On 10/30/2024 11:30 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad...
>> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
>> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-look-
>> into-crowdstrike.html
>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
>>
>> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with Zelenskiy,
>> and Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you blabbering about?"
>>
>> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation of
>> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The "Crowdstrike"
>> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably demolished.
>
> Rudy is now in denial about the very transcripts I posted showing that one one
> of the key element of the call.

No, scooter, it was not a "key element" of the call. It was only very briefly
mentioned, and Zelenskiy made no commitment to undertake an investigation. You
clearly didn't read the *authoritative* news stories I linked above that show
the "Crowdstrike" conspiracy yarn has been thoroughly and irrevocably debunked,
scooter.

You didn't post any "transcripts," scooter. Stop lying. What you did was make
some lie claims *about* "Crowdstrike," but you didn't even *attempt* to support
your lie claims. You just puked them into your post.

In article <Y4xUO.442120$FzW1.440654@fx14.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>
> On 10/30/2024 11:30 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>
> > "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad...
> >> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-look-
> >> into-crowdstrike.html
> >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
> >>
> >> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with Zelenskiy,
> >> and Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you blabbering about?"
> >>
> >> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation of
> >> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The "Crowdstrike"
> >> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably demolished.
> >
> > Rudy is now in denial about the very transcripts I posted showing that one one
> > of the key element of the call.
>
> No, scooter, it was not a "key element" of the call. It was only very briefly
> mentioned, and Zelenskiy made no commitment to undertake an investigation. You
> clearly didn't read the *authoritative* news stories I linked above that show
> the "Crowdstrike" conspiracy yarn has been thoroughly and irrevocably debunked,
> scooter.
>
> You didn't post any "transcripts," scooter. Stop lying. What you did was make
> some lie claims *about* "Crowdstrike," but you didn't even *attempt* to support
> your lie claims. You just puked them into your post.

It all looks pretty shady to me. I am usually right.

[Default] a cowardly incel dwarf typed:

>I pretended not to see any "transcripts," Scout.

Here's a transcript from the last guy's visit to the Jolly Kone

Rudy: "Slurp slurp slurp slurp slurp slurp slurp slurp slurp"

If you're feeling down and out
If you're feeling glum
You should know that I'll be glad
To take it up the bum!
Blow jobs aren't the only thing
I happily provide
I'll lift my skirt to offer you
A hole to cum inside!
Please ignore the sores and pus
I've had a little issue
I'm sure that it'll wipe right off
And I'll give you a tissue!
So meet me at the Jolly Kone!
Two holes and there's no waiting!
You know that I'm the best there is
On that there's no debating!

On 10/30/2024 2:42 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <Y4xUO.442120$FzW1.440654@fx14.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On 10/30/2024 11:30 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>
>>
>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad...
>>>> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
>>>> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-look-
>>>> into-crowdstrike.html
>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
>>>>
>>>> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with Zelenskiy,
>>>> and Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you blabbering about?"
>>>>
>>>> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation of
>>>> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The "Crowdstrike"
>>>> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably demolished.
>>>
>>> Rudy is now in denial about the very transcripts I posted showing that one one
>>> of the key element of the call.
>>
>> No, scooter, it was not a "key element" of the call. It was only very briefly
>> mentioned, and Zelenskiy made no commitment to undertake an investigation. You
>> clearly didn't read the *authoritative* news stories I linked above that show
>> the "Crowdstrike" conspiracy yarn has been thoroughly and irrevocably debunked,
>> scooter.
>>
>> You didn't post any "transcripts," scooter. Stop lying. What you did was make
>> some lie claims *about* "Crowdstrike," but you didn't even *attempt* to support
>> your lie claims. You just puked them into your post.
>
> It all looks pretty shady to me.

It wasn't.

> I am usually right.

You are always wrong.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

On 10/31/2024 6:12 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Y4xUO.442120$FzW1.440654@fx14.iad...
>> On 10/30/2024 11:30 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>
>>
>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad...
>>>> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
>>>> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-look-
>>>> into-crowdstrike.html
>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
>>>>
>>>> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with Zelenskiy,
>>>> and Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you blabbering
>>>> about?"
>>>>
>>>> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation of
>>>> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The "Crowdstrike"
>>>> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably demolished.
>>>
>>> Rudy is now in denial about the very transcripts I posted showing that one
>>> one of the key element of the call.
>>
>> No, scooter, it was not a "key element" of the call.
>
> Well it came up twice

Once, scooter. "Crowdstrike" both as a word and as a topic came up once,
scooter. You got caught lying again, scooter.

> and accounted for at least 30% of the conversation.

Bullshit, scooter. Here is the *full* portion from the /ex post/ transcript,
scooter.

Shitbag felon insurrectionist-in-chief Trump:

I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through
a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what
happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I
guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has
it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think
you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to
have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get
to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a
very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent
performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can
do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.

President Zelenskyy:

Yes it is very important for me and everything that you just mentioned
earlier. For me as a President, it is very important and we are open for any
future cooperation. We are ready to open a new page on cooperation in
relations between the United States and Ukraine. For that. purpose, I just
recalled our ambassador from United States and he will be replaced by a very
competent and very experienced ambassador who will work hard on making sure
that our two nations are getting closer. I would also like and hope to see
him having your trust and your confidence and have personal relations with
you so we can cooperate even more so. I will personally tell you that one of
my assistants spoke with Mr. Giuliani just recently and we are hoping very
much that Mr. Giuliani will be able to travel to Ukraine and we will meet
once he comes to Ukraine. I just wanted to assure you once again that you
have nobody but friends around us. I will make sure that I surround myself
with the best and most experienced people. I also wanted to tell you that we
are friends. We are great friends and you Mr. President have, friends in our
country so we can continue our strategic partnership. I also plan to surround
myself with great people and in addition to that investigation, I guarantee
as the President of Ukraine that all the investigations will be done openly
and candidly. That I can assure you.

I fed the entire transcript into a word counter site, and separate fed the
portion above into it.

Full transcript: 2,457 words 13,750 characters

"Crowdstrike" fragment: 409 words 2,226 characters

Not even close to 30%, scooter. Being the inveterate liar you are, you just
pulled a number out of your gaping asshole.

How do you delude yourself into thinking you can get away with that kind of
bullshit lying, scooter? I'll answer that myself: it's because you *still*
operate under the irrational and objectively false belief that you are masterful
at playing a Usenet trolling game, a game at which you actually *suck*. You
*suck* at it, scooter. You are the exact opposite of masterful at it.

>
> You have the transcript...

Yes. Unlike you, scooter, I actually read it.

> how much was said about this? Looks like a page and a
> half, at least,

Not even, scooter. It's not even one full page, scooter, and everything except
the first sentence of Zelenskyy's wheezy reply to the insurrectionist-in-chief
(and feckless coward and rapist) was simply flattery toward Trump — not exactly
Zelenskyy's finest moment.

On 10/31/2024 6:19 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6722a833$1$1895494$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> In article <Y4xUO.442120$FzW1.440654@fx14.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On 10/30/2024 11:30 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>
>>>
>>> > "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad...
>>> >> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
>>> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-look-
>>> >> into-crowdstrike.html
>>> >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
>>> >>
>>> >> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with >>
>>> Zelenskiy,
>>> >> and Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you >>
>>> blabbering about?"
>>> >>
>>> >> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation of
>>> >> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The "Crowdstrike"
>>> >> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably >> demolished.
>>> >
>>> > Rudy is now in denial about the very transcripts I posted showing that >
>>> one one
>>> > of the key element of the call.
>>>
>>> No, scooter, it was not a "key element" of the call. It was only very briefly
>>> mentioned, and Zelenskiy made no commitment to undertake an investigation. You
>>> clearly didn't read the *authoritative* news stories I linked above that show
>>> the "Crowdstrike" conspiracy yarn has been thoroughly and irrevocably debunked,
>>> scooter.
>>>
>>> You didn't post any "transcripts," scooter. Stop lying. What you did was make
>>> some lie claims *about* "Crowdstrike," but you didn't even *attempt* to support
>>> your lie claims. You just puked them into your post.
>>
>> It all looks pretty shady to me.

It isn't.

>> I am usually right.

Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell is *always* wrong.

>
> Update, I have found that Crowdstrike does indeed provide cybersecurity to our
> electronic elections (ie Dominion).

Undoubtedly a lie, but even if true, so what, scooter? You think there's
something sinister or "shady" about that?

>
> Interesting how all the pieces are going together.

No, scooter.

> they threatened Zilenskiy to
> halt and [sic]

That's another scooterism! It's like "were" and "where." scooter, the drunken
Virginia camper, keeps writing "and" when he means "an," and vice-versa!

> investigation into Crowdstrike,

No, scooter, they did not. There was no "investigation" into Crowdstrike,
scooter. And Zelenskyy wasn't Ukraine's president when Shokin was fired.

> lost it when Trump encouraged the
> investigation to resume (and Democrats attempted an impeachment because of it)

No, scooter. The felon Trump was impeached because he abused his office in
attempting to extort an unwarranted investigation of Joe Biden *purely* for
Trump's private political benefit. That's why he was impeached, scooter, and you
fucking well know it.

> and finally we find that Crowdstrike in involved in the security of our
> electronic voting.

No, we only have your unsupported allegation of that, scooter.

> Was that why they wanted the first prosecutor fired? Is that why they wanted to
> halt any such investigation?

There was no investigation into Crowdstrike going on, scooter.

> What is the DNC attempting to hide

Nothing, scooter. Trump was the one attempting to hide his extortion attempt,
scooter.

By the way, scooter: why are you confused between the Democratic National
Committee, and the Democratic congressional caucuses? It was Democrats in
Congress, *not* the DNC, who impeached the insurrectionist-in-chief and felon
Trump. Seems to me you're working again at being stupid, scooter.

[Default] a diseased incel dwarf typed:

>Yes.

That's what EVERYONE says when I ask, "Are you ready for me to give
you the best blow job in your life?"

If there is a cock to suck
Then Rudy is your guy
He may past retirement age
But still he's pretty spry
He has no trouble getting down
Upon his bony knees
And sucking on your schwanzstucker
With practiced skill and ease
Don't hesitate to get your nut
Into his soft white mouth
'Cuz he's the best no matter where
East, west, north, or south!
So come down to the Jolly Kone
You know he knows the owner!
And let him do his magic
On your incredible stiff boner!

On 10/31/2024 11:25 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> By the way, scooter: why are you confused between the Democratic
> National Committee, and the Democratic congressional caucuses?
> Rudy Canoza <rc.@hendrie.com> posted some news:
>> I like my gay porn just how I like my search history, disabled.
>
> 424 Hartnell Pl, Sacramento CA 95825, (626) 798-1552
>
>
https://www.fastpeoplesearch.com/jonathan-ball_id_G4500493173378555612

On 10/31/2024 11:10 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> flattery toward Trump — not exactly Zelenskyy's finest moment.
> Rudy Canoza <rc.@hendrie.com> posted some news:
>> I like my gay porn just how I like my search history, disabled.
>
> 424 Hartnell Pl, Sacramento CA 95825, (626) 798-1552
>
>
https://www.fastpeoplesearch.com/jonathan-ball_id_G4500493173378555612

On 10/31/2024 4:10 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <YeyUO.105847$S9Vb.97667@fx45.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/30/2024 2:42 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <Y4xUO.442120$FzW1.440654@fx14.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/30/2024 11:30 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad...
>>>>>> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
>>>>>> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-look-
>>>>>> into-crowdstrike.html
>>>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with Zelenskiy,
>>>>>> and Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you blabbering about?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation of
>>>>>> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The "Crowdstrike"
>>>>>> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably demolished.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rudy is now in denial about the very transcripts I posted showing that one one
>>>>> of the key element of the call.
>>>>
>>>> No, scooter, it was not a "key element" of the call. It was only very briefly
>>>> mentioned, and Zelenskiy made no commitment to undertake an investigation. You
>>>> clearly didn't read the *authoritative* news stories I linked above that show
>>>> the "Crowdstrike" conspiracy yarn has been thoroughly and irrevocably debunked,
>>>> scooter.
>>>>
>>>> You didn't post any "transcripts," scooter. Stop lying. What you did was make
>>>> some lie claims *about* "Crowdstrike," but you didn't even *attempt* to support
>>>> your lie claims. You just puked them into your post.
>>>
>>> It all looks pretty shady to me.
>>
>> It wasn't.
>>
>>> I am usually right.
>>
>> You are always wrong.
>
> Nope and

Yes. You are always wrong. You're wrong because a) you're a fucking idiot, and
b) you're a lying shitbag.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing