On 1/12/2025 1:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <XnsB264D079D879F629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>> news:vlunak$pja7$2@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> On 2025-01-11, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>> On 1/11/2025 11:01 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:vlu8rd$n21b$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-01-11, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vltmts$jubq$2@dont-email.me>, OFeem1987@teleworm.us
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> super70s wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-11 01:56:18 +0000, Josh Rosenbluth said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2025 5:02 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Who cares ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He can't because it is a state crime.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on
>>>>>>>>> appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines
>>>>>>>>> for years.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Exactly.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
>>>>>>>> dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
>>>>>> toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to
>>>>>> focus on for appeal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are
>>>>>> far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs.
>>>>>> He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump will need to show violation
>>>>> of the Constitution to get there. And
>>>>> what was unconstititional about his trial?
>>>>
>>>> Based on their filings so far, they will likely argue that some
>>>> evidence should not have been presented in conflict with the previous
>>>> SCOTUS immunity case (Trump v. United States).
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>> Plus denial of due process and a judge who acted much like another
>>> prosecutor on the case.
>>>
>>> This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to a
>>> felony for a book keeping error. He is well known for being soft on
>>> crime and lowering offenses from felonies to misdemeanors. Then of
>>> course there is the specific underlying crime which "permitted" him to
>>> do that.
>>>
>>> Trump was unfairly prosecuted because he is Trump.
>>
>>
>> Trump was unfairly SENTENCED because he is Trump.
>
> True.

False. There was nothing "unfair" about the indictment, the prosecution, the
trial, the verdict or the sentencing. It was scrupulously fair.

>>
>> Name any other defendant convicted of a felony
>> offense who walked out of court with no jail, no
>> prison, no fine and no probation.
>
> Most get nothing but the judge changed the crime from misdemeanor to
> felony.

No, the judge did not do that, you stupid cocksucker. There was *no* change. The
prosecutor brought felony charges in the first place. And they were fully justified.

>>
>> Just one, any one.
>>
>> Put their name right here:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Others doing the same and worse pay a fine and move on.
>>> Not a felony.
>>
>> Bingo. ALL others convicted of ANYTHING
>> have *some* punishment.
>>
>> But not Trump.
>
>
> Because they know it will never happen.

It *would* have happened if the crook had not won a fraudulent election.
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing