"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:6722853e$5$3828$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <vftvu4$299g1$2@dont-email.me>,
> me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>>
>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:67227f7c$1$3827$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> > In article <eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
>> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-look-into-crowdstrike.html
>> >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
>> >>
>> >> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with
>> >> Zelenskiy, and
>> >> Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you blabbering
>> >> about?"
>> >>
>> >> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation of
>> >> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The "Crowdstrike"
>> >> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably
>> >> demolished.
>> >
>> > Were you there?
>>
>>
>> Hmmm. Try as I might that seems the only point of interest I can find for
>> Democrats in that transcript.. I mean it was also important enough to use
>> 1
>> Billion dollars of our taxpayer money to bribe them to end the
>> investigation
>> by firing the prosecutor involved.
>>
>> So what would so important that Democrats felt it was worth a Billion
>> dollars to keep hidden???
>>
>>
>
> Tru dat. Rudy still can't answer why a no account prosecutor in another
> country would matter to them.

Or attempt to impeach a present that supports another prosecutor being
appointed to the job.. Trump doesn't even know who the prosecutor would be.
Yet, it had the Democrats reacting in total fear.

On 10/30/2024 12:24 PM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6722853e$5$3828$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> In article <vftvu4$299g1$2@dont-email.me>,
>> me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>>>
>>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:67227f7c$1$3827$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>> > In article <eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>> >>
>>> >> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
>>> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-
>>> look-into-crowdstrike.html
>>> >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
>>> >>
>>> >> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with
>>> >> Zelenskiy, and
>>> >> Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you blabbering
>>> >> about?"
>>> >>
>>> >> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation of
>>> >> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The "Crowdstrike"
>>> >> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably >> demolished.
>>> >
>>> > Were you there?
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm. Try as I might that seems the only point of interest I can find for
>>> Democrats in that transcript.. I mean it was also important enough to use 1
>>> Billion dollars of our taxpayer money to bribe them to end the investigation
>>> by firing the prosecutor involved.
>>>
>>> So what would so important that Democrats felt it was worth a Billion
>>> dollars to keep hidden???
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Tru dat. Rudy still can't answer why a no account prosecutor in another
>> country would matter to them.
>
> Or attempt to impeach a present [sic]

Impeach a what, scooter?

> that supports another prosecutor being appointed
> to the job

Trump never made such a request, scooter. You lied about the transcript of
Trump's extortion call. Trump was not impeached for a /quid pro quo/ attempt
/per se/, scooter. He was impeached because *his* /quid pro quo/ offer was
manifestly corrupt and an abuse of power.

Repeat after me, scooter: /quid pro quo/ is not inherently unethical and
corrupt. Study the examples again, scooter, as you *still* aren't getting it.

Examples of legal and ethical /quid pro quo/

Father to teenage son: "If you mow the lawn, I'll give you $20."

Mother to same son: "If you don't clean up your room, you're not going to
the game."

Examples of illegal and unethical /quid pro quo/

scooter to criminal: "I'll pay you $10,000 to kill my wife."

scooter to subordinate employee: "Suck my cock if you want that promotion
and raise."

Trump to Zelenskyy: "You're not getting the money and weapons unless you
announce a bogus investigation of Joe Biden."

In article <e9xUO.442125$FzW1.96560@fx14.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>
> On 10/30/2024 12:24 PM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
> >
> > "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:6722853e$5$3828$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> >> In article <vftvu4$299g1$2@dont-email.me>,
> >> me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
> >>>
> >>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:67227f7c$1$3827$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> >>> > In article <eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
> >>> >>
> >>> >> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
> >>> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-
> >>> look-into-crowdstrike.html
> >>> >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with
> >>> >> Zelenskiy, and
> >>> >> Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you blabbering
> >>> >> about?"
> >>> >>
> >>> >> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation of
> >>> >> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The "Crowdstrike"
> >>> >> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably >> demolished.
> >>> >
> >>> > Were you there?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hmmm. Try as I might that seems the only point of interest I can find for
> >>> Democrats in that transcript.. I mean it was also important enough to use 1
> >>> Billion dollars of our taxpayer money to bribe them to end the investigation
> >>> by firing the prosecutor involved.
> >>>
> >>> So what would so important that Democrats felt it was worth a Billion
> >>> dollars to keep hidden???
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Tru dat. Rudy still can't answer why a no account prosecutor in another
> >> country would matter to them.
> >
> > Or attempt to impeach a present [sic]
>
> Impeach a what, scooter?
>
> > that supports another prosecutor being appointed
> > to the job
>
> Trump never made such a request, scooter. You lied about the transcript of
> Trump's extortion call. Trump was not impeached for a /quid pro quo/ attempt
> /per se/, scooter. He was impeached because *his* /quid pro quo/ offer was
> manifestly corrupt and an abuse of power.
>
> Repeat after me, scooter: /quid pro quo/ is not inherently unethical and
> corrupt. Study the examples again, scooter, as you *still* aren't getting it.
>
> Examples of legal and ethical /quid pro quo/
>
> Father to teenage son: "If you mow the lawn, I'll give you $20."
>
> Mother to same son: "If you don't clean up your room, you're not going to
> the game."
>
> Examples of illegal and unethical /quid pro quo/
>
> scooter to criminal: "I'll pay you $10,000 to kill my wife."
>
> scooter to subordinate employee: "Suck my cock if you want that promotion
> and raise."
>
> Trump to Zelenskyy: "You're not getting the money and weapons unless you
> announce a bogus investigation of Joe Biden."

Joe bragged about it.

[Default] a frightened incel dwarf typed:

>Examples of legal and ethical /quid pro quo/
>
> Father to teenage son: "If you mow the lawn, I'll give you $20."
>
> Mother to same son: "If you don't clean up your room, you're not going to
>the game."

Rudy to crowd: "IF you let me blow you, you can fuck my ass!

If you're feeling down and out
If you're feeling glum
You should know that I'll be glad
To take it up the bum!
Blow jobs aren't the only thing
I happily provide
I'll lift my skirt to offer you
A hole to cum inside!
Please ignore the sores and pus
I've had a little issue
I'm sure that it'll wipe right off
And I'll give you a tissue!
So meet me at the Jolly Kone!
Two holes and there's no waiting!
You know that I'm the best there is
On that there's no debating!

Rudy Cánoza wrote:
> [Default] a frightened incel dwarf typed:
>
>> Examples of legal and ethical /quid pro quo/
>>
>> Father to teenage son: "If you mow the lawn, I'll give you $20."
>>
>> Mother to same son: "If you don't clean up your room, you're not going to
>> the game."
>
> Rudy to crowd: "IF you let me blow you, you can fuck my ass!
>
> If you're feeling down and out
> If you're feeling glum
> You should know that I'll be glad
> To take it up the bum!
> Blow jobs aren't the only thing
> I happily provide
> I'll lift my skirt to offer you
> A hole to cum inside!
> Please ignore the sores and pus
> I've had a little issue
> I'm sure that it'll wipe right off
> And I'll give you a tissue!
> So meet me at the Jolly Kone!
> Two holes and there's no waiting!
> You know that I'm the best there is
> On that there's no debating!
>
plagerism

On 10/30/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <e9xUO.442125$FzW1.96560@fx14.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On 10/30/2024 12:24 PM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>
>>>
>>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:6722853e$5$3828$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>> In article <vftvu4$299g1$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>> me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:67227f7c$1$3827$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>>>> In article <eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
>>>>>>> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-
>>>>> look-into-crowdstrike.html
>>>>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with
>>>>>>> Zelenskiy, and
>>>>>>> Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you blabbering
>>>>>>> about?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation of
>>>>>>> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The "Crowdstrike"
>>>>>>> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably >> demolished.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Were you there?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm. Try as I might that seems the only point of interest I can find for
>>>>> Democrats in that transcript.. I mean it was also important enough to use 1
>>>>> Billion dollars of our taxpayer money to bribe them to end the investigation
>>>>> by firing the prosecutor involved.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what would so important that Democrats felt it was worth a Billion
>>>>> dollars to keep hidden???
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tru dat. Rudy still can't answer why a no account prosecutor in another
>>>> country would matter to them.
>>>
>>> Or attempt to impeach a present [sic]
>>
>> Impeach a what, scooter?
>>
>>> that supports another prosecutor being appointed
>>> to the job
>>
>> Trump never made such a request, scooter. You lied about the transcript of
>> Trump's extortion call. Trump was not impeached for a /quid pro quo/ attempt
>> /per se/, scooter. He was impeached because *his* /quid pro quo/ offer was
>> manifestly corrupt and an abuse of power.
>>
>> Repeat after me, scooter: /quid pro quo/ is not inherently unethical and
>> corrupt. Study the examples again, scooter, as you *still* aren't getting it.
>>
>> Examples of legal and ethical /quid pro quo/
>>
>> Father to teenage son: "If you mow the lawn, I'll give you $20."
>>
>> Mother to same son: "If you don't clean up your room, you're not going to the game."
>>
>> Examples of illegal and unethical /quid pro quo/
>>
>> scooter to criminal: "I'll pay you $10,000 to kill my wife."
>>
>> scooter to subordinate employee: "Suck my cock if you want that promotion and raise."
>>
>> Trump to Zelenskyy: "You're not getting the money and weapons unless you
>> announce a bogus investigation of Joe Biden."
>
> Joe bragged about it.
That's right, and well he *should* have bragged about it, because it was a great
accomplishment. Joe acted on the official position and wishes of the U.S., the
U.K., France, Germany and the IMF, and he got what they all wanted. It was a job
well done.

Trump's corrupt attempt at a /quid pro quo/ with Ukraine was unconstitutional
and unethical and an abuse of his office, and he should have been removed from
office for it.

In article <ESadncmrqczfNr_6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
>
> Rudy Cánoza wrote:
> > [Default] a frightened incel dwarf typed:
> >
> >> Examples of legal and ethical /quid pro quo/
> >>
> >> Father to teenage son: "If you mow the lawn, I'll give you $20."
> >>
> >> Mother to same son: "If you don't clean up your room, you're not going to
> >> the game."
> >
> > Rudy to crowd: "IF you let me blow you, you can fuck my ass!
> >
> > If you're feeling down and out
> > If you're feeling glum
> > You should know that I'll be glad
> > To take it up the bum!
> > Blow jobs aren't the only thing
> > I happily provide
> > I'll lift my skirt to offer you
> > A hole to cum inside!
> > Please ignore the sores and pus
> > I've had a little issue
> > I'm sure that it'll wipe right off
> > And I'll give you a tissue!
> > So meet me at the Jolly Kone!
> > Two holes and there's no waiting!
> > You know that I'm the best there is
> > On that there's no debating!
> >
> plagerism

and a true classic, how dare he

[Default] a cowardly incel dwarf typed:

======================================
An incel dwarf's
Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
repaired and restored.
======================================

>> Joe bragged about it.
>That's right, and well he *should* have bragged about it, because it was a great
>accomplishment.

Not as big an accomplishment as the number of cocks I went thought
last night at the Jolly Kone Parking Lot!

Bring Your Cock To the Jolly Kone!!!
It's The Central Valley's Fellatio Zone!
If You're On The Left or On The Right
I'll Suck Your Cock and I Won't Bite!
I'll Make You Cum and I'll Make you Moan!
Rudy Canoza Will Make Sure You Get Blown!
On Your Cock My Skills I'll Hone!
My Expertise Is Quite Well Known!
That Talent, You Know, Is Unconcealed!
I've Sucked Every Cock In Bakersfield!
Watch Me Work That Hardened Bone!
I'm Right On Top Of The Skull Fuck Throne™!

In news:y1yUO.37356$9Rk4.7186@fx37.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <katt@gmail.com>
typed:

> On 10/30/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:

>> Joe bragged about it.

> That's right, and well he *should* have bragged about it, because it was a
> great accomplishment. Joe acted on the official position and wishes of the
> U.S., the U.K., France, Germany and the IMF, and he got what they all wanted.
> It was a job well done.

"Just weeks before then-Vice President Joe Biden took the opposite action in
late 2015, a task force of State, Treasury and Justice Department officials
declared that Ukraine had made adequate progress on anti-corruption reforms and
deserved a new $1 billion U.S. loan guarantee, according to government memos
that conflict with the narrative Democrats have sustained since the 2019
impeachment scandal....

"The recommendation is one of several U.S. government memos gathered by Just the
News over the last 36 months from Freedom of Information Act litigation,
congressional inquiries and government agency sources that directly conflict
with the long-held narrative that Biden was conducting official U.S. policy when
he threatened to withhold a $1 billion U.S. loan guarantee to force Ukraine to
fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin, the country's equivalent of the American
attorney general...."

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/hdfeds-urged-biden-give-ukraine-loan-guarantee-he

On 10/31/2024 5:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
>
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e9xUO.442125$FzW1.96560@fx14.iad...
>> On 10/30/2024 12:24 PM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>
>>>
>>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:6722853e$5$3828$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>> In article <vftvu4$299g1$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>> me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:67227f7c$1$3827$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>>> > In article <eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
>>>>> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-
>>>>> look-into-crowdstrike.html
>>>>> >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with
>>>>> >> Zelenskiy, and
>>>>> >> Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you blabbering
>>>>> >> about?"
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation of
>>>>> >> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The >> "Crowdstrike"
>>>>> >> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably >> >>
>>>>> demolished.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Were you there?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm. Try as I might that seems the only point of interest I can find for
>>>>> Democrats in that transcript.. I mean it was also important enough to use 1
>>>>> Billion dollars of our taxpayer money to bribe them to end the investigation
>>>>> by firing the prosecutor involved.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what would so important that Democrats felt it was worth a Billion
>>>>> dollars to keep hidden???
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tru dat. Rudy still can't answer why a no account prosecutor in another
>>>> country would matter to them.
>>>
>>> Or attempt to impeach a present [sic]
>>
>> Impeach a what, scooter?

Well, scooter? What does it mean to impeach a "present"? Isn't a present
something that is given or received?

>>
>>> that supports another prosecutor being appointed to the job
>>
>> Trump never made such a request, scooter. You lied about the transcript of
>> Trump's extortion call.
>
> Well, it's clear Rudy either couldn't read or

No, it's clear that you didn't read it, scooter.

> "The link, which you unethically erased from the thread but which I easily found
> despite your juvenile vandalism:"
>
> https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-
> text-pdf-1510770
>
> What's the matter Rudy.. afraid people might actually find out the TRUTH???
Nothing you say is the truth, scooter. There is exactly one mention of
"Crowdstrike" in the transcript, scooter, and nowhere in the transcript does
Zelenskyy say or hint at reviving an investigation of it. You lied, scooter.

On 10/31/2024 5:30 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
>
> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6722a87a$0$1895503$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> In article <e9xUO.442125$FzW1.96560@fx14.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On 10/30/2024 12:24 PM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:6722853e$5$3828$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>> >> In article <vftvu4$299g1$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> >> me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>> >>> news:67227f7c$1$3827$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>> >>> > In article <eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
>>> >>> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-
>>> >>> look-into-crowdstrike.html
>>> >>> >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with
>>> >>> >> Zelenskiy, and
>>> >>> >> Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you >>> >>
>>> blabbering
>>> >>> >> about?"
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation of
>>> >>> >> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The >>> >>
>>> "Crowdstrike"
>>> >>> >> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably >> >>> >>
>>> demolished.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Were you there?
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hmmm. Try as I might that seems the only point of interest I can find >>>
>>> for
>>> >>> Democrats in that transcript.. I mean it was also important enough to >>>
>>> use 1
>>> >>> Billion dollars of our taxpayer money to bribe them to end the >>>
>>> investigation
>>> >>> by firing the prosecutor involved.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> So what would so important that Democrats felt it was worth a Billion
>>> >>> dollars to keep hidden???
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> Tru dat. Rudy still can't answer why a no account prosecutor in >> another
>>> >> country would matter to them.
>>> >
>>> > Or attempt to impeach a present [sic]
>>>
>>> Impeach a what, scooter?
>>>
>>> > that supports another prosecutor being appointed
>>> > to the job
>>>
>>> Trump never made such a request, scooter. You lied about the transcript of
>>> Trump's extortion call. Trump was not impeached for a /quid pro quo/ attempt
>>> /per se/, scooter. He was impeached because *his* /quid pro quo/ offer was
>>> manifestly corrupt and an abuse of power.
>>>
>>> Repeat after me, scooter: /quid pro quo/ is not inherently unethical and
>>> corrupt. Study the examples again, scooter, as you *still* aren't getting it.
>>>
>>> Examples of legal and ethical /quid pro quo/
>>>
>>>     Father to teenage son: "If you mow the lawn, I'll give you $20."
>>>
>>>     Mother to same son:    "If you don't clean up your room, you're not going to the game."
>>>
>>> Examples of illegal and unethical /quid pro quo/
>>>
>>>     scooter to criminal:   "I'll pay you $10,000 to kill my wife."
>>>
>>>     scooter to subordinate employee: "Suck my cock if you want that promotion
>>> and raise."
>>>
>>>     Trump to Zelenskyy:    "You're not getting the money and weapons unless you
>>>                            announce a bogus investigation of Joe Biden."
>
> Now Rudy is lying about what was said and inventing fake quotes.

No, I'm not lying, scooter, and there are no "fake quotes."

>
> However, it does show Rudy's typical double standard.

No double standard, scooter.

> What is it about Crowdstrike being investigated that fills Democrats with so
> much fear?
It wasn't being investigated, scooter. You lied about that.

On 10/31/2024 6:06 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
>
> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
>
>> In news:y1yUO.37356$9Rk4.7186@fx37.iad, Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch) *wrote* (not "typed"):
>>
>>> On 10/30/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:

>>
>>>> Joe bragged about it.
>>
>>> That's right, and well he *should* have bragged about it, because it was a
>>> great accomplishment. Joe acted on the official position and wishes of the
>>> U.S., the U.K., France, Germany and the IMF, and he got what they all wanted.
>>> It was a job well done.
>>
>> "Just weeks before then-Vice President Joe Biden took the opposite action in
>> late 2015, a task force of State, Treasury and Justice Department officials
>> declared that Ukraine had made adequate progress on anti-corruption reforms
>> and deserved a new $1 billion U.S. loan guarantee, according to government
>> memos that conflict with the narrative Democrats have sustained since the 2019
>> impeachment scandal....
>>
>> "The recommendation is one of several U.S. government memos gathered by Just
>> the News

That's a lie site telling lies, o oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters
at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch). Biden was, of
course, carrying out the wishes and the official position of the U.S.
government, our European allies, and the IMF.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/10/us/politics/joe-biden-ukraine.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/29/business/media/fact-check-biden-ukraine-burisma-china-hunter.html

>
> And max steps in an [sic] napalms Rudy's position.

There's scooter's latest scooterism again: using "an" when he means "and", and
vice-versa. Yesterday:

that Joe's quid pro quo was to stop and [sic] investigation into Crowdstrike.

"and" was supposed to be "an". These are not "typos" — they are scooter's
*routine* fuck-ups.

oozing scarlet red maxipad didn't damage my position at all, scooter.

> Which only begs the question

You misused that expression, scooter. "begs the question" does not mean what you
think it means, scooter. It does not mean "raises a question that needs to be
answered."

Beg the question

Begging the question is a logical fallacy in which an argument’s premises
assume the truth of the conclusion. Arguments that beg the question work to
obscure the actual points in controversy and can be looked at as a form of
circular reasoning.

For example, “Wool sweaters are superior to nylon jackets as fall attire
because wool sweaters have the higher wool content” begs the question because
the argument fails to explain why having the higher wool content makes a
garment superior.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/beg_the_question

scooter is stupid and illiterate.

[Default] a diseased incel dwarf typed:

>No, I'm not lying, scooter, and there are no "fake quotes."

It's no lie to claim I give the best blow jobs!

If there is a cock to suck
Then Rudy is your guy
He may past retirement age
But still he's pretty spry
He has no trouble getting down
Upon his bony knees
And sucking on your schwanzstucker
With practiced skill and ease
Don't hesitate to get your nut
Into his soft white mouth
'Cuz he's the best no matter where
East, west, north, or south!
So come down to the Jolly Kone
You know he knows the owner!
And let him do his magic
On your incredible stiff boner!

In news:NdRUO.257141$WXO8.254393@fx13.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <katt@gmail.com>
typed:

> On 10/31/2024 6:06 AM, Scout, the intellectual, moral, professional, social,
> literary and physical superior to "Cunt Flaps", typed:
>> On every date, Max the Magnificent typed:
>>> In news:y1yUO.37356$9Rk4.7186@fx37.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza"typed:
>>>> On 10/30/2024 2:43 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>> content-free batch of lies:

>>>>> Joe bragged about it.

>>>> That's right, and well he *should* have bragged about it, because it was a
>>>> great accomplishment. Joe acted on the official position and wishes of the
>>>> U.S., the U.K., France, Germany and the IMF, and he got what they all
>>>> wanted. It was a job well done.

>>> "Just weeks before then-Vice President Joe Biden took the opposite action in
>>> late 2015, a task force of State, Treasury and Justice Department officials
>>> declared that Ukraine had made adequate progress on anti-corruption reforms
>>> and deserved a new $1 billion U.S. loan guarantee, according to government
>>> memos that conflict with the narrative Democrats have sustained since the
>>> 2019 impeachment scandal....

>>> "The recommendation is one of several U.S. government memos gathered by Just
>>> the News over the last 36 months from Freedom of Information Act litigation,
>>> congressional inquiries and government agency sources that directly conflict
>>> with the long-held narrative that Biden was conducting official U.S. policy
>>> when he threatened to withhold a $1 billion U.S. loan guarantee to force
>>> Ukraine to fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin, the country's equivalent
>>> of the American attorney general...."

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/hdfeds-urged-biden-give-ukraine-loan-guarantee-he

> That's a lie site telling lies. Biden was, of course, carrying out the wishes
> and the official position of the U.S.government, our European allies, and the
> IMF.

> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/10/us/politics/joe-biden-ukraine.html
> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/29/business/media/fact-check-biden-ukraine-burisma-china-hunter.html

" ... directly conflict with the long-held narrative that Biden was conducting
official U.S. policy ..."

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2023-08/UkraineTaskForceLoanGuaranteeMemo.pdf

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:mdQUO.750796$_o_3.354455@fx17.iad...
> On 10/31/2024 5:30 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>>
>>
>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:6722a87a$0$1895503$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>> In article <e9xUO.442125$FzW1.96560@fx14.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/30/2024 12:24 PM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
>>>> gutless
>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> > news:6722853e$5$3828$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>> >> In article <vftvu4$299g1$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>> >> me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> >>> news:67227f7c$1$3827$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>> >>> > In article <eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad>, katt@gmail.com
>>>> >>> > says...
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
>>>> >>> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-
>>>> >>> look-into-crowdstrike.html
>>>> >>> >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with
>>>> >>> >> Zelenskiy, and
>>>> >>> >> Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you >>> >>
>>>> blabbering
>>>> >>> >> about?"
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation
>>>> >>> >> of
>>>> >>> >> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The >>> >>
>>>> "Crowdstrike"
>>>> >>> >> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably >>
>>>> >>> >> >>> >>
>>>> demolished.
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > Were you there?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hmmm. Try as I might that seems the only point of interest I can
>>>> >>> find >>>
>>>> for
>>>> >>> Democrats in that transcript.. I mean it was also important enough
>>>> >>> to >>>
>>>> use 1
>>>> >>> Billion dollars of our taxpayer money to bribe them to end the >>>
>>>> investigation
>>>> >>> by firing the prosecutor involved.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> So what would so important that Democrats felt it was worth a
>>>> >>> Billion
>>>> >>> dollars to keep hidden???
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Tru dat. Rudy still can't answer why a no account prosecutor in >>
>>>> >> another
>>>> >> country would matter to them.
>>>> >
>>>> > Or attempt to impeach a present [sic]
>>>>
>>>> Impeach a what, scooter?
>>>>
>>>> > that supports another prosecutor being appointed
>>>> > to the job
>>>>
>>>> Trump never made such a request, scooter. You lied about the transcript
>>>> of
>>>> Trump's extortion call. Trump was not impeached for a /quid pro quo/
>>>> attempt
>>>> /per se/, scooter. He was impeached because *his* /quid pro quo/ offer
>>>> was
>>>> manifestly corrupt and an abuse of power.
>>>>
>>>> Repeat after me, scooter: /quid pro quo/ is not inherently unethical
>>>> and
>>>> corrupt. Study the examples again, scooter, as you *still* aren't
>>>> getting it.
>>>>
>>>> Examples of legal and ethical /quid pro quo/
>>>>
>>>> Father to teenage son: "If you mow the lawn, I'll give you $20."
>>>>
>>>> Mother to same son: "If you don't clean up your room, you're not
>>>> going to the game."
>>>>
>>>> Examples of illegal and unethical /quid pro quo/
>>>>
>>>> scooter to criminal: "I'll pay you $10,000 to kill my wife."
>>>>
>>>> scooter to subordinate employee: "Suck my cock if you want that
>>>> promotion
>>>> and raise."
>>>>
>>>> Trump to Zelenskyy: "You're not getting the money and weapons
>>>> unless you
>>>> announce a bogus investigation of Joe
>>>> Biden."
>>
>> Now Rudy is lying about what was said and inventing fake quotes.
>
> No, I'm not lying, scooter, and there are no "fake quotes."

Ok, on what page of the transcript are you claiming this was said?

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770

Meanwhile the audience will note Rudy is lying his ass off..

On 11/1/2024 8:25 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
>
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:mdQUO.750796$_o_3.354455@fx17.iad...
>> On 10/31/2024 5:30 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:6722a87a$0$1895503$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>> In article <e9xUO.442125$FzW1.96560@fx14.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/30/2024 12:24 PM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> > news:6722853e$5$3828$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>>> >> In article <vftvu4$299g1$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> >> me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> >>> news:67227f7c$1$3827$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>>> >>> > In article <eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad>, katt@gmail.com >>> >
>>>>> says...
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
>>>>> >>> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-
>>>>> >>> look-into-crowdstrike.html
>>>>> >>> >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call with
>>>>> >>> >> Zelenskiy, and
>>>>> >>> >> Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you >>> >>
>>>>> blabbering
>>>>> >>> >> about?"
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an investigation >>>
>>>>> >> of
>>>>> >>> >> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The >>> >>
>>>>> "Crowdstrike"
>>>>> >>> >> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably >> >>>
>>>>> >>  >>> >>
>>>>> demolished.
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> > Were you there?
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Hmmm. Try as I might that seems the only point of interest I can >>>
>>>>> find >>>
>>>>> for
>>>>> >>> Democrats in that transcript.. I mean it was also important enough >>>
>>>>> to >>>
>>>>> use 1
>>>>> >>> Billion dollars of our taxpayer money to bribe them to end the >>>
>>>>> investigation
>>>>> >>> by firing the prosecutor involved.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> So what would so important that Democrats felt it was worth a >>> Billion
>>>>> >>> dollars to keep hidden???
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Tru dat. Rudy still can't answer why a no account prosecutor in >> >>
>>>>> another
>>>>> >> country would matter to them.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Or attempt to impeach a present [sic]
>>>>>
>>>>> Impeach a what, scooter?
>>>>>
>>>>> > that supports another prosecutor being appointed
>>>>> > to the job
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump never made such a request, scooter. You lied about the transcript of
>>>>> Trump's extortion call. Trump was not impeached for a /quid pro quo/ attempt
>>>>> /per se/, scooter. He was impeached because *his* /quid pro quo/ offer was
>>>>> manifestly corrupt and an abuse of power.
>>>>>
>>>>> Repeat after me, scooter: /quid pro quo/ is not inherently unethical and
>>>>> corrupt. Study the examples again, scooter, as you *still* aren't getting it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Examples of legal and ethical /quid pro quo/
>>>>>
>>>>>     Father to teenage son: "If you mow the lawn, I'll give you $20."
>>>>>
>>>>>     Mother to same son:    "If you don't clean up your room, you're not
>>>>> going to the game."
>>>>>
>>>>> Examples of illegal and unethical /quid pro quo/
>>>>>
>>>>>     scooter to criminal:   "I'll pay you $10,000 to kill my wife."
>>>>>
>>>>>     scooter to subordinate employee: "Suck my cock if you want that promotion
>>>>>     and raise."
>>>>>
>>>>>     Trump to Zelenskyy:    "You're not getting the money and weapons unless
>>>>> you
>>>>>                            announce a bogus investigation of Joe Biden."
>>>
>>> Now Rudy is lying about what was said and inventing fake quotes.
>>
>> No, I'm not lying, scooter, and there are no "fake quotes."
>
>
> Ok, on what page of the transcript are you claiming this was said?

On what page am I claiming *what* was said, scooter? If you are shrilly and
bitchily demanding that I identify on what page of the transcript something was
said, don't you think you should identify the "something"?

Yet further proof that scooter is *not* a masterful Usenet troll — he *sucks* at it.

[Default] The Gay Gaucho typed:

>> Ok, on what page of the transcript are you claiming this was said?
>
>On what page am I claiming *what* was said, Scout?

That seems like a pretty simple question, even for the Gay Gaucho!

LOL

In the Parking Lot of the Jolly Kone
Is where I’ll suck on your hard bone
Fellatio done with your consent
It won’t cost you one red cent
I gobble cock all day for free!
Why, you can even sodomize me!
I’ll make you scream like a banshee
‘Cause cock-sucking is my specialty!
You’ll find me there 'most every night
And don’t you worry- I won’t bite!
Feeling horny? Got lots of stress?
Look for the dwarf that’s wearing a dress!

©2024 Rudy Canoza Cock Sucking Services

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Sb9VO.19951$tnK2.18475@fx04.iad...
> On 11/1/2024 8:25 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>>
>>
>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:mdQUO.750796$_o_3.354455@fx17.iad...
>>> On 10/31/2024 5:30 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:6722a87a$0$1895503$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>>> In article <e9xUO.442125$FzW1.96560@fx14.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/30/2024 12:24 PM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
>>>>>> gutless
>>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> > news:6722853e$5$3828$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>>>> >> In article <vftvu4$299g1$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> >> me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> >>> news:67227f7c$1$3827$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>>>> >>> > In article <eCuUO.15972$Vuz4.1651@fx08.iad>, katt@gmail.com >>>
>>>>>> >>> > >
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>> >>> >> https://apnews.com/article/aa1f66a1770d4995a6bada960a7d119e
>>>>>> >>> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/why-trump-asked-ukraines-president-to-
>>>>>> >>> look-into-crowdstrike.html
>>>>>> >>> >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/tech/what-is-crowdstrike/index.html
>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>> >>> >> Trump barely touched on "Crowdstrike" in his extortion call
>>>>>> >>> >> with
>>>>>> >>> >> Zelenskiy, and
>>>>>> >>> >> Zelenskiy's reaction basically was "what the fuck are you >>>
>>>>>> >>> >> >>
>>>>>> blabbering
>>>>>> >>> >> about?"
>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>> >>> >> No Ukrainian prosecutor was about to "pick up" an
>>>>>> >>> >> investigation >>>
>>>>>> >> of
>>>>>> >>> >> "Crowdstrike," because there was nothing to pick up. The >>>
>>>>>> >>> >> >>
>>>>>> "Crowdstrike"
>>>>>> >>> >> conspiracy bullshit had already been fully and irretrievably
>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>> >>
>>>>>> demolished.
>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>> >>> > Were you there?
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Hmmm. Try as I might that seems the only point of interest I can
>>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>>> find >>>
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> >>> Democrats in that transcript.. I mean it was also important
>>>>>> >>> enough >>>
>>>>>> to >>>
>>>>>> use 1
>>>>>> >>> Billion dollars of our taxpayer money to bribe them to end the
>>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>>> investigation
>>>>>> >>> by firing the prosecutor involved.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> So what would so important that Democrats felt it was worth a >>>
>>>>>> >>> Billion
>>>>>> >>> dollars to keep hidden???
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Tru dat. Rudy still can't answer why a no account prosecutor in >>
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> another
>>>>>> >> country would matter to them.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Or attempt to impeach a present [sic]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Impeach a what, scooter?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > that supports another prosecutor being appointed
>>>>>> > to the job
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump never made such a request, scooter. You lied about the
>>>>>> transcript of
>>>>>> Trump's extortion call. Trump was not impeached for a /quid pro quo/
>>>>>> attempt
>>>>>> /per se/, scooter. He was impeached because *his* /quid pro quo/
>>>>>> offer was
>>>>>> manifestly corrupt and an abuse of power.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Repeat after me, scooter: /quid pro quo/ is not inherently unethical
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> corrupt. Study the examples again, scooter, as you *still* aren't
>>>>>> getting it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Examples of legal and ethical /quid pro quo/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Father to teenage son: "If you mow the lawn, I'll give you $20."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mother to same son: "If you don't clean up your room, you're
>>>>>> not going to the game."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Examples of illegal and unethical /quid pro quo/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> scooter to criminal: "I'll pay you $10,000 to kill my wife."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> scooter to subordinate employee: "Suck my cock if you want that
>>>>>> promotion
>>>>>> and raise."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump to Zelenskyy: "You're not getting the money and weapons
>>>>>> unless you
>>>>>> announce a bogus investigation of Joe
>>>>>> Biden."
>>>>
>>>> Now Rudy is lying about what was said and inventing fake quotes.
>>>
>>> No, I'm not lying, scooter, and there are no "fake quotes."
>>
>>
>> Ok, on what page of the transcript are you claiming this was said?
>
> On what page am I claiming *what* was said, scooter?

Rudy, tries to play dumb, but only sounds like his normal ignorance.

? If you are shrilly and
> bitchily demanding that I identify on what page of the transcript
> something was said, don't you think you should identify the "something"?

Asking you to back up your bullshit certainly is silly since we all know you
neither will.... nor can.

"Rudy Cánoza" <little-Rudolph@incel-dwarf.com> wrote in message
news:7dcaij9eoidjmi0t57a3a6mh3d3k8qj7oj@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> [Default] The Gay Gaucho typed:
>
>
>>> Ok, on what page of the transcript are you claiming this was said?
>>
>>On what page am I claiming *what* was said, Scout?
>
> That seems like a pretty simple question, even for the Gay Gaucho!

Which is why Rudy won't or can't answer it.

Because what he claimed isn't supported by what he asserts is his source.