On 12/24/2024 9:54 PM, burch cassidy wrote:
> In <eFKaP.123544$oR74.16208@fx16.iad> Jon Ball wrote:

No such poster, as the cocksucking faggot shitbag spammy well knows.

>>
>> On 12/24/2024 3:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <vkfacq$21md8$1@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 12/24/2024 1:46 PM, pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-12-24, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <XnsB2527C861BF5629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:676ae944$0$1895507
>>>>>>> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <XnsB252511777370629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:676ab5e8$3$1895491$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <vkc2ic$19b36$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/2024 6:16 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vkas1g$12f7o$1@dont- email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/22/2024 6:51 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/22/2024 7:27 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once again, if she knowingly published a poll with a known
>>>>>>> bad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> methodology (as you had noted, she had the same issue in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past) it's fraud.  That's what discovery is for.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what if it is a fraud? First amendment, sunshine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraud is not protected by the First Amendment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dipshit was using 'fraud' with a nonlegal meaning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This would be considerred political speecch which has
>>>>>>> additional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protections.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If Selzer intentionally published poll results she knew to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> false, I don't think she is protected by the First Amendment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> When has a pollster ever been successfully
>>>>>>>>>>>> sued for defamation?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The lawsuit claims consumer fraud, not defamation. As far as I
>>>>>>> know,
>>>>>>>>>>> no pollster has been successfully sued. Trump's case is frivolous
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> many reasons. He is a bully, crybaby, sore loser and sore winner.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He was defamed and won.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trump spends years ranting about
>>>>>>>>> Crooked Hillary and Pocahontas and
>>>>>>>>> Lyin' Ted and then complains HE is
>>>>>>>>> being defamed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What a crybaby.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So? He was telling the truth.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like his "I never had sex with Stormy Daniels" truth?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You guys are soooo gullible.........
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like "I will never pardon Hunter".
>>>>>
>>>>> Or my uncle Boise was eaten by cannibals.
>>>> Biden's uncle's body was never found. He may have been eaten by cannibals. You
>>>> can't prove he wasn't.
>>>
>>> It was a lie.
>>
>> No. At worst, it might be Biden's incorrect belief. But it's not a lie if he
>> sincerely believes it. In fact, it may well be true, even though Biden could
>> never prove it. But you — a stupid fucktard — can't disprove it.
>>
>> Trump lies.
>
> That's correct.
Of course it's correct, spammy, you squat-to-piss lying Nazi faggot.

--
Every Republiscum/QAnon accusation is, in fact, a confession