is about balancing valid interests, and making the
>>> hard choices that create an ethical society.
>>>
>>> Isn’t Kamala supposed to know this? She went to law school, right?
>>>
>>> “We have to be a nation that trusts women”—what does Harris think that
>>> means? Should women be subject to no legal restraints at all, since we
>>> trust these heavenly creatures? Women can’t be trusted to do the right
>>> thing when they have an interest in opposition to that conduct; in this
>>> respect, they’re no different from anyone else. Should we trust women
>>> not to get pregnant when they can’t care for or support a child? And if
>>> a woman violates that trust, what are the consequences? Should they be
>>> borne by her, or the innocent life her conduct created? We can trust
>>> women to be highly tempted to choose the latter, not because they aren’t
>>> trustworthy, but because they are human, and humans are frequently
>>> guided by non-ethical motives and consideration.
>>>
>>> A complex ethics conflict like abortion can only be addressed by
>>> examining all factors and competing interests, and what we get from the
>>> Vice-President of the United States is hypocrisy, straw man arguments ,
>>> appeals to emotion and “How dare they!”
>>>
>>> An untrustworthy woman is calling for women to be trusted.
>>
>> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
>> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
>> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
>> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
>> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>>
>> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
>> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the US & elsewhere is by
>> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
>> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
>> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
>> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
>> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
>> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
>> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
>> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
>> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
>> longer effective.
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Source:
https://narkive.com/3k1eAxtP.4

Positive control on USENET:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

Suggested further reading:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ

Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

....because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:02:26 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:20:33 -0700, Michael Ejercito
>> <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1bhrecg/death_by_a_thousand_cuts_uk_insolvencies_soar_17/
>>>
>>> ‘Death by a thousand cuts’: UK insolvencies soar 17 per cent and exceed
>>> pandemic levels
>>> BY:JACK MENDEL
>>>
>>>
>>> The Insolvency Service said the numbers of compulsory liquidations,
>>> CVLs, and administrations were also higher than in February 2023.
>>> Fresh insolvency figures painted a grim picture this morning, with a
>>> number of companies going bust soaring by 17 per cent last month
>>> compared to 2023.
>>>
>>> The Insolvency Service said 2,102 companies went bust last month which
>>> was a 17 per cent rise on the same period last year, which was at 1,801.
>>>
>>> The government agency said this was higher than levels seen during the
>>> pandemic “while the government support measures were in place”, with
>>> things like the furlough scheme. It is also higher than pre-pandemic
>>> figures.
>>>
>>> Analysts blamed a mixture of high inflation and the sharp increase in
>>> interest rates following the mini-budget, which increased costs of
>>> borrowing, and encouraged Brits to tighten their purses.
>>>
>>> The war in Ukraine, which Russia launched two years ago, has also placed
>>> huge pressure on businesses’ energy costs and ability to pay rent.
>>>
>>> It said this included 217 compulsory liquidations, 1,707 creditors’
>>> voluntary liquidations (CVLs), 166 administrations and 12 company
>>> voluntary arrangements (CVAs).
>>>
>>> The Insolvency Service said the numbers of compulsory liquidations,
>>> CVLs, and administrations were also higher than in February 2023.
>>>
>>>
>>> It also said that the number of insolvencies in February 2024 was
>>> 10,136, around 23 per cent higher than last year.
>>>
>>> This comes as the UK entered a brief recession last month, but there are
>>> already signs it had exited that period. This week it was reported the
>>> UK took its first steps out of recession after the economy returned to
>>> growth in January.
>>>
>>> At the end of last month, S&P’s closely watched purchasing managers’
>>> index (PMI), also showed the UK economy made a stronger start to 2024
>>> than major European economies.
>>>
>>> Yet, many businesses have struggled with higher interest rates, which
>>> have been on hold for some months now.
>>>
>>> Millions of Brits are eagerly anticipating their fall, which is
>>> anticipated later this year, but some in the Bank of England’s
>>> decision-making MPC committee have been more hawkish. This week it was
>>> reported that interest rate cuts are drawing ever nearer after new data
>>> showed that slack continued to build in the labour market.
>>>
>>> READ MORE
>>>
>>> Why the Bank of England will keep interest rates on hold despite lower
>>> inflation
>>>
>>>
>>> Although almost every measure suggested a softer labour market than
>>> expected, the downside surprises were small, which demonstrated the
>>> labour market was still tight in historical terms.
>>>
>>> Julie Palmer, a partner at Begbies Traynor, said the latest data “paints
>>> an unhappy picture for the state of the UK economy”.
>>>
>>> “This environment is putting a huge amount of pressure on businesses and
>>> the challenge business leaders now face will be insurmountable for many. “
>>>
>>> Julie Palmer,
>>> “After a decade of interest rates floating around zero, many businesses
>>> simply were not prepared for higher interest rates for a sustained
>>> period of time, having loaded up on cheap debt during the boom years,”
>>> Palmer said.
>>>
>>> “Sadly, the debt storm has now broken and this morning’s data from the
>>> Insolvency Service highlights how this macro-economic environment is
>>> wreaking havoc on small and medium businesses across the country.”
>>>
>>> She added that the latest figures would discourage business owners who
>>> had hoped interest rates might come down soon.
>>>
>>> Daniel Staunton, a senior associate in the restructuring & insolvency
>>> team at Kingsley Napley, warned that “the facts don’t lie”.
>>>
>>> Staunton said: “When you speak to other professionals operating in the
>>> restructuring and insolvency field they all report being busier which is
>>> reflected in the increased numbers.
>>>
>>> “We can likely expect March 2024 stats to show another incremental
>>> increase.”
>>>
>>> READ MORE
>>>
>>> Pound Sterling makes strong start to 2024 as UK recovery from recession
>>> to continue
>>>
>>>
>>> He predicted that while “new records continue to be broken” he feared it
>>> would “be an ongoing trend and whilst we won’t see tsunami levels, the
>>> total number of insolvencies this year will ebb and flow like the tide.”
>>>
>>> Nicky Fisher, president at R3 warned that “businesses are still
>>> suffering the after-effects of last year’s economic turbulence”.
>>>
>>> “Rising fuel, energy and funding costs and cautious consumer spending
>>> are continuing to take their toll on bottom lines and make it harder for
>>> businesses to break even,” Fisher added.
>>>
>>> “After the pandemic era lockdowns; Brexit; staff shortages – and rising
>>> wage costs; spiralling fuel costs; high interest rates and inflation
>>> eroding consumers spending power and confidence; and the contraction in
>>> income implied by falling GDP , it is sad but unsurprising that company
>>> insolvencies have increased.”
>>>
>>> Jeremy Whiteson,
>>> “While there is still some optimism among firms about what the next year
>>> has in store, the economic conditions remain a key area of concern for
>>> many and unless things improve, we could see more and more firms turning
>>> to an insolvency process to help resolve their financial issues. “
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, Jeremy Whiteson, restructuring and insolvency partner at city
>>> law firm, Fladgate warned that company failures can “provoke wider
>>> economic problems if that causes unemployment or lost production”.
>>>
>>> Whiteson said: “Against this background, the increased figures are
>>> worrying. There has been something of a ‘death by a thousand cuts’ for
>>> many businesses”, citing the impact of the war in Ukraine, the aftermath
>>> of Covid, Brexit changes and inflation.
>>
>> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
>> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
>> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
>> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
>> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>>
>> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
>> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
>> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
>> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
>> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
>> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
>> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
>> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
>> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
>> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
>> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
>> longer effective.
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/03/19/heluva-scotus-choice-there-joe/
>>>
>>> Heluva SCOTUS Choice There, Joe!
>>> MARCH 19, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>>
>>>
>>> Great. We now have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who doesn’t like the
>>> First Amendment. The Babylon Bee hardly had to be satirical to come up
>>> with that headline. During yesterday’s oral arguments before the U.S.
>>> Supreme Court in Murthy v. Missouri, the newest Justice and the only one
>>> appointed by President Biden, Kentanji Brown Jackson revealed a
>>> frightening hostility to the most important guaranteed principle of
>>> American freedom from oppressive government.
>>>
>>> “My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment
>>> hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important
>>> time periods,” Jackson told Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin
>>> Aguiñaga as he argued against allowing Big Brother to recruit Big Tech
>>> as a political ally by intimidating social media platforms into removing
>>> posts the government finds inconvenient. I read Jackson’s quotes
>>> yesterday with genuine horror. My sister, a federal litigator of liberal
>>> tendencies, had assured me that Jackson was a smart, solid, trustworthy
>>> jurist based on her experiences appearing before her. Justice Jackson
>>> may be smart, but trustworthy she isn’t. Intentionally or accidentally,
>>> President Biden’s openly DEI appointment to fill the Court slot vacated
>>> by Stephen Breyer installed the perfect tool to assist aspiring Democrat
>>> totalitarians to achieve their agendas.
>>>
>>> Oh please, tell us again how Donald Trump is the existential threat to
>>> democracy.
>>>
>>>
>>> “Hamstringing the government” is the entire principle underlying the
>>> First Amendment, indeed the entire Bill of Rights. Jackson’ lament
>>> demonstrates the socking devolution of the American Left. On the
>>> celebrated, ultra-liberal Warren Court that brought us school
>>> integration, the rights have a lawyer appointed and “the fruit of the
>>> poisonous tree” among other advances in civil rights, liberal icon
>>> William O. Douglas and fellow Democrat Hugo Black kept reminding the
>>> public and the government that “Congress shall make no law abridging the
>>> freedom of speech” means that Congress shall make no law abridging the
>>> freedom of speech, and that in the Bill of Rights, Constitution
>>> prohibitions on “Congress” are prohibitions on the government as a
>>> whole. In those golden days, it was the evil conservatives trying to
>>> tell people what they were allowed to see, read and hear.
>>>
>>> Jackson’s statement about the perils of hamstringing the government were
>>> just the beginning of her cheerleading for government censorship. “Some
>>> might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to
>>> protect the citizens of this country” she said, making it obvious that
>>> she was one of the ‘some.” “You seem to be suggesting that that duty
>>> cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring
>>> platforms to take down harmful information,” continued Jackson. “So can
>>> you help me? Because I’m really worried about that. Because you’ve got
>>> the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening
>>> circumstances, from the government’s perspective, and you’re saying that
>>> the government can’t interact with the source of those problems.”
>>>
>>> Ah, yes, those “threatening circumstances.” Can’t have that. You know,
>>> like telling the public about the President’s son’s laptop, questioning
>>> the edicts of the CDC during the pandemic and the suspicious undermining
>>> of election integrity …or endangering Democratic power in Washington, D.C.
>>>
>>> Despite indisputable proof that the Department of Health and Human
>>> Services, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Centers
>>> for Disease Control and Prevention, Census Bureau, Department of
>>> Homeland Security, Department of State, FBI, Department of Justice, and
>>> the White House demanded Big Tech companies like Twitter (now X),
>>> Facebook, and YouTube interfere with Americans attempting to publicize
>>> facts and opinions the government preferred to keep buried, Jackson
>>> appeared to see this as completely benign.
>>>
>>> Judge Terry Doughty, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the
>>> Western District of Louisiana in his 155-page ruling described the Biden
>>> administration’s efforts to push social media platforms into doing its
>>> censorship “the most massive attack against free speech in United
>>> States’ history.” But Joe’s justice doesn’t see it that way at all. In
>>> another exchange, Jackson argued that a “once-in-a-lifetime pandemic” or
>>> other declared “emergencies” should allow the always well-meaning
>>> government expand constitutional limits. You know, like Woodrow Wilson
>>> locking up dissenters during World War I. Biden already has tried to use
>>> his “emergency powers” illicitly, like ordering landlords not to evict
>>> deadbeat tenants, or allowing degree holders to skip their obligations
>>> to pay back loans. Most dictators take over in “emergencies,” and the
>>> freedom of speech is usually the first right to go.
>>>
>>> “I’m interested in your view that the context doesn’t change the First
>>> Amendment principles,” Jackson said. “I understood our First Amendment
>>> jurisprudence to require heightened scrutiny of government restrictions
>>> of speech, but not necessarily a total prohibition when you’re talking
>>> about a compelling interest of the government to ensure, for example,
>>> that the public has accurate information in the context of a
>>> once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.”
>>>
>>> She actually said that, even though it is now undeniable that the public
>>> was given false, deliberately misleading and repeatedly wrong
>>> information by the government (as well as the fearmongering news media).
>>> Conservative writer Matt Margolis correctly observed this morning, “More
>>> often than not, it seems that the speech that the government censored or
>>> suppressed turned out to be right in the end.”
>>>
>>> Naturally, the mainstream media is soft-peddling Justice Jackson’s
>>> ominous unmasking as a government censorship advocate. But the public
>>> needs to understand: she stands for and with the party and the President
>>> that are claiming only they can “save democracy,” when it is becoming
>>> increasingly clear that the exact opposite is the truth.
>>
>> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
>> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
>> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
>> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
>> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>>
>> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
>> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
>> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
>> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
>> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
>> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
>> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
>> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
>> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
>> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
>> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
>> longer effective.
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!