On 10/23/2024 10:12 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:

> In article <wk8SO.47978$5837.24211@fx35.iad>, cleetis@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>> July 26
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>> instability.
>>>>>
>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>
>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>> Why won't she?
>>>
>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The moment for
>>> which you've been waiting").
>>>
>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>
>>>    Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>    You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>
>>>    Me:
>>>    That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about Harris not
>>>    debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same office Vance
>>> is.
>>>
>>>    KG/BoN:
>>>    Huh?
>>>    Citation required.
>>>
>>>    Me:
>>>    No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance]. This is only
>>>    your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>
>>>    KG/BoN:
>>>    Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming I did.
>>>    To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden will be on you.
>>>
>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>
>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and stupidly
>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are not running
>>> for the same office.
>>>
>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and bad-faith
>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>
>>>    Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>    Why won't she?
>>>
>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>
>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which she won't
>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered things she
>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the subject" or
>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about "reading
>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands citations and
>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her intellectual
>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's all a
>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines that she plays
>>> it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every fucking time.
>>>
>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this time: she's
>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>
>>>    Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>    Why won't she?
>>>
>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically announce her
>>> kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course won't work
>>> because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>
> And Jon Ball forges again.
No such poster here, as you well know.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

Michael A Terrell wrote:
> On 10/23/2024 10:12 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
> content-free batch of lies:
>
>> In article <wk8SO.47978$5837.24211@fx35.iad>, cleetis@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>>> July 26
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>>> instability.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>> Why won't she?
>>>>
>>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The
>>>> moment for
>>>> which you've been waiting").
>>>>
>>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>>
>>>>      Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>>      You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>>
>>>>      Me:
>>>>      That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about
>>>> Harris not
>>>>      debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same
>>>> office Vance
>>>> is.
>>>>
>>>>      KG/BoN:
>>>>      Huh?
>>>>      Citation required.
>>>>
>>>>      Me:
>>>>      No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance].
>>>> This is only
>>>>      your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>>
>>>>      KG/BoN:
>>>>      Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming
>>>> I did.
>>>>      To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden
>>>> will be on you.
>>>>
>>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>>
>>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and
>>>> stupidly
>>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are
>>>> not running
>>>> for the same office.
>>>>
>>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and
>>>> bad-faith
>>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>>
>>>>      Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice
>>>> President?
>>>>      Why won't she?
>>>>
>>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>>
>>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which
>>>> she won't
>>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered
>>>> things she
>>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the
>>>> subject" or
>>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about
>>>> "reading
>>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands
>>>> citations and
>>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her
>>>> intellectual
>>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's
>>>> all a
>>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines
>>>> that she plays
>>>> it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every
>>>> fucking time.
>>>>
>>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this
>>>> time: she's
>>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>>
>>>>      Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice
>>>> President?
>>>>      Why won't she?
>>>>
>>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically
>>>> announce her
>>>> kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course
>>>> won't work
>>>> because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>>
>> And Jon Ball forges again.
> No such poster here, as you well know.
>
>

It's a nickname, short for balls on the chin.

On 10/24/2024 9:52 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <dGuSO.120727$6a33.64189@fx33.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/23/2024 10:12 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>> content-free batch of lies:
>>
>>> In article <wk8SO.47978$5837.24211@fx35.iad>, cleetis@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/22/2024 8:16 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>> On 7/27/2024 7:48 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Trump Campaign Confirms It Is
>>>>>>> Retreating From Kamala Harris
>>>>>>> Debate?for Now
>>>>>>> July 26
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Donald Trump?s campaign fired
>>>>>>> back at Kamala Harris on Thursday,
>>>>>>> digging in its heels over the
>>>>>>> prospect of debating the likely
>>>>>>> Democratic presidential nominee
>>>>>>> and confirming the former
>>>>>>> president will not participate?
>>>>>>> at least not yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, in confirming Trump
>>>>>>> would not partake, his campaign
>>>>>>> blamed Democratic Party
>>>>>>> instability.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ?Given the continued political
>>>>>>> chaos surrounding Crooked Joe
>>>>>>> Biden and the Democrat Party,
>>>>>>> general election details cannot
>>>>>>> be finalized until Democrats
>>>>>>> formally decide on their nominee,?
>>>>>>> the campaign?said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/harris-taunts-trump-for-backpedaling-on-de
>>>>>>> bate-promise-lets-go
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why would you expect Trump to debate someone who is not yet the
>>>>>> Democrat's pick?  Why would you also not expect her to put on her big
>>>>>> girl pants and have a real tradition debate, not the dumbed down
>>>>>> format so that feeble Joe could attend?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>> Why won't she?
>>>>>
>>>>> Here it is! The moment you've been waiting for (gooder English: "The moment for
>>>>> which you've been waiting").
>>>>>
>>>>> Here was the exchange over the course of three days, 10/17 - 10/19:
>>>>>
>>>>>    Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness (to me):
>>>>>    You can't seem to follow basic logic.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Me:
>>>>>    That's you, of course. That's why you stupidly whinged about Harris not
>>>>>    debating Vance despite the fact she is not running for the same office Vance
>>>>> is.
>>>>>
>>>>>    KG/BoN:
>>>>>    Huh?
>>>>>    Citation required.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Me:
>>>>>    No, it isn't. You posted that [about Harris debating Vance]. This is only
>>>>>    your time-wasting m.o. again.
>>>>>
>>>>>    KG/BoN:
>>>>>    Citation required where I posted this.  You're the one claiming I did.
>>>>>    To the best of my recollation [sic] I have not so the burden will be on you.
>>>>>
>>>>> What the hell is "recollation"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, above we see that she *did* petulantly and childishly and stupidly
>>>>> whinge about Harris debating Vance, *despite the fact* that they are not running
>>>>> for the same office.
>>>>>
>>>>> So KG/BoN was just engaging in her usual shitty and dishonest and bad-faith
>>>>> game-playing in demanding a "citation" for her having whinged,
>>>>>
>>>>>    Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>    Why won't she?
>>>>>
>>>>> when clearly she *did* whinge about it, and she *knew* it all along.
>>>>>
>>>>> All of her participation here is nothing but game-playing, in which she won't
>>>>> give straight answers; frequently lies and says she has answered things she
>>>>> hasn't; complains constantly about others having "changed the subject" or
>>>>> "pivotted" [sic] or "evaded" when they have not; lamely bleats about "reading
>>>>> comprehension" and other stale Usenet tropes; bitchily demands citations and
>>>>> then rejects them out-of-hand; whinges about being ignored by her intellectual
>>>>> superiors; constantly engages in uncivil namecalling, etc. etc. It's all a
>>>>> stupid time-wasting game, and she stupidly and *wrongly* imagines that she plays
>>>>> it masterfully, when in fact she *sucks* at it and gets played every fucking time.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, here's how I predict her bad-faith game playing will go this time: she's
>>>>> going to blabber some vacuous bullshit about how what she plainly said:
>>>>>
>>>>>    Is she going to debate JD Vance in her current role as Vice President?
>>>>>    Why won't she?
>>>>>
>>>>> doesn't mean what it plainly means. Then she will narcissistically announce her
>>>>> kill-filing of me ? *only* narcissists announce it ? which of course won't work
>>>>> because she can't. She doesn't know how.
>>>> And "NoBody" flees screaming in terror...
>>>
>>> And Jon Ball forges again.
>>
>> No such poster here, as you well know.>
> Now he lies.
Nope. There is no such poster here. No one posts under that name, and that is
not the "real" name behind any pseudonym.

You're swallowing spammy's bullshit (and semen), "Lamey". You don't know any
"real life" details about *any* pseudonymous poster here. This is settled.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing