Rocksolid Light

News from da outaworlds

mail  files  register  groups  login

Message-ID:  

BOFH excuse #363: Out of cards on drive D:


alt / alt.atheism / Re: Team Trump Debates ‘How Much Should We Invade Mexico?’

SubjectAuthor
* Team Trump Debates ‘How Much Should We Invade Mexico?’J Carlson
+- Re: Team Trump Debates ‘How Much Should We Invade Mexico?’Siri Cruise
`- Re: Team Trump Debates ‘How Much Should We Invade Mexico?’Ted

1
Subject: Team Trump Debates ‘How Much Should We Invade Mexico?’
From: J Carlson
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 20:20 UTC
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: j_carlson@gmx.com (J Carlson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Team_Trump_Debates_‘How_Much_Should_We_Invade_Mex
ico?’
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 12:20:09 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vid7lp$17ei6$9@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 21:20:10 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f85e472fdede0e970bc29c36a3abd7f2";
logging-data="1292870"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX192SUj42Klxhk2wK2xNxo/BsygWQAangks="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8oDWcJjz2i9rR5OqhPUZJYkYLy0=
Content-Language: en-US
View all headers

Within Donald Trump’s government-in-waiting, there is a fresh debate over
whether and how thoroughly the president-elect should follow through on his
campaign promise to attack or even invade Mexico, as part of the “war” he’s
pledged to wage against powerful drug cartels.

“How much should we invade Mexico?” says a senior Trump transition member. “That
is the question.”

It is a question that would have seemed batty for the GOP elite to consider
before, even during Trump’s first term. But in the four years since, many within
the mainstream Republican centers of power have come around to support Trump’s
idea to bomb or attack Mexico.

Trump’s Cabinet picks, including his choices for secretary of defense and
secretary of state, have publicly supported the idea of potentially unleashing
the U.S. military in Mexico. So has the man Trump has tapped to be his national
security adviser. So has the man Trump selected as his “border czar” to lead his
immigration crackdowns. So have various Trump allies in Congress and in the media.

Trump, who has routinely (and falsely) promoted himself as the candidate who
would stop “endless wars,” now wants to lead a new conflict just south of our
nation’s border. But at this moment, it is, in the words of one Trump adviser,
“unclear how far he’ll go on this one.” This source adds: “If things don’t
change, the president still believes it’s necessary to take some kind of
military action against these killers.”

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-mexico-drug-cartels-military-invade-1235183177/

The Republiscum/QAnon KKK shitbags who spew here are going to dismiss this
because it's from Rolling Stone, but that only proves their idiocy and bad
faith. Rolling Stone is an *impeccable* journalism outlet.

Subject: Re: Team Trump Debates ‘How Much Should We Invade Mexico?’
From: Siri Cruise
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns
Organization: Pseudochaotic
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 20:53 UTC
References: 1
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com (Siri Cruise)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re:_Team_Trump_Debates_‘How_Much_Should_We_Invade
Mexico?’
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 12:53:06 -0800
Organization: Pseudochaotic
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <vid9jh$18735$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vid7lp$17ei6$9@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 21:53:07 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="afdd3cb9f5c2c65c9c0501a0805a25e2";
logging-data="1317989"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18xWfVKkxPao6zEW/MQllPiX3S9za7hX7c="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 11.7; rv:91.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:X0cFm9Yv+eQnbc3MYtN8WAucnZs=
In-Reply-To: <vid7lp$17ei6$9@dont-email.me>
View all headers

J Carlson wrote:
> Within Donald Trump’s government-in-waiting, there is a fresh
> debate over whether and how thoroughly the president-elect should
> follow through on his campaign promise to attack or even invade
> Mexico, as part of the “war” he’s pledged to wage against powerful
> drug cartels.
>
> “How much should we invade Mexico?” says a senior Trump transition
> member. “That is the question.”

Operation Pershing will once again make Mexico heel to our command.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

Subject: Re: Team Trump Debates ‘How Much Should We Invade Mexico?’
From: Ted
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 16:46 UTC
References: 1
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx38.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ted.street@gmail.com (Ted)
Subject: Re: Team Trump Debates ‘How_Much_Should_We_Inv
ade_Mexico?’
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns
References: <vid7lp$17ei6$9@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: Groundhog Newsreader for Android
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <yNk4P.2$pYv6.1@fx38.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 16:46:22 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 2823
View all headers

J Carlson wrote:

> Within Donald Trump’s government-in-waiting, there is a fresh debate
> over whether and how thoroughly the president-elect should follow
> through on his campaign promise to attack or even invade Mexico, as
> part of the “war” he’s pledged to wage against powerful drug cartels.
>
> “How much should we invade Mexico?” says a senior Trump transition
> member. “That is the question.”
>

Okay with me. I'm still pist about the Alamo.

> It is a question that would have seemed batty for the GOP elite to
> consider before, even during Trump’s first term. But in the four
> years since, many within the mainstream Republican centers of power
> have come around to support Trump’s idea to bomb or attack Mexico.
>
> Trump’s Cabinet picks, including his choices for secretary of defense
> and secretary of state, have publicly supported the idea of
> potentially unleashing the U.S. military in Mexico. So has the man
> Trump has tapped to be his national security adviser. So has the man
> Trump selected as his “border czar” to lead his immigration
> crackdowns. So have various Trump allies in Congress and in the media.
>
> Trump, who has routinely (and falsely) promoted himself as the
> candidate who would stop “endless wars,” now wants to lead a new
> conflict just south of our nation’s border. But at this moment, it
> is, in the words of one Trump adviser, “unclear how far he’ll go on
> this one.” This source adds: “If things don’t change, the president
> still believes it’s necessary to take some kind of military action
> against these killers.”
>
>
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-mexico-drug-cartels-military-invade-1235183177/
>
> The Republiscum/QAnon KKK shitbags who spew here are going to dismiss
> this because it's from Rolling Stone, but that only proves their
> idiocy and bad faith. Rolling Stone is an impeccable journalism
> outlet.

Yep.

1

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor