On 10/24/2024 10:00 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:

> In article <fFuSO.120726$6a33.19362@fx33.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On 10/23/2024 8:09 AM, Alan wrote:
>>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>>> July 26
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>>> instability.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>> Why won't she?
>>>>
>>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The moment
>>>> for which you've been waiting").
>>>>
>>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>>
>>>>     Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>>     You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>>
>>>>     Me:
>>>>     That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about Harris not
>>>>     debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same office
>>>> Vance is.
>>>>
>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>     Huh?
>>>>     Citation required.
>>>>
>>>>     Me:
>>>>     No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance]. This is only
>>>>     your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>>
>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>     Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming I did.
>>>>     To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden will be on you.
>>>>
>>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>>
>>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and stupidly
>>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are not
>>>> running for the same office.
>>>>
>>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and bad-faith
>>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>>
>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>
>>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>>
>>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which she won't
>>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered things she
>>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the subject" or
>>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about "reading
>>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands citations and
>>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her intellectual
>>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's all a
>>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines that she
>>>> plays it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every
>>>> fucking time.
>>>>
>>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this time: she's
>>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>>
>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>
>>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically announce
>>>> her kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course won't
>>>> work because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>>>
>>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>>
>> And "NoBody" *continues* to flee screaming in terror...
>
> He sure has a leash on you.
*She* sure is a cowardly little twat, just as you are.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

On 10/24/2024 12:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:

> In article <nyvSO.15934$Vuz4.12800@fx08.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/24/2024 10:00 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>> content-free batch of lies:
>>
>>> In article <fFuSO.120726$6a33.19362@fx33.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/23/2024 8:09 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>>>>> July 26
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>>>>> instability.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>> Why won't she?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The moment
>>>>>> for which you've been waiting").
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>>>>     You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>     That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about Harris not
>>>>>>     debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same office
>>>>>> Vance is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>     Huh?
>>>>>>     Citation required.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>     No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance]. This is only
>>>>>>     your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>     Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming I did.
>>>>>>     To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden will be on you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and stupidly
>>>>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are not
>>>>>> running for the same office.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and bad-faith
>>>>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which she won't
>>>>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered things she
>>>>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the subject" or
>>>>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about "reading
>>>>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands citations and
>>>>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her intellectual
>>>>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's all a
>>>>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines that she
>>>>>> plays it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every
>>>>>> fucking time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this time: she's
>>>>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically announce
>>>>>> her kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course won't
>>>>>> work because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>>>>>
>>>>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>>>>
>>>> And "NoBody" *continues* to flee screaming in terror...
>>>
>>> He sure has a leash on you.
>>
>> *She* sure is a cowardly little twat, just as you are.>
> He

She

> has you chasing your tail.

No. I have her running away screaming in terror.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

On 10/24/2024 1:12 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <FdxSO.247195$WXO8.135405@fx13.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/24/2024 12:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>> content-free batch of lies:
>>
>>> In article <nyvSO.15934$Vuz4.12800@fx08.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/24/2024 10:00 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <fFuSO.120726$6a33.19362@fx33.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/23/2024 8:09 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>>>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>>>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>>>>>>> July 26
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>>>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>>>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>>>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>>>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>>>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>>>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>>>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>>>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>>>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>>>>>>> instability.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>>>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>>>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>>>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>>>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>>>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>>>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>>>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>>>>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>>>>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>>>>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>> Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The moment
>>>>>>>> for which you've been waiting").
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>>>>>>     You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>     That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about Harris not
>>>>>>>>     debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same office
>>>>>>>> Vance is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>     Huh?
>>>>>>>>     Citation required.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>     No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance]. This is only
>>>>>>>>     your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>     Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming I did.
>>>>>>>>     To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden will be on you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and stupidly
>>>>>>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are not
>>>>>>>> running for the same office.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and bad-faith
>>>>>>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which she won't
>>>>>>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered things she
>>>>>>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the subject" or
>>>>>>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about "reading
>>>>>>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands citations and
>>>>>>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her intellectual
>>>>>>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's all a
>>>>>>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines that she
>>>>>>>> plays it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every
>>>>>>>> fucking time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this time: she's
>>>>>>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically announce
>>>>>>>> her kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course won't
>>>>>>>> work because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And "NoBody" *continues* to flee screaming in terror...
>>>>>
>>>>> He sure has a leash on you.
>>>>
>>>> *She* sure is a cowardly little twat, just as you are.>
>>> He
>>
>> She
>>
>>> has you chasing your tail.
>>
>> No. I have her running away screaming in terror.
>
> He

On 10/25/2024 6:11 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <9_ASO.54992$5Cq3.22997@fx06.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/24/2024 1:12 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <FdxSO.247195$WXO8.135405@fx13.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/24/2024 12:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <nyvSO.15934$Vuz4.12800@fx08.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 10:00 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <fFuSO.120726$6a33.19362@fx33.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/23/2024 8:09 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>>>>>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>>>>>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>>>>>>>>> July 26
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>>>>>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>>>>>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>>>>>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>>>>>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>>>>>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>>>>>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>>>>>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>>>>>>>>> instability.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>>>>>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>>>>>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>>>>>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>>>>>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>>>>>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>>>>>>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>>>>>>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>>>>>>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>> Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The moment
>>>>>>>>>> for which you've been waiting").
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>>>>>>>>     You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>     That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about Harris not
>>>>>>>>>>     debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same office
>>>>>>>>>> Vance is.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>     Huh?
>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>     No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance]. This is only
>>>>>>>>>>     your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming I did.
>>>>>>>>>>     To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden will be on you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and stupidly
>>>>>>>>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are not
>>>>>>>>>> running for the same office.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and bad-faith
>>>>>>>>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which she won't
>>>>>>>>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered things she
>>>>>>>>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the subject" or
>>>>>>>>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about "reading
>>>>>>>>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands citations and
>>>>>>>>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her intellectual
>>>>>>>>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's all a
>>>>>>>>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines that she
>>>>>>>>>> plays it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every
>>>>>>>>>> fucking time.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this time: she's
>>>>>>>>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically announce
>>>>>>>>>> her kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course won't
>>>>>>>>>> work because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" *continues* to flee screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He sure has a leash on you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *She* sure is a cowardly little twat, just as you are.>
>>>>> He
>>>>
>>>> She
>>>>
>>>>> has you chasing your tail.
>>>>
>>>> No. I have her running away screaming in terror.
>>>
>>> He
>>
>> She. It's the opposite of "pothole," who claims to be female but who is actually
>> an effeminate male.
>
> She
Yes, Kremlin Girl is "she," and "pothole" is "he." It's obvious and it's settled.

On 10/25/2024 9:58 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <eUPSO.730970$_o_3.409817@fx17.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/25/2024 6:11 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <9_ASO.54992$5Cq3.22997@fx06.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/24/2024 1:12 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <FdxSO.247195$WXO8.135405@fx13.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 12:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <nyvSO.15934$Vuz4.12800@fx08.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 10:00 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <fFuSO.120726$6a33.19362@fx33.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/23/2024 8:09 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> July 26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instability.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>>>>>>>>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>>>>>>>>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The moment
>>>>>>>>>>>> for which you've been waiting").
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>>>>>>>>>>     You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about Harris not
>>>>>>>>>>>>     debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same office
>>>>>>>>>>>> Vance is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Huh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance]. This is only
>>>>>>>>>>>>     your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming I did.
>>>>>>>>>>>>     To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden will be on you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and stupidly
>>>>>>>>>>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are not
>>>>>>>>>>>> running for the same office.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and bad-faith
>>>>>>>>>>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which she won't
>>>>>>>>>>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered things she
>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the subject" or
>>>>>>>>>>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about "reading
>>>>>>>>>>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands citations and
>>>>>>>>>>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her intellectual
>>>>>>>>>>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's all a
>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines that she
>>>>>>>>>>>> plays it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every
>>>>>>>>>>>> fucking time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this time: she's
>>>>>>>>>>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically announce
>>>>>>>>>>>> her kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course won't
>>>>>>>>>>>> work because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" *continues* to flee screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He sure has a leash on you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *She* sure is a cowardly little twat, just as you are.>
>>>>>>> He
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> has you chasing your tail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. I have her running away screaming in terror.
>>>>>
>>>>> He
>>>>
>>>> She. It's the opposite of "pothole," who claims to be female but who is actually
>>>> an effeminate male.
>>>
>>> She
>> Yes, Kremlin Girl is "she," and "pothole" is "he." It's obvious and it's settled.
>
> Nope and

On 10/25/2024 11:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:

> In article <r3RSO.201820$WtV9.120292@fx10.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/25/2024 9:58 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <eUPSO.730970$_o_3.409817@fx17.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/25/2024 6:11 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <9_ASO.54992$5Cq3.22997@fx06.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 1:12 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <FdxSO.247195$WXO8.135405@fx13.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 12:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <nyvSO.15934$Vuz4.12800@fx08.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 10:00 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <fFuSO.120726$6a33.19362@fx33.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/23/2024 8:09 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> July 26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instability.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The moment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for which you've been waiting").
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about Harris not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same office
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vance is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Huh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance]. This is only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming I did.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden will be on you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and stupidly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running for the same office.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and bad-faith
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which she won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered things she
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the subject" or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about "reading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands citations and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her intellectual
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's all a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines that she
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plays it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucking time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this time: she's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically announce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" *continues* to flee screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He sure has a leash on you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *She* sure is a cowardly little twat, just as you are.>
>>>>>>>>> He
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> She
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> has you chasing your tail.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No. I have her running away screaming in terror.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She. It's the opposite of "pothole," who claims to be female but who is actually
>>>>>> an effeminate male.
>>>>>
>>>>> She
>>>> Yes, Kremlin Girl is "she," and "pothole" is "he." It's obvious and it's settled.
>>>
>>> Nope and
>>
>> Yes. I'm right.
>
> No proof

On 10/25/2024 2:01 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <2dSSO.437588$WOde.92033@fx09.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/25/2024 11:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>> content-free batch of lies:
>>
>>> In article <r3RSO.201820$WtV9.120292@fx10.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/25/2024 9:58 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <eUPSO.730970$_o_3.409817@fx17.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/25/2024 6:11 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <9_ASO.54992$5Cq3.22997@fx06.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 1:12 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <FdxSO.247195$WXO8.135405@fx13.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 12:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <nyvSO.15934$Vuz4.12800@fx08.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2024 10:00 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>>>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>>>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <fFuSO.120726$6a33.19362@fx33.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/23/2024 8:09 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> July 26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instability.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The moment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for which you've been waiting").
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about Harris not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same office
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vance is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Huh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance]. This is only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     KG/BoN:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming I did.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden will be on you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and stupidly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running for the same office.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and bad-faith
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which she won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered things she
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the subject" or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about "reading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands citations and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her intellectual
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's all a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines that she
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plays it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucking time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this time: she's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why won't she?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically announce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And "NoBody" *continues* to flee screaming in terror...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> He sure has a leash on you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *She* sure is a cowardly little twat, just as you are.>
>>>>>>>>>>> He
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> She
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> has you chasing your tail.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No. I have her running away screaming in terror.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> She. It's the opposite of "pothole," who claims to be female but who is actually
>>>>>>>> an effeminate male.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She
>>>>>> Yes, Kremlin Girl is "she," and "pothole" is "he." It's obvious and it's settled.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope and
>>>>
>>>> Yes. I'm right.
>>>
>>> No proof
>>
>> Boxcars full of proof.
>
> None or you would have posted it.

Michael A Terrell wrote:
> I'm running away screaming in terror.
>
My life story.

Michael A Terrell wrote:
> She. It's the opposite of "pothole," who claims to be female but who is
> actually an effeminate male.
>
Sounds like my pappy.