"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:vfhbgb$3d2c1$1@dont-email.me:

> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
> news:XnsB21583875F590629555@185.151.15.160...
>>
>>Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>news:671a5878$7$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Just like when they say it costs to much to deport. Remove the red
>>> tape and send the fuckers home. Pretty simple.
>>
>>
>> By "red tape" you mean the Constitution.
>>
>>
>>
>>"The Due Process Clause applies to all persons within the
>>United States, including aliens, whether their presence is
>>lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent."
>>The US Supreme Court, Zadvydas v. Davis (2001)
>><http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/99-7791.html>
>>
>
> If someone invaded your house would you wait for due process?
>
>

"nor shall any State deprive any person
(not citizen. PERSON) of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law; nor
deny to any person within its jurisdiction
the equal protection of the laws."
14th Amendment.

"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
news:XnsB216D1DF39B629555@185.151.15.160...
>
>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>news:vfh25g$3bdui$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> "Scout" wrote in message news:vfg9qv$37bp4$4@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in message
>>>news:vfeni8$2rig0$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>>>> news:XnsB21483D3AA2DA629555@185.151.15.190...
>>>>>
>>>>>"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>news:vfb0tj$22men$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>>>> <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:ufufhjdm4lrdsnhimji4kengs0if4b8p9i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>> cksu cking.dwarf.com...
>>>>>>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con>
>>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
>>>>>>>>Shit-4-Braincell back
>>>>>>>>when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having posted as
>>>>>>>>"Lamey," but
>>>>>>>>he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a fucking
>>>>>>>>loser.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>> <js@phendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> This is absolutely true. Research shows that the more new
>>>>>>>>>>> prisons there are,
>>>>>>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and
>>>>>>>>>>> longer the sentences.
>>>>>>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions. The
>>>>>>>>>>> more prisons and
>>>>>>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> More support:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-criminal-j
>>>>>>>>>> usti
>>>>>>>>>> ce-reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lie site not read
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another
>>>>>>>>>> gimmick to fill up the
>>>>>>>>>> prisons.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The relevant facts follow. On March 16, 1978, the Link Belt
>>>>>>> Credit Union in Marion County, Indiana was robbed. Men took money
>>>>>>> and blank credit union checks at gunpoint from Martha Watts, a
>>>>>>> Link Belt Credit Union employee. On March 27, 1978, Richardson
>>>>>>> was arrested for forgery when he attempted to cash one of the
>>>>>>> checks stolen from the Link Belt Credit Union at another bank.See
>>>>>>> footnote On May 5, 1978, Richardson was arrested in Kentucky on
>>>>>>> unrelated controlled substances and stolen property charges.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Career criminal. Life without parole is most deserved, "Cunt
>>>>>>> Flaps."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would suggest that once someone gets life without parole, they
>>>>>> clearly are a waste of resources and an on-going threat. Jail
>>>>>> servers no purpose at that point since they will never be
>>>>>> rehabilitated. I suggest that once the appeals and such have run
>>>>>> their course they be executed. No, not by some official and
>>>>>> expensive process, but rather some sedatives and a time delay fast
>>>>>> acting poison. They have dinner, go to sleep and simply never wake
>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At which point we no longer have to pay to house, feed, cloth and
>>>>>> otherwise support this burden on society.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> All death sentences are more expensive
>>>>>than incarceration costs. But since you want
>>>>>these executions you don't mind paying for
>>>>>them, no?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Who's creating the paradigm of criminals in the first place?
>>>
>>>Well, one could claim the law does, but without the law everything
>>>would be legal and your life wouldn't be worth anything.
>>>
>>
>> Correct answer: Corrupt governments and corporation create criminality
>> by making life and survival very difficult for people so many people
>> turn to crime just to survive.
>> Also the television and video games have been promoting violence for
>> decades.
>>
>>
>
>
> Funny that the most videogame saturated
>country in the world - Japan - is also one
>of the safest. Do explain.
>

Do they play many violent v.games?
Does their gov. let things get out of control?
Do their parents care little and let their kids do crazy things?

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

In article <XnsB216D28FED905629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:vfhbgb$3d2c1$1@dont-email.me:
>
> > "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
> > news:XnsB21583875F590629555@185.151.15.160...
> >>
> >>Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> >>news:671a5878$7$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Just like when they say it costs to much to deport. Remove the red
> >>> tape and send the fuckers home. Pretty simple.
> >>
> >>
> >> By "red tape" you mean the Constitution.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>"The Due Process Clause applies to all persons within the
> >>United States, including aliens, whether their presence is
> >>lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent."
> >>The US Supreme Court, Zadvydas v. Davis (2001)
> >><http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/99-7791.html>
> >>
> >
> > If someone invaded your house would you wait for due process?
> >
> >
>
> "nor shall any State deprive any person
> (not citizen. PERSON) of life, liberty, or
> property, without due process of law; nor
> deny to any person within its jurisdiction
> the equal protection of the laws."
> 14th Amendment.

Just answer the question.

Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> And wouldn't you just know it? Richardson is a black man, and he was
> given a 60 year no-parole no-probation sentence in shithole Louisiana.
> And yes, a huge majority of such sentences are imposed on black men in
> red shithole states.
>
>
https://postimg.cc/GTL6LV6D

"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:vfhtl8$3jalj$1@dont-
email.me:

> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
> news:XnsB216D1DF39B629555@185.151.15.160...
>>
>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>news:vfh25g$3bdui$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> "Scout" wrote in message news:vfg9qv$37bp4$4@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:vfeni8$2rig0$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>>>>> news:XnsB21483D3AA2DA629555@185.151.15.190...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>>news:vfb0tj$22men$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>>>>> <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>
news:ufufhjdm4lrdsnhimji4kengs0if4b8p9i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>> cksu cking.dwarf.com...
>>>>>>>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con>
>>>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
>>>>>>>>>Shit-4-Braincell back
>>>>>>>>>when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having posted
as
>>>>>>>>>"Lamey," but
>>>>>>>>>he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a fucking
>>>>>>>>>loser.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>> <js@phendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is absolutely true. Research shows that the more new
>>>>>>>>>>>> prisons there are,
>>>>>>>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and
>>>>>>>>>>>> longer the sentences.
>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions. The
>>>>>>>>>>>> more prisons and
>>>>>>>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> More support:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-
criminal-j
>>>>>>>>>>> usti
>>>>>>>>>>> ce-reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lie site not read
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another
>>>>>>>>>>> gimmick to fill up the
>>>>>>>>>>> prisons.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply
wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The relevant facts follow. On March 16, 1978, the Link Belt
>>>>>>>> Credit Union in Marion County, Indiana was robbed. Men took
money
>>>>>>>> and blank credit union checks at gunpoint from Martha Watts, a
>>>>>>>> Link Belt Credit Union employee. On March 27, 1978, Richardson
>>>>>>>> was arrested for forgery when he attempted to cash one of the
>>>>>>>> checks stolen from the Link Belt Credit Union at another
bank.See
>>>>>>>> footnote On May 5, 1978, Richardson was arrested in Kentucky on
>>>>>>>> unrelated controlled substances and stolen property charges.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Career criminal. Life without parole is most deserved, "Cunt
>>>>>>>> Flaps."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would suggest that once someone gets life without parole, they
>>>>>>> clearly are a waste of resources and an on-going threat. Jail
>>>>>>> servers no purpose at that point since they will never be
>>>>>>> rehabilitated. I suggest that once the appeals and such have run
>>>>>>> their course they be executed. No, not by some official and
>>>>>>> expensive process, but rather some sedatives and a time delay
fast
>>>>>>> acting poison. They have dinner, go to sleep and simply never
wake
>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At which point we no longer have to pay to house, feed, cloth and
>>>>>>> otherwise support this burden on society.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All death sentences are more expensive
>>>>>>than incarceration costs. But since you want
>>>>>>these executions you don't mind paying for
>>>>>>them, no?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Who's creating the paradigm of criminals in the first place?
>>>>
>>>>Well, one could claim the law does, but without the law everything
>>>>would be legal and your life wouldn't be worth anything.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Correct answer: Corrupt governments and corporation create
criminality
>>> by making life and survival very difficult for people so many people
>>> turn to crime just to survive.
>>> Also the television and video games have been promoting violence for
>>> decades.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Funny that the most videogame saturated
>>country in the world - Japan - is also one
>>of the safest. Do explain.
>>
>
> Do they play many violent v.games?

Of course.

> Does their gov. let things get out of control?

Who do you think invented playstations
and X boxes?

> Do their parents care little and let their kids do crazy things?
>

Just tell us what video games
have to do with violence in people.

Michael A Terrell wrote:
> <*CRICKETS*>
>
<*Crotch crickets*>

On 10/26/2024 5:30 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> And wouldn't you just know it? Richardson is a black man, and he was
>> given a 60 year no-parole no-probation sentence in shithole Louisiana.
>> And yes, a huge majority of such sentences are imposed on black men in
>> red shithole states.
> >
> >
> https://postimg.cc/GTL6LV6D

HA!

On 10/26/2024 5:57 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:vfhtl8$3jalj$1@dont-
> email.me:
>
>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>> news:XnsB216D1DF39B629555@185.151.15.160...
>>>
>>> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>> news:vfh25g$3bdui$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> "Scout" wrote in message news:vfg9qv$37bp4$4@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:vfeni8$2rig0$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:XnsB21483D3AA2DA629555@185.151.15.190...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:vfb0tj$22men$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>>>>>> <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
> news:ufufhjdm4lrdsnhimji4kengs0if4b8p9i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>>> cksu cking.dwarf.com...
>>>>>>>>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
>>>>>>>>>> Shit-4-Braincell back
>>>>>>>>>> when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having posted
> as
>>>>>>>>>> "Lamey," but
>>>>>>>>>> he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a fucking
>>>>>>>>>> loser.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>>> <js@phendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is absolutely true. Research shows that the more new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisons there are,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> longer the sentences.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>> more prisons and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> More support:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-
> criminal-j
>>>>>>>>>>>> usti
>>>>>>>>>>>> ce-reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lie site not read
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another
>>>>>>>>>>>> gimmick to fill up the
>>>>>>>>>>>> prisons.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply
> wrong.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The relevant facts follow. On March 16, 1978, the Link Belt
>>>>>>>>> Credit Union in Marion County, Indiana was robbed. Men took
> money
>>>>>>>>> and blank credit union checks at gunpoint from Martha Watts, a
>>>>>>>>> Link Belt Credit Union employee. On March 27, 1978, Richardson
>>>>>>>>> was arrested for forgery when he attempted to cash one of the
>>>>>>>>> checks stolen from the Link Belt Credit Union at another
> bank.See
>>>>>>>>> footnote On May 5, 1978, Richardson was arrested in Kentucky on
>>>>>>>>> unrelated controlled substances and stolen property charges.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Career criminal. Life without parole is most deserved, "Cunt
>>>>>>>>> Flaps."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would suggest that once someone gets life without parole, they
>>>>>>>> clearly are a waste of resources and an on-going threat. Jail
>>>>>>>> servers no purpose at that point since they will never be
>>>>>>>> rehabilitated. I suggest that once the appeals and such have run
>>>>>>>> their course they be executed. No, not by some official and
>>>>>>>> expensive process, but rather some sedatives and a time delay
> fast
>>>>>>>> acting poison. They have dinner, go to sleep and simply never
> wake
>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At which point we no longer have to pay to house, feed, cloth and
>>>>>>>> otherwise support this burden on society.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All death sentences are more expensive
>>>>>>> than incarceration costs. But since you want
>>>>>>> these executions you don't mind paying for
>>>>>>> them, no?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who's creating the paradigm of criminals in the first place?
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, one could claim the law does, but without the law everything
>>>>> would be legal and your life wouldn't be worth anything.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Correct answer: Corrupt governments and corporation create
> criminality
>>>> by making life and survival very difficult for people so many people
>>>> turn to crime just to survive.
>>>> Also the television and video games have been promoting violence for
>>>> decades.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Funny that the most videogame saturated
>>> country in the world - Japan - is also one
>>> of the safest. Do explain.
>>>
>>
>> Do they play many violent v.games?
>
>
>
> Of course.
>
>
>> Does their gov. let things get out of control?
>
>
> Who do you think invented playstations
> and X boxes?
>
>
>> Do their parents care little and let their kids do crazy things?
>>
>
> Just tell us what video games
> have to do with violence in people.

They teach children and susceptible "adults" that mass murder is okay
and life of any sort has no value. See also Democrat abortion demands.

"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
news:XnsB217506D8E22C629555@185.151.15.190...
>
>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:vfhtl8$3jalj$1@dont-
>email.me:
>
>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>> news:XnsB216D1DF39B629555@185.151.15.160...
>>>
>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>>news:vfh25g$3bdui$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> "Scout" wrote in message news:vfg9qv$37bp4$4@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:vfeni8$2rig0$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:XnsB21483D3AA2DA629555@185.151.15.190...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>news:vfb0tj$22men$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>>>>>> <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
>news:ufufhjdm4lrdsnhimji4kengs0if4b8p9i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>>> cksu cking.dwarf.com...
>>>>>>>>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
>>>>>>>>>>Shit-4-Braincell back
>>>>>>>>>>when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having posted
>as
>>>>>>>>>>"Lamey," but
>>>>>>>>>>he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a fucking
>>>>>>>>>>loser.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>>> <js@phendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is absolutely true. Research shows that the more new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisons there are,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> longer the sentences.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>> more prisons and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> More support:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-
>criminal-j
>>>>>>>>>>>> usti
>>>>>>>>>>>> ce-reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lie site not read
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another
>>>>>>>>>>>> gimmick to fill up the
>>>>>>>>>>>> prisons.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply
>wrong.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The relevant facts follow. On March 16, 1978, the Link Belt
>>>>>>>>> Credit Union in Marion County, Indiana was robbed. Men took
>money
>>>>>>>>> and blank credit union checks at gunpoint from Martha Watts, a
>>>>>>>>> Link Belt Credit Union employee. On March 27, 1978, Richardson
>>>>>>>>> was arrested for forgery when he attempted to cash one of the
>>>>>>>>> checks stolen from the Link Belt Credit Union at another
>bank.See
>>>>>>>>> footnote On May 5, 1978, Richardson was arrested in Kentucky on
>>>>>>>>> unrelated controlled substances and stolen property charges.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Career criminal. Life without parole is most deserved, "Cunt
>>>>>>>>> Flaps."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would suggest that once someone gets life without parole, they
>>>>>>>> clearly are a waste of resources and an on-going threat. Jail
>>>>>>>> servers no purpose at that point since they will never be
>>>>>>>> rehabilitated. I suggest that once the appeals and such have run
>>>>>>>> their course they be executed. No, not by some official and
>>>>>>>> expensive process, but rather some sedatives and a time delay
>fast
>>>>>>>> acting poison. They have dinner, go to sleep and simply never
>wake
>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At which point we no longer have to pay to house, feed, cloth and
>>>>>>>> otherwise support this burden on society.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All death sentences are more expensive
>>>>>>>than incarceration costs. But since you want
>>>>>>>these executions you don't mind paying for
>>>>>>>them, no?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who's creating the paradigm of criminals in the first place?
>>>>>
>>>>>Well, one could claim the law does, but without the law everything
>>>>>would be legal and your life wouldn't be worth anything.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Correct answer: Corrupt governments and corporation create
>criminality
>>>> by making life and survival very difficult for people so many people
>>>> turn to crime just to survive.
>>>> Also the television and video games have been promoting violence for
>>>> decades.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Funny that the most videogame saturated
>>>country in the world - Japan - is also one
>>>of the safest. Do explain.
>>>
>>
>> Do they play many violent v.games?
>
>
>
> Of course.
>
>
>> Does their gov. let things get out of control?
>
>
> Who do you think invented playstations
>and X boxes?
>

Irrelevant

>
>> Do their parents care little and let their kids do crazy things?
>>
>
> Just tell us what video games
>have to do with violence in people.
>

Many young people are impressionable and rebellious and will follow crazy
and bad trends and attitudes.

But look at Japanese culture. It's very different and focuses on values and
discipline. Your comparison is moot.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

On 10/25/2024 2:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <vfh1kc$3b902$1@dont-email.me>, OFeem1987@teleworm.us says...
>>
>> Mitchell Holman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>> news:vfg9qu$37bp4$2@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>> Of course, if we make it very hard to enter.. then no due process is
>>>> needed.
>>>>
>>>> Built the wall.
>>>
>>> We built the wall.
>>> Trump said so.
>>> Why isn't it working?
>>>
>>> "I did finish the wall. I built a wall,"
>>> Donald Trump, May 9 2003
>>> https://tinyurl.com/mrxxdw6t
>>
>> Trump says a lot of things. Mostly lies, whines, and Hitleresque rantings.
>
> No he doesn't.

He does — all the fucking time.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

On 10/26/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <X_fTO.248132$WXO8.3556@fx13.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/25/2024 2:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <vfh1kc$3b902$1@dont-email.me>, OFeem1987@teleworm.us says...
>>>>
>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>
>>>>> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:vfg9qu$37bp4$2@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, if we make it very hard to enter.. then no due process is
>>>>>> needed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Built the wall.
>>>>>
>>>>> We built the wall.
>>>>> Trump said so.
>>>>> Why isn't it working?
>>>>>
>>>>> "I did finish the wall. I built a wall,"
>>>>> Donald Trump, May 9 2003
>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/mrxxdw6t
>>>>
>>>> Trump says a lot of things. Mostly lies, whines, and Hitleresque rantings.
>>>
>>> No he doesn't.
>>
>> He does ? all the fucking time.
>
> Nope.

Yep. You don't watch, and you wouldn't know what to watch for anyway. I do.

Trump says lies, whines, and Hitleresque rantings all the time. It's settled.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

Bradley <bradley@ha-ha-lasvegasraiders.com> wrote in news:vfjl70$2dqhg$2
@news.mixmin.net:

> On 10/26/2024 5:57 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:vfhtl8$3jalj$1@dont-
>> email.me:
>>
>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>>> news:XnsB216D1DF39B629555@185.151.15.160...
>>>>
>>>> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>>> news:vfh25g$3bdui$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>> "Scout" wrote in message news:vfg9qv$37bp4$4@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:vfeni8$2rig0$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:XnsB21483D3AA2DA629555@185.151.15.190...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:vfb0tj$22men$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>>>>>>> <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>
>> news:ufufhjdm4lrdsnhimji4kengs0if4b8p9i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>>>> cksu cking.dwarf.com...
>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
>>>>>>>>>>> Shit-4-Braincell back
>>>>>>>>>>> when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having
posted
>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> "Lamey," but
>>>>>>>>>>> he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a
fucking
>>>>>>>>>>> loser.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>>>> <js@phendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is absolutely true. Research shows that the more new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisons there are,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> longer the sentences.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions.
The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more prisons and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> More support:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-
>> criminal-j
>>>>>>>>>>>>> usti
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ce-reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lie site not read
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gimmick to fill up the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisons.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply
>> wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The relevant facts follow. On March 16, 1978, the Link Belt
>>>>>>>>>> Credit Union in Marion County, Indiana was robbed. Men took
>> money
>>>>>>>>>> and blank credit union checks at gunpoint from Martha Watts, a
>>>>>>>>>> Link Belt Credit Union employee. On March 27, 1978, Richardson
>>>>>>>>>> was arrested for forgery when he attempted to cash one of the
>>>>>>>>>> checks stolen from the Link Belt Credit Union at another
>> bank.See
>>>>>>>>>> footnote On May 5, 1978, Richardson was arrested in Kentucky
on
>>>>>>>>>> unrelated controlled substances and stolen property charges.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Career criminal. Life without parole is most deserved, "Cunt
>>>>>>>>>> Flaps."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would suggest that once someone gets life without parole,
they
>>>>>>>>> clearly are a waste of resources and an on-going threat. Jail
>>>>>>>>> servers no purpose at that point since they will never be
>>>>>>>>> rehabilitated. I suggest that once the appeals and such have
run
>>>>>>>>> their course they be executed. No, not by some official and
>>>>>>>>> expensive process, but rather some sedatives and a time delay
>> fast
>>>>>>>>> acting poison. They have dinner, go to sleep and simply never
>> wake
>>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At which point we no longer have to pay to house, feed, cloth
and
>>>>>>>>> otherwise support this burden on society.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All death sentences are more expensive
>>>>>>>> than incarceration costs. But since you want
>>>>>>>> these executions you don't mind paying for
>>>>>>>> them, no?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who's creating the paradigm of criminals in the first place?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, one could claim the law does, but without the law everything
>>>>>> would be legal and your life wouldn't be worth anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct answer: Corrupt governments and corporation create
>> criminality
>>>>> by making life and survival very difficult for people so many
people
>>>>> turn to crime just to survive.
>>>>> Also the television and video games have been promoting violence
for
>>>>> decades.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Funny that the most videogame saturated
>>>> country in the world - Japan - is also one
>>>> of the safest. Do explain.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do they play many violent v.games?
>>
>>
>>
>> Of course.
>>
>>
>>> Does their gov. let things get out of control?
>>
>>
>> Who do you think invented playstations
>> and X boxes?
>>
>>
>>> Do their parents care little and let their kids do crazy things?
>>>
>>
>> Just tell us what video games
>> have to do with violence in people.
>
> They teach children and susceptible "adults" that mass murder is okay
> and life of any sort has no value.

Kinda like the Bible, where God solves
problems by killing people.

> See also Democrat abortion demands.
>
>
If you don't like abortion don't
get one.

"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
news:vfjqjr$3tc3n$1@dont-email.me:

> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
> news:XnsB217506D8E22C629555@185.151.15.190...
>>
>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:vfhtl8$3jalj$1@dont-
>>email.me:
>>
>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>>> news:XnsB216D1DF39B629555@185.151.15.160...
>>>>
>>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>>>news:vfh25g$3bdui$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>> "Scout" wrote in message news:vfg9qv$37bp4$4@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:vfeni8$2rig0$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:XnsB21483D3AA2DA629555@185.151.15.190...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>news:vfb0tj$22men$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>>>>>>> <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>
>>news:ufufhjdm4lrdsnhimji4kengs0if4b8p9i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>>>> cksu cking.dwarf.com...
>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
>>>>>>>>>>>Shit-4-Braincell back
>>>>>>>>>>>when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having
>>>>>>>>>>>posted
>>as
>>>>>>>>>>>"Lamey," but
>>>>>>>>>>>he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a
>>>>>>>>>>>fucking loser.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>>>> <js@phendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is absolutely true. Research shows that the more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new prisons there are,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> longer the sentences.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The more prisons and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> More support:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-
>>criminal-j
>>>>>>>>>>>>> usti
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ce-reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lie site not read
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gimmick to fill up the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisons.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply
>>wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The relevant facts follow. On March 16, 1978, the Link Belt
>>>>>>>>>> Credit Union in Marion County, Indiana was robbed. Men took
>>money
>>>>>>>>>> and blank credit union checks at gunpoint from Martha Watts,
>>>>>>>>>> a Link Belt Credit Union employee. On March 27, 1978,
>>>>>>>>>> Richardson was arrested for forgery when he attempted to cash
>>>>>>>>>> one of the checks stolen from the Link Belt Credit Union at
>>>>>>>>>> another
>>bank.See
>>>>>>>>>> footnote On May 5, 1978, Richardson was arrested in Kentucky
>>>>>>>>>> on unrelated controlled substances and stolen property
>>>>>>>>>> charges.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Career criminal. Life without parole is most deserved, "Cunt
>>>>>>>>>> Flaps."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would suggest that once someone gets life without parole,
>>>>>>>>> they clearly are a waste of resources and an on-going threat.
>>>>>>>>> Jail servers no purpose at that point since they will never be
>>>>>>>>> rehabilitated. I suggest that once the appeals and such have
>>>>>>>>> run their course they be executed. No, not by some official
>>>>>>>>> and expensive process, but rather some sedatives and a time
>>>>>>>>> delay
>>fast
>>>>>>>>> acting poison. They have dinner, go to sleep and simply never
>>wake
>>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At which point we no longer have to pay to house, feed, cloth
>>>>>>>>> and otherwise support this burden on society.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All death sentences are more expensive
>>>>>>>>than incarceration costs. But since you want
>>>>>>>>these executions you don't mind paying for
>>>>>>>>them, no?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who's creating the paradigm of criminals in the first place?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Well, one could claim the law does, but without the law everything
>>>>>>would be legal and your life wouldn't be worth anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct answer: Corrupt governments and corporation create
>>criminality
>>>>> by making life and survival very difficult for people so many
>>>>> people turn to crime just to survive.
>>>>> Also the television and video games have been promoting violence
>>>>> for decades.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Funny that the most videogame saturated
>>>>country in the world - Japan - is also one
>>>>of the safest. Do explain.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do they play many violent v.games?
>>
>>
>>
>> Of course.
>>
>>
>>> Does their gov. let things get out of control?
>>
>>
>> Who do you think invented playstations
>>and X boxes?
>>
>
> Irrelevant
>
>
>>
>>> Do their parents care little and let their kids do crazy things?
>>>
>>
>> Just tell us what video games
>>have to do with violence in people.
>>
>
> Many young people are impressionable and rebellious and will follow
> crazy and bad trends and attitudes.
>

On 10/25/2024 1:59 AM, Sam Elliott Harris Voter wrote:
> On 10/24/2024 6:29 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
>> On 10/22/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <rxSRO.54739$KDwf.3770@fx01.iad>, rudy@phil.hendrie.con
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-
>>>> Braincell back
>>>> when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having posted as
>>>> "Lamey," but
>>>> he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a fucking loser.
>>>>
>>>> On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>> This is absolutely true.  Research shows that the more new
>>>>>>> prisons there are,
>>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and longer
>>>>>>> the sentences.
>>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions.  The more
>>>>>>> prisons and
>>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> More support:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-criminal-
>>>>>> justice-reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another gimmick to
>>>>>> fill up the
>>>>>> prisons.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply wrong.
>>>
>>> Then dont do it.
>>
>> A tiny number of people do, though, and will continue to do so.  Point
>> is that people can and do change while in prison.  Does it make sense
>> to imprison someone for having robbed a bank for 5K some 5 years ago?
>> 10? 50?  A year ago?
>
> If that's your position on robbery, why not include rape?  Rapists
> change, assuming they ever really were rapists.
>

Rape is different than robbery, the latter being an economic crime.
Most robbers do not intend to harm anyone; they just want someone else's
money and are using coercion to get it. With rape, the assailant
intends to cause actual harm to another human being.

Dawn

"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
news:XnsB217D1BB77317629555@185.151.15.160...
>
>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>news:vfjqjr$3tc3n$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>> news:XnsB217506D8E22C629555@185.151.15.190...
>>>
>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:vfhtl8$3jalj$1@dont-
>>>email.me:
>>>
>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>>>> news:XnsB216D1DF39B629555@185.151.15.160...
>>>>>
>>>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>>>>news:vfh25g$3bdui$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Scout" wrote in message news:vfg9qv$37bp4$4@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:vfeni8$2rig0$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:XnsB21483D3AA2DA629555@185.151.15.190...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>news:vfb0tj$22men$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>>>>>>>> <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>news:ufufhjdm4lrdsnhimji4kengs0if4b8p9i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>>>>> cksu cking.dwarf.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
>>>>>>>>>>>>Shit-4-Braincell back
>>>>>>>>>>>>when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having
>>>>>>>>>>>>posted
>>>as
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Lamey," but
>>>>>>>>>>>>he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a
>>>>>>>>>>>>fucking loser.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <js@phendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is absolutely true. Research shows that the more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new prisons there are,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> longer the sentences.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The more prisons and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More support:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-
>>>criminal-j
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usti
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ce-reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lie site not read
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gimmick to fill up the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisons.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply
>>>wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The relevant facts follow. On March 16, 1978, the Link Belt
>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Union in Marion County, Indiana was robbed. Men took
>>>money
>>>>>>>>>>> and blank credit union checks at gunpoint from Martha Watts,
>>>>>>>>>>> a Link Belt Credit Union employee. On March 27, 1978,
>>>>>>>>>>> Richardson was arrested for forgery when he attempted to cash
>>>>>>>>>>> one of the checks stolen from the Link Belt Credit Union at
>>>>>>>>>>> another
>>>bank.See
>>>>>>>>>>> footnote On May 5, 1978, Richardson was arrested in Kentucky
>>>>>>>>>>> on unrelated controlled substances and stolen property
>>>>>>>>>>> charges.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Career criminal. Life without parole is most deserved, "Cunt
>>>>>>>>>>> Flaps."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would suggest that once someone gets life without parole,
>>>>>>>>>> they clearly are a waste of resources and an on-going threat.
>>>>>>>>>> Jail servers no purpose at that point since they will never be
>>>>>>>>>> rehabilitated. I suggest that once the appeals and such have
>>>>>>>>>> run their course they be executed. No, not by some official
>>>>>>>>>> and expensive process, but rather some sedatives and a time
>>>>>>>>>> delay
>>>fast
>>>>>>>>>> acting poison. They have dinner, go to sleep and simply never
>>>wake
>>>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At which point we no longer have to pay to house, feed, cloth
>>>>>>>>>> and otherwise support this burden on society.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All death sentences are more expensive
>>>>>>>>>than incarceration costs. But since you want
>>>>>>>>>these executions you don't mind paying for
>>>>>>>>>them, no?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who's creating the paradigm of criminals in the first place?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well, one could claim the law does, but without the law everything
>>>>>>>would be legal and your life wouldn't be worth anything.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Correct answer: Corrupt governments and corporation create
>>>criminality
>>>>>> by making life and survival very difficult for people so many
>>>>>> people turn to crime just to survive.
>>>>>> Also the television and video games have been promoting violence
>>>>>> for decades.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Funny that the most videogame saturated
>>>>>country in the world - Japan - is also one
>>>>>of the safest. Do explain.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do they play many violent v.games?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Of course.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Does their gov. let things get out of control?
>>>
>>>
>>> Who do you think invented playstations
>>>and X boxes?
>>>
>>
>> Irrelevant
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Do their parents care little and let their kids do crazy things?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just tell us what video games
>>>have to do with violence in people.
>>>
>>
>> Many young people are impressionable and rebellious and will follow
>> crazy and bad trends and attitudes.
>>
>
>
> That is why children were so well behaved
>before video games came along. Right.
>

On 10/27/2024 4:44 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <GJgTO.207225$15a6.178157@fx12.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/26/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <X_fTO.248132$WXO8.3556@fx13.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/25/2024 2:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <vfh1kc$3b902$1@dont-email.me>, OFeem1987@teleworm.us says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:vfg9qu$37bp4$2@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course, if we make it very hard to enter.. then no due process is
>>>>>>>> needed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Built the wall.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We built the wall.
>>>>>>> Trump said so.
>>>>>>> Why isn't it working?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "I did finish the wall. I built a wall,"
>>>>>>> Donald Trump, May 9 2003
>>>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/mrxxdw6t
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump says a lot of things. Mostly lies, whines, and Hitleresque rantings.
>>>>>
>>>>> No he doesn't.
>>>>
>>>> He does ? all the fucking time.
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>
>> Yep. You don't watch, and you wouldn't know what to watch for anyway. I do.
>>
>> Trump says lies, whines, and Hitleresque rantings all the time. It's settled.
>
> Nope and

Yes. I've seen and heard him.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:TJOSO.207007$15a6.58477@fx12.iad...
> On 10/25/2024 7:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>>
>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <bks@panix.com> wrote in message
>> news:XowSO.101994$S9Vb.43068@fx45.iad...
>>> On 10/24/2024 8:24 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
>>>> molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free
>>>> batch of lies:
>>>
>>>>> In article <vfdkis$2lias$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is
>>>>> frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
>>>>>> molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free
>>>>>> batch of lies:
>>>
>>>>>> > In article <XnsB21483D3AA2DA629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
>>>>>> > says...
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who
>>>>>> >> is >>
>>>>>> frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > KKKlaun "Cunt Flaps" SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi
>>>>>> >> > >> >
>>>>>> fake Jew and cocksucking dwarf, lied:
>>>
>>>>>> >> >> [Default] Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional,
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>
>>>>>> social, literary and physical superior to KKKlaun >> >>
>>>>>> SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew, *wrote*:
>>>
>>> Yep! That certainly is the default, all right! *HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
>>> HA HA*!
>>>
>>>>>> >> >> [...]
>>>>>> >> All death sentences are more expensive
>>>>>> >> than incarceration costs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's only because we make it into a circus, if we chose to do so,
>>>>>> we could
>>>>>> make it much cheaper by instead of retrying the case over and over
>>>>>> and over,
>>>>>> simply require that the defense show new evidence or new cause for
>>>>>> why the
>>>>>> convicted could possibly be show to be innocent, that a procedural
>>>>>> error was
>>>>>> made during the trial, or that evidence/testimony was reasonably
>>>>>> tainted,
>>>>>> corrupted or otherwise improper.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you can't show that to the court.. the conviction stands and the
>>>>>> execution proceeds on track.
>>>>>> Further, put a time limit on the whole thing. Say 4 years. If you
>>>>>> can't make
>>>>>> your case in that time... then it's all but certain you never all.
>>>>>> Finally, if it is rejected by the appeals court.. that's the end of
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>> There, I've just eliminated 95% of the cost. Freeing up prison space
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> reducing expenses so we can house the next bad guy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> But since you want
>>>>>> >> these executions you don't mind paying for
>>>>>> >> them, no?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We already are. However, if you feel the costs are too high, we can
>>>>>> certainly streamline the process by eliminating long times you can
>>>>>> file and
>>>>>> appeal, the endless stream of appeals, and narrow it down to a simply
>>>>>> hearing in which the defense presents their case to a judge who
>>>>>> decides
>>>>>> whether any of the facts established at trial would need to be
>>>>>> reexamined in
>>>>>> the light of new evidence provided or proof of a procedural or
>>>>>> judicial
>>>>>> error.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you can't.. then you have no case. and the execution can be
>>>>>> carried out
>>>>>> immediately.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See, it's not the execution that is so expensive but the endless
>>>>>> round of
>>>>>> appeals, stays, delays, and other legal maneuvers. As it is, you have
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> defense, a representative from the prosecutor's office and the judge
>>>>>> who can
>>>>>> review any new evidence or proof of errors made during trial that
>>>>>> could
>>>>>> reasonably impact the jury's finding.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3 people.. maybe 2 hours... and if it fails we can carry out the
>>>>>> execution
>>>>>> that evening.. without muss, fuss, or great cost.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> True, the only expense really is on the defense.. the judge is
>>>>>> already being
>>>>>> paid a regular salary and the prosecutors similarly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, if he wants to claim the appeal process is just too
>>>>>> expensive.. I
>>>>>> set out a plan above how to reduce that and the time needed for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only question now will be what his next excuse will be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just like when they say it costs to much to deport. Remove the red
>>>>> tape
>>>>> and send the fuckers home. Pretty simple.
>>>>
>>>> Yep, the cost to do so is minimal.. it's the BS that jacks up the price
>>>
>>> That "BS" is what differentiates us from North Korea. If you want to
>>> live in North Korea, go right ahead, scooter. But we are not going to
>>> emulate North Korea.
>>
>> The problem is with North Korea the border walls are to keep the people
>> IN.. ours on the other hand would be to keep them OUT.

> That's not the problem, scooter.

We know it's not a problem to keep people out of our country. That is after
all, part of why borders exist.

>The problem is that North Korea is a despotic dictatorship, and that is the
>only reason they don't have due process.

Much like Democrats during the era of Jim Crow, right?

However, I will just note that you are now claiming that border fences are
NOT the issue.

> What you are calling "BS," scooter, is due process and the rest of the
> rule of law that makes the U.S. civilized, and the lack of which makes
> North Korea a shithole.

Due process and rule of law....

Where does that require that the law be ignored and crimes allowed to happen
without interference?

I mean, you do know that it is a CRIME to illegally cross the border
anywhere other than at a point of entry.
Further it is also a matter of law that you have to obtain permission by
getting a visa to enter there unless you are a US citizen..
I mean that's what due process and the rule of law require.
So why exactly are you demanding that due process and the rule of law be
IGNORED???

> You're just not going to get your way, scooter.

So you're telling me the law won't be enforced?

> The due process that makes our justice system relatively just is not going
> away.

And yet, you just stated it was.

> We are not going to have summary executions of people you consider
> undesirable, scooter.

The only person talking executions is you.

Meanwhile, under the law you can be fined and/or jailed for illegally
entering the country.

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:BLOSO.207008$15a6.109985@fx12.iad...
> On 10/25/2024 7:08 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>>
>>
>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:671a9c57$0$3826$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>> In article <XnsB21583875F590629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>>> news:671a5878$7$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > Just like when they say it costs to much to deport. Remove the red
>>>> > tape and send the fuckers home. Pretty simple.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> By "red tape" you mean the Constitution.
>>>
>>> Oh please.
>>
>> I'm curious where the Constitution says invaders
>
> No "invaders," scooter.
>
>>
>>>> "The Due Process Clause applies to all persons within the
>>>> United States, including aliens, whether their presence is
>>>> lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent."
>>>> The US Supreme Court, Zadvydas v. Davis (2001)
>>>> <http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/99-7791.html>
>>
>> Great..
>> Says,[Hartung comma] nothing about us not removing them
>
> It specifies you can't just round up people you think don't belong here
> and deport them, scooter. That's what it says.

Then we have no problem rounding up and deporting those we know don't belong
here.

And we CERTAINLY can round up those caught illegally crossing the border.

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:qPOSO.201812$WtV9.70852@fx10.iad...
> On 10/25/2024 7:14 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>>
>>
>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:671a9c75$2$3830$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>> In article <XnsB2158607681D5629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is
>>>> frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > See, it's not the execution that is so expensive but the endless
>>>> > round
>>>> > of appeals, stays, delays, and other legal maneuvers. As it is, you
>>>> > have the defense, a representative from the prosecutor's office and
>>>> > the judge who can review any new evidence or proof of errors made
>>>> > during trial that could reasonably impact the jury's finding.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is precisely those "endless rounds
>>>> of appeals" that uncovered over 100 innocent
>>>> men sitting on death rows across the country.
>>
>> Where [sic] they innocent? The only link produced does not establish
>> that.
>
> It does, scooter.

No, it doesn't. But as typical you either didn't read or didn't understand
what you cited.

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:FtPSO.26517$9Rk4.10335@fx37.iad...
> On 10/25/2024 7:19 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>>
>>
>> "Dawn Flood" <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:vfes9n$2s3np$4@dont-email.me...
>>> On 10/22/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <rxSRO.54739$KDwf.3770@fx01.iad>, rudy@phil.hendrie.con
>>>> says...
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
>>>>> Shit-4-Braincell back
>>>>> when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having posted as
>>>>> "Lamey," but
>>>>> he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a fucking loser.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>> This is absolutely true. Research shows that the more new prisons
>>>>>>>> there are,
>>>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and longer the
>>>>>>>> sentences.
>>>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions. The more
>>>>>>>> prisons and
>>>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More support:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-criminal-justice-
>>>>>>> reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another gimmick to
>>>>>>> fill up the
>>>>>>> prisons.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Then dont do it.
>>>
>>> A tiny number of people do, though, and will continue to do so. Point
>>> is that people can and do change while in prison.
>>
>> Somehow, I bet it wasn't just the $5,000 that was taken.. I'm pretty sure
>> one or more people died due to a direct result of that crime. It is those
>> deaths that put you in prison without parole.
>
> No one was killed in the bank robbery, scooter.

Bank robbery? When did that specific become part of the topic and which
specific bank robbery are you claiming was part of the discussion?

> Shots were fired, but no one was hit.

So?

Illegal possession of a firearm
Illegal discharge of a Firearm
Reckless endangerment
Attempted homicide

All are crimes yet none actually requires anyone to be hit by the bullet.

Once again we see that Rudy's lame defensive evasion fails in to stand in
the face of the facts.

>The sentence imposed was *solely* for the robbery, scooter.

Sorry, but given how often you are wrong, or simply just lie, I don't
believe you.
Further as a felony.. and a VIOLENT felony... the law can and could impose a
life sentence on you.
Often referred to as the 3 strikes rule.

Are you suggesting that we IGNORE the law?

> If you think there was some other element to the sentencing, scooter, trot
> out your evidence. But you don't have any and you never will.

How about the law? I mean you seem to ignore it all the time. I'm pretty
sure the law allowed that sentence to be imposed for that crime otherwise it
couldn't have been imposed QED.

>>> Does it make sense to imprison someone for having robbed a bank for 5K
>>> some 5 years ago? 10? 50? A year ago?
>>
>> Well.. we could always just execute them.
>
> That's not going to happen, scooter.

Then count your blessings he's only getting life.

>You are not going to get the despotic state that you want.

An I know you want the despotic state you want.

>You can move to North Korea if you want to live in a state that summarily
>executes people for jaywalking, scooter.

I should I move? You're the one that has problems with our laws.

>> However, show me a case were someone was given like [life] just for
>> robbing a bank
>> of 5K... can't be for any other crime just the robbery of the money.

Except when you rob a bank... it's not just about the robbery of the money.
Instead you have a multitude of laws being violated.

> *This* case, scooter — the case of Robert Richardson detailed in the New
> York Times (Gold Standard) story above.

and yet, it wasn't just about robbing a bank. It was about ARMED bank
robbery..

You do understand what it means that he was armed, right?

Also according to police reports he fired said gun at a police officer.

That's called "attempted murder".

Finally he had a chance at a plea deal... instead he rolled the dice and
lost.

> Richardson robbed a bank of $5,000. No one was killed or even injured in
> the robbery and its aftermath.

Irrelevant.. It was armed robbery, and from what I can find he apparently
fired at a police officer during the pursuit.

All I can say is he was offered a plea deal, and instead decided to roll the
dice. He lost.

I would simply note that breaking the law has consequences. You seem to have
an issue with that.. whether it's robbing a bank with a gun, or crossing a
border in violation of the law.

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:671bc470$0$1786$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <FtPSO.26517$9Rk4.10335@fx37.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On 10/25/2024 7:19 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > "Dawn Flood" <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:vfes9n$2s3np$4@dont-email.me...
>> >> On 10/22/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >>> In article <rxSRO.54739$KDwf.3770@fx01.iad>, rudy@phil.hendrie.con
>> >>> says...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
>> >>>> Shit-4-Braincell back
>> >>>> when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having posted as
>> >>>> "Lamey," but
>> >>>> he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a fucking
>> >>>> loser.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>> >>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> >>>>>>> This is absolutely true. Research shows that the more new
>> >>>>>>> prisons there
>> >>>>>>> are,
>> >>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and longer
>> >>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>> sentences.
>> >>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions. The more
>> >>>>>>> prisons and
>> >>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> More support:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>> >>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-criminal-justice-
>> >>>>>> reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another gimmick to
>> >>>>>> fill up
>> >>>>>> the
>> >>>>>> prisons.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply wrong.
>> >>>
>> >>> Then dont do it.
>> >>
>> >> A tiny number of people do, though, and will continue to do so. Point
>> >> is that
>> >> people can and do change while in prison.
>> >
>> > Somehow, I bet it wasn't just the $5,000 that was taken.. I'm pretty
>> > sure one or
>> > more people died due to a direct result of that crime. It is those
>> > deaths that
>> > put you in prison without parole.
>>
>> No one was killed in the bank robbery, scooter. Shots were fired, but no
>> one was
>> hit. The sentence imposed was *solely* for the robbery, scooter. If you
>> think
>> there was some other element to the sentencing, scooter, trot out your
>> evidence.
>> But you don't have any and you never will.
>
> If shots were fired than attempted murder should be on there.
>>
>> >
>> >> Does it make sense to imprison someone for having robbed a bank for
>> >> 5K some 5
>> >> years ago? 10? 50? A year ago?
>> >
>> > Well.. we could always just execute them.
>>
>> That's not going to happen, scooter. You are not going to get the
>> despotic state
>> that you want. You can move to North Korea if you want to live in a state
>> that
>> summarily executes people for jaywalking, scooter.
>
> No they don't.
>>
>> > However, show me a case were someone was given like [life] just for
>> > robbing a bank
>> > of 5K... can't be for any other crime just the robbery of the money.
>> *This* case, scooter ? the case of Robert Richardson detailed in the New
>> York
>> Times (Gold Standard) story above. Richardson robbed a bank of $5,000. No
>> one
>> was killed or even injured in the robbery and its aftermath.
>>
>> And wouldn't you just know it? Richardson is a black man, and he was
>> given a 60
>> year no-parole no-probation sentence in shithole Louisiana. And yes, a
>> huge
>> majority of such sentences are imposed on black men in red shithole
>> states.
>
> Don't do the crime if you don't want the time.

If he didn't want the time, he should have taken the plea deal.. instead he
decided to gamble.

Who's fault is that? I mean his wife took the deal and only served 3.5
years..

On 10/28/2024 8:26 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
>
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:FtPSO.26517$9Rk4.10335@fx37.iad...
>> On 10/25/2024 7:19 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Dawn Flood" <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:vfes9n$2s3np$4@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 10/22/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <rxSRO.54739$KDwf.3770@fx01.iad>, rudy@phil.hendrie.con
>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell back
>>>>>> when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having posted as "Lamey,"
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a fucking loser.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>> This is absolutely true.  Research shows that the more new prisons
>>>>>>>>> there are,
>>>>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and longer the
>>>>>>>>> sentences.
>>>>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions.  The more
>>>>>>>>> prisons and
>>>>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More support:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-criminal-justice-
>>>>>>>> reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another gimmick to fill
>>>>>>>> up the
>>>>>>>> prisons.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then dont do it.
>>>>
>>>> A tiny number of people do, though, and will continue to do so.  Point is
>>>> that people can and do change while in prison.
>>>
>>> Somehow, I bet it wasn't just the $5,000 that was taken.. I'm pretty sure one
>>> or more people died due to a direct result of that crime. It is those deaths
>>> that put you in prison without parole.
>>
>> No one was killed in the bank robbery, scooter.
>
> Bank robbery?

Yes, bank robbery, scooter. That's all that Richardson was charged with.

> When did that specific become part of the topic and which specific
> bank robbery are you claiming was part of the discussion?

It always was part of the topic, scooter. "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us
Any Safer" is about a bank robber who was given a 60 year no-parole no-probation
sentence for robbing a bank of $5,000. Why don't you try paying attention, scooter?

>
>> Shots were fired, but no one was hit.
>
> So?

So, the conviction was only for bank robbery, scooter.

>
> Illegal possession of a firearm
> Illegal discharge of a Firearm
> Reckless endangerment
> Attempted homicide

None of those were part of the charges, scooter.

>> The sentence imposed was *solely* for the robbery, scooter.
>
> Sorry, but

No "but," scooter.

>
>> If you think there was some other element to the sentencing, scooter, trot out
>> your evidence. But you don't have any and you never will.
>
> How about the law?

Nothing about the law, scooter. The man was duly and justly convicted, but the
sentence is manifestly unjust.

>>>>  Does it make sense to imprison someone for having robbed a bank for 5K some
>>>> 5 years ago?  10? 50?  A year ago?
>>>
>>> Well.. we could always just execute them.
>>
>> That's not going to happen, scooter.
>
> Then count your blessings he's only getting life.

We don't execute people for the theft of $5,000, scooter, and we never will. You
are not going to get the North Korean "justice" that you wish to see.

>> You are not going to get the despotic state that you want.
>
> An [sic] I know you want the despotic state you want.

I don't want a despotic state, scooter. You do.

>
>> You can move to North Korea if you want to live in a state that summarily
>> executes people for jaywalking, scooter.
>
> I should I move?

Because you're the one who wishes to live in a despotic state, scooter.

>
>>> However, show me a case were someone was given like [life] just for robbing a
>>> bank of 5K... can't be for any other crime just the robbery of the money.
>
> Except when you rob a bank... it's not just about the robbery of the money.

If that's all that happened, scooter, then it *is* only about the robbery of the
money.

>
>> *This* case, scooter — the case of Robert Richardson detailed in the New York
>> Times (Gold Standard) story above.
>
> and yet,

No, scooter. Fuck off with your scooterisms.

"Actually..." [empty padding]
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding]
"I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
acknowledgment]
"So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
*never* said, i.e. a straw man]
"TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." — a straw man]
"Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and "TRANSLATION:.."
— a straw man]
"Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in the
Constitution anyway]
"it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
"its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
"where" [he means "were"]
"were" [he means "where"]
"creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]

>
> Also according to police reports he fired said gun at a police officer.

That's a lie, scooter. You didn't *read* any police reports.

>
> That's called "attempted murder".

Robertson wasn't charged with that, scooter. He was charged *only* with armed
robbery, a violation of La. R.S. 14:64.

>
>> Richardson robbed a bank of $5,000. No one was killed or even injured in the
>> robbery and its aftermath.
>
> Irrelevant.

Fully relevant, scooter. He was charged with and convicted of armed robbery only.

You're not going to get the despotic state you wish for, scooter.

On 10/28/2024 8:27 AM, Scout wrote:
>
>
> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> news:671bc470$0$1786$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> In article <FtPSO.26517$9Rk4.10335@fx37.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On 10/25/2024 7:19 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > "Dawn Flood" <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:vfes9n$2s3np$4@dont-email.me...
>>> >> On 10/22/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> >>> In article <rxSRO.54739$KDwf.3770@fx01.iad>, rudy@phil.hendrie.con
>>> >>> says...
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off >>>> Shit-4-
>>> Braincell back
>>> >>>> when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having posted as >>>>
>>> "Lamey," but
>>> >>>> he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a fucking >>>> loser.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>> >>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con>
>>> >>>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> >>>>>>> This is absolutely true.  Research shows that the more new >>>>>>>
>>> prisons there
>>> >>>>>>> are,
>>> >>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and longer
>>> >>>>>>> the
>>> >>>>>>> sentences.
>>> >>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions.  The more
>>> >>>>>>> prisons and
>>> >>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> More support:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>>> >>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-criminal-justice-
>>> >>>>>> reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another gimmick to
>>> >>>>>> fill up
>>> >>>>>> the
>>> >>>>>> prisons.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply wrong.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Then dont do it.
>>> >>
>>> >> A tiny number of people do, though, and will continue to do so.  Point >>
>>> is that
>>> >> people can and do change while in prison.
>>> >
>>> > Somehow, I bet it wasn't just the $5,000 that was taken.. I'm pretty > sure
>>> one or
>>> > more people died due to a direct result of that crime. It is those > deaths
>>> that
>>> > put you in prison without parole.
>>>
>>> No one was killed in the bank robbery, scooter. Shots were fired, but no one was
>>> hit. The sentence imposed was *solely* for the robbery, scooter. If you think
>>> there was some other element to the sentencing, scooter, trot out your evidence.
>>> But you don't have any and you never will.
>>
>> If shots were fired than attempted murder should be on there.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >>  Does it make sense to imprison someone for having robbed a bank for >> 5K
>>> some 5
>>> >> years ago?  10? 50?  A year ago?
>>> >
>>> > Well.. we could always just execute them.
>>>
>>> That's not going to happen, scooter. You are not going to get the despotic state
>>> that you want. You can move to North Korea if you want to live in a state that
>>> summarily executes people for jaywalking, scooter.
>>
>> No they don't.
>>>
>>> > However, show me a case were someone was given like [life] just for >
>>> robbing a bank
>>> > of 5K... can't be for any other crime just the robbery of the money.
>>> *This* case, scooter ? the case of Robert Richardson detailed in the New York
>>> Times (Gold Standard) story above. Richardson robbed a bank of $5,000. No one
>>> was killed or even injured in the robbery and its aftermath.
>>>
>>> And wouldn't you just know it? Richardson is a black man, and he was given a 60
>>> year no-parole no-probation sentence in shithole Louisiana. And yes, a huge
>>> majority of such sentences are imposed on black men in red shithole states.
>>
>> Don't do the crime if you don't want the time.
>
> If he didn't want the time, he should have taken the plea deal

Cite that there was a plea deal, scooter.

In article <wzOTO.89026$7OO5.77312@fx43.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>
> On 10/28/2024 8:26 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
> >
> >
> > "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:FtPSO.26517$9Rk4.10335@fx37.iad...
> >> On 10/25/2024 7:19 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Dawn Flood" <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:vfes9n$2s3np$4@dont-email.me...
> >>>> On 10/22/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <rxSRO.54739$KDwf.3770@fx01.iad>, rudy@phil.hendrie.con
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell back
> >>>>>> when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having posted as "Lamey,"
> >>>>>> but
> >>>>>> he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a fucking loser.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> This is absolutely true.  Research shows that the more new prisons
> >>>>>>>>> there are,
> >>>>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and longer the
> >>>>>>>>> sentences.
> >>>>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions.  The more
> >>>>>>>>> prisons and
> >>>>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> More support:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
> >>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-criminal-justice-
> >>>>>>>> reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another gimmick to fill
> >>>>>>>> up the
> >>>>>>>> prisons.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply wrong.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Then dont do it.
> >>>>
> >>>> A tiny number of people do, though, and will continue to do so.  Point is
> >>>> that people can and do change while in prison.
> >>>
> >>> Somehow, I bet it wasn't just the $5,000 that was taken.. I'm pretty sure one
> >>> or more people died due to a direct result of that crime. It is those deaths
> >>> that put you in prison without parole.
> >>
> >> No one was killed in the bank robbery, scooter.
> >
> > Bank robbery?
>
> Yes, bank robbery, scooter. That's all that Richardson was charged with.
>
> > When did that specific become part of the topic and which specific
> > bank robbery are you claiming was part of the discussion?
>
> It always was part of the topic, scooter. "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us
> Any Safer" is about a bank robber who was given a 60 year no-parole no-probation
> sentence for robbing a bank of $5,000. Why don't you try paying attention, scooter?
>
> >
> >> Shots were fired, but no one was hit.
> >
> > So?
>
> So, the conviction was only for bank robbery, scooter.
>
> >
> > Illegal possession of a firearm
> > Illegal discharge of a Firearm
> > Reckless endangerment
> > Attempted homicide
>
> None of those were part of the charges, scooter.
>
>
> >> The sentence imposed was *solely* for the robbery, scooter.
> >
> > Sorry, but
>
> No "but," scooter.
>
> >
> >> If you think there was some other element to the sentencing, scooter, trot out
> >> your evidence. But you don't have any and you never will.
> >
> > How about the law?
>
> Nothing about the law, scooter. The man was duly and justly convicted, but the
> sentence is manifestly unjust.
>
> >>>>  Does it make sense to imprison someone for having robbed a bank for 5K some
> >>>> 5 years ago?  10? 50?  A year ago?
> >>>
> >>> Well.. we could always just execute them.
> >>
> >> That's not going to happen, scooter.
> >
> > Then count your blessings he's only getting life.
>
> We don't execute people for the theft of $5,000, scooter, and we never will. You
> are not going to get the North Korean "justice" that you wish to see.
>
> >> You are not going to get the despotic state that you want.
> >
> > An [sic] I know you want the despotic state you want.
>
> I don't want a despotic state, scooter. You do.
>
> >
> >> You can move to North Korea if you want to live in a state that summarily
> >> executes people for jaywalking, scooter.
> >
> > I should I move?
>
> Because you're the one who wishes to live in a despotic state, scooter.
>
> >
> >>> However, show me a case were someone was given like [life] just for robbing a
> >>> bank of 5K... can't be for any other crime just the robbery of the money.
> >
> > Except when you rob a bank... it's not just about the robbery of the money.
>
> If that's all that happened, scooter, then it *is* only about the robbery of the
> money.
>
> >
> >> *This* case, scooter ? the case of Robert Richardson detailed in the New York
> >> Times (Gold Standard) story above.
> >
> > and yet,
>
> No, scooter. Fuck off with your scooterisms.
>
> "Actually..." [empty padding]
> "Further..." [empty padding]
> "Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
> "And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
> before fleeing]
> "On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
> "And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
> "Heck..." [empty padding]
> "Well..." [empty padding]
> "After all..." [empty padding]
> "In fact..." [empty padding]
> "Indeed..." [empty padding]
> "I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
> acknowledgment]
> "So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
> *never* said, i.e. a straw man]
> "TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." ? a straw man]
> "Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and "TRANSLATION:.."
> ? a straw man]
> "Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in the
> Constitution anyway]
> "it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
> "its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
> "where" [he means "were"]
> "were" [he means "where"]
> "creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]
>
> >
> > Also according to police reports he fired said gun at a police officer.
>
> That's a lie, scooter. You didn't *read* any police reports.
>
> >
> > That's called "attempted murder".
>
> Robertson wasn't charged with that, scooter. He was charged *only* with armed
> robbery, a violation of La. R.S. 14:64.
>
> >
> >> Richardson robbed a bank of $5,000. No one was killed or even injured in the
> >> robbery and its aftermath.
> >
> > Irrelevant.
>
> Fully relevant, scooter. He was charged with and convicted of armed robbery only.
>
> You're not going to get the despotic state you wish for, scooter.

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:wzOTO.89026$7OO5.77312@fx43.iad...
> On 10/28/2024 8:26 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>>
>>
>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:FtPSO.26517$9Rk4.10335@fx37.iad...
>>> On 10/25/2024 7:19 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Dawn Flood" <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:vfes9n$2s3np$4@dont-email.me...
>>>>> On 10/22/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <rxSRO.54739$KDwf.3770@fx01.iad>, rudy@phil.hendrie.con
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
>>>>>>> Shit-4-Braincell back
>>>>>>> when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having posted as
>>>>>>> "Lamey," but
>>>>>>> he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a fucking
>>>>>>> loser.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> This is absolutely true. Research shows that the more new
>>>>>>>>>> prisons there are,
>>>>>>>>>> the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and longer
>>>>>>>>>> the sentences.
>>>>>>>>>> One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions. The more
>>>>>>>>>> prisons and
>>>>>>>>>> prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> More support:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-criminal-justice-
>>>>>>>>> reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's a true statement. Life without parole is another gimmick to
>>>>>>>>> fill up the
>>>>>>>>> prisons.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then dont do it.
>>>>>
>>>>> A tiny number of people do, though, and will continue to do so. Point
>>>>> is that people can and do change while in prison.
>>>>
>>>> Somehow, I bet it wasn't just the $5,000 that was taken.. I'm pretty
>>>> sure one or more people died due to a direct result of that crime. It
>>>> is those deaths that put you in prison without parole.
>>>
>>> No one was killed in the bank robbery, scooter.
>>
>> Bank robbery?
>
> Yes, bank robbery, scooter. That's all that Richardson was charged with.

And how did we go from the general cases above to this SPECIFIC case? Oh,
that's right.. you had to attempt to find the rare, if it is, case against
the general condition under discussion.
>
>> When did that specific become part of the topic and which specific bank
>> robbery are you claiming was part of the discussion?
>
> It always was part of the topic, scooter.

No, it's not.

> "Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer" is about a bank robber who
> was given a 60 year no-parole no-probation sentence for robbing a bank of
> $5,000. Why don't you try paying attention, scooter?

Well, has he committed another violent crime since he's been in jail?

If he hasn't then it looks like we are safer.

Sure, it might suck to be the violent criminal who help up a business at gun
point and reportedly fired at a police officer, but that's his problem.
After all he turned down the plea deal and decided to roll the dice.

>>
>>> Shots were fired, but no one was hit.
>>
>> So?
>
> So, the conviction was only for bank robbery, scooter.

You have proof of that? Somehow I doubt it.

Because just because you missed doesn't mean it wasn't a crime.

>>
>> Illegal possession of a firearm
>> Illegal discharge of a Firearm
>> Reckless endangerment
>> Attempted homicide
>
> None of those were part of the charges, scooter.

Prove it. Somehow, I don't think you can.

>>> The sentence imposed was *solely* for the robbery, scooter.
>>
>> Sorry, but
>
> No "but," scooter.

Then prove your claim that it was *solely* for the robbery. Because in my
experience, they throw on any charge they can.

>>
>>> If you think there was some other element to the sentencing, scooter,
>>> trot out your evidence. But you don't have any and you never will.
>>
>> How about the law?
>
> Nothing about the law, scooter.

Somehow I don't see your suggestion that we ignore the law will make us
safer.

> The man was duly and justly convicted, but the sentence is manifestly
> unjust.

I don't see it. You say he was duly and justly convicted.. so how can the
sentence suddenly become unjust?

Can you show that it is in excess of what the law allows? If you could I bet
his lawyers would love to hear from you because that would be a basis to
have his sentence revoked or reduced depending on how much time he should
have served under the law.

>>>>> Does it make sense to imprison someone for having robbed a bank for
>>>>> 5K some 5 years ago? 10? 50? A year ago?
>>>>
>>>> Well.. we could always just execute them.
>>>
>>> That's not going to happen, scooter.
>>
>> Then count your blessings he's only getting life.
>
> We don't execute people for the theft of $5,000, scooter, and we never
> will. You are not going to get the North Korean "justice" that you wish to
> see.

Rudy.. when will you learn not to make such stupid claims because you know I
will prove you wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Ketchum

>>> You are not going to get the despotic state that you want.
>>
>> An [sic] I know you want the despotic state you want.
>
> I don't want a despotic state, scooter. You do.
>
>>
>>> You can move to North Korea if you want to live in a state that
>>> summarily executes people for jaywalking, scooter.
>>
>> I should I move?
>
> Because you're the one who wishes to live in a despotic state, scooter.
>
>>
>>>> However, show me a case were someone was given like [life] just for
>>>> robbing a bank of 5K... can't be for any other crime just the robbery
>>>> of the money.
>>
>> Except when you rob a bank... it's not just about the robbery of the
>> money.
>
> If that's all that happened, scooter, then it *is* only about the robbery
> of the money.
>
>>
>>> *This* case, scooter — the case of Robert Richardson detailed in the New
>>> York Times (Gold Standard) story above.
>>
>> and yet,
>
> No, scooter. Fuck off with your scooterisms.
>
> "Actually..." [empty padding]
> "Further..." [empty padding]
> "Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
> "And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
> immediately before fleeing]
> "On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
> "And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and
> pointless]
> "Heck..." [empty padding]
> "Well..." [empty padding]
> "After all..." [empty padding]
> "In fact..." [empty padding]
> "Indeed..." [empty padding]
> "I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
> acknowledgment]
> "So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the
> opponent *never* said, i.e. a straw man]
> "TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." — a straw man]
> "Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and
> "TRANSLATION:.." — a straw man]
> "Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be*
> in the Constitution anyway]
> "it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
> "its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
> "where" [he means "were"]
> "were" [he means "where"]
> "creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]
>
>>
>> Also according to police reports he fired said gun at a police officer.
>
> That's a lie, scooter. You didn't *read* any police reports.
>
>>
>> That's called "attempted murder".
>
> Robertson wasn't charged with that, scooter. He was charged *only* with
> armed robbery, a violation of La. R.S. 14:64.
>
>>
>>> Richardson robbed a bank of $5,000. No one was killed or even injured in
>>> the robbery and its aftermath.
>>
>> Irrelevant.
>
> Fully relevant, scooter. He was charged with and convicted of armed
> robbery only.
>
> You're not going to get the despotic state you wish for, scooter.