wats a Christian Atheists? Is that an atheists who
don't believe in God but believes in Jesus Christ??

make up your mind..trans.

There are too many atheists here that have
christian values...yous knows whos yous ares.

damn, alt.atheism is like a church...with different relgions in it.

okay, i'm passing out the collection plate here...

dis is my church now, everybody pays!

I guess a Christian Atheist is a person who don't want to go to hell.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

The Starmaker wrote:
> wats a Christian Atheists? Is that an atheists who
> don't believe in God but believes in Jesus Christ??
>
>
> make up your mind..trans.
>
> There are too many atheists here that have
> christian values...yous knows whos yous ares.
>
>
> damn, alt.atheism is like a church...with different relgions in it.
>
>
> okay, i'm passing out the collection plate here...
>
> dis is my church now, everybody pays!
>
>
> I guess a Christian Atheist is a person who don't want to go to hell.
>

transitive property precludes the existence of such a being.

On 10/30/2024 2:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> wats a Christian Atheists? Is that an atheists who
> don't believe in God but believes in Jesus Christ??
>
>
> make up your mind..trans.
>
> There are too many atheists here that have
> christian values...yous knows whos yous ares.
>
>
> damn, alt.atheism is like a church...with different relgions in it.
>
>
> okay, i'm passing out the collection plate here...
>
> dis is my church now, everybody pays!
>
>
> I guess a Christian Atheist is a person who don't want to go to hell.
>

Why are you cross-posting this crap in the physics groups?

Dawn

Dawn Flood: Starmaker likes to joke around. After all, physics
(especially relativity) nowadays is utterly ridiculous.

On 10/30/2024 4:08 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> Dawn Flood: Starmaker likes to joke around. After all, physics
> (especially relativity) nowadays is utterly ridiculous.

The newsgroup? Or, the theory? I am assuming the former.

Thanks,

Dawn

Dawn Flood wrote:
>
> On 10/30/2024 2:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > wats a Christian Atheists? Is that an atheists who
> > don't believe in God but believes in Jesus Christ??
> >
> >
> > make up your mind..trans.
> >
> > There are too many atheists here that have
> > christian values...yous knows whos yous ares.
> >
> >
> > damn, alt.atheism is like a church...with different relgions in it.
> >
> >
> > okay, i'm passing out the collection plate here...
> >
> > dis is my church now, everybody pays!
> >
> >
> > I guess a Christian Atheist is a person who don't want to go to hell.
> >
>
> Why are you cross-posting this crap in the physics groups?
>
> Dawn

Oh come on Dawn, you of all people are the biggest Christian Atheist in the world!
You read more about Jesus Christ than anyone else here! You and Jesus Christ are buddie buddies.

You are an absolute Christian Atheist.

You have good company, Richard Dawkins is known to be a...Christian Atheist.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Dawn Flood wrote:
> On 10/30/2024 4:08 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>> Dawn Flood: Starmaker likes to joke around. After all, physics
>> (especially relativity) nowadays is utterly ridiculous.
>
> The newsgroup?  Or, the theory?  I am assuming the former.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dawn

uhh both of them are mad, general relativity is as rock solid as
ever, matching observations of all kinds of esoteric phenomenon
till date. nothing that disagrees with the theory as yet!

the biggest one recently being the detection of gravity waves.

people are trying to quantize gravity, but no dice.

On 10/31/2024 7:35 AM, kazu wrote:
> Dawn Flood wrote:
>> On 10/30/2024 4:08 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>> Dawn Flood: Starmaker likes to joke around. After all, physics
>>> (especially relativity) nowadays is utterly ridiculous.
>>
>> The newsgroup?  Or, the theory?  I am assuming the former.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dawn
>
>
> uhh both of them are mad, general relativity is as rock solid as ever,
> matching observations of all kinds of esoteric phenomenon till date.
> nothing that disagrees with the theory as yet!
>
> the biggest one recently being the detection of gravity waves.
>
> people are trying to quantize gravity, but no dice.

Okay, thanks! To think that long ago Usenet used to be a respectable
place to share thoughtful ideas as opposed to solitary cranks who are
now using it to spread their nonsense.

Dawn

On 10/30/2024 6:54 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>
>> On 10/30/2024 2:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> wats a Christian Atheists? Is that an atheists who
>>> don't believe in God but believes in Jesus Christ??
>>>
>>>
>>> make up your mind..trans.
>>>
>>> There are too many atheists here that have
>>> christian values...yous knows whos yous ares.
>>>
>>>
>>> damn, alt.atheism is like a church...with different relgions in it.
>>>
>>>
>>> okay, i'm passing out the collection plate here...
>>>
>>> dis is my church now, everybody pays!
>>>
>>>
>>> I guess a Christian Atheist is a person who don't want to go to hell.
>>>
>>
>> Why are you cross-posting this crap in the physics groups?
>>
>> Dawn
>
> Oh come on Dawn, you of all people are the biggest Christian Atheist in the world!
> You read more about Jesus Christ than anyone else here! You and Jesus Christ are buddie buddies.
>
>
> You are an absolute Christian Atheist.
>
>
> You have good company, Richard Dawkins is known to be a...Christian Atheist.
>

And, so, people who study Jesus automatically "believe" in Jesus??
Ditto for scholars of the Aztecs, Greeks and the Mesolithic Era?

Dawn

Dawn Flood wrote:
>
> On 10/30/2024 6:54 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Dawn Flood wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/30/2024 2:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> wats a Christian Atheists? Is that an atheists who
> >>> don't believe in God but believes in Jesus Christ??
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> make up your mind..trans.
> >>>
> >>> There are too many atheists here that have
> >>> christian values...yous knows whos yous ares.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> damn, alt.atheism is like a church...with different relgions in it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> okay, i'm passing out the collection plate here...
> >>>
> >>> dis is my church now, everybody pays!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I guess a Christian Atheist is a person who don't want to go to hell.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Why are you cross-posting this crap in the physics groups?
> >>
> >> Dawn
> >
> > Oh come on Dawn, you of all people are the biggest Christian Atheist in the world!
> > You read more about Jesus Christ than anyone else here! You and Jesus Christ are buddie buddies.
> >
> >
> > You are an absolute Christian Atheist.
> >
> >
> > You have good company, Richard Dawkins is known to be a...Christian Atheist.
> >
>
> And, so, people who study Jesus automatically "believe" in Jesus??
> Ditto for scholars of the Aztecs, Greeks and the Mesolithic Era?
>
> Dawn

what happen to you Dawnnnie, the glass slipper didn't fit?

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

kazu wrote:
>
> Dawn Flood wrote:
> > On 10/30/2024 4:08 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> >> Dawn Flood: Starmaker likes to joke around. After all, physics
> >> (especially relativity) nowadays is utterly ridiculous.
> >
> > The newsgroup? Or, the theory? I am assuming the former.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dawn
>
> uhh both of them are mad, general relativity is as rock solid as
> ever, matching observations of all kinds of esoteric phenomenon
> till date. nothing that disagrees with the theory as yet!
>
> the biggest one recently being the detection of gravity waves.
>
> people are trying to quantize gravity, but no dice.

kazuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

How did you come up with that name????

it's a girl's name...are you a girl?

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Dawn Flood: The idea that real skepticism is only skeptical of
alternative ideas and accepts the status quo as gospel truth is the
mentality of an imbecile. If you can't see how foolish modern physics is
what is the matter with you?

Dawn Flood: "solitary cranks" is only a case of ad populum fallacy.

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> Dawn Flood: The idea that real skepticism is only skeptical of
> alternative ideas and accepts the status quo as gospel truth is the
> mentality of an imbecile. If you can't see how foolish modern
> physics is
> what is the matter with you?

what is the matter with you?? are you the 21st century galileo?
what is your copernican model? tell us how the field equations
are wrong?

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> Dawn Flood: "solitary cranks" is only a case of ad populum fallacy.

as much as i would like to believe there is a super genius rebel
among us who is decades ahead of his peers, good will is not
hunting here.

predict something that differs from the standard model, confirm
it with experimentation.

Dawn Flood: Both types of skepticism are serious: of alternative ideas
like ghosts and Bigfoot and consensus ideas like curved space and time
dilation. All of these are absurd.

Dawn Flood: You are a petulant child making demands. No one needs to
propose a new theory to criticize the old one.

CORRECTION: Kazu: You are a petulant child making demands. No one needs
to propose a new theory to criticize the old one.

Kazu: Critically criticizing relativity and modern physics doesn't take
a genius. You are unaware of the many excellent books criticizing both.

In sci.physics LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
> Dawn Flood: You are a petulant child making demands. No one needs to
> propose a new theory to criticize the old one.

If they want to be taken seriously and not deemed a crackpot, they most
certainly do.

W dniu 31.10.2024 o 21:50, Jim Pennino pisze:
> In sci.physics LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>> Dawn Flood: You are a petulant child making demands. No one needs to
>> propose a new theory to criticize the old one.
>
> If they want to be taken seriously and not deemed a crackpot, they most
> certainly do.
>
>

- It's not just me and my idiot guru saying!
It's MUONS!!! And EXPERIMENTS!!! And the
overwhelming majority saying!!!!!

- but experiments can't speak and the
overwhelming majority is not even aware
of your idiocies...

- UUUU!!! UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!! UUUUUUUUUU!!!!
PLONK!!!!!

kazu wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > kazu wrote:
> >>
> >> Dawn Flood wrote:
> >>> On 10/30/2024 4:08 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> >>>> Dawn Flood: Starmaker likes to joke around. After all, physics
> >>>> (especially relativity) nowadays is utterly ridiculous.
> >>>
> >>> The newsgroup? Or, the theory? I am assuming the former.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Dawn
> >>
> >> uhh both of them are mad, general relativity is as rock solid as
> >> ever, matching observations of all kinds of esoteric phenomenon
> >> till date. nothing that disagrees with the theory as yet!
> >>
> >> the biggest one recently being the detection of gravity waves.
> >>
> >> people are trying to quantize gravity, but no dice.
> >
> >
> >
> > kazuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
> >
> >
> > How did you come up with that name????
> >
> >
> > it's a girl's name...are you a girl?
> >
>
> its not a girl's name, kazu means number. i am a trader by side
> hustle, i want to get into it full time. but presently i am just
> losing money.

IT'S A GIRLS NAME!!!!

The name Kazu is primarily a female name
https://babynames.com/name/kazu

In other words, most people with the name "kazu" are...girls. GIRLS! It's a chick name!!

How did you come up with that name???? your muther wanted a girl...she shoulda named you Sue. kasueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> wats a Christian Atheists? Is that an atheists who
> don't believe in God but believes in Jesus Christ??
>
> make up your mind..trans.
>
> There are too many atheists here that have
> christian values...yous knows whos yous ares.
>
> damn, alt.atheism is like a church...with different relgions in it.
>
> okay, i'm passing out the collection plate here...
>
> dis is my church now, everybody pays!
>
> I guess a Christian Atheist is a person who don't want to go to hell.

Any Christian Scientists out there?

There are two types of Scientists...one believes in God, the other
doesn't.

How can they both be Scientists????

The minute one of them mentions God...

Science is really a Cosmic Religion.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>
> Dawn Flood: Both types of skepticism are serious: of alternative ideas
> like ghosts and Bigfoot and consensus ideas like curved space and time
> dilation. All of these are absurd.

Albert Einstein realized that his idea of 'time dilation' was incorrect.

Maybe he is in Heaven now saying to everyone..."I meant time dilation... IN A VACUMN!!!!"

All experiments made on 'time dilation' are fraud experiments.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> CORRECTION: Kazu: You are a petulant child making demands. No one
> needs
> to propose a new theory to criticize the old one.

what exactly is your criticism? could you state it concretely? by
default, the criticism would point to an observation, a deviation
from the theory. else if everything aligns with the theory, there
is nothing really being criticized, is there?